If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Win98se and large disks
What will happend to a 250GB disk with 4 x 60GB partitions under
Win98se? As long as the disk is connected though USB from an external USB cabinet Win98se sees all 4 partitions and can read/write as normal But will this work diffrently when I hook up the disk to the internal S-ATA controller and boot Win98se (drivers for S-ATA are installed)? What will happend? Will it see the disk at all? Will it see all partitions that are less than 137GB? Will it see all partitions within the first 137GB of the disk? What then about partitions that span the 137GB limit (will it corrupt then if access as it can see whole)? Are there other limitations (someone mentioned a 64GB limit)? And do any of these limitations apply to WinXP (non-SP, SP2)? (lets say I must reinstall XP w/o SP, then apply SP2 afterward) -- Lars-Erik - http://www.osterud.name - ICQ 7297605 XP, Asus P4PE, 2.53 GHz, Asus V8420 (Ti4200), SB-Live |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Win98se and large disks
I do not have a complete answer, but here is some related info:
First, before even asking about the operating system, ask how large a disk can the BIOS support? Modern motherboards can go way above 127Gig. But, older ones had that as a limit. Even older ones had a limit around 32Gig. And, further back in time there were limits near 8Gig, etc. One way to use larger disks with an older PC is to install a separate PCI-IDE controller (or PCI-to-SCSI, etc). These contain there own mini-BIOS for handling disks. You motherboard is likely new enough that none of this is an issue, but I mention it in case you ever deal with an older PC. As for the intrinsic features of Win98, bear in mind that even the original release of XP was limited to about 127Gig. XP with SP-2 can handle very large disks. I forget whether XP with SP-1 could. Some people have had luck using the original XP on larger disks, so long as they made a partition under that limit and loaded XP on it. But, in general, using a disk larger than fully supported by the operating system could eventually lead to problems. I suppose the key to success and failure might be whether it is really the disk size or the partiiton size that matters to the operating system. For example, the old FDISK could not prepare disks with a total size greater than about 64Gig. But, once prepared by some other means, win98 could be loaded onto somewhat larger dfisks. I have also noticed a marked difference in the rules for disk access between DOS, win98, and XP. DOS seems to use only the BIOS for disk access, that is, it uses no special drivers. Thus, a win98 (DOS) boot floppy can see and use my SATA hard drives. But, when I attempted to install XP, it could not even see the drives, until I loaded special drivers during the XP installation process. I just took a look at the driver set for my disk controllers (on an ASUS P4S8X motherboard) and they included separate drives for win98. Thus, I assume that 98 also requires special drives. However, unlike XP, I am unsure how one adds these drives to 98 in a clean install. Adding them after 98 is installed on a plain IDE disk would be fairly easy, but then 98 would be using the SATA drives for auxilliary storage only. As for USB and firewire and the newer eSATA (external SATA), I do not know what really limits disk size: PC BIOS, operating system, BIOS inside of port controller (USB, firewire, eSATA), ability to parition and format (FDISK, GDISK, XP disk mgt or XP recovery console), etc. "Lars-Erik Østerud" .@. wrote in message ... What will happend to a 250GB disk with 4 x 60GB partitions under Win98se? As long as the disk is connected though USB from an external USB cabinet Win98se sees all 4 partitions and can read/write as normal But will this work diffrently when I hook up the disk to the internal S-ATA controller and boot Win98se (drivers for S-ATA are installed)? What will happend? Will it see the disk at all? Will it see all partitions that are less than 137GB? Will it see all partitions within the first 137GB of the disk? What then about partitions that span the 137GB limit (will it corrupt then if access as it can see whole)? Are there other limitations (someone mentioned a 64GB limit)? And do any of these limitations apply to WinXP (non-SP, SP2)? (lets say I must reinstall XP w/o SP, then apply SP2 afterward) -- Lars-Erik - http://www.osterud.name - ICQ 7297605 XP, Asus P4PE, 2.53 GHz, Asus V8420 (Ti4200), SB-Live |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Win98se and large disks
"Bob Harris" wrote in message
... when I attempted to install XP, it could not even see the drives, until I loaded special drivers during the XP installation process. I just took a look at the driver set for my disk controllers (on an ASUS P4S8X motherboard) and they included separate drives for win98. Thus, I assume that 98 also requires special drives. However, unlike XP, I am unsure how one adds these drives to 98 in a clean install. Adding them after 98 is installed on a plain IDE disk would be fairly easy, but then 98 would be using the SATA drives for auxilliary storage only. No: Win98 requires no drivers to see hard drives connected to either of the two IDE sockets. (So yes: connecting them is easy: set jumper and plug in.) -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Win98se and large disks
There are third-parrty patches available for 98, end even for 95B/C.
Not tried them so I can't vouch for their effectiveness/reliability. In any case you need to make sure you mobo supports 48-bit LBA, or it matters not, DOS or Vista. One place of several: http://www.largeharddrivesupport.win....com/win98.htm Watch out that there is also a crippleware one around, limited to 137GB. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Win98se and large disks
After moving my Win98se and WinXP to a new 250GB disk I can confirm at
Win98se doesn't really have a problem wit hdisk 137GB, it's (as someone suggested) a limitation in the APAPI-drivers. With my S-ATA controller (and Win98se drivers for it) all disk is visible in Win98 To be sure I made no partitions larger than 64GB as I read somewere that some Win98 applications (like "scandisk") will mess up then :-) -- Lars-Erik - http://www.osterud.name - ICQ 7297605 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Win98se and large disks
Lars-Erik Østerud .@. wrote:
After moving my Win98se and WinXP to a new 250GB disk I can confirm at Win98se doesn't really have a problem wit hdisk 137GB, it's (as someone suggested) a limitation in the APAPI-drivers. With my S-ATA controller (and Win98se drivers for it) all disk is visible in Win98 To be sure I made no partitions larger than 64GB as I read somewere that some Win98 applications (like "scandisk") will mess up then :-) Actually the practical limit for FAT32 partitions is 128 gb (137 billion bytes). Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada -- Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006) On-Line Help Computer Service http://onlinehelp.bc.ca Syberfix Remote Computer Repair "Anyone who thinks that they are too small to make a difference has never been in bed with a mosquito." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
dual boot and large amounts of memory | Robert M Jones | General | 6 | May 20th 06 12:11 AM |
Win98SE hard drive limit? | Old Geezer | General | 8 | September 8th 05 06:04 PM |
Win98se registry problem | Ron Martell | Setup & Installation | 0 | October 28th 04 10:32 PM |
Win98se RAM problems SOLVED! | Cloaked | Setup & Installation | 5 | September 15th 04 10:44 PM |
Win98SE and USB 2.0 Problem | Dwalker | General | 1 | July 29th 04 12:23 PM |