A Windows 98 & ME forum. Win98banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Win98banter forum » Windows 98 » Improving Performance
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Windows 98SE limits?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old November 23rd 05, 06:39 PM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Ron Martell
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 240
Default Windows 98SE limits?

"Ron Badour" wrote:

You will probably have a problem with that as a 36 gb partition should have
a 32 kb cluster size. http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=229154


The values in that article are excessively conservative.

Insofar as Scandisk and Defrag are concerned you can use:

4K clusters for drives up to 16 gb
8K clusters for drives up to 32 gb
16K clusters for drives up to 64 gb
32K clusters for drives up to 128 gb.

I don't know why Microsoft chose the values they did for this article,
but if you follow the logic used with the other cluster sizes then the
limit for 32K clusters should be 64 gb whereas in fact it is 128 gb.
Experimentation has shown that the values I gave above do work.

This cluster size issue used to come up very frequently a few years
ago, when many people were replacing their hard drives with larger
models. Often they would use a drive cloning utility to copy the
entire content of the old drive to the new one and by doing so the new
drive would often end up with the same cluster size as the old drive.
So if a 4 gb drive with 4K clusters was cloned to a new 17 gb drive it
could result in a 4K cluster size on the new drive, creating more than
4.1 million total clusters and therefore neither Scandisk or Defrag
would work.


Good luck

Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP (1997 - 2006)
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
  #22  
Old August 10th 06, 11:29 PM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
J. P. Gilliver
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 214
Default Windows 98SE limits?

"Johnny" wrote in message
...
Looks like it time to move to Windows XP. I just like 98se it has all ways
work so well for me.


So why do you need to move - planning on needing more than these then?
[]
The maximum HDD size Windows supports is 128GB ( since there are no
128GB

[]
you can use 1GB of memory without any problems. Again, your motherboard

[]


  #23  
Old August 10th 06, 11:29 PM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
J. P. Gilliver
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 214
Default Windows 98SE limits?

"Johnny" wrote in message
...
Looks like it time to move to Windows XP. I just like 98se it has all ways
work so well for me.


So why do you need to move - planning on needing more than these then?
[]
The maximum HDD size Windows supports is 128GB ( since there are no
128GB

[]
you can use 1GB of memory without any problems. Again, your motherboard

[]


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
891711/MS05-002 Updated (fixed) for Win9x David H. Lipman General 80 April 21st 05 10:12 PM
FAQ: Win98 users: Upgrading to WinXP, IE6, etc. JM Setup & Installation 6 July 26th 04 01:44 PM
FAQ: Win98 users: Upgrading to WinXP, IE6, etc. JM Improving Performance 6 July 26th 04 01:44 PM
Can't read Windows 98se drive on Win Me system Robert General 7 July 17th 04 07:01 PM
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-024 - Vulnerability in Windows Shell Could Allow Remote Code Execution (839645) Gary S. Terhune General 2 July 14th 04 05:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Win98banter.
The comments are property of their posters.