If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Here's a poser!
I'm running both Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows XP on my machine. I
started with 512MB of memory. Both OS booted fine and all worked fine. So, I decided to increase the memory. I installed another 512MB of the exact same type, size and manufacturer memory. The Windows XP boots fine and all works fine. The Windows 98se fails with a 'VFAT failure' message no matter what I do. I've read and tried all the Microsoft remedies on VFAT failures. They all refer to missing files that are needed for Windows to boot. My problem is Windows 98se does boot just fine with a limited amount of memory. First the Windows 98se doesn't have a 'CONFIG.SYS' file. The DEVIVE= files are all loaded by another process, I suspect the HIMEM.SYS file, just as they do with only one memory module installed. Now for the big question! What would make Windows 98se fail to boot with a second memory module installed but work just fine with only one? Do you suppose something is restricting the amount of memory that my Windows 98se be allowed to use? I've used this OS for years but have never added more than 512MB of memory until now. The fact that the Windows XP OS works says to me that the problem may have something to do with the MSDOS Drivers because XP doesn't use them. But if the MSDOS drivers were bad why would 98 work with 512MB but not 1024MB? Also can anyone tell me where I can get a file editor so I can look at the contents of these *.sys files? Bud |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
=?Utf-8?B?TmV2QnVk?= wrote in
: The fact that the Windows XP OS works says to me that the problem may have something to do with the MSDOS Drivers because XP doesn't use them. But if the MSDOS drivers were bad why would 98 work with 512MB but not 1024MB? W98 can have problems with more than 512 MB. But there's a work around. Read this: support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;253912 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Out of Memory" Error Messages with Large Amounts of RAM Installed:
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=253912 Set a MaxFileCache setting of 524,288, in the [vcache] section of System.ini in Win98. -- Glen Ventura, MS MVP W95/98 Systems http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm "NevBud" wrote in message ... I'm running both Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows XP on my machine. I started with 512MB of memory. Both OS booted fine and all worked fine. So, I decided to increase the memory. I installed another 512MB of the exact same type, size and manufacturer memory. The Windows XP boots fine and all works fine. The Windows 98se fails with a 'VFAT failure' message no matter what I do. I've read and tried all the Microsoft remedies on VFAT failures. They all refer to missing files that are needed for Windows to boot. My problem is Windows 98se does boot just fine with a limited amount of memory. First the Windows 98se doesn't have a 'CONFIG.SYS' file. The DEVIVE= files are all loaded by another process, I suspect the HIMEM.SYS file, just as they do with only one memory module installed. Now for the big question! What would make Windows 98se fail to boot with a second memory module installed but work just fine with only one? Do you suppose something is restricting the amount of memory that my Windows 98se be allowed to use? I've used this OS for years but have never added more than 512MB of memory until now. The fact that the Windows XP OS works says to me that the problem may have something to do with the MSDOS Drivers because XP doesn't use them. But if the MSDOS drivers were bad why would 98 work with 512MB but not 1024MB? Also can anyone tell me where I can get a file editor so I can look at the contents of these *.sys files? Bud |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
NevBud wrote:
Also can anyone tell me where I can get a file editor so I can look at the contents of these *.sys files? Any text or hex editor but unless the files are pure text that won't tell you much. -- dadiOH ____________________________ dadiOH's dandies v3.05... ....a help file of info about MP3s, recording from LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that. Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
NevBud wrote:
I'm running both Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows XP on my machine. I started with 512MB of memory. Both OS booted fine and all worked fine. So, I decided to increase the memory. I installed another 512MB of the exact same type, size and manufacturer memory. The Windows XP boots fine and all works fine. The Windows 98se fails with a 'VFAT failure' message no matter what I do. To use more than 512MB RAM with Win98 you need to make a tweak to the system.ini file. Find the [vcache] section, and add this line: MaxFileCache=512000 -- Tim Slattery MS MVP(DTS) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
" Find the [vcache] section, and add this line: MaxFileCache=512000 Hello,,, yawn, I am up way past my bodies allowance, but I couldnt resist clicking yet another post. Tim, I have listened to what you said to the other person and immediately did a "run" on 'msconfig' to see what mine said, and all I could find under the heading of "vcache" (under sysini) was Zero. It confuses me sometimes when I am running the same O/S as others yet all our settings seem to be different. In this case, I dont even have one other that the fact that I have a Tick next to Vcache in the sysini within msconfig. I wish things could be simple. regards Jane |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
To add to the others -- having in view the advice to set
[vcache] MaxFileCache=512000 If your Config.sys contains the lines with Himem.sys, and all the more with Emm386.exe -- rem out these lines (add the word REM followed by space to the beginning of these lines). Emm386.exe was not meant for such amounts of memory, and even with 512 MB works slightly wrong (it reduces the amount of available memory from 512 to 511 MB, what you can see on General tab of System Properties -- but it seems it is, hopefully, the only undesirable effect in this case), but with 1GB of RAM creates very significant problems. And if you have the programs that require Emm386 loading from Config.sys -- then you're out of luck with 1GB RAM. Himem.sys will be loaded in any case, but in the other process, via io.sys -- what will eliminate some very minor problems in contrast with loading it from Config.sys when more than 512 MB of RAM is installed. -- Mikhail Zhilin http://www.aha.ru/~mwz Sorry, no technical support by e-mail. Please reply to the newsgroups only. ====== On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:21:03 -0800, NevBud wrote: I'm running both Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows XP on my machine. I started with 512MB of memory. Both OS booted fine and all worked fine. So, I decided to increase the memory. I installed another 512MB of the exact same type, size and manufacturer memory. The Windows XP boots fine and all works fine. The Windows 98se fails with a 'VFAT failure' message no matter what I do. I've read and tried all the Microsoft remedies on VFAT failures. They all refer to missing files that are needed for Windows to boot. My problem is Windows 98se does boot just fine with a limited amount of memory. First the Windows 98se doesn't have a 'CONFIG.SYS' file. The DEVIVE= files are all loaded by another process, I suspect the HIMEM.SYS file, just as they do with only one memory module installed. Now for the big question! What would make Windows 98se fail to boot with a second memory module installed but work just fine with only one? Do you suppose something is restricting the amount of memory that my Windows 98se be allowed to use? I've used this OS for years but have never added more than 512MB of memory until now. The fact that the Windows XP OS works says to me that the problem may have something to do with the MSDOS Drivers because XP doesn't use them. But if the MSDOS drivers were bad why would 98 work with 512MB but not 1024MB? Also can anyone tell me where I can get a file editor so I can look at the contents of these *.sys files? Bud |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Ah!, that explains why my system properties says 511 mb's in 98SE and 512
mb's in XP Pro. Thanks again, Mikhail. "Mikhail Zhilin" wrote in message ... To add to the others -- having in view the advice to set [vcache] MaxFileCache=512000 If your Config.sys contains the lines with Himem.sys, and all the more with Emm386.exe -- rem out these lines (add the word REM followed by space to the beginning of these lines). Emm386.exe was not meant for such amounts of memory, and even with 512 MB works slightly wrong (it reduces the amount of available memory from 512 to 511 MB, what you can see on General tab of System Properties -- but it seems it is, hopefully, the only undesirable effect in this case), but with 1GB of RAM creates very significant problems. And if you have the programs that require Emm386 loading from Config.sys -- then you're out of luck with 1GB RAM. Himem.sys will be loaded in any case, but in the other process, via io.sys -- what will eliminate some very minor problems in contrast with loading it from Config.sys when more than 512 MB of RAM is installed. -- Mikhail Zhilin http://www.aha.ru/~mwz Sorry, no technical support by e-mail. Please reply to the newsgroups only. ====== On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:21:03 -0800, NevBud wrote: I'm running both Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows XP on my machine. I started with 512MB of memory. Both OS booted fine and all worked fine. So, I decided to increase the memory. I installed another 512MB of the exact same type, size and manufacturer memory. The Windows XP boots fine and all works fine. The Windows 98se fails with a 'VFAT failure' message no matter what I do. I've read and tried all the Microsoft remedies on VFAT failures. They all refer to missing files that are needed for Windows to boot. My problem is Windows 98se does boot just fine with a limited amount of memory. First the Windows 98se doesn't have a 'CONFIG.SYS' file. The DEVIVE= files are all loaded by another process, I suspect the HIMEM.SYS file, just as they do with only one memory module installed. Now for the big question! What would make Windows 98se fail to boot with a second memory module installed but work just fine with only one? Do you suppose something is restricting the amount of memory that my Windows 98se be allowed to use? I've used this OS for years but have never added more than 512MB of memory until now. The fact that the Windows XP OS works says to me that the problem may have something to do with the MSDOS Drivers because XP doesn't use them. But if the MSDOS drivers were bad why would 98 work with 512MB but not 1024MB? Also can anyone tell me where I can get a file editor so I can look at the contents of these *.sys files? Bud |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Jane,
With all due respect, Stay Out of areas you are not familiar with. I = don't mean this in a bad way, it's always good to see learning efforts = made by others. All that's needed is one wrong move in an unforgiving = area and you'll be learning how to place the machine properly nudged = against the door. One should really only use msconfig for = troubleshooting. You should not have nor need to set a max cache if your systems RAM is = 512 or . For some reading info on the purpose of this setting. Error Message: Insufficient Memory to Initialize Windows: http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;EN-US;184447 "Out of Memory" Error Messages with Large Amounts of RAM Installed: http://support.microsoft.com/support.../Q253/9/12.ASP Computer May Reboot Continuously with More Than 1.5 GB of RAM: http://support.microsoft.com/default...n-us;304943=20 As per your statement; quote It confuses me sometimes when I am running the same O/S as others yet = all our settings seem to be different. /quote Think of your machine like you think of your house, car, purse, etc. No = 2 will be exactly the same unless they started out exactly the same and = anything/everything done to one was done exactly to the other at the = same time.=20 --=20 Brian A. Conflicts start where information lacks. http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm "jane" wrote in message = ... =20 " Find the [vcache] section, and add this line: MaxFileCache=3D512000 =20 Hello,,, yawn, I am up way past my bodies allowance, but I couldnt resist clicking yet another post. =20 Tim, I have listened to what you said to the other person and = immediately did a "run" on 'msconfig' to see what mine said, and all I could find = under the heading of "vcache" (under sysini) was Zero. It confuses me sometimes when I am running the same O/S as others yet = all our settings seem to be different. In this case, I dont even have one other that the fact that I have a = Tick next to Vcache in the sysini within msconfig. I wish things could be simple. =20 regards Jane =20 |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"NevBud" wrote: I'm running both Windows 98 Second Edition and Windows XP on my machine. I started with 512MB of memory. Both OS booted fine and all worked fine. So, I decided to increase the memory. I installed another 512MB of the exact same type, size and manufacturer memory. The Windows XP boots fine and all works fine. The Windows 98se fails with a 'VFAT failure' message no matter what I do. I've read and tried all the Microsoft remedies on VFAT failures. They all refer to missing files that are needed for Windows to boot. My problem is Windows 98se does boot just fine with a limited amount of memory. First the Windows 98se doesn't have a 'CONFIG.SYS' file. The DEVIVE= files are all loaded by another process, I suspect the HIMEM.SYS file, just as they do with only one memory module installed. Now for the big question! What would make Windows 98se fail to boot with a second memory module installed but work just fine with only one? Do you suppose something is restricting the amount of memory that my Windows 98se be allowed to use? I've used this OS for years but have never added more than 512MB of memory until now. The fact that the Windows XP OS works says to me that the problem may have something to do with the MSDOS Drivers because XP doesn't use them. But if the MSDOS drivers were bad why would 98 work with 512MB but not 1024MB? Also can anyone tell me where I can get a file editor so I can look at the contents of these *.sys files? Bud |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|