A Windows 98 & ME forum. Win98banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Win98banter forum » Windows 98 » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Downloading PDF files



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old February 19th 05, 06:40 AM
Bill in Co.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

rb999.cab

PCR wrote:
I know that. But which RB..cab did you restore?

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
I am fine, and I am on top of it. No problems over here!

PCR wrote:
Hmm. Very well, I guess. Well, anyway, you should be fine. OK, bye.

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
(I think we have beaten this issue to death. Moving right along.....)

PCR wrote:
Also, the numbered sequence above is incorrect, as written above. I

did
the Adobe Update thing first before I ever installed that PDF Speedup
program. And THEN I backed up the registry, and went to bed.

Then, on the next day, I went ahead and installed PDF Speedup, tried

it
out, then later decided to use its restore button to revert back to

the
original setup, (which it did). And just to be sure, I then

reinstalled
the old registry just predating this.

I think you are OK, from all you said. Still...

(a) You did the Adobe Update, & "START, Run, Scanreg"?

If this was on 2/17/05, then you have TWO RB..cab's with that
date, presuming you did a boot on that day. One is created at the

first
successful boot per day. How did you tell these two apart, if you did?
(ONLY the one you did would be good to your purpose.) I'm thinking..

is
there a timestamp I do not quite recall? I'm fairly sure...

1. The RB..cab created at the most recent boot is marked "not started"


by /Restore in DOS.
2. The RB..cab created by "START, Run, Scanreg" is also "not started"

(b) If you shut down before going to bed, then the next day you'd also
have a usable (for your purpose) 2/18/05 registry. Is that the one you
/Restored?


--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
Hugh Candlin wrote:
"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
Hugh Candlin wrote:
"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
An update. This was interesting. I found I was only able to
remove half of those plugins w/o loading errors,
so I went back to PDF Speedup, which,
somehow, is able to manage Acrobat 6 properly with only two
plugins.
I think PDF Speedup disables the "update" plugin and its
dependencies
(at least that's my guess), and some others, but, whatever, it
appears to be working!

I have no problems, and I only have the 3 that I posted about.

Well, before I did any of this I used the Update option of Acrobat
(while on line) to see if there was anything I could still get for
this somewhat dated version (6.00).

Sounds like your app makes changes OK,
but doesn't reverse those changes properly.

Nope, cause I restored the previous registry, and also checked SFC,

and
kept track of the Program File Acrobat 6.0 subfolder changes. (But

as I
said, I *did* use the Update feature once before doing any of

this).

Did you reboot anywhere in the process at all?

ALWAYS! If anything, I am *overzealous* in that regard. It's

nearly
instinctive with me to reboot ANY time I make ANY changes, and

usually
on a one by one event basis.

The only thing in plug-ins right now is EWH32.api and Search.api.
Acrobat comes up a lot faster, I'll have to say. (All the other
plug-ins were moved by the PDF Speed Up "program" to the Optional
subfolder.

(BTW, I also checked out some reviews of this small program, and

they
were all positive, which was encouraging to hear).

I'll spell it out as I see it, to see if I understand you correctly

1 You booted up today, or yesterday or earlier, at which time
you created the most recent Registry backup file RB???.CAB

2 You ran your new app, which made Registry changes

3 You ran Adobe Update, which updated Adobe Acrobat Reader,
and made Registry changes

4 You ran a Registry restore to this morning's version ?
or to an earlier version ? either of which would lack
the Registry changes made by the Acrobat Reader Update

5 You now get Adobe Acrobat Reader execution errors

NOT "execution errors", per se. I simply got plug-in loading

errors
(or rather, warnings), for the "missing" api plug-ins, unless I left
about half of them or so in there, (because some were obviously being
loaded, that depended on some others being available and loaded too).

Also, the numbered sequence above is incorrect, as written above. I

did
the Adobe Update thing first before I ever installed that PDF Speedup
program. And THEN I backed up the registry, and went to bed.

Then, on the next day, I went ahead and installed PDF Speedup, tried

it
out, then later decided to use its restore button to revert back to

the
original setup, (which it did). And just to be sure, I then

reinstalled
the old registry just predating this.

At this point I tried removing MOST of the plugins, but could only

remove
about half of them or so before i started encountering some of those
missing plugin warnings.

Finally, at that point, later in the afternoon, I just went ahead and
reinstalled PDF Speedup. I say "reinstalled", because actually it
doesn't even have an installer, per se. It's just a tiny registry
modifying program, as far as I can tell. Very lightweight.

Before you review and make any necessary corrections
to the above analysis, I would copy the RBxxx.CAB files
to a safe place, to be sure they are not overlayed.

And I would refrain from any installs, or automatic updates,
until you conduct your own mental walkthrough
of what transpired, to establish if you need to go back
to the Registry that you overwrote.

I think I'm ok - as I said, no hard execution errors resulted, only

those
soft loading api errors (missing api plugin warnings). Of course

NOW I
don't have any of those warning errors (of missing some api plug ins)

Anyway, that's a long winded explanation, which probably wasn't the
clearest, but it's after midnite, and my writing style may be

slippin!
Hopefully it wasn't too confusing the way I explained it.



  #22  
Old February 19th 05, 08:41 AM
Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How come I don't believe that?

As to why Hugh can do with 3 and you need more is perhaps because you
let Adobe act as a sever at least once on your machine? My Zone Alarm
sounds off that Adobe wants to do things on the internet and I've never
let it do that. Without ZA, I suspect Adobe would do what it wants to
which is to be available for further updates to itself for just one
thing it could out on the web unsupervised.

Running one of these api could get dlls registered which then might
force Windows to look for them when Adobe is loaded? PDF speedup
probably knows these relationships and unregisters the appropriate dlls
such that Acroread doesn't force a 'find' for them when loaded?

  #27  
Old February 20th 05, 10:29 PM
PCR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't see any seedy historical part on the one I know, just a mental
institution. You must be in a different Borough.


--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
| Yeah, my mistake. Stillwell. Anyway I've just found out it's
been
| totally revamped, so so much for the seedy historical part being
visible
| anymore.
|
| PCR wrote:
| Probably it has even more "L"s than that in it's name, if it's
anything
| like the street I know.
|
| --
| Thanks or Good Luck,
| There may be humor in this post, and,
| Naturally, you will not sue,
| should things get worse after this,
| PCR
|

| "Bill in Co." wrote in message
| ...
| Hey PCR - do you know anything about the old Stilwell subway
station at
| Coney Island, by chance?
|
| PCR wrote:
| You can count fairly high, then. Very good. OK, bye.
|
| --
| Thanks or Good Luck,
| There may be humor in this post, and,
| Naturally, you will not sue,
| should things get worse after this,
| PCR
|

| "Bill in Co." wrote in message
| ...
| rb999.cab
|
| PCR wrote:
| I know that. But which RB..cab did you restore?
|
| --
| Thanks or Good Luck,
| There may be humor in this post, and,
| Naturally, you will not sue,
| should things get worse after this,
| PCR
|

| "Bill in Co." wrote in message
| ...
| I am fine, and I am on top of it. No problems over here!
|
| PCR wrote:
| Hmm. Very well, I guess. Well, anyway, you should be fine. OK,
bye.
|
| --
| Thanks or Good Luck,
| There may be humor in this post, and,
| Naturally, you will not sue,
| should things get worse after this,
| PCR
|

| "Bill in Co." wrote in message
| ...
| (I think we have beaten this issue to death.
|
| ...snip
|
|


  #28  
Old February 20th 05, 10:45 PM
Bill in Co.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

At Coney Island.

PCR wrote:
I don't see any seedy historical part on the one I know, just a mental
institution. You must be in a different Borough.


--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
Yeah, my mistake. Stillwell. Anyway I've just found out it's been
totally revamped, so so much for the seedy historical part being visible
anymore.

PCR wrote:
Probably it has even more "L"s than that in it's name, if it's anything
like the street I know.

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
Hey PCR - do you know anything about the old Stilwell subway station at
Coney Island, by chance?

PCR wrote:
You can count fairly high, then. Very good. OK, bye.

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
rb999.cab

PCR wrote:
I know that. But which RB..cab did you restore?

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
I am fine, and I am on top of it. No problems over here!

PCR wrote:
Hmm. Very well, I guess. Well, anyway, you should be fine. OK,

bye.

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
(I think we have beaten this issue to death.

...snip



  #29  
Old February 20th 05, 11:40 PM
PCR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yep. That's where the seedy one would be.

--
Thanks or Good Luck,
There may be humor in this post, and,
Naturally, you will not sue,
should things get worse after this,
PCR

"Bill in Co." wrote in message
...
| At Coney Island.
|
| PCR wrote:
| I don't see any seedy historical part on the one I know, just a
mental
| institution. You must be in a different Borough.
|
|
| --
| Thanks or Good Luck,
| There may be humor in this post, and,
| Naturally, you will not sue,
| should things get worse after this,
| PCR
|

| "Bill in Co." wrote in message
| ...
| Yeah, my mistake. Stillwell. Anyway I've just found out it's
been
| totally revamped, so so much for the seedy historical part being
visible
| anymore.
|
| PCR wrote:
| Probably it has even more "L"s than that in it's name, if it's
anything
| like the street I know.
|
| --
| Thanks or Good Luck,
| There may be humor in this post, and,
| Naturally, you will not sue,
| should things get worse after this,
| PCR
|

| "Bill in Co." wrote in message
| ...
| Hey PCR - do you know anything about the old Stilwell subway
station at
| Coney Island, by chance?
|
| PCR wrote:
| You can count fairly high, then. Very good. OK, bye.
|
| --
| Thanks or Good Luck,
| There may be humor in this post, and,
| Naturally, you will not sue,
| should things get worse after this,
| PCR
|

| "Bill in Co." wrote in message
| ...
| rb999.cab
|
| PCR wrote:
| I know that. But which RB..cab did you restore?
|
| --
| Thanks or Good Luck,
| There may be humor in this post, and,
| Naturally, you will not sue,
| should things get worse after this,
| PCR
|

| "Bill in Co." wrote in message
| ...
| I am fine, and I am on top of it. No problems over here!
|
| PCR wrote:
| Hmm. Very well, I guess. Well, anyway, you should be fine.
OK,
| bye.
|
| --
| Thanks or Good Luck,
| There may be humor in this post, and,
| Naturally, you will not sue,
| should things get worse after this,
| PCR
|

| "Bill in Co." wrote in message
| ...
| (I think we have beaten this issue to death.
|
| ...snip
|
|


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TMP Files rooster General 25 August 15th 04 03:23 AM
dos wild card syntax comm barry martin General 0 August 4th 04 02:47 PM
error downloading files mike Internet 1 July 3rd 04 08:33 AM
My Documents Menno Hershberger General 5 June 30th 04 07:47 PM
C Windows profiles user application data LuckyStrike General 24 June 18th 04 12:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Win98banter.
The comments are property of their posters.