free Antivirus for Windows 98SE?

ANYONE connected to the Internet can be hacked relatively easily,
which if you had a brain and spent some time actually researching these
issues, you'd STFU...

whats a "stfu"? or futs, or tufs or suft or sfut or fust or stuf or ??
MEB

btw,,,, law starts in genesis,, ask any mp how they fire up a meet.

ANYONE connected to the Internet can be hacked relatively easily,
which if you had a brain and spent some time actually researching these
issues, you'd STFU...

whats a "stfu"? or futs, or tufs or suft or sfut or fust or stuf or ??
MEB

btw,,,, law starts in genesis,, ask any mp how they fire up a meet.

Hi Lurky!

whats a "stfu"? or futs, or tufs or suft or sfut or fust or stuf or ??

stfu = Southern Tenant Farmers Union (it could also be used
in an unpolite answer to someone, but since everybody knows
that there comes no good out of being inpolite in news-postings
it is probably not that)

:-D

futs = Framework for Unit Testing SAS
tufs = Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
suft = a Construction company in Phoenix
stuf = Sudan Trade Union Federation
the others I don't know, but probably something nasty

But when it comes to acronyms, I prefer ROTFLMAO :-D

PCMCIA is also a good one (with the meaning
people can't memorize computer industry acronyms)


About the topic I can only say, there is allways ClamWin
that is not only freeware, but also free (open source)

Hi Lurky!

whats a "stfu"? or futs, or tufs or suft or sfut or fust or stuf or ??

stfu = Southern Tenant Farmers Union (it could also be used
in an unpolite answer to someone, but since everybody knows
that there comes no good out of being inpolite in news-postings
it is probably not that)

:-D

futs = Framework for Unit Testing SAS
tufs = Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
suft = a Construction company in Phoenix
stuf = Sudan Trade Union Federation
the others I don't know, but probably something nasty

But when it comes to acronyms, I prefer ROTFLMAO :-D

PCMCIA is also a good one (with the meaning
people can't memorize computer industry acronyms)


About the topic I can only say, there is allways ClamWin
that is not only freeware, but also free (open source)

On 06/17/2009 09:59 AM, lurky wrote:
ANYONE connected to the Internet can be hacked relatively easily,
which if you had a brain and spent some time actually researching these
issues, you'd STFU...

whats a "stfu"? or futs, or tufs or suft or sfut or fust or stuf or ??

It's a semi-polite [and shortened] way of telling someone to stop
ignorant or otherwise discussion. You certainly know that by now ...

MEB

btw,,,, law starts in genesis,, ask any mp how they fire up a meet.



"Law", per se, started well before *men* determined any "religion" was a
viable way to control mankind.
Stating otherwise limits one to what *MAN* claims and wrote, and
denies man's existence much beyond a few tens of thousands of years ago;
neglecting or denying the existence of scientific evidence otherwise.
That also reflects a severe mis-understanding of the HISTORY of *any* of
the numerous "religions" throughout man's existence on this planet.
*Developed BY man* when advancements in mankind's KNOWLEDGE dictated a
NEW religion be created so the new knowledge could be incorporated within.
Following mankind's prior history, we find new religions *should* have
been created a thousand or so years ago... or AT LEAST when evolutionary
evidence began to be understood. INSTEAD we find a "clinging" to
religions which have no real hard evidence to support some of their most
basic premises. We also find that there WERE attempts to create new
religions based upon increased intellect and understanding, yet these
were literally destroyed, or ignored.

Consider far more ancient man living in caves with only tribal/group
necessities as the controlling issues. Was there a "Law" developed
within the group? Almost certainly there was, as any interaction between
mankind, automatically develops *what* CAN be done verses *what* CAN NOT
be done. Look at some of the old cave paintings,, they could easily be
seen as descriptive pictures of things like: "Law" of the hunt, "Law" of
the group, or other like activities...

Consider animals developing their own "Laws", which man generally
thinks of as hereditary or as unknowable or, if you lean that way, as
the maker's "plan". Again denying man's own continued advancements in
their own Laws and understandings of mankind and this planet; and the
history and evolution of, and development within the animal "kingdom".
Or is that you fail to appreciate the creation of man's "Law of Nature".
What is that but a basic attempt to assign boundaries [e.g., Law]
within the animal world.
No? Then you will also be denying mankind's evolution evidenced DAILY
in knowledge and understandings of the planet and universe.

Did man ride on the backs of dinosaurs?? Yeah right, so where are
mankind's fossilized remains? We should find them laying right next to
or in the same layers of rock as the dinosaur... we don't.
So on what day did the present religions' god(s) create dinosaurs and
why??

On what day did the ocean's creatures crawl to land?
NO, then on what day were these hundred's of millennium old ocean
creatures [fossilized] created and why?

So unless you are prepared to provide absolute proof of EVERYTHING
contained within any "religion", please avoid these issues here...

--
~
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The *REAL WORLD* of Law, Justice, and Government
_______

On 06/17/2009 09:59 AM, lurky wrote:
ANYONE connected to the Internet can be hacked relatively easily,
which if you had a brain and spent some time actually researching these
issues, you'd STFU...

whats a "stfu"? or futs, or tufs or suft or sfut or fust or stuf or ??

It's a semi-polite [and shortened] way of telling someone to stop
ignorant or otherwise discussion. You certainly know that by now ...

MEB

btw,,,, law starts in genesis,, ask any mp how they fire up a meet.



"Law", per se, started well before *men* determined any "religion" was a
viable way to control mankind.
Stating otherwise limits one to what *MAN* claims and wrote, and
denies man's existence much beyond a few tens of thousands of years ago;
neglecting or denying the existence of scientific evidence otherwise.
That also reflects a severe mis-understanding of the HISTORY of *any* of
the numerous "religions" throughout man's existence on this planet.
*Developed BY man* when advancements in mankind's KNOWLEDGE dictated a
NEW religion be created so the new knowledge could be incorporated within.
Following mankind's prior history, we find new religions *should* have
been created a thousand or so years ago... or AT LEAST when evolutionary
evidence began to be understood. INSTEAD we find a "clinging" to
religions which have no real hard evidence to support some of their most
basic premises. We also find that there WERE attempts to create new
religions based upon increased intellect and understanding, yet these
were literally destroyed, or ignored.

Consider far more ancient man living in caves with only tribal/group
necessities as the controlling issues. Was there a "Law" developed
within the group? Almost certainly there was, as any interaction between
mankind, automatically develops *what* CAN be done verses *what* CAN NOT
be done. Look at some of the old cave paintings,, they could easily be
seen as descriptive pictures of things like: "Law" of the hunt, "Law" of
the group, or other like activities...

Consider animals developing their own "Laws", which man generally
thinks of as hereditary or as unknowable or, if you lean that way, as
the maker's "plan". Again denying man's own continued advancements in
their own Laws and understandings of mankind and this planet; and the
history and evolution of, and development within the animal "kingdom".
Or is that you fail to appreciate the creation of man's "Law of Nature".
What is that but a basic attempt to assign boundaries [e.g., Law]
within the animal world.
No? Then you will also be denying mankind's evolution evidenced DAILY
in knowledge and understandings of the planet and universe.

Did man ride on the backs of dinosaurs?? Yeah right, so where are
mankind's fossilized remains? We should find them laying right next to
or in the same layers of rock as the dinosaur... we don't.
So on what day did the present religions' god(s) create dinosaurs and
why??

On what day did the ocean's creatures crawl to land?
NO, then on what day were these hundred's of millennium old ocean
creatures [fossilized] created and why?

So unless you are prepared to provide absolute proof of EVERYTHING
contained within any "religion", please avoid these issues here...

--
~
--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The *REAL WORLD* of Law, Justice, and Government
_______

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:29:26 +0930, "lurky" wrote:


ANYONE connected to the Internet can be hacked relatively easily,
which if you had a brain and spent some time actually researching these
issues, you'd STFU...

whats a "stfu"? or futs, or tufs or suft or sfut or fust or stuf or ??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STFU

On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:29:26 +0930, "lurky" wrote:


ANYONE connected to the Internet can be hacked relatively easily,
which if you had a brain and spent some time actually researching these
issues, you'd STFU...

whats a "stfu"? or futs, or tufs or suft or sfut or fust or stuf or ??

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STFU

On Fri, 29 May 2009 01:39:44 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

AVG just announced that they no longer support Windows 98. Worse, they
just released an "update" that does nothing but nag me to update and
then tell me I can't because my OS is too old.

I went through that too, about a month ago.

I'm not allowed to say any more.

What alternatives do I have to install? I don't want to spend any
money on my old computer and searching on Google is extremely
frustrating trying to find an anti-virus program that supports 98 and
that I don't have to pay for.

Please answer with program solutions and not snarky "you need to
upgrade your OS" or "you need to buy a new computer". I have win98 on
this OLD computer for a reason, so it is not an option.

On Fri, 29 May 2009 01:39:44 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

AVG just announced that they no longer support Windows 98. Worse, they
just released an "update" that does nothing but nag me to update and
then tell me I can't because my OS is too old.

I went through that too, about a month ago.

I'm not allowed to say any more.

What alternatives do I have to install? I don't want to spend any
money on my old computer and searching on Google is extremely
frustrating trying to find an anti-virus program that supports 98 and
that I don't have to pay for.

Please answer with program solutions and not snarky "you need to
upgrade your OS" or "you need to buy a new computer". I have win98 on
this OLD computer for a reason, so it is not an option.