A Windows 98 & ME forum. Win98banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Win98banter forum » Windows 98 » Networking
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cable to DSL



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 5th 04, 11:04 AM
Lil' Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cable to DSL

Hi folks,
Simple question here. Have roadrunner cable modem connected to network for
internet service (Cox). Intend to simply swap the cable modem with DSL
modem (Verizon).
Setup as below
modem
|
router
|
PC = NAT router and internet server
|
hub
|
Two PCs

Only thing I can find different is that Verizon requires a PPOe setup for
the router, Cox don't. Verizon tech support is only familar with their
modem (theirs)-router (theirs)-PC. Haven't received DSL modem, prepping.
Any tips?


  #2  
Old June 5th 04, 03:40 PM
Steve Winograd [MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cable to DSL

In article 4Vgwc.2333$5B2.1284@lakeread04, "Lil' Dave"
wrote:
Hi folks,
Simple question here. Have roadrunner cable modem connected to network for
internet service (Cox). Intend to simply swap the cable modem with DSL
modem (Verizon).
Setup as below
modem
|
router
|
PC = NAT router and internet server
|
hub
|
Two PCs

Only thing I can find different is that Verizon requires a PPOe setup for
the router, Cox don't. Verizon tech support is only familar with their
modem (theirs)-router (theirs)-PC. Haven't received DSL modem, prepping.
Any tips?


I'm sorry, but I don't understand your setup: there's a hardware
router between the modem and PC, and the PC acts as a NAT router.

Why are there two routers? Can the hardware router (possibly with the
hub connected to it) give Internet access to all three computers?
That would eliminate the need to run NAT on the first PC and use it as
an Internet server.

A typical hardware router has PPPoE software built in. In that case,
replacing the cable modem with a DSL modem shouldn't require any
changes to the setup other than enabling PPPoE in the hardware router.

If you connect the DSL modem directly to the first PC, without the
hardware router, you'll need to install PPPoE software on the PC. One
possibility is to use RASPPPoE, from:

http://www.raspppoe.com
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm
  #3  
Old June 6th 04, 11:01 AM
Lil' Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cable to DSL

"Steve Winograd [MVP]" wrote in message
...
In article 4Vgwc.2333$5B2.1284@lakeread04, "Lil' Dave"
wrote:
Hi folks,
Simple question here. Have roadrunner cable modem connected to network

for
internet service (Cox). Intend to simply swap the cable modem with DSL
modem (Verizon).
Setup as below
modem
|
router
|
PC = NAT router and internet server
|
hub
|
Two PCs

Only thing I can find different is that Verizon requires a PPOe setup for
the router, Cox don't. Verizon tech support is only familar with their
modem (theirs)-router (theirs)-PC. Haven't received DSL modem, prepping.
Any tips?


I'm sorry, but I don't understand your setup: there's a hardware
router between the modem and PC, and the PC acts as a NAT router.

Why are there two routers? Can the hardware router (possibly with the
hub connected to it) give Internet access to all three computers?
That would eliminate the need to run NAT on the first PC and use it as
an Internet server.

A typical hardware router has PPPoE software built in. In that case,
replacing the cable modem with a DSL modem shouldn't require any
changes to the setup other than enabling PPPoE in the hardware router.

If you connect the DSL modem directly to the first PC, without the
hardware router, you'll need to install PPPoE software on the PC. One
possibility is to use RASPPPoE, from:

http://www.raspppoe.com
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm


Originally the cable modem and router was not part of this install. Was
using a telco modem connected to the single PC, same hub and two PCs. The
single PC is using the older sygate internet sharing software, and has
built-in firewall software as well..
Went to cable. Connected the cable modem and router to the single PC.
Worked fine, so I left it that way.

See no reason to change to hardware configuration that I've shown. Thanks
for your advice.


  #4  
Old June 6th 04, 07:03 PM
Steve Winograd [MVP]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cable to DSL

In article hYBwc.20905$aM1.4570@fed1read02, "Lil' Dave"
wrote:
Simple question here. Have roadrunner cable modem connected to network for
internet service (Cox). Intend to simply swap the cable modem with DSL
modem (Verizon).
Setup as below
modem
|
router
|
PC = NAT router and internet server
|
hub
|
Two PCs

Only thing I can find different is that Verizon requires a PPOe setup for
the router, Cox don't. Verizon tech support is only familar with their
modem (theirs)-router (theirs)-PC. Haven't received DSL modem, prepping.
Any tips?


I'm sorry, but I don't understand your setup: there's a hardware
router between the modem and PC, and the PC acts as a NAT router.

Why are there two routers? Can the hardware router (possibly with the
hub connected to it) give Internet access to all three computers?
That would eliminate the need to run NAT on the first PC and use it as
an Internet server.

A typical hardware router has PPPoE software built in. In that case,
replacing the cable modem with a DSL modem shouldn't require any
changes to the setup other than enabling PPPoE in the hardware router.

If you connect the DSL modem directly to the first PC, without the
hardware router, you'll need to install PPPoE software on the PC. One
possibility is to use RASPPPoE, from:

http://www.raspppoe.com


Originally the cable modem and router was not part of this install. Was
using a telco modem connected to the single PC, same hub and two PCs. The
single PC is using the older sygate internet sharing software, and has
built-in firewall software as well..
Went to cable. Connected the cable modem and router to the single PC.
Worked fine, so I left it that way.

See no reason to change to hardware configuration that I've shown. Thanks
for your advice.


OK -- since you're happy with the setup, there's no need to change
anything. I used Sygate to share a dial-up connection long ago, and I
think it's a great program.

I see one disadvantage to your setup: the primary PC has to be up and
running at all times that the other PCs are using the Internet. That
wouldn't be true if all the computers connected directly to the
hardware router.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm
  #5  
Old June 7th 04, 03:24 AM
Papa
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cable to DSL

Your setup, in my opinion, seems awkward. Why not just go from modem (either
cable or DSL) to router, plug ALL PCs into the router using straight-thru
CAT 5 cable, and dump the hub? Most routers I've seen have built-in NAT
protection.

That way, all PCs are totally independent of one another and can access the
internet whether or not another PC is running, ICS is not needed, and only
one NIC is required per PC.

"Lil' Dave" wrote in message
news:4Vgwc.2333$5B2.1284@lakeread04...
Hi folks,
Simple question here. Have roadrunner cable modem connected to network for
internet service (Cox). Intend to simply swap the cable modem with DSL
modem (Verizon).
Setup as below
modem
|
router
|
PC = NAT router and internet server
|
hub
|
Two PCs

Only thing I can find different is that Verizon requires a PPOe setup for
the router, Cox don't. Verizon tech support is only familar with their
modem (theirs)-router (theirs)-PC. Haven't received DSL modem, prepping.
Any tips?




  #6  
Old June 9th 04, 09:49 AM
Lil' Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cable to DSL

"Steve Winograd [MVP]" wrote in message
...
In article hYBwc.20905$aM1.4570@fed1read02, "Lil' Dave"
wrote:
Simple question here. Have roadrunner cable modem connected to network

for
internet service (Cox). Intend to simply swap the cable modem with DSL
modem (Verizon).
Setup as below
modem
|
router
|
PC = NAT router and internet server
|
hub
|
Two PCs

Only thing I can find different is that Verizon requires a PPOe setup

for
the router, Cox don't. Verizon tech support is only familar with their
modem (theirs)-router (theirs)-PC. Haven't received DSL modem,

prepping.
Any tips?

I'm sorry, but I don't understand your setup: there's a hardware
router between the modem and PC, and the PC acts as a NAT router.

Why are there two routers? Can the hardware router (possibly with the
hub connected to it) give Internet access to all three computers?
That would eliminate the need to run NAT on the first PC and use it as
an Internet server.

A typical hardware router has PPPoE software built in. In that case,
replacing the cable modem with a DSL modem shouldn't require any
changes to the setup other than enabling PPPoE in the hardware router.

If you connect the DSL modem directly to the first PC, without the
hardware router, you'll need to install PPPoE software on the PC. One
possibility is to use RASPPPoE, from:

http://www.raspppoe.com


Originally the cable modem and router was not part of this install. Was
using a telco modem connected to the single PC, same hub and two PCs.

The
single PC is using the older sygate internet sharing software, and has
built-in firewall software as well..
Went to cable. Connected the cable modem and router to the single PC.
Worked fine, so I left it that way.

See no reason to change to hardware configuration that I've shown.

Thanks
for your advice.


OK -- since you're happy with the setup, there's no need to change
anything. I used Sygate to share a dial-up connection long ago, and I
think it's a great program.

I see one disadvantage to your setup: the primary PC has to be up and
running at all times that the other PCs are using the Internet. That
wouldn't be true if all the computers connected directly to the
hardware router.
--
Best Wishes,
Steve Winograd, MS-MVP (Windows Networking)

Please post any reply as a follow-up message in the news group
for everyone to see. I'm sorry, but I don't answer questions
addressed directly to me in E-mail or news groups.

Microsoft Most Valuable Professional - Windows Networking
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com

Steve Winograd's Networking FAQ
http://www.bcmaven.com/networking/faq.htm


The 486 motherboard/P166 cpu has no problems running 24/7. Very reliable.
The partition is imaged to CD, if a breakin should somehow occur. I may,
some day, eliminate this PC from the equation. Probably when it breaks.


  #7  
Old June 9th 04, 10:04 AM
Lil' Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Cable to DSL

The single PC (486/P166) is essentially a NAT router in itself. Has two
NICs, one in/one out for internet incoming traffic to the other two PCs.
Yes, its a bit awkward in that another piece of hardware is in the network
chain. If the single PC was somehow fiicky, or unreliable; I would consider
removing it. Thing is, its not.
The router is one of the originals made prior to built-in hub. There is no
hub on the router. Yes, the router is a NAT firewall as well. Yes, I
changed its password access.
The other two PCs do not seem limited by this setup when accessing the
internet simultaneously. Originally had 10 Mbps NICs. Moved up to the 100
Mbps version NICs for all 3 PCs. That sped things up substantially.
"Papa" wrote in message
...
Your setup, in my opinion, seems awkward. Why not just go from modem

(either
cable or DSL) to router, plug ALL PCs into the router using straight-thru
CAT 5 cable, and dump the hub? Most routers I've seen have built-in NAT
protection.

That way, all PCs are totally independent of one another and can access

the
internet whether or not another PC is running, ICS is not needed, and only
one NIC is required per PC.

"Lil' Dave" wrote in message
news:4Vgwc.2333$5B2.1284@lakeread04...
Hi folks,
Simple question here. Have roadrunner cable modem connected to network

for
internet service (Cox). Intend to simply swap the cable modem with DSL
modem (Verizon).
Setup as below
modem
|
router
|
PC = NAT router and internet server
|
hub
|
Two PCs

Only thing I can find different is that Verizon requires a PPOe setup

for
the router, Cox don't. Verizon tech support is only familar with their
modem (theirs)-router (theirs)-PC. Haven't received DSL modem,

prepping.
Any tips?






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
port problems? solo_senorita Printing 3 July 25th 04 03:54 AM
Can't read Windows 98se drive on Win Me system Robert General 7 July 17th 04 07:01 PM
cable modem/router question sf General 31 June 30th 04 08:05 AM
Windows 98 vs Windows 98 SE ---- should I upgrade ? ? ? julio General 2 June 23rd 04 11:32 PM
EZ Armor LE jt3 General 15 June 23rd 04 05:39 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Win98banter.
The comments are property of their posters.