If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Test Paragraph 4b
"reported below" should have read "reposted below"
MM Mike M wrote: John John - MVP wrote: Ha! ha! ...go play with his dolls! Priceless! You haven't lost your edge Mike, give them trolls more of those well deserved gems! My first reply was deleted from the MS servers but did propagate to UseNet. I've reported it below and double spaced the offensive word that caused it to be deleted. Thanks JJ, It's very rare for me to feel the need to Plonk someone and actually do it but on this o c c a s i o n I have done so with some pleasure. :-) BTW I've now determined two or three very simple and innocuous English language character strings that when posted to the MS nntp servers result in the post being deleted. Others such strings obviously exist but these are three strings that can and do appear in normal polite text. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Test Paragraph 4b
Heather wrote:
YO JJ.....haven't seen you for a long time, and I was giggling over this FOOL daring to tell Mike he didn't know what he was talking about........ROFL!! Yes, I too was having a chuckle when I saw this troll lining himself up, I thought to myself, "..this shouldn't last too long, well probably see a knock out punch halfway through round one..." John |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Test Paragraph 4b
Mike M wrote:
John John - MVP wrote: Ha! ha! ...go play with his dolls! Priceless! You haven't lost your edge Mike, give them trolls more of those well deserved gems! My first reply was deleted from the MS servers but did propagate to UseNet. I've reported it below and double spaced the offensive word that caused it to be deleted. Thanks JJ, It's very rare for me to feel the need to Plonk someone and actually do it but on this o c c a s i o n I have done so with some pleasure. :-) BTW I've now determined two or three very simple and innocuous English language character strings that when posted to the MS nntp servers result in the post being deleted. Others such strings obviously exist but these are three strings that can and do appear in normal polite text. Yes, some *very* polite posters report that for reasons unknown some of their posts seem to be filtered. MS might have gone a bit overboard on the filter... yet you have to wonder why they can't stop a handful of polluting trolls from ruining the Vista groups... go figure. John |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Test Paragraph 4b
John John - MVP wrote:
Ha! ha! ...go play with his dolls! Priceless! Actually - pretty lame. You haven't lost your edge Mike, give them trolls more of those well deserved gems! Oh yes, please hurt me some more. What a joke you people are. It's very rare for me to feel the need to Plonk someone Oh, was I plonked? I didn't notice. Maybe that's because only old pharts do plonking. but on this o c c a s i o n What's the matter? Is the nntp server that you use run by morons and idiots? I have done so with some pleasure. :-) Plonking gives you pleasure? Here. I plonk you. Did that feel good? Yes, some *very* polite posters report that for reasons unknown some of their posts seem to be filtered. MS might have gone a bit overboard on the filter... Because the Microsoft usenet servers are run by monkeys. yet you have to wonder why they can't stop a handful of polluting trolls from ruining the Vista groups... go figure. Because Microsoft doesn't give a rat's ass about their usenet servers. That's why they have no Windows 7 newsgroups. They are removing groups from their server, and probably in a year they will remove all win-9x/me groups, leaving you people out in the cold because you're too stubborn to use a real NNTP server. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Test Paragraph 4b
Still waiting for you to reply to this, Mike M.
Full-Quoter Mike M top-poasted: You really are stupid and simply do not have a clue and know nothing about how Microsoft manage their nntp servers. I never said that I knew *how* microsoft manages their news servers - only that they do it poorly - if at all. A significant amount of spam that is posted to the microsoft.public hierarchy comes directly via microsoft's servers, because the microsoft sys-admins have not implimented simple filters that detect when the same user is posting dozens or hundreds of messages- one to each and every microsoft.public newsgroup over a short period of time. For example I can easily demonstrate that: It has never been shown (not at least during the past 10 years) that any resonsible person can be reached at micrsofot who administers their server or who is in a position to change, Is untrue but then again why waste my time Please post a URL showing that a real microsoft sys-admin responded in a comment or complaint or at least engaged in a discussion about the microsoft NNTP servers. If it was worth your time to assert that such a post exists, it's certainly worth your time to prove the credibility of the statements you post. yourself who demonstrably knows little and has nothing to contribute. How exactly did I demonstrate that I "know little"? I said that there is a history of inattention and inactivity when it comes to how microsoft sys-admins administer and operate their server. You can prove me wrong by posting evidence to the contrary. I said that Microsoft (or their servers) plays no role in the operation of these newsgroups on a world-wide basis. You have said nothing specifically about that statement, so either you are unsure of that fact or you agree with it. I am contributing to solving this problem by offering an effective and simple solution (use a different NNTP server). You offer no viable solution. In other words is a total waste of space and air. You are the one spouting hot-air here, not I. I am making concise statements that I assert are true, you rant like a child and say they are not true while offering nothing to back up your point of view. If I simply want to have a conversation with Shane all I need do is e-mail him or better pick up the phone but then again, you're too stupid to even understand that. Who is Shane? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Test Paragraph 4b
98 Guy wrote:
Actually - pretty lame. Yes, we all agree that you are pretty lame... |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Test Paragraph 4b
ROFL
-- Joan Archer http://crossstitcher.webs.com/ "John John - MVP" wrote in message ... 98 Guy wrote: Actually - pretty lame. Yes, we all agree that you are pretty lame... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Test Paragraph 4b
98 Guy wrote:
How's microsoft-server fix job going Mike? Or are you still being censored? How's "shane"? Did you get him to fix the problem yet? Got a nice fan-club going here - but they're not too sophisticated. They've got a remarkably simple sense of humor - you should work on that. Doesn't reflect well on you. Still waiting for you to reply to this Mike: You really are stupid and simply do not have a clue and know nothing about how Microsoft manage their nntp servers. I never said that I knew *how* microsoft manages their news servers - only that they do it poorly - if at all. A significant amount of spam that is posted to the microsoft.public hierarchy comes directly via microsoft's servers, because the microsoft sys-admins have not implimented simple filters that detect when the same user is posting dozens or hundreds of messages- one to each and every microsoft.public newsgroup over a short period of time. For example I can easily demonstrate that: It has never been shown (not at least during the past 10 years) that any resonsible person can be reached at micrsofot who administers their server or who is in a position to change, Is untrue but then again why waste my time Please post a URL showing that a real microsoft sys-admin responded in a comment or complaint or at least engaged in a discussion about the microsoft NNTP servers. If it was worth your time to assert that such a post exists, it's certainly worth your time to prove the credibility of the statements you post. yourself who demonstrably knows little and has nothing to contribute. How exactly did I demonstrate that I "know little"? I said that there is a history of inattention and inactivity when it comes to how microsoft sys-admins administer and operate their server. You can prove me wrong by posting evidence to the contrary. I said that Microsoft (or their servers) plays no role in the operation of these newsgroups on a world-wide basis. You have said nothing specifically about that statement, so either you are unsure of that fact or you agree with it. I am contributing to solving this problem by offering an effective and simple solution (use a different NNTP server). You offer no viable solution. In other words is a total waste of space and air. You are the one spouting hot-air here, not I. I am making concise statements that I assert are true, you rant like a child and say they are not true while offering nothing to back up your point of view. If I simply want to have a conversation with Shane all I need do is e-mail him or better pick up the phone but then again, you're too stupid to even understand that. Who is Shane? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Test Paragraph 4b
From: "98 Guy"
| 98 Guy wrote: | How's microsoft-server fix job going Mike? Or are you still being | censored? plonk -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Test Paragraph 4b
David & others reading this thread including Shane,
It appears that on some occasions Microsoft occasionally listen to their users and make the occasional change to their newsgroup filters. So on this occasion it is Mike M 1, doll playing '98 child -999. Mike M David H. Lipman wrote: From: "98 Guy" 98 Guy wrote: How's microsoft-server fix job going Mike? Or are you still being censored? plonk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Virus? Paragraph, space and return marks displayed, etc. | California Dreamin' | General | 3 | October 1st 06 11:14 PM |
test | MedRxMan | General | 3 | March 12th 06 07:13 PM |
Test | Test | General | 0 | May 23rd 05 10:41 AM |
Test | Test | Setup & Installation | 0 | May 23rd 05 10:38 AM |
Test | Test | Printing | 0 | May 23rd 05 10:38 AM |