Checking the value of Optimal refresh rate

Is there a DOS command that will tell me what the monitor
refresh rate is? It is set to "Optimal", but I want to know
that actual rate used by Optimal.

Thanks,

If your monitor has a 'menu' for settings, you should be able to access that
information from there......well, mine does.
Heirloom, old and needs refreshing

"Dave Boland" wrote in message
...
Is there a DOS command that will tell me what the monitor refresh rate is?
It is set to "Optimal", but I want to know that actual rate used by
Optimal.

Thanks,

Hard day at the office dear g
Joan


Heirloom wrote:
Heirloom, old and needs refreshing

Nope, no office..........still limping around. Stitches come out Monday.
Still having much of the same pain as before....hope they don't have to do
this again. :-(
Heirloom, old and applied
for mgr. job at "I Hop"

"Joan Archer" wrote in message
...
Hard day at the office dear g
Joan


Heirloom wrote:
Heirloom, old and needs refreshing

Dave Boland wrote:
Is there a DOS command that will tell me what the monitor refresh rate
is? It is set to "Optimal", but I want to know that actual rate used by
Optimal.

Thanks,

I've re-posted this in the hope that I'll get some
intelligent responses. Heirloom and Joan don't need to
respond since they have nothing to say worth reading.

Dave,

Neither have I

George Gee


Heirloom and Joan don't need to respond since they have nothing to say
worth reading.

Dave,

On Fri 29 Sep 2006 01:33:07p, "George Gee" took the
time to tell us all in :

Neither have I

George Gee


Heirloom and Joan don't need to respond since they have nothing to say
worth reading.

Dave,




I have a wonderfull low priced tool callled Adobe Photshop that includes
this in the callibration process. Corel draw does tooo, or if you have the
time, search for the tools for your display adaptor! Duh!

--
"Time will bring to light whatever is hidden;
it will cover up and conceal what is now shining in splendor."
Horace (65 - 8 BC); Roman poet.

Mike

Dave Boland wrote:

Dave Boland wrote:
I've re-posted this in the hope that I'll get some
intelligent responses. Heirloom and Joan don't need to
respond since they have nothing to say worth reading.

You've already had an intelligent response. The problem is that you don't
appear to have the intelligence to understand it.

AnonnyMouse

Dave Boland wrote:

I've re-posted this in the hope that I'll get some
intelligent responses. Heirloom and Joan don't need to
respond since they have nothing to say worth reading.

With a post as rude as yours do you honestly expect anyone to now bother
offering you help? I doubt it.
--
Mike Maltby
MS-MVP Windows

On Fri 29 Sep 2006 01:55:19p, "MikeM" took the
time to tell us all in :

Dave Boland wrote:

I've re-posted this in the hope that I'll get some
intelligent responses. Heirloom and Joan don't need to
respond since they have nothing to say worth reading.

With a post as rude as yours do you honestly expect anyone to now bother
offering you help? I doubt it.

You're more helpful than I wass, Mike.

--
"Time will bring to light whatever is hidden;
it will cover up and conceal what is now shining in splendor."
Horace (65 - 8 BC); Roman poet.

Mike