If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Arvind,
You won't see the contents of the _RESTORE folder or some other folders when using Explorer unless you set it to see these files and folders. To do this, when using Explorer, go to Tools | Folder Options | View and check "Show hidden files and folders" and uncheck "Hide protected operating system files" and all will be revealed. HTH -- Mike Maltby MS-MVP arvind wrote: i've ME with NAV03, and i agree with mike in that i can't restore my puter to a point before the last liveupdate session with new signature files, without the NAV refusing to boot the puter. so i make it a point to create a restore point after every LU session. no other problems otherwise. by the way, i don't seem to have any TEMP folder in C:\_RESTORE. the only ones are- VxDMoN.cfg, DISKCFG, SRDISKID, and VxDMoN. do i've to do something about this or let it be. tia. arvind |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:29:24 -0400, Mike M wrote:
=A0Ron Martell =A0wrote: =A0NAV2002 and NAV2003 are okay with WindowsMe it appears, but =A0certainly not NAV2004. =A0And it appears that NAV2005 is also not =A0usable with WindowsMe. =A0Ron, =A0They may "work" but can they survive the use of system restore and =A0what about the damage that can be caused by LiveUpdate? well darnit. I'm running NAV 2004 on WinMe, and don't seem to be having tooooo many= problems. Something goes whacky once in awhile, and NAV is usually the= first one I suspect as the perp...but I've used Norton's for so many years= that it's hard to trust another program. Any suggestions for a really good= av program that works smoothly with WinMe?...cuz I'm thinking maybe I= should stop holding out for NAV to fix the kinks with WinMe. :\ |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
thanks mike, thus i could 'see' the TEMP folder in
c:\_RESTORE. it has 25.2 mb of files, some hidden. should i flush all these. tia. arvind -----Original Message----- Arvind, You won't see the contents of the _RESTORE folder or some other folders when using Explorer unless you set it to see these files and folders. To do this, when using Explorer, go to Tools | Folder Options | View and check "Show hidden files and folders" and uncheck "Hide protected operating system files" and all will be revealed. HTH -- Mike Maltby MS-MVP arvind wrote: i've ME with NAV03, and i agree with mike in that i can't restore my puter to a point before the last liveupdate session with new signature files, without the NAV refusing to boot the puter. so i make it a point to create a restore point after every LU session. no other problems otherwise. by the way, i don't seem to have any TEMP folder in C:\_RESTORE. the only ones are- VxDMoN.cfg, DISKCFG, SRDISKID, and VxDMoN. do i've to do something about this or let it be. tia. arvind . |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
There's nothing abnormal in having 25MB of files in the C_\RESTORE\TEMP
folder unless it amounts to 10K-15K or more files in which case the problem could be that the state manager has stopped analysing these files and discarding those not required for a checkpoint and cabbing to FS*.CAB files in the C:\_RESTORE\ARCHIVE folder those that are needed for a checkpoint. Don't try and delete files from the C:\_RESTORE folder as doing so will break the integrity of the store. Instead cycle system restore off and then back on again as follows: System | Performance | File System | Troubleshooting and check "Disable System Restore", Apply and IMMEDIATELY reboot. This will flush you restore folder and erase all checkpoints, then, System | Performance | File System | Troubleshooting and uncheck "Disable System Restore", Apply and again IMMEDIATELY reboot. This should now automatically create a new checkpoint immediately following the restart. Finally adjust the space allocated to the restore folder using the slider found at System | Performance | File System | Hard Disk. A figure of 200MB is normally more than adequate for day to day use allowing perhaps a week of checkpoints to be available although increasing this to perhaps 400MB for a few days during periods of large installs such Microsoft Office is advisable. If this doesn't clear down the _restore archive (and it doesn't always when users have experienced similar problems) the next suggestion is to boot to DOS using a floppy and delete the entire _RESTORE folder structure from the a) Boot to DOS using a floppy. Do NOT choose "Minimal Boot" from the menu when booting from a floppy but rather choose "Start computer with (or without) CD-ROM support" otherwise the ATTRIB command will not be available. b) At the DOS A:\ prompt, type: ATTRIB -H -S -R C:\_RESTORE REN C:\_RESTORE OLDREST c) Remove the floppy d) Reboot your PC e) Delete the folder C:\OLDREST f) Check that an automatic system restore checkpoint was created. g) Finally adjust the space allocated to the restore folder: Finally you may want to give system restore the once over by carrying out the following quick test. a) Create a shortcut on your desktop to a file. b) Create a manual checkpoint c) Delete the shortcut d) Restore you PC to the checkpoint you created. Was the shortcut restored? Did you see any error messages? -- Mike Maltby MS-MVP arvind wrote: thanks mike, thus i could 'see' the TEMP folder in c:\_RESTORE. it has 25.2 mb of files, some hidden. should i flush all these. tia. arvind |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Recommend eTrust for your ME system ... and, it's free for 1 year
from this link : http://www.my-etrust.com/microsoft/ MowGreen [MVP] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== fuzzeroo wrote: On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:29:24 -0400, Mike M wrote: Ron Martell wrote: NAV2002 and NAV2003 are okay with WindowsMe it appears, but certainly not NAV2004. And it appears that NAV2005 is also not usable with WindowsMe. Ron, They may "work" but can they survive the use of system restore and what about the damage that can be caused by LiveUpdate? well darnit. I'm running NAV 2004 on WinMe, and don't seem to be having tooooo many problems. Something goes whacky once in awhile, and NAV is usually the first one I suspect as the perp...but I've used Norton's for so many years that it's hard to trust another program. Any suggestions for a really good av program that works smoothly with WinMe?...cuz I'm thinking maybe I should stop holding out for NAV to fix the kinks with WinMe. :\ |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Ditto!! Been using it for eons. Back when it was the free InoculateIT PE.
I owe you an email, Mowgen!! Heather "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Recommend eTrust for your ME system ... and, it's free for 1 year from this link : http://www.my-etrust.com/microsoft/ MowGreen [MVP] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== fuzzeroo wrote: On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:29:24 -0400, Mike M wrote: Ron Martell wrote: NAV2002 and NAV2003 are okay with WindowsMe it appears, but certainly not NAV2004. And it appears that NAV2005 is also not usable with WindowsMe. Ron, They may "work" but can they survive the use of system restore and what about the damage that can be caused by LiveUpdate? well darnit. I'm running NAV 2004 on WinMe, and don't seem to be having tooooo many problems. Something goes whacky once in awhile, and NAV is usually the first one I suspect as the perp...but I've used Norton's for so many years that it's hard to trust another program. Any suggestions for a really good av program that works smoothly with WinMe?...cuz I'm thinking maybe I should stop holding out for NAV to fix the kinks with WinMe. :\ |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Bring me your daughter, woman
MG Heather wrote: Ditto!! Been using it for eons. Back when it was the free InoculateIT PE. I owe you an email, Mowgen!! Heather "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Recommend eTrust for your ME system ... and, it's free for 1 year from this link : http://www.my-etrust.com/microsoft/ MowGreen [MVP] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== fuzzeroo wrote: On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:29:24 -0400, Mike M wrote: Ron Martell wrote: NAV2002 and NAV2003 are okay with WindowsMe it appears, but certainly not NAV2004. And it appears that NAV2005 is also not usable with WindowsMe. Ron, They may "work" but can they survive the use of system restore and what about the damage that can be caused by LiveUpdate? well darnit. I'm running NAV 2004 on WinMe, and don't seem to be having tooooo many problems. Something goes whacky once in awhile, and NAV is usually the first one I suspect as the perp...but I've used Norton's for so many years that it's hard to trust another program. Any suggestions for a really good av program that works smoothly with WinMe?...cuz I'm thinking maybe I should stop holding out for NAV to fix the kinks with WinMe. :\ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
I thought I told you lot not to get up to any mischief while I was missing
g Joan MowGreen [MVP] wrote: Bring me your daughter, woman MG |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the info! I'll check it out.
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:37:25 -0400, MowGreen [MVP] wrote: =A0Recommend eTrust for your ME system ... and, it's free for 1 year =A0from this link : http://www.my-etrust.com/microsoft/ =A0MowGreen =A0[MVP] =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D =A0*-343-* FDNY =A0Never Forgotten =A0=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3 D =A0fuzzeroo wrote: =A0On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:29:24 -0400, Mike M wrote: =A0Ron Martell =A0wrote: =A0NAV2002 and NAV2003 are okay with WindowsMe it appears, but =A0certainly not NAV2004. =A0And it appears that NAV2005 is also =A0not usable with WindowsMe. =A0Ron, =A0They may "work" but can they survive the use of system restore =A0and what about the damage that can be caused by LiveUpdate? =A0well darnit. =A0I'm running NAV 2004 on WinMe, and don't seem to be having tooooo =A0many problems. =A0Something goes whacky once in awhile, and NAV is =A0usually the first one I suspect as the perp...but I've used =A0Norton's for so many years that it's hard to trust another =A0program. Any suggestions for a really good av program that works =A0smoothly with WinMe?...cuz I'm thinking maybe I should stop =A0holding out for NAV to fix the kinks with WinMe. :\ |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
You will have to.....
a) write her.....and b) get up to Vancouver, grin. Mom "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Bring me your daughter, woman MG Heather wrote: Ditto!! Been using it for eons. Back when it was the free InoculateIT PE. I owe you an email, Mowgen!! Heather "MowGreen [MVP]" wrote in message ... Recommend eTrust for your ME system ... and, it's free for 1 year from this link : http://www.my-etrust.com/microsoft/ MowGreen [MVP] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== fuzzeroo wrote: On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 19:29:24 -0400, Mike M wrote: Ron Martell wrote: NAV2002 and NAV2003 are okay with WindowsMe it appears, but certainly not NAV2004. And it appears that NAV2005 is also not usable with WindowsMe. Ron, They may "work" but can they survive the use of system restore and what about the damage that can be caused by LiveUpdate? well darnit. I'm running NAV 2004 on WinMe, and don't seem to be having tooooo many problems. Something goes whacky once in awhile, and NAV is usually the first one I suspect as the perp...but I've used Norton's for so many years that it's hard to trust another program. Any suggestions for a really good av program that works smoothly with WinMe?...cuz I'm thinking maybe I should stop holding out for NAV to fix the kinks with WinMe. :\ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Norton (and maybe others) | jeff | Software & Applications | 7 | August 30th 04 10:15 AM |
Norton def file too large for Rescue Set | anonymous | General | 4 | August 17th 04 10:41 PM |
w98se / xp pro / Norton ack-up strategy.... | RJK | General | 4 | August 15th 04 10:58 PM |
NORTON POLL ... | RJK | General | 8 | July 1st 04 12:27 AM |
Cant install Norton AV or Cyberlink DVD Player on new installation of WinME | fred | General | 0 | June 16th 04 05:29 PM |