If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
OT help with Win 95 install
Gabriel Knight wrote:
Hi I tried other news groups for win 95 but their latest questions were from year 2009 or no questions at all I hope this is ok here. You should have considered the windows-98 newsgroup for your question. I've cross-posted this reply to that group to assist you. I am trying to install Win 95 But I get an error, "while initializing device IOS: windows protection error. You need to restart your computer." I googled this and it said it could be a virus or because of a new installed hardware/software. I am doing a clean install of the OS with a new (deleted and new partition made) partition and then formated so there are no files on the hdd. I have taken out the sound and agp video card so im using onboard video but I get this error still. I have 512mb of ram installed as I found out that any more causes another type of error. I have installed Win95 on this pc before so I know there should not be anything wrong with the hardware, I also have tried using two hard drives one an 80 gig with ultra ata and a 40 gig with ata 133 but both the same. I am using: P4SGX-MX Mobo P4 2.80 GHz CPU 512mb DDR PC2700 ram 40 Gig HDD ATA 133 (IDE) I can get into the bios so I know the onboard video works and I have tried an agp 128mb 3d card aswell. I get to the stage after the install that says something like "windows is now starting for the first time" then the "while initializing device IOS:" error. I can not get into safe mode if I try the same error happens, If I use "step-by-step confirmation" it gets to the "load all windows drivers" then the error. Please help There were several version of windows 95 (2 or 3). The last one had better support for large hard drives - that could be the problem you're seeing. Do you know what version of Win-98 you have? Can you read the date-stamp on the files on the CD? As Philo said, win-95 did have a problem with CPU's running faster than 2.4 ghz - but that might not cause you a problem until you try to get a network card up and running (don't quote me on that). In any case, I highly recommend that you install Windows 98 instead of Windows 95. You'll have a more stable os with more compatibility options in terms of software and hardware (particularly USB devices). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
OT help with Win 95 install
In message , 98 Guy writes:
[] In any case, I highly recommend that you install Windows 98 instead of Windows 95. You'll have a more stable os with more compatibility options in terms of software and hardware (particularly USB devices). Yes, '98 supports USB a lot better (making '95 do so is hard work, and I suspect few drivers exist). Especially if you use the universal driver from the start. If you don't like the user interface, you can make '98 look very like '95, by using 98lite; this makes for a more stable (and less demanding) system too, though some people hate it. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong." - Arthur C. Clarke |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
OT help with Win 95 install
98 Guy wrote in :
Gabriel Knight wrote: .. .. .. "while initializing device IOS: windows protection error. You need to restart your computer." .. .. .. I have installed Win95 on this pc before so I know there should not be anything wrong with the hardware, I also have tried using two hard drives one an 80 gig with ultra ata and a 40 gig with ata 133 but both the same. I am using: P4SGX-MX Mobo P4 2.80 GHz CPU 512mb DDR PC2700 ram 40 Gig HDD ATA 133 (IDE) .. .. .. I get to the stage after the install that says something like "windows is now starting for the first time" then the "while initializing device IOS:" error. I can not get into safe mode if I try the same error happens, If I use "step-by-step confirmation" it gets to the "load all windows drivers" then the error. There were several version of windows 95 (2 or 3). The last one had better support for large hard drives - that could be the problem you're seeing. Do you know what version of Win-98 you have? Can you read the date-stamp on the files on the CD? As Philo said, win-95 did have a problem with CPU's running faster than 2.4 ghz - but that might not cause you a problem until you try to get a network card up and running (don't quote me on that). In any case, I highly recommend that you install Windows 98 instead of Windows 95. You'll have a more stable os with more compatibility options in terms of software and hardware (particularly USB devices). First, seconded. W98 SE. With the W95 OSR2 C explorer shell. (98-Lite with the second edition of the shell swap, the one that still leaves the original W98 SHELL32.DLL as default for most programs to call on for shell functions). Second, there is a problem with AMD CPU's that does this, at clock speeds anything above 300 MHz. I know this is about a P4 machine, but the fix may be the same. It has an updated ESDI_506.PDR amongst a couple of other things, and is one of the standard M$ patches for W9X. What bothers me is that that machine apparently installed W95 ok before. So somethign changed, and likely hardware. That protection error usually results when a static VXD fails. It is also possible, that as the failure occurred during first reboot after install, that VMM32.VXD, a package of discreet static VXD's, didn't build correctly for that machine. VMM32.VXD does not vary a lot between machines despite the intention that it can at need, but it may well have gone wrong. If so, re-install is th best choice after testing with another OS, that the hardware is sound. There are lots of fun technical explorations possible, but what matters is: will it work? If a simple repeat attempt at install fails, it likely won't without other attention elsewhere. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
OT help with Win 95 install
Lostgallifreyan wrote in
: Second, there is a problem with AMD CPU's that does this, at clock speeds anything above 300 MHz. I know this is about a P4 machine, but the fix may be the same. It has an updated ESDI_506.PDR amongst a couple of other things, and is one of the standard M$ patches for W9X. Forget I said that. It may become important, but in this case the IOS.VXD failed. Two places to start looking: Hard disk connections and cables, they may need refitting, or even replacing. This applies to power cables as well as data cables, a loose Molex connector causes many ills. The other is to try to log the boot, then boot to real mode DOS and see how far that got by looking in the log file using EDIT.COM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
OT help with Win 95 install
J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
In message , 98 Guy writes: [] In any case, I highly recommend that you install Windows 98 instead of Windows 95. You'll have a more stable os with more compatibility options in terms of software and hardware (particularly USB devices). Yes, '98 supports USB a lot better (making '95 do so is hard work, and I suspect few drivers exist). Especially if you use the universal driver from the start. If you don't like the user interface, you can make '98 look very like '95, by using 98lite; this makes for a more stable (and less demanding) system too, though some people hate it. I can (have) made *Win98SE* look very much like 95 - LOL. You don't need to go to the stripped down Lite version (which brings with it some of its own limitations, as you've occasionally noted :-). Let's face it, they're both pretty light, compared to what's out there now (or ever since Vista and Windows7 made their icky debut) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
OT help with Win 95 install
There was four versions of Windows 95 a,b,c,d,
-- Peter Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. http://www.microsoft.com/protect "98 Guy" wrote in message ... Gabriel Knight wrote: Hi I tried other news groups for win 95 but their latest questions were from year 2009 or no questions at all I hope this is ok here. You should have considered the windows-98 newsgroup for your question. I've cross-posted this reply to that group to assist you. I am trying to install Win 95 But I get an error, "while initializing device IOS: windows protection error. You need to restart your computer." I googled this and it said it could be a virus or because of a new installed hardware/software. I am doing a clean install of the OS with a new (deleted and new partition made) partition and then formated so there are no files on the hdd. I have taken out the sound and agp video card so im using onboard video but I get this error still. I have 512mb of ram installed as I found out that any more causes another type of error. I have installed Win95 on this pc before so I know there should not be anything wrong with the hardware, I also have tried using two hard drives one an 80 gig with ultra ata and a 40 gig with ata 133 but both the same. I am using: P4SGX-MX Mobo P4 2.80 GHz CPU 512mb DDR PC2700 ram 40 Gig HDD ATA 133 (IDE) I can get into the bios so I know the onboard video works and I have tried an agp 128mb 3d card aswell. I get to the stage after the install that says something like "windows is now starting for the first time" then the "while initializing device IOS:" error. I can not get into safe mode if I try the same error happens, If I use "step-by-step confirmation" it gets to the "load all windows drivers" then the error. Please help There were several version of windows 95 (2 or 3). The last one had better support for large hard drives - that could be the problem you're seeing. Do you know what version of Win-98 you have? Can you read the date-stamp on the files on the CD? As Philo said, win-95 did have a problem with CPU's running faster than 2.4 ghz - but that might not cause you a problem until you try to get a network card up and running (don't quote me on that). In any case, I highly recommend that you install Windows 98 instead of Windows 95. You'll have a more stable os with more compatibility options in terms of software and hardware (particularly USB devices). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
OT help with Win 95 install
On Feb 7, 5:58*pm, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
98 Guy wrote : Gabriel Knight wrote: . . . "while initializing device IOS: windows protection error. You need to restart your computer." . . . I have installed Win95 on this pc before so I know there should not be anything wrong with the hardware, I also have tried using two hard drives one an 80 gig with ultra ata and a 40 gig with ata 133 but both the same. I am using: P4SGX-MX Mobo P4 2.80 GHz CPU 512mb DDR PC2700 ram 40 Gig HDD ATA 133 (IDE) . . . I get to the stage after the install that says something like "windows is now starting for the first time" then the "while initializing device IOS:" error. I can not get into safe mode if I try the same error happens, If I use "step-by-step confirmation" it gets to the "load all windows drivers" then the error. There were several version of windows 95 (2 or 3). *The last one had better support for large hard drives - that could be the problem you're seeing. *Do you know what version of Win-98 you have? *Can you read the date-stamp on the files on the CD? As Philo said, win-95 did have a problem with CPU's running faster than 2.4 ghz - but that might not cause you a problem until you try to get a network card up and running (don't quote me on that). In any case, I highly recommend that you install Windows 98 instead of Windows 95. *You'll have a more stable os with more compatibility options in terms of software and hardware (particularly USB devices). First, seconded. W98 SE. With the W95 OSR2 C explorer shell. (98-Lite with the second edition of the shell swap, the one that still leaves the original W98 SHELL32.DLL as default for most programs to call on for shell functions). Second, there is a problem with AMD CPU's that does this, at clock speeds anything above 300 MHz. I know this is about a P4 machine, but the fix may be the same. It has an updated ESDI_506.PDR amongst a couple of other things, and is one of the standard M$ patches for W9X. What bothers me is that that machine apparently installed W95 ok before. So somethign changed, and likely hardware. That protection error usually results when a static VXD fails. It is also possible, that as the failure occurred during first reboot after install, that VMM32.VXD, a package of discreet static VXD's, didn't build correctly for that machine. VMM32.VXD does not vary a lot between machines despite the intention that it can at need, but it may well have gone wrong. If so, re-install is th best choice after testing with another OS, that the hardware is sound. There are lots of fun technical explorations possible, but what matters is: will it work? If a simple repeat attempt at install fails, it likely won't without other attention elsewhere. Is it possible that the original Win95 install that worked had a specific order which software would sequence through, then upon re- installing Win95 THAT order changed exacerbating any sensitivity to HW speeds as mentioned previously? I had this happen once during the 'old' days developing computer systems when a software upgrade, did NOT! Some section of I/O became unreliable. Went back and did a true timing diagram and source of the problem became obvious. Changing sequence rules for the SW and adding an intentional delay got us by WITHOUT having to modify the HW, including costly field update to the HW. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
OT help with Win 95 install
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
OT help with Win 95 install
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
OT help with Win 95 install
"Peter Foldes" wrote in
: There was four versions of Windows 95 a,b,c,d, Do tell! I knew about OSR2 C, but never knew about D. I want to know so I can see if the shell (Comdlg32.dll, Explorer.exe, Shell32.dll) offer anythign better than those from OSR2c when doing shell swaps for 98-Lite. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to install DSL, how to install ethernet card? | mm | General | 49 | September 17th 07 05:54 PM |
Un-install/Clean re-install? | Lady Deadra | General | 3 | January 15th 07 04:18 PM |
I need to install win98 on 3 PC's, I have single copy, how can I install? | GS | Setup & Installation | 1 | November 2nd 05 06:16 PM |
cant install ms office in newly install w98se | peter | General | 7 | January 15th 05 12:49 AM |