If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
"MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/07/2010 09:39 PM, Sunny wrote: "Hot-text" wrote in message ... But they are not Microsoft Communities ! No, they are part of the rest of the World, (you know, the "Microsoft is not the whole World set") AH, once again I'm going to recommend you actually read the materials you would have found via the links I provided for you AND you need to read the "Joe Banana" material Glen posted, in particular this: "so I doubt this can be achieved without a maintainer." Then TRY to think through the ramifications... What "ramifications" ? Web based "forums" are a pain in the arse to navigate. Take your links and post them to the "Microsoft Communities" One Usenet server drops out from the plethora Worldwide and you and your ilk think it is the end of the World? May surprise you to discover that many people do not know that MS has NNTP servers. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
On 05/07/2010 10:23 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
MEB spewed: Then TRY to think through the ramifications... I am thinking through the ramifications - and delighting in them. This newsgroup will soon become MEB-free. Ah, what a wonderful world it will be. And you can post your messages to your local area and among those who connect *to each other* since Microsoft _WAS_ the maintainer - the MASTER SERVER for distribution content *worldwide*... Dimwit, this is a first, at least from my experience, this has NEVER occurred before... are *YOU* going supply the servers AND staff to maintain the _entire_ microsoft.public hierarchy? No, I thought not... -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
On 05/07/2010 10:23 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
MEB spewed: Then TRY to think through the ramifications... I am thinking through the ramifications - and delighting in them. This newsgroup will soon become MEB-free. Ah, what a wonderful world it will be. And you can post your messages to your local area and among those who connect *to each other* since Microsoft _WAS_ the maintainer - the MASTER SERVER for distribution content *worldwide*... Dimwit, this is a first, at least from my experience, this has NEVER occurred before... are *YOU* going supply the servers AND staff to maintain the _entire_ microsoft.public hierarchy? No, I thought not... -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
Your NOT read this @ msnews.microsoft.com
We telling you that ((( msnews.microsoft.com ))) is Close Down! Only ((( msnews.microsoft.com ))) There will be no more Post @ msnews.microsoft.com No more msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com it's Closeting "98 Guy" wrote in message ... MEB spewed: Then TRY to think through the ramifications... I am thinking through the ramifications - and delighting in them. This newsgroup will soon become MEB-free. Ah, what a wonderful world it will be. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
Your NOT read this @ msnews.microsoft.com
We telling you that ((( msnews.microsoft.com ))) is Close Down! Only ((( msnews.microsoft.com ))) There will be no more Post @ msnews.microsoft.com No more msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com msnews.microsoft.com it's Closeting "98 Guy" wrote in message ... MEB spewed: Then TRY to think through the ramifications... I am thinking through the ramifications - and delighting in them. This newsgroup will soon become MEB-free. Ah, what a wonderful world it will be. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
Yes you right!
May surprise you to discover that many people do not know that MS has NNTP servers. nntp://msnews.microsoft.com is Closeing to the public Member Only We saying that there will be no more Repost to nntp://msnews.microsoft.com from USERNET Be Cause of the Close there of .... to the public .... "Sunny" wrote in message ... "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/07/2010 09:39 PM, Sunny wrote: "Hot-text" wrote in message ... But they are not Microsoft Communities ! No, they are part of the rest of the World, (you know, the "Microsoft is not the whole World set") AH, once again I'm going to recommend you actually read the materials you would have found via the links I provided for you AND you need to read the "Joe Banana" material Glen posted, in particular this: "so I doubt this can be achieved without a maintainer." Then TRY to think through the ramifications... What "ramifications" ? Web based "forums" are a pain in the arse to navigate. Take your links and post them to the "Microsoft Communities" One Usenet server drops out from the plethora Worldwide and you and your ilk think it is the end of the World? May surprise you to discover that many people do not know that MS has NNTP servers. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
Yes you right!
May surprise you to discover that many people do not know that MS has NNTP servers. nntp://msnews.microsoft.com is Closeing to the public Member Only We saying that there will be no more Repost to nntp://msnews.microsoft.com from USERNET Be Cause of the Close there of .... to the public .... "Sunny" wrote in message ... "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/07/2010 09:39 PM, Sunny wrote: "Hot-text" wrote in message ... But they are not Microsoft Communities ! No, they are part of the rest of the World, (you know, the "Microsoft is not the whole World set") AH, once again I'm going to recommend you actually read the materials you would have found via the links I provided for you AND you need to read the "Joe Banana" material Glen posted, in particular this: "so I doubt this can be achieved without a maintainer." Then TRY to think through the ramifications... What "ramifications" ? Web based "forums" are a pain in the arse to navigate. Take your links and post them to the "Microsoft Communities" One Usenet server drops out from the plethora Worldwide and you and your ilk think it is the end of the World? May surprise you to discover that many people do not know that MS has NNTP servers. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
MEB wrote:
since Microsoft _WAS_ the maintainer - the MASTER SERVER for distribution content *worldwide*... You can post no evidence that microsoft was the "maintainer" or "master server" for the posts in these (microsoft.public) newsgroups. If that was true, then any posts made via external servers would have to show up first on the microsoft server, and the PATH of those posts would have to indicate that they were sourced or routed through microsoft's server. And Microsoft could excercise some degree of moderation or censorship if that were the case. Microsoft could identify certain posters (or be made aware of them) and simply prevent their posts from propagating out of their "master" server once it receives those posts. But none of that happens. Microsoft is a PEER in this context, as all usenet servers are peers with each other. You are reluctant to admit this, because you somehow want to believe that Microsoft holds some authoritative role over the microsoft.public hierarchy of usenet newsgroups. This reluctance blinds you to having a true understanding of how usenet works, how servers peer with each other, and how posts are propagated between peers. I have copied this post to alt.free.newsservers and news.admin.misc for others to comment on your technical understanding of this situation. Dimwit, this is a first, at least from my experience, this has NEVER occurred before... are *YOU* going supply the servers AND staff to maintain the _entire_ microsoft.public hierarchy? No, I thought not... And they can comment on that as well. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
MEB wrote:
since Microsoft _WAS_ the maintainer - the MASTER SERVER for distribution content *worldwide*... You can post no evidence that microsoft was the "maintainer" or "master server" for the posts in these (microsoft.public) newsgroups. If that was true, then any posts made via external servers would have to show up first on the microsoft server, and the PATH of those posts would have to indicate that they were sourced or routed through microsoft's server. And Microsoft could excercise some degree of moderation or censorship if that were the case. Microsoft could identify certain posters (or be made aware of them) and simply prevent their posts from propagating out of their "master" server once it receives those posts. But none of that happens. Microsoft is a PEER in this context, as all usenet servers are peers with each other. You are reluctant to admit this, because you somehow want to believe that Microsoft holds some authoritative role over the microsoft.public hierarchy of usenet newsgroups. This reluctance blinds you to having a true understanding of how usenet works, how servers peer with each other, and how posts are propagated between peers. I have copied this post to alt.free.newsservers and news.admin.misc for others to comment on your technical understanding of this situation. Dimwit, this is a first, at least from my experience, this has NEVER occurred before... are *YOU* going supply the servers AND staff to maintain the _entire_ microsoft.public hierarchy? No, I thought not... And they can comment on that as well. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
98 Guy expressed an opinion:
MEB wrote: since Microsoft _WAS_ the maintainer - the MASTER SERVER for distribution content *worldwide*... You can post no evidence that microsoft was the "maintainer" or "master server" for the posts in these (microsoft.public) newsgroups. If that was true, then any posts made via external servers would have to show up first on the microsoft server, and the PATH of those posts would have to indicate that they were sourced or routed through microsoft's server. And Microsoft could excercise some degree of moderation or censorship if that were the case. Microsoft could identify certain posters (or be made aware of them) and simply prevent their posts from propagating out of their "master" server once it receives those posts. But none of that happens. Microsoft is a PEER in this context, as all usenet servers are peers with each other. You are reluctant to admit this, because you somehow want to believe that Microsoft holds some authoritative role over the microsoft.public hierarchy of usenet newsgroups. This reluctance blinds you to having a true understanding of how usenet works, how servers peer with each other, and how posts are propagated between peers. I have copied this post to alt.free.newsservers and news.admin.misc for others to comment on your technical understanding of this situation. Dimwit, this is a first, at least from my experience, this has NEVER occurred before... are *YOU* going supply the servers AND staff to maintain the _entire_ microsoft.public hierarchy? No, I thought not... And they can comment on that as well. Apparently, "MEB" doesn't understand *propagated* on Usenet. ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
multiple VNC servers behind ICS | Ogg | Networking | 0 | October 11th 06 03:40 AM |
Can't retreive email from servers | mrc121 | Setup & Installation | 1 | February 11th 05 01:28 PM |
Print Servers | hawk | Networking | 5 | June 27th 04 06:08 PM |
Cannot Browse Network Servers | Bill | Networking | 0 | June 25th 04 12:41 AM |