If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quantative Measure of People Still Using 98?
This presents a legitimate question for software developers
updating their programs. To my recollection, the last 98 computer was sold in 2001. That would make the last sold computer seven years old. You would think that the number of such systems still around would be near zero. Yet, anecdotally, lots of 98 users seem to be around. They speak up on newsgroups and forums. They still seem to like their systems and boast of not changing their operating systems. Still having a ten year old operating system does reflect some sophistication of computer skills. I have long wondered if there is any reliable quantitative measure of continuing 98 users. Various measures surface from time to time most all of which seem to raise doubts of the accuracy of the numbers and the interests of who is publishing them. The question of what portion of the universe the numbers reflect always seems problematic. I recently came across a measure, that while hardly perfect, appears to be objective, not subject to anyone's special influence, and relevant to the issue. I found on the Guliverkli2 site counts of downloads of win98 files and winxp versions at https://sourceforge.net/project/show..._id=205650&pac kage_id=246121&release_id=541232 and https://sourceforge.net/project/show..._id=205650&pac kage_id=245753&release_id=540363 While the absolute numbers might be problematic, the proportion of win 98 to win xp users would seem to be significant as an approximate measure of a continuing 98 user base for purposes of software developers of similar programs. The first program was Media Player Classic 6.4.9.1. This is an excellent program that puts its developers in the software hall of fame. It plays lots of files well. The download counts are 98 15,417 (12%) xp 100,239 (88%) There is nothing special about this program for 98. Other similar programs, zoom player and vlc player, too run on 98. The other page was for directvobsub. The numbers were 98 2,053 (24%) xp 6,568 (76%) The fact that 12% of the persons downloading the win 98 version of the program, a OS version not sold commercially in seven years, would indicate a still significant base of sophisticated users keeping their software current consistent with the number of 98 users raising their voice on news groups and forums. This would contradict the claim heard from the Pacific Northwest that no one uses 98 any more. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quantative Measure of People Still Using 98?
There is nothing special about this program for 98. Other similar programs, zoom player and vlc player, too run on 98. that may be so smithy,, but i d/loaded vlc player using 98se and Still cant get it to work! something about an 'error' and 'file missing' blah blah... if you got any tips on how to make it work, i'm all fingers and toes... (ears) 5strings (one short) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quantative Measure of People Still Using 98?
"Smith" wrote in message
... To my recollection, the last 98 computer was sold in 2001. That would make the last sold computer seven years old. You would think that the number of such systems still around would be near zero. The last Win98 PC I bought new was custom-built to my specifications in July 2004. Reasons for this included hardware and software; e.g. my WP is Borland Sprint, an MS-DOS implementation of Emacs, that requires a DOS-capable printer. (Some manufacturers e.g. Brother still offer DOS-capable printers.) The PC hardware and software markets were focussed a decade ago on security (firewalls, antivirus screens etc.) and secondarily multiple functions in office applications. (E.g. office word processors now are configured for fancy printing, watermarks etc., and to borrow tabular data from related software; this makes the software bulky and slow although, when writing a legal brief or a student essay, we do not need fancy printing etc.) The market has changed in two respects. It now emphasizes security less (because security apps are now built into the Operating System and processing power maintains operating speed) and instead offers multimedia entertainment (TV and music via Internet.) Entertainment software has improved enormously in the last decade (and is supported by hardware improvements) but changes in office software are largely cosmetic. Planned obsolence appears to characterize the market in the 21st century in ways not done in the 20th, probably because of collapsing prices. My first three PCs, 1983 to about 1993, each cost new close too $2500. (This generated a useful rule when planning to upgrade: first design a dream machine, then watch component prices so as to buy when the total cost fell to $2500.) But my fourth and fifth cost less than $1000 each. Most recently I bought (used) one year ago a complete WinXP PC (1.5 GHz, 512 Mb RAM, 40 Gb HDD) for $125 including an excellent 22" monitor, now networked wireless with my 2.8 GHz WinXP PC (new 2004.) Appropriate hardware and software meets all my current functional needs. Functionalism is prima facie not the way the market works, but we can leave to philosophers market directions (pop music and role-playing games) and market prices (willingly paid by office IT purchasers, i.e. spending other peoples' money.) Yes, I sometimes buy toys too, if they seem to be functional as well, so have an eye on the irresistibly cute Eee, perhaps for Christmas . . . -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quantative Measure of People Still Using 98?
There are still quite a few 98 users out there but many may not be hooked up
to the Internet or hook up only to get drivers. I say this with pride while posting in Microsoft Windows 98 Second Edition. I also use XP Professional Service Pack 3 with this dual-boot computer, briefly dabbled with Ubuntu Linux and plan to work with it more in the future and have a generic run of the mill Toshiba Windows Vista Laptop that is now being repaired by Toshiba because of hardware issues including faulty biometrics that kept messing up. The Real or should I say Reel movies -- grin Deal is this -- do you want to use Windows 9x consumer source code, Windows NT business source code, Unix/Linux, etc. and what is the flavor of os's you prefer and why. In addition, how will you protect and safeguard 9x through use of 3rd party software like Mozilla Firefox and SpywareBlaster. BTW, Chris Quirke, mvp from Africa understands the internal safety of 9x and the external security of NT. You can just "Google" his name for Chris's Blog and other interesting stuff. "Smith" wrote: This presents a legitimate question for software developers updating their programs. To my recollection, the last 98 computer was sold in 2001. That would make the last sold computer seven years old. You would think that the number of such systems still around would be near zero. Yet, anecdotally, lots of 98 users seem to be around. They speak up on newsgroups and forums. They still seem to like their systems and boast of not changing their operating systems. Still having a ten year old operating system does reflect some sophistication of computer skills. I have long wondered if there is any reliable quantitative measure of continuing 98 users. Various measures surface from time to time most all of which seem to raise doubts of the accuracy of the numbers and the interests of who is publishing them. The question of what portion of the universe the numbers reflect always seems problematic. I recently came across a measure, that while hardly perfect, appears to be objective, not subject to anyone's special influence, and relevant to the issue. I found on the Guliverkli2 site counts of downloads of win98 files and winxp versions at https://sourceforge.net/project/show..._id=205650&pac kage_id=246121&release_id=541232 and https://sourceforge.net/project/show..._id=205650&pac kage_id=245753&release_id=540363 While the absolute numbers might be problematic, the proportion of win 98 to win xp users would seem to be significant as an approximate measure of a continuing 98 user base for purposes of software developers of similar programs. The first program was Media Player Classic 6.4.9.1. This is an excellent program that puts its developers in the software hall of fame. It plays lots of files well. The download counts are 98 15,417 (12%) xp 100,239 (88%) There is nothing special about this program for 98. Other similar programs, zoom player and vlc player, too run on 98. The other page was for directvobsub. The numbers were 98 2,053 (24%) xp 6,568 (76%) The fact that 12% of the persons downloading the win 98 version of the program, a OS version not sold commercially in seven years, would indicate a still significant base of sophisticated users keeping their software current consistent with the number of 98 users raising their voice on news groups and forums. This would contradict the claim heard from the Pacific Northwest that no one uses 98 any more. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quantative Measure of People Still Using 98?
Smith wrote in
: This presents a legitimate question for software developers updating their programs. To my recollection, the last 98 computer was sold in 2001. That would make the last sold computer seven years old. You would think that the number of such systems still around would be near zero. SNIP I am doing this on a 166MHz / 96MB RAM made in Sept. 97 running Win95B. With a 33.6 modem. I am certain that it is faster than any Vista machine at basic computing tasks, although it obviously can not do video editing, and a music format conversion takes about 5 hrs for a 4 minute song, nor can it play games at 1600x1200 150 fps, but aside from that, it works perfectly and never crashes. Not to mention I NEVER have to upgrade or patch ANYTHING. Because I do a lot of music stuff, I bought a 2002 (2003?) used 2GHz/256MB RAM Compaq EVO D510 which originally had XP pro on it (still has the license sticker) but came with a wiped HD which checked out "factory new". I put 98SELite on it. It is not connected to the internet. It does everything I could possibly want to do. I have been lucky in that it is working perfectly so far as well. But it is apparently a pretty good Compaq, good components and was quite expensive when new. -- [from a recent conversation] thanatoid: So why did you decide you needed broadband? Neighbor: I wanted to read my e-mail faster. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quantative Measure of People Still Using 98?
"gibson" wrote in
: There is nothing special about this program for 98. Other similar programs, zoom player and vlc player, too run on 98. that may be so smithy,, but i d/loaded vlc player using 98se and Still cant get it to work! something about an 'error' and 'file missing' blah blah... if you got any tips on how to make it work, i'm all fingers and toes... (ears) 5strings (one short) I don't get the 5 strings thing. If you broke a guitar string, you replace it! Anyway... There is a file called unicows.dll. I believe it is an exe (IIRC, contains a second file, unicows.pdb), and the installer puts them somewhere. If it doesn't put them in the VLC directory, move them there. It has to be downloaded separately, it does not (to my recollection) come with the VLC package, but it is avail. on the same site (and presumably many driver sites). I installed VLC a couple of years ago, but I imagine this is the same problem - which I was able to resolve by reading the info ;-) Let me know if this helped. -- [from a recent conversation] thanatoid: So why did you decide you needed broadband? Neighbor: I wanted to read my e-mail faster. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quantative Measure of People Still Using 98?
Thanks Don and I see that as part of the problem nowadays because solutions
are built into software rather than hardware. The issue is that software is easier to manipulate and break than hardware. For example, in a cell phone, a hacker may send the user's phone a baddie to annihilate the user's cell phone. I am not pleased that current phones unlike let us say older Motorola cell phones allow you to reprogram the cell phone using let us say *228 and then default the user back to the default duh password thus allowing the hacking of the cell phone to proceed if the remote hacker knows the default not to hard to guess usually--- many times the last 4 digits of the cell phone password. Security and Safety with wireless really is a big joke to me and makes me laugh and not just with cell phones but also wireless corded phones. It just takes the proper equipment monitoring the proper frequency to jam, disrupt and cause issues for the end user. Nowadays, even with a corded phone, I suggest to users to use a DSL filter to filter out interference in the phone lines and potential problems. The entire industry at least here in the U.S.A. has gotten away from the internal safety model and are relying on external security much to the stupidity of the entire industry in the States. I will not go into any more proof of concept code but let it be known that it is being done know and the only reason I am writing this is to hopefully wake up the industry so that the electronics industry gets a new clue as to the problem facing users and itself. BTW, this was bound to happen and I am so thankful to Dan K. and his research with DNS Pollution so hopefully now Apple, AT&T, Verizon Wireless, Verizon, etc. can Wake Up and Smell the Coffee shall we say and get with the program of not tying software as one and keeping it seperate. The important part about history is to learn from it and use what works in the past in the present. Let us hopefully not be so dumb as a nation, in the States and also the world that we just have an open door policy to hackers with their strong computers and bot networks. this could be posted in microsoft.public.security but is not since I have no desire for a 40+ debate this time around Finally, the responsiblity must fall on everyone: 1. The End User 2. The Software Maker 3. The Hardware Maker 4. Everyone Else "Don Phillipson" wrote: "Smith" wrote in message ... To my recollection, the last 98 computer was sold in 2001. That would make the last sold computer seven years old. You would think that the number of such systems still around would be near zero. The last Win98 PC I bought new was custom-built to my specifications in July 2004. Reasons for this included hardware and software; e.g. my WP is Borland Sprint, an MS-DOS implementation of Emacs, that requires a DOS-capable printer. (Some manufacturers e.g. Brother still offer DOS-capable printers.) The PC hardware and software markets were focussed a decade ago on security (firewalls, antivirus screens etc.) and secondarily multiple functions in office applications. (E.g. office word processors now are configured for fancy printing, watermarks etc., and to borrow tabular data from related software; this makes the software bulky and slow although, when writing a legal brief or a student essay, we do not need fancy printing etc.) The market has changed in two respects. It now emphasizes security less (because security apps are now built into the Operating System and processing power maintains operating speed) and instead offers multimedia entertainment (TV and music via Internet.) Entertainment software has improved enormously in the last decade (and is supported by hardware improvements) but changes in office software are largely cosmetic. Planned obsolence appears to characterize the market in the 21st century in ways not done in the 20th, probably because of collapsing prices. My first three PCs, 1983 to about 1993, each cost new close too $2500. (This generated a useful rule when planning to upgrade: first design a dream machine, then watch component prices so as to buy when the total cost fell to $2500.) But my fourth and fifth cost less than $1000 each. Most recently I bought (used) one year ago a complete WinXP PC (1.5 GHz, 512 Mb RAM, 40 Gb HDD) for $125 including an excellent 22" monitor, now networked wireless with my 2.8 GHz WinXP PC (new 2004.) Appropriate hardware and software meets all my current functional needs. Functionalism is prima facie not the way the market works, but we can leave to philosophers market directions (pop music and role-playing games) and market prices (willingly paid by office IT purchasers, i.e. spending other peoples' money.) Yes, I sometimes buy toys too, if they seem to be functional as well, so have an eye on the irresistibly cute Eee, perhaps for Christmas . . . -- Don Phillipson Carlsbad Springs (Ottawa, Canada) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quantative Measure of People Still Using 98?
"thanatoid" wrote in message ... "gibson" wrote in : There is nothing special about this program for 98. Other similar programs, zoom player and vlc player, too run on 98. that may be so smithy,, but i d/loaded vlc player using 98se and Still cant get it to work! something about an 'error' and 'file missing' blah blah... if you got any tips on how to make it work, i'm all fingers and toes... (ears) 5strings (one short) I don't get the 5 strings thing. If you broke a guitar string, you replace it! I'm going to see John Pizzarelli in a few weeks he plays a 7 string guitar~ Not too many of those maybe he can spare one Anyway... There is a file called unicows.dll. I believe it is an exe (IIRC, contains a second file, unicows.pdb), and the installer puts them somewhere. If it doesn't put them in the VLC directory, move them there. It has to be downloaded separately, it does not (to my recollection) come with the VLC package, but it is avail. on the same site (and presumably many driver sites). I installed VLC a couple of years ago, but I imagine this is the same problem - which I was able to resolve by reading the info ;-) Let me know if this helped. -- [from a recent conversation] thanatoid: So why did you decide you needed broadband? Neighbor: I wanted to read my e-mail faster. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Quantative Measure of People Still Using 98?
Show me where those statistics are publicly displayed, please.
-- Gary S. Terhune MS-MVP Shell/User http://grystmill.com "Smith" wrote in message ... This presents a legitimate question for software developers updating their programs. To my recollection, the last 98 computer was sold in 2001. That would make the last sold computer seven years old. You would think that the number of such systems still around would be near zero. Yet, anecdotally, lots of 98 users seem to be around. They speak up on newsgroups and forums. They still seem to like their systems and boast of not changing their operating systems. Still having a ten year old operating system does reflect some sophistication of computer skills. I have long wondered if there is any reliable quantitative measure of continuing 98 users. Various measures surface from time to time most all of which seem to raise doubts of the accuracy of the numbers and the interests of who is publishing them. The question of what portion of the universe the numbers reflect always seems problematic. I recently came across a measure, that while hardly perfect, appears to be objective, not subject to anyone's special influence, and relevant to the issue. I found on the Guliverkli2 site counts of downloads of win98 files and winxp versions at https://sourceforge.net/project/show..._id=205650&pac kage_id=246121&release_id=541232 and https://sourceforge.net/project/show..._id=205650&pac kage_id=245753&release_id=540363 While the absolute numbers might be problematic, the proportion of win 98 to win xp users would seem to be significant as an approximate measure of a continuing 98 user base for purposes of software developers of similar programs. The first program was Media Player Classic 6.4.9.1. This is an excellent program that puts its developers in the software hall of fame. It plays lots of files well. The download counts are 98 15,417 (12%) xp 100,239 (88%) There is nothing special about this program for 98. Other similar programs, zoom player and vlc player, too run on 98. The other page was for directvobsub. The numbers were 98 2,053 (24%) xp 6,568 (76%) The fact that 12% of the persons downloading the win 98 version of the program, a OS version not sold commercially in seven years, would indicate a still significant base of sophisticated users keeping their software current consistent with the number of 98 users raising their voice on news groups and forums. This would contradict the claim heard from the Pacific Northwest that no one uses 98 any more. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quantative Measure of People Still Using 98?
"philo" wrote in
: "thanatoid" wrote in message ... "gibson" wrote in : There is nothing special about this program for 98. Other similar programs, zoom player and vlc player, too run on 98. that may be so smithy,, but i d/loaded vlc player using 98se and Still cant get it to work! something about an 'error' and 'file missing' blah blah... if you got any tips on how to make it work, i'm all fingers and toes... (ears) 5strings (one short) I don't get the 5 strings thing. If you broke a guitar string, you replace it! I'm going to see John Pizzarelli in a few weeks he plays a 7 string guitar~ Not too many of those maybe he can spare one Hey Philo, you probably will not believe this, but I /was/ actually going to say that "of course, there ARE some guitars that have 7 strings..." Honest! t. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why some people still use 98. | Smith | General | 2 | June 25th 08 01:51 PM |
FYI: I have noticed many people want MS-DOS in XP | Dan | General | 8 | April 2nd 06 10:28 PM |
why not people come from chinese? | peifengjiang | Disk Drives | 0 | March 25th 06 03:03 PM |
Maybe 98 people can help teacher | joe16 | General | 0 | December 14th 04 06:03 AM |
~7583836889.TMP (Yes, people, another one....) | Mitch D. | General | 2 | June 27th 04 02:34 PM |