If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is the web-based interface to the microsoft.public groups working?
I was on this page:
http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx and I selected (expanded) the microsoft.public.win98 tree (on the left side), and then went back (scrolled down) to select microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion and after a minute or two I get this: -------------- Service Temporarily Unavailable We apologize for this inconvenience. Please try again later. --------------- I got this last night, and I'm getting it again just now. Is there some other way to bring up the microsoft web-interface to this group? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is the web-based interface to the microsoft.public groups working?
YES Start here!
http://connect.microsoft.com/MicrosoftForums/ Poor UseNet "98 Guy" wrote in message ... I was on this page: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx and I selected (expanded) the microsoft.public.win98 tree (on the left side), and then went back (scrolled down) to select microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion and after a minute or two I get this: -------------- Service Temporarily Unavailable We apologize for this inconvenience. Please try again later. --------------- I got this last night, and I'm getting it again just now. Is there some other way to bring up the microsoft web-interface to this group? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is the web-based interface to the microsoft.public groups working?
YES Start here! http://connect.microsoft.com/MicrosoftForums/ Poor UseNet "98 Guy" wrote in message ... I was on this page: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx and I selected (expanded) the microsoft.public.win98 tree (on the left side), and then went back (scrolled down) to select microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion and after a minute or two I get this: -------------- Service Temporarily Unavailable We apologize for this inconvenience. Please try again later. --------------- I got this last night, and I'm getting it again just now. Is there some other way to bring up the microsoft web-interface to this group? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is the web-based interface to the microsoft.public groups working?
Hot-text wrote:
YES Start here! http://connect.microsoft.com/MicrosoftForums/ So is this web-interface now dead: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx ??? Where (or how) can I read this newsgroup on Microsoft using a web browser right now? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is the web-based interface to the microsoft.public groups working?
Hot-text wrote:
YES Start here! http://connect.microsoft.com/MicrosoftForums/ So is this web-interface now dead: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx ??? Where (or how) can I read this newsgroup on Microsoft using a web browser right now? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is the web-based interface to the microsoft.public groups working?
On 05/10/2010 09:45 AM, 98 Guy wrote:
Hot-text wrote: YES Start here! http://connect.microsoft.com/MicrosoftForums/ So is this web-interface now dead: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx ??? Where (or how) can I read this newsgroup on Microsoft using a web browser right now? Using that particular interface is not apparently going to work. You, 98 Guy, received and commented [some in a semi-acceptable fashion and some not] on the official notice(s) from Microsoft pursuant the closing of the NNTP service and interface, that includes the web entry point into the forum and its NNTP service; apparently the web interface is now closed or being otherwise worked on, perhaps for redirection purposes. You shouldn't need that explained to you. It MAY also have something to do with the "proxy"/software that needs installed. Additionally, "cloud" is being instituted and other methods within Microsoft products, so there are aspects involved/for consideration. THE BELOW IS NOT OFFICIAL, but what appears to be happening. It is merely an attempt at explanation as it appears to me, and opinion per the future/any continuance: As noted within the official Notice from Microsoft, the groups Microsoft intends to continue are being converted into forums within its communities unless there is already a comparable group offered. This may take some time to accomplish as there are hundreds to do, and numerous are redundant. Those which already have similar groups, such as security issues, Office issues, networking, and similar, are being directed towards the community forums and there-through, towards those comparable groups. Other legacy products appear to presently be in-limbo, such as the OSs Windows 2000 and Windows 98, and similar. Whether Microsoft chooses to continue these or provide comparable community groups is something Microsoft is presently determining and working through [as noted in the official Notices]. Personally, I see no reason Microsoft shouldn't provide SOMETHING pursuant these in its communities. It would certainly not be an indication of continued official "support" but as per these public NNTP services, merely "user" support within Microsoft's communities. It can/could be handled [for legal purposes] in the same fashion as Microsoft has handled its old articles, TechNet inclusions, etc., which deal with legacy products; or others have done elsewhere; such as: by a "sticky" Notice, pop-over, or click through, or other simple similar inclusion within the legacy group, for instance, a page header inclusion noting Microsoft's policy statement {as in "Notice: This is not official Microsoft support" or similar} pursuant the reason for and indicating these were NOT official support but provided for the "user" community [a PR issue]. The groups are and/or could be moderated, so there would be no apparent reason not to include legacy products, as the moderator(s) could, if necessary, direct to Microsoft's policy/statement and Product Support page if/when necessary. Moreover, this would also likely help keep those legacy product users from searching elsewhere for information and likely running across the very things Microsoft does not want, cracks, keys, pirated software, and similar. Of course that's just my opinion. As previously noted by Microsoft, official Notice from Microsoft will be placed within the public NNTP groups pursuant the official date of closing that segment/group. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is the web-based interface to the microsoft.public groups working?
On 05/10/2010 09:45 AM, 98 Guy wrote:
Hot-text wrote: YES Start here! http://connect.microsoft.com/MicrosoftForums/ So is this web-interface now dead: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx ??? Where (or how) can I read this newsgroup on Microsoft using a web browser right now? Using that particular interface is not apparently going to work. You, 98 Guy, received and commented [some in a semi-acceptable fashion and some not] on the official notice(s) from Microsoft pursuant the closing of the NNTP service and interface, that includes the web entry point into the forum and its NNTP service; apparently the web interface is now closed or being otherwise worked on, perhaps for redirection purposes. You shouldn't need that explained to you. It MAY also have something to do with the "proxy"/software that needs installed. Additionally, "cloud" is being instituted and other methods within Microsoft products, so there are aspects involved/for consideration. THE BELOW IS NOT OFFICIAL, but what appears to be happening. It is merely an attempt at explanation as it appears to me, and opinion per the future/any continuance: As noted within the official Notice from Microsoft, the groups Microsoft intends to continue are being converted into forums within its communities unless there is already a comparable group offered. This may take some time to accomplish as there are hundreds to do, and numerous are redundant. Those which already have similar groups, such as security issues, Office issues, networking, and similar, are being directed towards the community forums and there-through, towards those comparable groups. Other legacy products appear to presently be in-limbo, such as the OSs Windows 2000 and Windows 98, and similar. Whether Microsoft chooses to continue these or provide comparable community groups is something Microsoft is presently determining and working through [as noted in the official Notices]. Personally, I see no reason Microsoft shouldn't provide SOMETHING pursuant these in its communities. It would certainly not be an indication of continued official "support" but as per these public NNTP services, merely "user" support within Microsoft's communities. It can/could be handled [for legal purposes] in the same fashion as Microsoft has handled its old articles, TechNet inclusions, etc., which deal with legacy products; or others have done elsewhere; such as: by a "sticky" Notice, pop-over, or click through, or other simple similar inclusion within the legacy group, for instance, a page header inclusion noting Microsoft's policy statement {as in "Notice: This is not official Microsoft support" or similar} pursuant the reason for and indicating these were NOT official support but provided for the "user" community [a PR issue]. The groups are and/or could be moderated, so there would be no apparent reason not to include legacy products, as the moderator(s) could, if necessary, direct to Microsoft's policy/statement and Product Support page if/when necessary. Moreover, this would also likely help keep those legacy product users from searching elsewhere for information and likely running across the very things Microsoft does not want, cracks, keys, pirated software, and similar. Of course that's just my opinion. As previously noted by Microsoft, official Notice from Microsoft will be placed within the public NNTP groups pursuant the official date of closing that segment/group. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is the web-based interface to the microsoft.public groups working?
rant
Web-based access to these newsgroups (i.e., via http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx) is not dead, at least not literally...yet. That being said, the dependability/reliability of web-based access to these newsgroups is iffy at best and has been for over a year now (primarily due to staffing/budget cuts IMHO). For example, I wasn't able to access any newsgroups (e.g., http://www.microsoft.com/communities...orer. general) via the web-interface this past weekend...and usually on any weekend. And I note that no one on the team responsible for keeping these newsgroups up & running works weekends or holidays now. /rant |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is the web-based interface to the microsoft.public groups working?
rant
Web-based access to these newsgroups (i.e., via http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx) is not dead, at least not literally...yet. That being said, the dependability/reliability of web-based access to these newsgroups is iffy at best and has been for over a year now (primarily due to staffing/budget cuts IMHO). For example, I wasn't able to access any newsgroups (e.g., http://www.microsoft.com/communities...orer. general) via the web-interface this past weekend...and usually on any weekend. And I note that no one on the team responsible for keeping these newsgroups up & running works weekends or holidays now. /rant |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is the web-based interface to the microsoft.public groups working?
On 05/10/2010 02:38 PM, PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:
rant Web-based access to these newsgroups (i.e., via http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx) is not dead, at least not literally...yet. That being said, the dependability/reliability of web-based access to these newsgroups is iffy at best and has been for over a year now (primarily due to staffing/budget cuts IMHO). For example, I wasn't able to access any newsgroups (e.g., http://www.microsoft.com/communities...orer. general) via the web-interface this past weekend...and usually on any weekend. And I note that no one on the team responsible for keeping these newsgroups up & running works weekends or holidays now. /rant Whoa, cuts everywhere then... so Microsoft has now seen the effects of the market and financial rip-off. So let's see, that means the people should have a major someone on their side now... ah yeah... You must be right, the access seems to be available at the moment... musta forgot to leave the electric on to the server... -- MEB |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Microsoft has removed 500+ groups, including 21 Windows-98 groups | 98 Guy | General | 165 | December 28th 09 05:21 AM |
post on microsoft.public.windowsme.setup | Alan Edwards | Setup & Installation | 1 | July 31st 09 08:14 AM |
revised microsoft.public.win98.performance charter | [email protected] | Improving Performance | 2 | January 7th 06 09:13 PM |
dear microsoft.public.win98.disks.general readers | [email protected] | Disk Drives | 0 | September 1st 05 10:39 AM |
dear microsoft.public.windowsme.general readers | [email protected] | General | 0 | September 1st 05 10:38 AM |