A Windows 98 & ME forum. Win98banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Win98banter forum » Windows ME » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

firewall/router question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old October 9th 08, 04:36 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
bagger
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 21
Default firewall/router question

Routers with NAT are
invariably better than most firewalls at blocking intrusions and at the
same time relieve the load on the local system.

Any suggestions on a router for an old computer on a cable modem?
  #12  
Old October 9th 08, 05:52 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
Heather
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 781
Default firewall/router question

Cuz it interfered with Pogo!! IIRC. I just run with the XP firewall.
It tests out better on GRC's website than the router. I also had ZA and
I like the fact it catches outgoing stuff.....but it is also disabled.

And the root canal was beyond horrendous!!!!! My gorgeous new dentist
(Dr. McDreamy) was quite upset at the pain I was in. We discussed
calling it quits and me going to a specialist to be totally
anaesthetized, but between my Ativan and his Nitrous Oxide and me
allowing him *just one more try* at getting to the nerve, he got there.

Seems the nerve was horribly inflamed (not infected) and he had to
literately get to it in order to freeze it. It also seems that merely
freezing me up to my eyeballs does not always get down into the
nerve......I never want to go thru that again!! I have had at least 6
root canals over the years and never, ever has one hurt one IOTA!!

I hate getting OLD!! My body is falling apart, lol. Mind you, he said
"you have one hell of a pain tolerance".....yeah, yippee!!

Figgs


"Joan Archer" wrote in message
...
If you had it working then, why did you stop using it ?
Joan

--
Joan Archer
http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
http://lachsoft.com/photogallery

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"David H. Lipman" wrote in message
...


You have two IP addresses. One on the LAN side of the Router and
one on the Internet (WAN) side of the Router.

The translation between WAN and LAN addreses is what the Router
does. This is the nature of of NAT as well.

I shall have to pick your collective brains later. I still have that
blasted D-Link Wireless router sitting here NOT connected up. I
don't have one clue on this piece of junk and need to put it on
before Elayne comes. I did manage to get it working 2 Christmases
ago, but don't know how. It is a model DI-764, I believe.

Night.....root canal in the morning......wahhhhhh!!

Figgs



  #13  
Old October 9th 08, 06:02 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
richard
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 125
Default firewall/router question

Mike,

Perfectly clear now. Thank you.

Mike M wrote:
Richard,

As I explained in my original post and again by David, your router has
one IP address that is outward facing, that is on the internet or WAN
side (in your case one in the 67.172 range) and your PC and everything
on your side (LAN side) of the router (including the router itself) has
an address in the private range 192.168.x.x. Note that addresses in the
192.168 range are what are called private addresses and non routable
over the internet, the same is true for those in the 10.x.x.x and
172.16.xx - 172.31.255.255 ranges. That is any traffic sent to such an
address on the internet will not go further than the first router it
encounters. When traffic hits your router from the internet your router
then translates the address to an internal address and forwards the
packet (hence the NAT) or drops the packet if it had not been requested
by your system (the firewall effect).

  #14  
Old October 9th 08, 09:40 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
Joan Archer[_2_]
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 83
Default firewall/router question

Ouch I feel for you and sorry but my pain level is not that high, not that I
have to worry about that had all mine out in my early twenties g Not a
pretty site for a young girl, toothless vbg

Mind you if that dentist was that dreamy I don't suppose you noticed you
naughty girl g

Know what you mean about getting old, trouble is my mind still tells me I
should be doing this that and the other but my body wont let me, I do try
though honest g

You take it easy and hope you're feeling better soon.

--
Joan Archer
http://www.freewebs.com/crossstitcher
http://lachsoft.com/photogallery

"Heather" wrote in message
...
Cuz it interfered with Pogo!! IIRC. I just run with the XP firewall. It
tests out better on GRC's website than the router. I also had ZA and I
like the fact it catches outgoing stuff.....but it is also disabled.

And the root canal was beyond horrendous!!!!! My gorgeous new dentist
(Dr. McDreamy) was quite upset at the pain I was in. We discussed calling
it quits and me going to a specialist to be totally anaesthetized, but
between my Ativan and his Nitrous Oxide and me allowing him *just one more
try* at getting to the nerve, he got there.

Seems the nerve was horribly inflamed (not infected) and he had to
literately get to it in order to freeze it. It also seems that merely
freezing me up to my eyeballs does not always get down into the
nerve......I never want to go thru that again!! I have had at least 6
root canals over the years and never, ever has one hurt one IOTA!!

I hate getting OLD!! My body is falling apart, lol. Mind you, he said
"you have one hell of a pain tolerance".....yeah, yippee!!

Figgs




  #15  
Old October 9th 08, 10:16 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
David H. Lipman
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 365
Default firewall/router question

From: "bagger"

Routers with NAT are

| invariably better than most firewalls at blocking intrusions and at the
| same time relieve the load on the local system.

| Any suggestions on a router for an old computer on a cable modem?

Linksys BEFSR41

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


  #16  
Old October 10th 08, 01:18 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
bagger
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 21
Default firewall/router question

Thanks, I have ordered that model.

"David H. Lipman" wrote:

From: "bagger"

Routers with NAT are

| invariably better than most firewalls at blocking intrusions and at the
| same time relieve the load on the local system.

| Any suggestions on a router for an old computer on a cable modem?

Linksys BEFSR41

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
EZ Firewall question MedRxMan General 8 July 10th 05 03:39 AM
ZoneAlarm missing Firewall Zones tab for subnet. New NAT router won't show Entire Network. Networking 5 July 5th 04 09:48 AM
ZoneAlarm missing Firewall Zones tab for subnet. New NAT router won't show Entire Network. Networking 5 July 5th 04 09:48 AM
cable modem/router question sf General 31 June 30th 04 08:05 AM
d-link router/zonealarm firewall Donna General 1 June 10th 04 04:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Win98banter.
The comments are property of their posters.