Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook

On 02/26/2010 09:08 AM, 98 Guy wrote:
HenryX wrote:

Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance
Handbook

U.S. Domestic Version March 2008

This document details exactly what user information is
logged or captured for the above services that is available
for disclosure to any level of Law Enforcement Agency.

This document is available he
http://jya.com/microsoft-spy.zip

Many thanks to 98 Guy for posting this here. Since I don't
use any M$ products but Win 98, this is the only M$ group I
regularly access. I am glad it was posted here.

It is worthwhile to see actual facts, not speculation, on
exactly what M$ does and provides.

Your welcome.

Hey, guys, why not discuss Oracle, Adobe, Sun, Cisco, and all these
others which are doing the same...

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

Here a ProGramMer'S Tips for you!

It's all products not just Mic ro soft!

For the xml Java Apple fall upon Linux Too!
That Big Bother looking out for you!
He have to keep a eye on you in all the Newsgroups and E-mail you send !
He have to look at all the word, yes word by word with a KeyWord description
list Software!
He need to know if you are in Good Group!
For Group He look for Hmm
One + One = One Group not Two!

For Big Bother love his Apples!



"HenryX" wrote in message
...
98 Guy wrote in :

Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance
Handbook

U.S. Domestic Version March 2008

Microsoft Confidential For Law Enforcement Use Only

This document describes the following services:

E-mail Services Authentication Service: Windows Live ID
Instant Messaging: Windows Live Messenger Social Networking
Services: Windows Live Spaces & MSN Groups Custom Domains:
Windows Live Admin Center & Office Live Small Business
Online File Storage: Office Live Workspace & Windows Live
SkyDrive Gaming: Xbox Live

This document details exactly what user information is
logged or captured for the above services that is available
for disclosure to any level of Law Enforcement Agency.

This document is available he
http://jya.com/microsoft-spy.zip

More information about this document can be found he

http://cryptome.org/

Many thanks to 98 Guy for posting this here. Since I don't
use any M$ products but Win 98, this is the only M$ group I
regularly access. I am glad it was posted here.

It is worthwhile to see actual facts, not speculation, on
exactly what M$ does and provides.

Here a ProGramMer'S Tips for you!

It's all products not just Mic ro soft!

For the xml Java Apple fall upon Linux Too!
That Big Bother looking out for you!
He have to keep a eye on you in all the Newsgroups and E-mail you send !
He have to look at all the word, yes word by word with a KeyWord description
list Software!
He need to know if you are in Good Group!
For Group He look for Hmm
One + One = One Group not Two!

For Big Bother love his Apples!



"HenryX" wrote in message
...
98 Guy wrote in :

Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance
Handbook

U.S. Domestic Version March 2008

Microsoft Confidential For Law Enforcement Use Only

This document describes the following services:

E-mail Services Authentication Service: Windows Live ID
Instant Messaging: Windows Live Messenger Social Networking
Services: Windows Live Spaces & MSN Groups Custom Domains:
Windows Live Admin Center & Office Live Small Business
Online File Storage: Office Live Workspace & Windows Live
SkyDrive Gaming: Xbox Live

This document details exactly what user information is
logged or captured for the above services that is available
for disclosure to any level of Law Enforcement Agency.

This document is available he
http://jya.com/microsoft-spy.zip

More information about this document can be found he

http://cryptome.org/

Many thanks to 98 Guy for posting this here. Since I don't
use any M$ products but Win 98, this is the only M$ group I
regularly access. I am glad it was posted here.

It is worthwhile to see actual facts, not speculation, on
exactly what M$ does and provides.

MEB wrote:

Why did you feel it necessary to try to immediately hijack this
thread and turn it to a different subject? Did you feel the
need to trump me by posting what you think is more important
or significant information?

And I'll now use your own argument against you: You posting
information relating to botnets shows you have no scope of
the world and what has been going on for years.
How does that fit?

What MEB is about to post in response is a foamy, disconnected ramble
that has no logical or coherent linkage to the material being discussed:

Because per usual with fools like you, that YOU can understand
WHAT Microsoft does with that information, WHY it has done so,
WHEN that information might be used, and THAT it isn't
concerned with parties UNLESS they are engaged in *criminal*
activity.

I make or made no judgement call with regard to Micro$haft and their
information policy which I posted a link to. I made no inference or
value judgements as to why they have such a policy, how they use it,
when they use it, etc.

Why did my posting a link to their policy affect you so much that you
feel you needed to defend it?

Why did it personally affect you such that you came to Microsoft's
defence and post what you feel to be a statement supporting the fact
that they have such an information disclosure policy?

Is it your love or admiration for Microsoft that caused you to react
like this?

Your strange tangent continues:

Just like every society where all of us live, presuming
you aren't actually physically dead, since you appear to
be BRAIN DEAD.

Is it important for you Maurice to feel that you're part of society?
That you have friends? That you are respected? That others pay
attention to and value what you write?

You speak of death and of being dead. Is it because you fear death?
Perhaps you fear dying alone? Is that why you combine these concepts of
mortality and society?

MEB wrote:

Why did you feel it necessary to try to immediately hijack this
thread and turn it to a different subject? Did you feel the
need to trump me by posting what you think is more important
or significant information?

And I'll now use your own argument against you: You posting
information relating to botnets shows you have no scope of
the world and what has been going on for years.
How does that fit?

What MEB is about to post in response is a foamy, disconnected ramble
that has no logical or coherent linkage to the material being discussed:

Because per usual with fools like you, that YOU can understand
WHAT Microsoft does with that information, WHY it has done so,
WHEN that information might be used, and THAT it isn't
concerned with parties UNLESS they are engaged in *criminal*
activity.

I make or made no judgement call with regard to Micro$haft and their
information policy which I posted a link to. I made no inference or
value judgements as to why they have such a policy, how they use it,
when they use it, etc.

Why did my posting a link to their policy affect you so much that you
feel you needed to defend it?

Why did it personally affect you such that you came to Microsoft's
defence and post what you feel to be a statement supporting the fact
that they have such an information disclosure policy?

Is it your love or admiration for Microsoft that caused you to react
like this?

Your strange tangent continues:

Just like every society where all of us live, presuming
you aren't actually physically dead, since you appear to
be BRAIN DEAD.

Is it important for you Maurice to feel that you're part of society?
That you have friends? That you are respected? That others pay
attention to and value what you write?

You speak of death and of being dead. Is it because you fear death?
Perhaps you fear dying alone? Is that why you combine these concepts of
mortality and society?

MEB wrote:

Hey, guys, why not discuss Oracle, Adobe, Sun, Cisco, and all
these others which are doing the same...

Just as you post here about malware threats that don't affect Windows 98
users?

MEB wrote:

Hey, guys, why not discuss Oracle, Adobe, Sun, Cisco, and all
these others which are doing the same...

Just as you post here about malware threats that don't affect Windows 98
users?

On 02/26/2010 12:40 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
MEB wrote:

Why did you feel it necessary to try to immediately hijack this
thread and turn it to a different subject? Did you feel the
need to trump me by posting what you think is more important
or significant information?

And I'll now use your own argument against you: You posting
information relating to botnets shows you have no scope of
the world and what has been going on for years.
How does that fit?

What MEB is about to post in response is a foamy, disconnected ramble
that has no logical or coherent linkage to the material being discussed:

Because per usual with fools like you, that YOU can understand
WHAT Microsoft does with that information, WHY it has done so,
WHEN that information might be used, and THAT it isn't
concerned with parties UNLESS they are engaged in *criminal*
activity.


Hey stupid, I TRIED to give you the purported ability to actually
UNDERSTAND what you posted and the linked materials. It says *CAN*, now
I have to change that to CAN'T since you, per usual, are to stupid to
take that offer and attempt make you APPEAR to be at least
*semi-intelligent*....

Might actually want to learn how to read messages..

Might as well change an actual error in my prior:

The *your* is of course "*you're* so scared".

MORON!!!!

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

On 02/26/2010 12:40 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
MEB wrote:

Why did you feel it necessary to try to immediately hijack this
thread and turn it to a different subject? Did you feel the
need to trump me by posting what you think is more important
or significant information?

And I'll now use your own argument against you: You posting
information relating to botnets shows you have no scope of
the world and what has been going on for years.
How does that fit?

What MEB is about to post in response is a foamy, disconnected ramble
that has no logical or coherent linkage to the material being discussed:

Because per usual with fools like you, that YOU can understand
WHAT Microsoft does with that information, WHY it has done so,
WHEN that information might be used, and THAT it isn't
concerned with parties UNLESS they are engaged in *criminal*
activity.


Hey stupid, I TRIED to give you the purported ability to actually
UNDERSTAND what you posted and the linked materials. It says *CAN*, now
I have to change that to CAN'T since you, per usual, are to stupid to
take that offer and attempt make you APPEAR to be at least
*semi-intelligent*....

Might actually want to learn how to read messages..

Might as well change an actual error in my prior:

The *your* is of course "*you're* so scared".

MORON!!!!

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

On 02/26/2010 12:42 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
MEB wrote:

Hey, guys, why not discuss Oracle, Adobe, Sun, Cisco, and all
these others which are doing the same...

Just as you post here about malware threats that don't affect Windows 98
users?

You got your shut up in the other postings... go somewhere else moron.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---