Windows Media Player 10 for Windows 98

Sunny wrote:

You are deficient in all that lends character. You have the
personality of wallpaper.

Actually, he has the personality of a Micro$haft lawyer.

He certainly has the writing style of one.

On 12/11/2009 07:07 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
Sunny wrote:

You are deficient in all that lends character. You have the
personality of wallpaper.

Actually, he has the personality of a Micro$haft lawyer.

He certainly has the writing style of one.

Actually nimrods, I have tested 9X betas, win3 betas, XP betas, and the
OSs, Linux compilations, and thousands of applications, AND posted to
the programmers.
WHILE doing legal work, my regular work, a computer business, AND a
couple hobbies. Now what is it EXACTLY that you have done in your POS
lives, I mean besides being the idiots you are...

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

MEB wrote:

Actually, he has the personality of a Micro$haft lawyer.

He certainly has the writing style of one.

Actually nimrods, I have tested 9X betas, ...

Ok you klown.

If you've tested 9x then why don't YOU test these suggested 9x patches
instead of always bellyaching that they need or should be tested.

After all, you're the big test man, right? Microsoft engineers come to
you when they need testing - right? You wrote the book on Windoze
testing - right?

And you've worked on inventing and setting up usenet for them too -
right?

WHILE doing legal work, my regular work,
Now what is it EXACTLY that you have done in your POS lives

You think I/we've got POS lives?

You're the one doing "legal work".

On 12/11/2009 10:35 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
MEB wrote:

Actually, he has the personality of a Micro$haft lawyer.

He certainly has the writing style of one.

Actually nimrods, I have tested 9X betas, ...

Ok you klown.

If you've tested 9x then why don't YOU test these suggested 9x patches
instead of always bellyaching that they need or should be tested.

Because you POS, I put my time in MS products... as I told the group I
was done testing, and even extended testing until it became impossible
to use 9X on the Internet, now a couple months ago.
YOU test them, you CLAIM there good files and fix 9X but you have
NOTHING upon which to base that do you..., but WE know you are incapable
of testing anything... but quite willing to pull posts from others while
claiming they are yours, *TRYING* to appear intelligent.
It might work except you don't know what you've posting means... just
as you haven't a CLUE about the files or vulnerabilities, security, nor
anything else you have posted here and elsewhere...


After all, you're the big test man, right? Microsoft engineers come to
you when they need testing - right? You wrote the book on Windoze
testing - right?

And you've worked on inventing and setting up usenet for them too -
right?

WHILE doing legal work, my regular work,
Now what is it EXACTLY that you have done in your POS lives

You think I/we've got POS lives?

You're the one doing "legal work".

And you ARE nothing but a worthless POS troll and apparently the most
inbred idiot I have run across out here.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

"MEB" wrote in message
...
And you ARE nothing but a worthless POS troll and apparently the most
inbred idiot I have run across out here.

Look into the mirror moron.
Has it completely passed your brain cells, that many posters have pointed
out that you are a cranky old fart?
Chill out you insult.

MEB wrote:

I put my time in MS products...

Then why are you still here?

If Win-98 is dead, what exactly brings you to this newsgroup?

as I told the group I was done testing, and even extended
testing until it became impossible to use 9X on the
Internet, now a couple months ago.

Post your test results. Describe them. What were these "tests" that
you've been doing, until as recently as a couple months ago?

until it became impossible to use 9X on the Internet

Since when is it impossible to use win-98 on the internet?

YOU test them

The onus is on you to prove the substitutions are faulty or
detrimental.

For the more elightened win-98 community at large, these updates and
patches are fully accepted. You go on making a fool of yourself in your
convoluted way, your pathetic attempt to spread FUD that is fooling
nobody.

you CLAIM there good files and fix 9X but you have
NOTHING upon which to base that do you...

And Microsoft claims those files fix or improve win-2k and IE6sp1, yet
they present NO PROOF, NO TEST RESULTS. Why don't you get on their case
and demand they prove to you how each and every patch they release
causes no new harm or vulnerability?

but WE know you are incapable of testing anything...

The only one proving he is incapable of testing anything IS YOU.

You claim these tests are very important and need to be done.

You claim you're a testing expert.

Yet you DO NO TESTING. Why is that?

PROVE TO US THAT YOU ARE INDEED CAPABLE OF SUCH TESTING BY ACTUALLY
PERFORMING A TEST AND POST THE RESULTS HERE.

but quite willing to pull posts from others while claiming
they are yours

I made no such claim, and that's really lame and desperate of you to
make such a statement.

It's a good example of how you like to post exaggerations and lies.

*TRYING* to appear intelligent.

That's what you attempt to do every day here - but you end up doing the
exact opposite.

On 12/12/2009 12:08 AM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
And you ARE nothing but a worthless POS troll and apparently the most
inbred idiot I have run across out here.

Look into the mirror moron.
Has it completely passed your brain cells, that many posters have pointed
out that you are a cranky old fart?
Chill out you insult.



WHo??? You trolls!!! ROTFLMAO

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

On 12/12/2009 12:08 AM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
And you ARE nothing but a worthless POS troll and apparently the most
inbred idiot I have run across out here.

Look into the mirror moron.
Has it completely passed your brain cells, that many posters have pointed
out that you are a cranky old fart?
Chill out you insult.



WHo??? You trolls!!! ROTFLMAO

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

On 12/12/2009 12:24 AM, 98 Guy wrote:
MEB wrote:

I put my time in MS products...

Then why are you still here?

If Win-98 is dead, what exactly brings you to this newsgroup?

as I told the group I was done testing, and even extended
testing until it became impossible to use 9X on the
Internet, now a couple months ago.

Post your test results. Describe them. What were these "tests" that
you've been doing, until as recently as a couple months ago?

until it became impossible to use 9X on the Internet

Since when is it impossible to use win-98 on the internet?

YOU test them

The onus is on you to prove the substitutions are faulty or
detrimental.

For the more elightened win-98 community at large, these updates and
patches are fully accepted. You go on making a fool of yourself in your
convoluted way, your pathetic attempt to spread FUD that is fooling
nobody.

you CLAIM there good files and fix 9X but you have
NOTHING upon which to base that do you...

And Microsoft claims those files fix or improve win-2k and IE6sp1, yet
they present NO PROOF, NO TEST RESULTS. Why don't you get on their case
and demand they prove to you how each and every patch they release
causes no new harm or vulnerability?

but WE know you are incapable of testing anything...

The only one proving he is incapable of testing anything IS YOU.

You claim these tests are very important and need to be done.

You claim you're a testing expert.

Yet you DO NO TESTING. Why is that?

PROVE TO US THAT YOU ARE INDEED CAPABLE OF SUCH TESTING BY ACTUALLY
PERFORMING A TEST AND POST THE RESULTS HERE.

but quite willing to pull posts from others while claiming
they are yours

I made no such claim, and that's really lame and desperate of you to
make such a statement.

It's a good example of how you like to post exaggerations and lies.

*TRYING* to appear intelligent.

That's what you attempt to do every day here - but you end up doing the
exact opposite.


You would have already SEEN these test and things if you weren't just a
recently "out of diapers" computer user in this group...
Go see mommy, I think you messed your pants...

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

On 12/12/2009 12:24 AM, 98 Guy wrote:
MEB wrote:

I put my time in MS products...

Then why are you still here?

If Win-98 is dead, what exactly brings you to this newsgroup?

as I told the group I was done testing, and even extended
testing until it became impossible to use 9X on the
Internet, now a couple months ago.

Post your test results. Describe them. What were these "tests" that
you've been doing, until as recently as a couple months ago?

until it became impossible to use 9X on the Internet

Since when is it impossible to use win-98 on the internet?

YOU test them

The onus is on you to prove the substitutions are faulty or
detrimental.

For the more elightened win-98 community at large, these updates and
patches are fully accepted. You go on making a fool of yourself in your
convoluted way, your pathetic attempt to spread FUD that is fooling
nobody.

you CLAIM there good files and fix 9X but you have
NOTHING upon which to base that do you...

And Microsoft claims those files fix or improve win-2k and IE6sp1, yet
they present NO PROOF, NO TEST RESULTS. Why don't you get on their case
and demand they prove to you how each and every patch they release
causes no new harm or vulnerability?

but WE know you are incapable of testing anything...

The only one proving he is incapable of testing anything IS YOU.

You claim these tests are very important and need to be done.

You claim you're a testing expert.

Yet you DO NO TESTING. Why is that?

PROVE TO US THAT YOU ARE INDEED CAPABLE OF SUCH TESTING BY ACTUALLY
PERFORMING A TEST AND POST THE RESULTS HERE.

but quite willing to pull posts from others while claiming
they are yours

I made no such claim, and that's really lame and desperate of you to
make such a statement.

It's a good example of how you like to post exaggerations and lies.

*TRYING* to appear intelligent.

That's what you attempt to do every day here - but you end up doing the
exact opposite.


You would have already SEEN these test and things if you weren't just a
recently "out of diapers" computer user in this group...
Go see mommy, I think you messed your pants...

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---