IP conflict

Please try reading Chris's original post again as it is patently obvious
that ICS is not being used.
--
Mike Maltby



N. Miller wrote:

Where exactly does the OP say he is running ICS?

He doesn't say it explicitly, but...

As far as I can see he makes no reference to ICS so why complicate
matters?

Matters were already complicated by using terminology which I found
confusing. Or can you explain that quote I left intact after much
snipage? Please explain it in the context of a Peer-to-Peer network?
Which is what I assume he is posting about.

On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 18:13:27 +0100, Mike M wrote:

Please try reading Chris's original post again as it is patently obvious
that ICS is not being used.

Just because he mentions the Linksys? People have been known to try to run
ICS *and* a router together before.

--
Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint

Norman thanks for taking the time. I have to admit that my description of the
PC events are always unconventional due to the fact that I am simply self
taught. You are absolutely right that by host I meant connected to the
printer and stuff.

"N. Miller" wrote:

On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 05:06:01 -0700, Chris wrote:

Hi Norman, I am not running ICS. Simply a LAN to share printer, file and
folders. Thank you for the comment.

Well, I suppose the computer connected printer can make that computer a
"host"; but, generally, when I think of a peer-to-peer network, I don't
think of "hosts" and "guests".

--
Norman
~Win dain a lotica, En vai tu ri, Si lo ta
~Fin dein a loluca, En dragu a sei lain
~Vi fa-ru les shutai am, En riga-lint