A Windows 98 & ME forum. Win98banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Win98banter forum » Windows ME » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 19th 09, 11:47 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
jeremiah wright
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 6
Default Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls


ActiveX is a tool or a set of rules that directs a program how to
function. It could be described as containing specifications that
indicate how applications for windows should talk to each other. If
anyone builds an ActiveX control, they can place it inside another
application that understands how to host ActiveX controls. Many sites
require you to download and use ActiveX controls, which lie around and
clutter up the registry of the system. This slows down the system and
it is important to clean up the registry from time to time. In order
to do this you will need a registry cleaner. There are many freeware
registry cleaners on the Internet. Download a free Registry cleaner
for your system and clean up your registry.
How Do We use ActiveX Controls
When a browser detects ActiveX components embedded in the web page the
browser refers to the 'CLASSID' in the webpage to determine if the
required ActiveX controls are present in the computer system. If the
controls are not present the browser will automatically download the
controls. After you have finished with these controls they remain in
your systems registry. A registry window cleaner will cleanup the
registry for you and speed up your system....

Registry Repair: http://groups.google.com/group/regrepairsbv
  #2  
Old February 19th 09, 02:29 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
Noel Paton[_2_]
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 46
Default Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls

I think he's trying to drum up interest in his googlegroup!
Shame he hasn't a clue....

--
Noel Paton (MVP 2002-2006)
(CrashFixPC)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.co.uk
"jeremiah wright" wrote in message
...

ActiveX is a tool or a set of rules that directs a program how to
function. It could be described as containing specifications that
indicate how applications for windows should talk to each other. If
anyone builds an ActiveX control, they can place it inside another
application that understands how to host ActiveX controls. Many sites
require you to download and use ActiveX controls, which lie around and
clutter up the registry of the system. This slows down the system and
it is important to clean up the registry from time to time. In order
to do this you will need a registry cleaner. There are many freeware
registry cleaners on the Internet. Download a free Registry cleaner
for your system and clean up your registry.
How Do We use ActiveX Controls
When a browser detects ActiveX components embedded in the web page the
browser refers to the 'CLASSID' in the webpage to determine if the
required ActiveX controls are present in the computer system. If the
controls are not present the browser will automatically download the
controls. After you have finished with these controls they remain in
your systems registry. A registry window cleaner will cleanup the
registry for you and speed up your system....

Registry Repair: http://groups.google.com/group/regrepairsbv



  #3  
Old February 20th 09, 08:04 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
webster72n
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 1,526
Default Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls


"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I think he's trying to drum up interest in his googlegroup!
Shame he hasn't a clue....


That's because he's a 'spamming troll' and we have learned to ignore 'him'.
H.


--
Noel Paton (MVP 2002-2006)
(CrashFixPC)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.co.uk new
"jers:1d9e31e4emiah wright" wrote in
message ...





  #4  
Old February 22nd 09, 05:06 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
Corday[_3_]
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 138
Default Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls

The Reverend Wright needs to Excommunicate himself from all discussion groups
using his own Registry Cleaner.
--
I mastered Wordstar graphics!


"webster72n" wrote:


"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I think he's trying to drum up interest in his googlegroup!
Shame he hasn't a clue....


That's because he's a 'spamming troll' and we have learned to ignore 'him'.
H.


--
Noel Paton (MVP 2002-2006)
(CrashFixPC)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.co.uk new
"jers:1d9e31e4emiah wright" wrote in
message ...






  #5  
Old February 23rd 09, 08:06 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
Noel Paton[_3_]
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 229
Default Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls

Looks like he has been excommunicated from the MS servers - the original
post (and many others he and his cronies wrote) has disappeared of the
servers.

--
Noel Paton
CrashFixPC

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
www.crashfixpc.co.uk
"Corday" wrote in message
...
The Reverend Wright needs to Excommunicate himself from all discussion
groups
using his own Registry Cleaner.
--
I mastered Wordstar graphics!


"webster72n" wrote:


"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I think he's trying to drum up interest in his googlegroup!
Shame he hasn't a clue....


That's because he's a 'spamming troll' and we have learned to ignore
'him'.
H.


--
Noel Paton (MVP 2002-2006)
(CrashFixPC)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.co.uk new
"jers:1d9e31e4emiah wright" wrote in
message ...







  #6  
Old February 23rd 09, 09:50 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
Shane[_7_]
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 17
Default Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls

That's as maybe, Noel, but look how long 'he's' been doing it:
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups/pr...uYqcsrUPIQKVkQ

Make a post including words of a certain kind and they never even appear, so
how come the exact same profile can keep making successful spamming posts
for years?

Doc Doc Doc Doc Doctor Beat


Noel Paton wrote:
Looks like he has been excommunicated from the MS servers - the
original post (and many others he and his cronies wrote) has
disappeared of the servers.


Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
www.crashfixpc.co.uk
"Corday" wrote in message
...
The Reverend Wright needs to Excommunicate himself from all
discussion groups
using his own Registry Cleaner.
--
I mastered Wordstar graphics!


"webster72n" wrote:


"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I think he's trying to drum up interest in his googlegroup!
Shame he hasn't a clue....

That's because he's a 'spamming troll' and we have learned to ignore
'him'.
H.


--
Noel Paton (MVP 2002-2006)
(CrashFixPC)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.co.uk new
"jers:1d9e31e4emiah wright" wrote in
message
...



  #7  
Old February 23rd 09, 10:26 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
Noel Paton[_3_]
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 229
Default Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls

MS only removes posts - it doesn't killfile users..... although if they do
it often enough they may end up in the spam filters, but there again, it's
content, rather than nick that gets a post binned

--
Noel Paton
CrashFixPC

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
www.crashfixpc.co.uk
"Shane" wrote in message
...
That's as maybe, Noel, but look how long 'he's' been doing it:
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups/pr...uYqcsrUPIQKVkQ

Make a post including words of a certain kind and they never even appear,
so how come the exact same profile can keep making successful spamming
posts for years?

Doc Doc Doc Doc Doctor Beat


Noel Paton wrote:
Looks like he has been excommunicated from the MS servers - the
original post (and many others he and his cronies wrote) has
disappeared of the servers.


Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
www.crashfixpc.co.uk
"Corday" wrote in message
...
The Reverend Wright needs to Excommunicate himself from all
discussion groups
using his own Registry Cleaner.
--
I mastered Wordstar graphics!


"webster72n" wrote:


"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I think he's trying to drum up interest in his googlegroup!
Shame he hasn't a clue....

That's because he's a 'spamming troll' and we have learned to ignore
'him'.
H.


--
Noel Paton (MVP 2002-2006)
(CrashFixPC)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.co.uk new
"jers:1d9e31e4emiah wright" wrote in
message
...




  #8  
Old February 23rd 09, 10:48 AM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
Shane[_7_]
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 17
Default Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls

Well, it does happen automatically, has done for years. And to put serial
offenders in would be easy. But then MS has many times demonstrated
questionable priorities. Cases in point the Privacy settings in IE, Root
Certificates etc. You might say it's very American, where Business is
Inherently 'Good' and if it is not already legislated against and is
obviously intended to profit, it is allowed to continue despite other things
being mercilessly crushed though one might consider the potential 'harm' of
each to be essentially equivalent. Of course, we do this too, just more
imitatively - although I suspect Jacqui Smith is imitating Mary Whitehouse
rather than the US.

(Just been reading about the California violent video games bill being
overturned by the Federal Court!)

But, really, I've made numerous posts over the years to test it and include
certain words and you'll never see them - or at best you'll be able to see
them flicker into and out of existence like a virtual particle.


Noel Paton wrote:
MS only removes posts - it doesn't killfile users..... although if
they do it often enough they may end up in the spam filters, but
there again, it's content, rather than nick that gets a post binned


Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
www.crashfixpc.co.uk
"Shane" wrote in message
...
That's as maybe, Noel, but look how long 'he's' been doing it:
http://groups.google.co.uk/groups/pr...uYqcsrUPIQKVkQ

Make a post including words of a certain kind and they never even
appear, so how come the exact same profile can keep making
successful spamming posts for years?

Doc Doc Doc Doc Doctor Beat


Noel Paton wrote:
Looks like he has been excommunicated from the MS servers - the
original post (and many others he and his cronies wrote) has
disappeared of the servers.


Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
www.crashfixpc.co.uk
"Corday" wrote in message
...
The Reverend Wright needs to Excommunicate himself from all
discussion groups
using his own Registry Cleaner.
--
I mastered Wordstar graphics!


"webster72n" wrote:


"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I think he's trying to drum up interest in his googlegroup!
Shame he hasn't a clue....

That's because he's a 'spamming troll' and we have learned to
ignore 'him'.
H.


--
Noel Paton (MVP 2002-2006)
(CrashFixPC)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.co.uk new
"jers:1d9e31e4emiah wright" wrote in
message
...



  #9  
Old February 23rd 09, 01:42 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
Mike M
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 2,047
Default Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls

FYI The "team", if one is prepared to grace them with such a name,
responsible for maintaining the NGs are external contractors and have been
now for some years. Basically they haven't a clue and the gut feeling is
that team members last just a few weeks before leaving. The result is
that no-one seems to know how the filters work or why many even exist.
Few at Microsoft know anything about NNTP and even less seem to care.
There are however a dedicated few Microsoft employees who go to
extraordinary lengths to try and keep spam and the like to a minimum but I
suspect that even they must be close to despair as it appears that their
requests to the "team" are often ignored.
--
Mike Maltby



Shane wrote:

Well, it does happen automatically, has done for years. And to put
serial offenders in would be easy. But then MS has many times
demonstrated questionable priorities. Cases in point the Privacy
settings in IE, Root Certificates etc. You might say it's very
American, where Business is Inherently 'Good' and if it is not
already legislated against and is obviously intended to profit, it is
allowed to continue despite other things being mercilessly crushed
though one might consider the potential 'harm' of each to be
essentially equivalent. Of course, we do this too, just more
imitatively - although I suspect Jacqui Smith is imitating Mary
Whitehouse rather than the US.
(Just been reading about the California violent video games bill being
overturned by the Federal Court!)

But, really, I've made numerous posts over the years to test it and
include certain words and you'll never see them - or at best you'll
be able to see them flicker into and out of existence like a virtual
particle.


  #10  
Old February 23rd 09, 08:26 PM posted to microsoft.public.windowsme.general
webster72n
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 1,526
Default Signed and Unsigned ActiveX Controls


"Mike M" wrote in message
...
FYI The "team", if one is prepared to grace them with such a name,
responsible for maintaining the NGs are external contractors and have been
now for some years. Basically they haven't a clue and the gut feeling is
that team members last just a few weeks before leaving. The result is
that no-one seems to know how the filters work or why many even exist. Few
at Microsoft know anything about NNTP and even less seem to care. There
are however a dedicated few Microsoft employees who go to extraordinary
lengths to try and keep spam and the like to a minimum but I suspect that
even they must be close to despair as it appears that their requests to
the "team" are often ignored.


Moral of the story: Reliance on 'self help'! H.

--
Mike Maltby



Shane wrote:

Well, it does happen automatically, has done for years. And to put
serial offenders in would be easy. But then MS has many times
demonstrated questionable priorities. Cases in point the Privacy
settings in IE, Root Certificates etc. You might say it's very
American, where Business is Inherently 'Good' and if it is not
already legislated against and is obviously intended to profit, it is
allowed to continue despite other things being mercilessly crushed
though one might consider the potential 'harm' of each to be
essentially equivalent. Of course, we do this too, just more
imitatively - although I suspect Jacqui Smith is imitating Mary
Whitehouse rather than the US.
(Just been reading about the California violent video games bill being
overturned by the Federal Court!)

But, really, I've made numerous posts over the years to test it and
include certain words and you'll never see them - or at best you'll
be able to see them flicker into and out of existence like a virtual
particle.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Security Settings/ActiveX Controls - PING Noel or Mike M Jan Il General 47 July 20th 05 06:07 AM
Deleting corrupted ActiveX controls sgt pepper New Users 1 November 27th 04 01:51 PM
ActiveX controls Ken Beaton General 0 November 23rd 04 10:05 AM
Deleting ActiveX Controls-Do these "Regenerate"? Eli Internet 1 May 31st 04 11:05 AM
Controls ActiveX alchimia Software & Applications 0 May 17th 04 10:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Win98banter.
The comments are property of their posters.