If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Win2000with SP4?
By my system analasys I am being encouraged to upgrade to Win2000 to improve
performance. My question: Is this step worthwhile compared to installing WinXP Professional w. SP2 instead? Harry. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Win2000with SP4?
Upgrading to Win2K from Win Me is unsupported and whilst it can be done is
not recommended by Microsoft. Personally I wouldn't bother, stick with Win Me until you get a new PC with XP. -- Mike Maltby webster72n wrote: By my system analasys I am being encouraged to upgrade to Win2000 to improve performance. My question: Is this step worthwhile compared to installing WinXP Professional w. SP2 instead? Harry. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Win2000with SP4?
SiSoft Strike Again??
-- Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's "Mike M" wrote in message ... Upgrading to Win2K from Win Me is unsupported and whilst it can be done is not recommended by Microsoft. Personally I wouldn't bother, stick with Win Me until you get a new PC with XP. -- Mike Maltby webster72n wrote: By my system analasys I am being encouraged to upgrade to Win2000 to improve performance. My question: Is this step worthwhile compared to installing WinXP Professional w. SP2 instead? Harry. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Win2000with SP4?
SiSoft looks beautiful to me and works just as nice, Noel, but aida32 was the cause of my inquiry. No *strike-out* here. Harry. "Noel Paton" wrote in message ... SiSoft Strike Again?? -- Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's "Mike M" wrote in message ... Upgrading to Win2K from Win Me is unsupported and whilst it can be done is not recommended by Microsoft. Personally I wouldn't bother, stick with Win Me until you get a new PC with XP. -- Mike Maltby webster72n wrote: By my system analasys I am being encouraged to upgrade to Win2000 to improve performance. My question: Is this step worthwhile compared to installing WinXP Professional w. SP2 instead? Harry. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Win2000with SP4?
Ah - the 'old' Aida 32?
I can't remember the last time I ran that on an ME system that was high enough spec to take either Win2K or XP. From memory the 'way to improve' at the bottom of most of the pages should be taken with a few grains of salt - IIRC, I ran it on a 512MB system, and it recommended adding more RAM to speed it up -- Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's "webster72n" wrote in message ... SiSoft looks beautiful to me and works just as nice, Noel, but aida32 was the cause of my inquiry. No *strike-out* here. Harry. "Noel Paton" wrote in message ... SiSoft Strike Again?? -- Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's "Mike M" wrote in message ... Upgrading to Win2K from Win Me is unsupported and whilst it can be done is not recommended by Microsoft. Personally I wouldn't bother, stick with Win Me until you get a new PC with XP. -- Mike Maltby webster72n wrote: By my system analasys I am being encouraged to upgrade to Win2000 to improve performance. My question: Is this step worthwhile compared to installing WinXP Professional w. SP2 instead? Harry. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Win2000with SP4?
Noel:
From now on in I'll ignore their recommendation(s) and make up my own mind upon their findings 'only'. Thanks. Harry and sooo much 'wiser' now. "Noel Paton" wrote in message ... Ah - the 'old' Aida 32? I can't remember the last time I ran that on an ME system that was high enough spec to take either Win2K or XP. From memory the 'way to improve' at the bottom of most of the pages should be taken with a few grains of salt - IIRC, I ran it on a 512MB system, and it recommended adding more RAM to speed it up -- Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's "webster72n" wrote in message ... SiSoft looks beautiful to me and works just as nice, Noel, but aida32 was the cause of my inquiry. No *strike-out* here. Harry. "Noel Paton" wrote in message ... SiSoft Strike Again?? -- Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's "Mike M" wrote in message ... Upgrading to Win2K from Win Me is unsupported and whilst it can be done is not recommended by Microsoft. Personally I wouldn't bother, stick with Win Me until you get a new PC with XP. -- Mike Maltby webster72n wrote: By my system analasys I am being encouraged to upgrade to Win2000 to improve performance. My question: Is this step worthwhile compared to installing WinXP Professional w. SP2 instead? Harry. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Win2000with SP4?
That's exactly what I needed to know, Mike, thank you. Harry, and probably needing an *analysis* myself. "Mike M" wrote in message ... Upgrading to Win2K from Win Me is unsupported and whilst it can be done is not recommended by Microsoft. Personally I wouldn't bother, stick with Win Me until you get a new PC with XP. -- Mike Maltby webster72n wrote: By my system analasys I am being encouraged to upgrade to Win2000 to improve performance. My question: Is this step worthwhile compared to installing WinXP Professional w. SP2 instead? Harry. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Win2000with SP4?
Mike M wrote:
Upgrading to Win2K from Win Me is unsupported and whilst it can be done is not recommended by Microsoft. Personally I wouldn't bother, stick with Win Me until you get a new PC with XP. Would a AMD Athlon 800 with 256 RAM be able to handle W2K? I have XP Pro on it now and it's a bit slow opening programs. Alias |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Win2000with SP4?
Should be OK, Alias - but can't you put another 256MB on it?
-- Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows) Nil Carborundum Illegitemi http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm http://tinyurl.com/6oztj Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's "Alias" wrote in message ... Mike M wrote: Upgrading to Win2K from Win Me is unsupported and whilst it can be done is not recommended by Microsoft. Personally I wouldn't bother, stick with Win Me until you get a new PC with XP. Would a AMD Athlon 800 with 256 RAM be able to handle W2K? I have XP Pro on it now and it's a bit slow opening programs. Alias |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Win2000with SP4?
I wrote:
Would a AMD Athlon 800 with 256 RAM be able to handle W2K? I have XP Pro on it now and it's a bit slow opening programs. Alias Noel Paton replied: Should be OK, Alias - but can't you put another 256MB on it? If I could, I would and leave XP on it. It was originally an ASUS board but HP messed with and removed one of the RAM slots, leaving two when there should be three. I have tried two 256s and no joy. I use one of either of the 256s, it works. If I use two 128s, it works. If I use one 256 and one 128, no joy. Do you think the performance would be better with W2K than XP Pro? I also have a 5400 rpm IDE hard drive on it. Would putting a 7200 on it improve performance? Alias |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|