If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
If running JAVA JDK JRE [see recent JAVA and Flash posted warning] and Office 2002 and above
In message , MEB
writes: J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , MEB writes: J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , MEB writes: Some new/additional vulnerabilities have been defined which may be of interest should you be running JAVA and Office applications [2002 - up] [Excel, Word, other]. It is recommended to review these potential issues, and seek updates or fixes if/when available. http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/bulletins/SB09-320.html A well-intentioned warning. How would a '98 user do the reviewing, i. e. establish whether the vulnerabilities exist in '98? (And yes, I have looked at the page - though wouldn't claim to have understood it.) My response, since you posted the warning in a '98 'group, and no other, was in effect asking whether the new/additional vulnerabilities were relevant to '98. I appreciate that you may not know the answer to that. Is that a real question or is this just another walk down some lane you have in mind... Genuine, for others' benefit ... How about you think about JAVA [which is its own environment] then think about whether the vulnerabilities/issues might be related to the version itself, for the most part. Since there are no elevation of Not having your experience, I wouldn't get very far with that kind of thinking (-:. I could just ask you do these vulnerabilities affect 98 or not, but I know you want us to do some of the thinking, so am trying to figure out how: first you told me to "review" it/them, now you're telling me to "think about" them - but I don't know how. I told you, it is an environment, as in, running with little control in *whatever OS it is installed in*. The vulnerabilities exist IN IT. Did you see a mention for any OS, NO, it was for specific *JAVA* versions/installations AS DEFINED. There was an implicit mention of 98 by the warning being posted in, only, a '98 'group - you didn't cross-post it to any other OS 'groups nor any Java ones, solely this one. I presume you had a reason for doing that; maybe I am wrong. So what the heck do you need to know.. or rather supposedly, since this IS just another of your recent postings styles in this group.. I don't _need_ to know, I just _wanted_ to know why you posted this warning here and only here. Who's next, 98 Guy or one of the others with nothing better to do... which worthless entity will pop-in now... Pots and kettles ... privileges necessary in 9X, not much that would need overcome by a hack or code or otherwise, would there be. I shouldn't say this since I write convoluted sentences too, so it's pots and kettles, but that last sentence is a bit Yoda-like ... Cut the crap, I'm not playing your games anymore... if you can't understand anything then what the frig are you posting for and about... you should be looking at the materials which explain it all to you... I can understand plenty; I can even make an educated guess at what the sentence "Since there are no elevation of privileges necessary in 9X, not much that would need overcome by a hack or code or otherwise, would there be." was trying to say. It certainly isn't very clear though! As for the Office vulnerabilities: what do you think... I'd be most surprised if Office isn't riddled with them. (Not that it's bad, it's just big, and popular.) But how would I - or an "innocent" 98-user - know if the specific new ones mentioned in the report you lined to, affect it under 98? And, what would I/he do about it if they do? Gee, how about looking at the links *within* the vulnerability reports,,, might be a REAL good place to start... OR you can rattle on under this subject heading for awhile... It might indeed. I just assumed that, since you posted the warning in a 98-only 'group, you'd already done some of that for us. I was wrong, or if I was right, you've now decided not to share your insights. Which is your right of course. I had tried to keep this polite. -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf ** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for ludicrously outdated thoughts on PCs. ** All I ask is to _prove_ that money can't make me happy. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
If running JAVA JDK JRE [see recent JAVA and Flash posted warning]and Office 2002 and above
On 11/17/2009 05:39 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
In message , MEB writes: J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , MEB writes: J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , MEB writes: Some new/additional vulnerabilities have been defined which may be of interest should you be running JAVA and Office applications [2002 - up] [Excel, Word, other]. It is recommended to review these potential issues, and seek updates or fixes if/when available. http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/bulletins/SB09-320.html A well-intentioned warning. How would a '98 user do the reviewing, i. e. establish whether the vulnerabilities exist in '98? (And yes, I have looked at the page - though wouldn't claim to have understood it.) My response, since you posted the warning in a '98 'group, and no other, was in effect asking whether the new/additional vulnerabilities were relevant to '98. I appreciate that you may not know the answer to that. HEY READ THE STUFF AGAIN.. maybe if I shout at you you might actually do it... the ISSUES ARE THE VULNERABILITIES IN *JAVA*.. the ability to use crafted codes and other *within* JAVA BASED INCIDENCES IN THE OS AND OTHER AS DEFINED WITHIN THE MATERIALS. DO YOU HAVE ##JAVA INSTALLED## YES? THEN THE VULNERABILITY EXISTS IN YOUR SYSTEM... are they known to exist? YEAH THEY ARE KNOWN TO EXIST.. Can JAVA be used to determine the ACTUAL SYSTEM IT IS RUN IN? *YES* and so can server side includes... so is there a potential your 9X system could be subjected to unwanted activities due to these vulnerabilities? YES YOUR SYSTEM, REGARDLESS OF WHICH OS, MAY BE SUBJECTED TO UNWANTED MALWARE, HACKS, OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DUE TO THESE VULNERABILITIES. NOW really are you this friggin dense or what.... Is that a real question or is this just another walk down some lane you have in mind... Genuine, for others' benefit ... How about you think about JAVA [which is its own environment] then think about whether the vulnerabilities/issues might be related to the version itself, for the most part. Since there are no elevation of Not having your experience, I wouldn't get very far with that kind of thinking (-:. I could just ask you do these vulnerabilities affect 98 or not, but I know you want us to do some of the thinking, so am trying to figure out how: first you told me to "review" it/them, now you're telling me to "think about" them - but I don't know how. I told you, it is an environment, as in, running with little control in *whatever OS it is installed in*. The vulnerabilities exist IN IT. Did you see a mention for any OS, NO, it was for specific *JAVA* versions/installations AS DEFINED. There was an implicit mention of 98 by the warning being posted in, only, a '98 'group - you didn't cross-post it to any other OS 'groups nor any Java ones, solely this one. I presume you had a reason for doing that; maybe I am wrong. So what the heck do you need to know.. or rather supposedly, since this IS just another of your recent postings styles in this group.. I don't _need_ to know, I just _wanted_ to know why you posted this warning here and only here. BECAUSE I POST HERE, YOU WANT THIS MATERIAL ELSEWHERE - YOU POST IT ELSEWHERE, I OWE NO USERS OF OTHER OSs ANYTHING, and I have finished my penance for recommending 9X to anyone... though I still post these warnings and advisements BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE BOTHERS TOO. Now really take the rest of your junk somewhere else, I'm done with your f-upped games. Who's next, 98 Guy or one of the others with nothing better to do... which worthless entity will pop-in now... Pots and kettles ... privileges necessary in 9X, not much that would need overcome by a hack or code or otherwise, would there be. I shouldn't say this since I write convoluted sentences too, so it's pots and kettles, but that last sentence is a bit Yoda-like ... Cut the crap, I'm not playing your games anymore... if you can't understand anything then what the frig are you posting for and about... you should be looking at the materials which explain it all to you... I can understand plenty; I can even make an educated guess at what the sentence "Since there are no elevation of privileges necessary in 9X, not much that would need overcome by a hack or code or otherwise, would there be." was trying to say. It certainly isn't very clear though! As for the Office vulnerabilities: what do you think... I'd be most surprised if Office isn't riddled with them. (Not that it's bad, it's just big, and popular.) But how would I - or an "innocent" 98-user - know if the specific new ones mentioned in the report you lined to, affect it under 98? And, what would I/he do about it if they do? Gee, how about looking at the links *within* the vulnerability reports,,, might be a REAL good place to start... OR you can rattle on under this subject heading for awhile... It might indeed. I just assumed that, since you posted the warning in a 98-only 'group, you'd already done some of that for us. I was wrong, or if I was right, you've now decided not to share your insights. Which is your right of course. I had tried to keep this polite. Yeah right. Sure ya did. That's why you asked these stupid questions and didn't bother to use whatever mental capacity you supposedly have. Who do you think would be fooled by this junk of yours... you have the materials, you have a brain, you have additional linked materials.. FRAKKEN USE THEM. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
If running JAVA JDK JRE [see recent JAVA and Flash posted warning]and Office 2002 and above
On 11/17/2009 05:39 PM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
In message , MEB writes: J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , MEB writes: J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote: In message , MEB writes: Some new/additional vulnerabilities have been defined which may be of interest should you be running JAVA and Office applications [2002 - up] [Excel, Word, other]. It is recommended to review these potential issues, and seek updates or fixes if/when available. http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/bulletins/SB09-320.html A well-intentioned warning. How would a '98 user do the reviewing, i. e. establish whether the vulnerabilities exist in '98? (And yes, I have looked at the page - though wouldn't claim to have understood it.) My response, since you posted the warning in a '98 'group, and no other, was in effect asking whether the new/additional vulnerabilities were relevant to '98. I appreciate that you may not know the answer to that. HEY READ THE STUFF AGAIN.. maybe if I shout at you you might actually do it... the ISSUES ARE THE VULNERABILITIES IN *JAVA*.. the ability to use crafted codes and other *within* JAVA BASED INCIDENCES IN THE OS AND OTHER AS DEFINED WITHIN THE MATERIALS. DO YOU HAVE ##JAVA INSTALLED## YES? THEN THE VULNERABILITY EXISTS IN YOUR SYSTEM... are they known to exist? YEAH THEY ARE KNOWN TO EXIST.. Can JAVA be used to determine the ACTUAL SYSTEM IT IS RUN IN? *YES* and so can server side includes... so is there a potential your 9X system could be subjected to unwanted activities due to these vulnerabilities? YES YOUR SYSTEM, REGARDLESS OF WHICH OS, MAY BE SUBJECTED TO UNWANTED MALWARE, HACKS, OR OTHER ACTIVITIES DUE TO THESE VULNERABILITIES. NOW really are you this friggin dense or what.... Is that a real question or is this just another walk down some lane you have in mind... Genuine, for others' benefit ... How about you think about JAVA [which is its own environment] then think about whether the vulnerabilities/issues might be related to the version itself, for the most part. Since there are no elevation of Not having your experience, I wouldn't get very far with that kind of thinking (-:. I could just ask you do these vulnerabilities affect 98 or not, but I know you want us to do some of the thinking, so am trying to figure out how: first you told me to "review" it/them, now you're telling me to "think about" them - but I don't know how. I told you, it is an environment, as in, running with little control in *whatever OS it is installed in*. The vulnerabilities exist IN IT. Did you see a mention for any OS, NO, it was for specific *JAVA* versions/installations AS DEFINED. There was an implicit mention of 98 by the warning being posted in, only, a '98 'group - you didn't cross-post it to any other OS 'groups nor any Java ones, solely this one. I presume you had a reason for doing that; maybe I am wrong. So what the heck do you need to know.. or rather supposedly, since this IS just another of your recent postings styles in this group.. I don't _need_ to know, I just _wanted_ to know why you posted this warning here and only here. BECAUSE I POST HERE, YOU WANT THIS MATERIAL ELSEWHERE - YOU POST IT ELSEWHERE, I OWE NO USERS OF OTHER OSs ANYTHING, and I have finished my penance for recommending 9X to anyone... though I still post these warnings and advisements BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE BOTHERS TOO. Now really take the rest of your junk somewhere else, I'm done with your f-upped games. Who's next, 98 Guy or one of the others with nothing better to do... which worthless entity will pop-in now... Pots and kettles ... privileges necessary in 9X, not much that would need overcome by a hack or code or otherwise, would there be. I shouldn't say this since I write convoluted sentences too, so it's pots and kettles, but that last sentence is a bit Yoda-like ... Cut the crap, I'm not playing your games anymore... if you can't understand anything then what the frig are you posting for and about... you should be looking at the materials which explain it all to you... I can understand plenty; I can even make an educated guess at what the sentence "Since there are no elevation of privileges necessary in 9X, not much that would need overcome by a hack or code or otherwise, would there be." was trying to say. It certainly isn't very clear though! As for the Office vulnerabilities: what do you think... I'd be most surprised if Office isn't riddled with them. (Not that it's bad, it's just big, and popular.) But how would I - or an "innocent" 98-user - know if the specific new ones mentioned in the report you lined to, affect it under 98? And, what would I/he do about it if they do? Gee, how about looking at the links *within* the vulnerability reports,,, might be a REAL good place to start... OR you can rattle on under this subject heading for awhile... It might indeed. I just assumed that, since you posted the warning in a 98-only 'group, you'd already done some of that for us. I was wrong, or if I was right, you've now decided not to share your insights. Which is your right of course. I had tried to keep this polite. Yeah right. Sure ya did. That's why you asked these stupid questions and didn't bother to use whatever mental capacity you supposedly have. Who do you think would be fooled by this junk of yours... you have the materials, you have a brain, you have additional linked materials.. FRAKKEN USE THEM. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
If running JAVA JDK JRE [see recent JAVA and Flash posted warning] and Office 2002 and above
In message , MEB
writes: [] [MUCH RANTING SNIPPED] *whatever OS it is installed in*. The vulnerabilities exist IN IT. Did you see a mention for any OS, NO, it was for specific *JAVA* versions/installations AS DEFINED. There was an implicit mention of 98 by the warning being posted in, only, a '98 'group - you didn't cross-post it to any other OS 'groups nor any Java ones, solely this one. I presume you had a reason for doing that; maybe I am wrong. So what the heck do you need to know.. or rather supposedly, since this IS just another of your recent postings styles in this group.. I don't _need_ to know, I just _wanted_ to know why you posted this warning here and only here. BECAUSE I POST HERE, YOU WANT THIS MATERIAL ELSEWHERE - YOU POST IT ELSEWHERE, I OWE NO USERS OF OTHER OSs ANYTHING, and I have finished my OK, I understand - you choose to bombard us with such warnings, but here only. penance for recommending 9X to anyone... though I still post these I haven't seen you _recommending_ '98 to anyone for some time. warnings and advisements BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE BOTHERS TOO. But only here. Now really take the rest of your junk somewhere else, I'm done with your f-upped games. The feeling is mutual. [] I had tried to keep this polite. Yeah right. Sure ya did. That's why you asked these stupid questions and didn't bother to use whatever mental capacity you supposedly have. So my capacities are doubtful ... Who do you think would be fooled by this junk of yours... you have the materials, you have a brain, you have additional linked materials.. .... or I do have a brain, make your mind up. But let's close this one, shall we? [] -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf ** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for ludicrously outdated thoughts on PCs. ** All I ask is to _prove_ that money can't make me happy. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
If running JAVA JDK JRE [see recent JAVA and Flash posted warning] and Office 2002 and above
In message , MEB
writes: [] [MUCH RANTING SNIPPED] *whatever OS it is installed in*. The vulnerabilities exist IN IT. Did you see a mention for any OS, NO, it was for specific *JAVA* versions/installations AS DEFINED. There was an implicit mention of 98 by the warning being posted in, only, a '98 'group - you didn't cross-post it to any other OS 'groups nor any Java ones, solely this one. I presume you had a reason for doing that; maybe I am wrong. So what the heck do you need to know.. or rather supposedly, since this IS just another of your recent postings styles in this group.. I don't _need_ to know, I just _wanted_ to know why you posted this warning here and only here. BECAUSE I POST HERE, YOU WANT THIS MATERIAL ELSEWHERE - YOU POST IT ELSEWHERE, I OWE NO USERS OF OTHER OSs ANYTHING, and I have finished my OK, I understand - you choose to bombard us with such warnings, but here only. penance for recommending 9X to anyone... though I still post these I haven't seen you _recommending_ '98 to anyone for some time. warnings and advisements BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE BOTHERS TOO. But only here. Now really take the rest of your junk somewhere else, I'm done with your f-upped games. The feeling is mutual. [] I had tried to keep this polite. Yeah right. Sure ya did. That's why you asked these stupid questions and didn't bother to use whatever mental capacity you supposedly have. So my capacities are doubtful ... Who do you think would be fooled by this junk of yours... you have the materials, you have a brain, you have additional linked materials.. .... or I do have a brain, make your mind up. But let's close this one, shall we? [] -- J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G.5AL-IS-P--Ch++(p)Ar@T0H+Sh0!:`)DNAf ** http://www.soft255.demon.co.uk/G6JPG-PC/JPGminPC.htm for ludicrously outdated thoughts on PCs. ** All I ask is to _prove_ that money can't make me happy. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
If running JAVA JDK JRE [see recent JAVA and Flash posted warning]and Office 2002 and above
On 11/18/2009 03:51 AM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
In message , MEB writes: [] [MUCH RANTING SNIPPED] *whatever OS it is installed in*. The vulnerabilities exist IN IT. Did you see a mention for any OS, NO, it was for specific *JAVA* versions/installations AS DEFINED. There was an implicit mention of 98 by the warning being posted in, only, a '98 'group - you didn't cross-post it to any other OS 'groups nor any Java ones, solely this one. I presume you had a reason for doing that; maybe I am wrong. So what the heck do you need to know.. or rather supposedly, since this IS just another of your recent postings styles in this group.. I don't _need_ to know, I just _wanted_ to know why you posted this warning here and only here. BECAUSE I POST HERE, YOU WANT THIS MATERIAL ELSEWHERE - YOU POST IT ELSEWHERE, I OWE NO USERS OF OTHER OSs ANYTHING, and I have finished my OK, I understand - you choose to bombard us with such warnings, but here only. penance for recommending 9X to anyone... though I still post these I haven't seen you _recommending_ '98 to anyone for some time. warnings and advisements BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE BOTHERS TOO. But only here. Now really take the rest of your junk somewhere else, I'm done with your f-upped games. The feeling is mutual. [] I had tried to keep this polite. Yeah right. Sure ya did. That's why you asked these stupid questions and didn't bother to use whatever mental capacity you supposedly have. So my capacities are doubtful ... Who do you think would be fooled by this junk of yours... you have the materials, you have a brain, you have additional linked materials.. ... or I do have a brain, make your mind up. But let's close this one, shall we? [] How about you stop PLAYING the fool in this group... http://www.google.com/search?q=Usene...ver+%28John%29 Like I said, I'm done playing stupid Usenet games, and you are one I have no more tolerance for.. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
If running JAVA JDK JRE [see recent JAVA and Flash posted warning]and Office 2002 and above
On 11/18/2009 03:51 AM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
In message , MEB writes: [] [MUCH RANTING SNIPPED] *whatever OS it is installed in*. The vulnerabilities exist IN IT. Did you see a mention for any OS, NO, it was for specific *JAVA* versions/installations AS DEFINED. There was an implicit mention of 98 by the warning being posted in, only, a '98 'group - you didn't cross-post it to any other OS 'groups nor any Java ones, solely this one. I presume you had a reason for doing that; maybe I am wrong. So what the heck do you need to know.. or rather supposedly, since this IS just another of your recent postings styles in this group.. I don't _need_ to know, I just _wanted_ to know why you posted this warning here and only here. BECAUSE I POST HERE, YOU WANT THIS MATERIAL ELSEWHERE - YOU POST IT ELSEWHERE, I OWE NO USERS OF OTHER OSs ANYTHING, and I have finished my OK, I understand - you choose to bombard us with such warnings, but here only. penance for recommending 9X to anyone... though I still post these I haven't seen you _recommending_ '98 to anyone for some time. warnings and advisements BECAUSE NO ONE ELSE BOTHERS TOO. But only here. Now really take the rest of your junk somewhere else, I'm done with your f-upped games. The feeling is mutual. [] I had tried to keep this polite. Yeah right. Sure ya did. That's why you asked these stupid questions and didn't bother to use whatever mental capacity you supposedly have. So my capacities are doubtful ... Who do you think would be fooled by this junk of yours... you have the materials, you have a brain, you have additional linked materials.. ... or I do have a brain, make your mind up. But let's close this one, shall we? [] How about you stop PLAYING the fool in this group... http://www.google.com/search?q=Usene...ver+%28John%29 Like I said, I'm done playing stupid Usenet games, and you are one I have no more tolerance for.. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
If running JAVA JDK JRE [see recent JAVA and Flash posted warning] and Office 2002 and above
"MEB" wrote in message ... snip Like I said, I'm done playing stupid Usenet games, and you are one I have no more tolerance for.. snip Try a web based "Forum" it may suit your "temperament" more. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
If running JAVA JDK JRE [see recent JAVA and Flash posted warning] and Office 2002 and above
"MEB" wrote in message ... snip Like I said, I'm done playing stupid Usenet games, and you are one I have no more tolerance for.. snip Try a web based "Forum" it may suit your "temperament" more. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
If running JAVA JDK JRE [see recent JAVA and Flash posted warning]and Office 2002 and above
On 11/18/2009 05:20 PM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message ... snip Like I said, I'm done playing stupid Usenet games, and you are one I have no more tolerance for.. snip Try a web based "Forum" it may suit your "temperament" more. Ahha, here's another one... yet one more party as Troll.. So does it offend you that I can handle types such as you.. Who's next, 98 Guy, Jeff, some new entity... Seems your type takes great effort attempting to discredit parties and viable materials, don't you.. you also seem to take pleasure destroying groups and/or taking over groups... but then you have already been identified; posts placed related to your activities and what you are; and other; have already been attended to.. So did you have anything of value to add pursuant the subject heading or related materials... -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More Flash and JAVA warnings | MEB[_17_] | General | 12 | November 11th 09 06:55 AM |
Recent version of Flash needs SSE capable CPU ? | dave xnet | General | 2 | August 12th 08 05:49 AM |
Java | Sandy | General | 1 | June 2nd 05 02:15 PM |
Low memory warning on running excel | P S CHRISTIDES | General | 2 | November 12th 04 08:33 PM |
java? | javafordummies | General | 1 | September 4th 04 03:31 AM |