If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook
On 02/26/2010 01:29 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
MEB wrote: Just as you post here about malware threats that don't affect Windows 98 users? You got your shut up in the other postings... go somewhere else moron. Maurice - Microsoft is logging your activities at this very moment. They are logging the activity of your Microsoft groups account ). They know your posting IP address is 76.5.124.31. Microsoft will provide all that information to any law enforcement agency that asks for it. It need not be proven to Microsoft that the request meets any legitamate legal standard. Judges will award access orders to various agencies on the basis of completely specious arguments or evidence. Yahoo even publishs a fee list for access to such information. They probably don't even require a court order to turn it over. How does that make you feel? Makes me feel warm and fuzzy... Now perhaps you might wish to think about your own ISP, your DNS service, and of all the other OUT HERE who are monitoring YOU merely because you access this PAYASYOUGO Internet. Some FEES may be slightly higher than most realize... then again those who DO understand, which you don't, don't like some of it very much, and even take action against it at times... So where are your links to *YOUR* actions to prevent the unlawful activities that might be involved? BTW: did you BOTHER to actually LOOK at what Microsoft is doing, what the extents are, for how long, what triggers any activity, and that those basic materials were ALREADY posted upon Microsoft.... in fact I would question what over-zealous party placed the take-down notice... my guess is they were reprimanded for being stupid. Just WHAT did/DO you think you have exposed... nothing of value. IN STARK CONTRAST I posted links to what HAS been done with some of that information and more importantly, WHY. BTW: Not only Microsoft, but the federal government, federal and state courts, state governments, and several foreign governments know EXACTLY who I am and have MORE information than that. Can you guess WHY they have that information. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook
On 02/26/2010 01:43 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
What's your problem MEB? I posted a link to Microsoft's information retention and disclosure policy. Why do you feel the need to come to Microsoft's defense? Why do you feel the need to explain their policy or the defend the reasons why they have one? Because STUPID it happens to be THE LAW, here and Internationally. You and parties like you, always attempt to make these into "conspiracy" activities... there are some out there, but this isn't one as YOU attempted to expose with these materials. Now, do you have any hard documentation regarding facts in which Microsoft HAS exceeded the requirements of Law? -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook
On 02/26/2010 01:43 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
What's your problem MEB? I posted a link to Microsoft's information retention and disclosure policy. Why do you feel the need to come to Microsoft's defense? Why do you feel the need to explain their policy or the defend the reasons why they have one? Because STUPID it happens to be THE LAW, here and Internationally. You and parties like you, always attempt to make these into "conspiracy" activities... there are some out there, but this isn't one as YOU attempted to expose with these materials. Now, do you have any hard documentation regarding facts in which Microsoft HAS exceeded the requirements of Law? -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook
If you have a problem with me posting that information, then why don't you elaborate? Come on! You knew full well what his problem was going to be. Posting that link means that arguments about what MS does or does not do will now be based on fact instead of being driven by paranoia, and that is going to make some people very annoyed as it will take away their basis for sounding important and knowledgeable. Or maybe it won't make any difference at all. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook
If you have a problem with me posting that information, then why don't you elaborate? Come on! You knew full well what his problem was going to be. Posting that link means that arguments about what MS does or does not do will now be based on fact instead of being driven by paranoia, and that is going to make some people very annoyed as it will take away their basis for sounding important and knowledgeable. Or maybe it won't make any difference at all. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook
On 02/26/2010 08:59 PM, Jeff Richards wrote:
If you have a problem with me posting that information, then why don't you elaborate? Come on! You knew full well what his problem was going to be. Posting that link means that arguments about what MS does or does not do will now be based on fact instead of being driven by paranoia, and that is going to make some people very annoyed as it will take away their basis for sounding important and knowledgeable. Okay Jeffiepoo, how about *you* cite the exact statutes, PDD, CFR, Act(s), and other wherein the purported document shows Microsoft has exceeded, limited or other failed to do as required BY LAW. Or maybe it won't make any difference at all. Oh it did as usual, it brought you, in your apparent present form as troll, back into this group to spout your nonsense. HINT: the PDF shows that Microsoft is in compliance with the existing Laws at that time. Exactly the OPPOSITE of what the intent of the post was for... yep you guys are a real bright bunch... -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook
On 02/26/2010 08:59 PM, Jeff Richards wrote:
If you have a problem with me posting that information, then why don't you elaborate? Come on! You knew full well what his problem was going to be. Posting that link means that arguments about what MS does or does not do will now be based on fact instead of being driven by paranoia, and that is going to make some people very annoyed as it will take away their basis for sounding important and knowledgeable. Okay Jeffiepoo, how about *you* cite the exact statutes, PDD, CFR, Act(s), and other wherein the purported document shows Microsoft has exceeded, limited or other failed to do as required BY LAW. Or maybe it won't make any difference at all. Oh it did as usual, it brought you, in your apparent present form as troll, back into this group to spout your nonsense. HINT: the PDF shows that Microsoft is in compliance with the existing Laws at that time. Exactly the OPPOSITE of what the intent of the post was for... yep you guys are a real bright bunch... -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook
MEB wrote:
Now perhaps you might wish to think about your own ISP, your DNS service, and of all the other OUT HERE who are monitoring YOU merely because you access this PAYASYOUGO Internet. Oh, that is classic MEB material. payasyougo internet? You want to explain what that is? Some FEES may be slightly higher than most realize... Fees? WTF are you talking about? Warning: the next MEB-statement may be flagged as sporge by spam-detection softwa then again those who DO understand, which you don't, don't like some of it very much, and even take action against it at times... I believe that MEB was having a mini-stroke while typing the above sentence fragment. So where are your links to *YOUR* actions to prevent the unlawful activities that might be involved? Who says that the function of Microsoft's document is to "prevent unlawful activities" ? It does nothing of the sort. BTW: did you BOTHER to actually LOOK at what Microsoft is doing, The document describes what information is captured or logged as the "customer" uses the various Microsoft-provided services. what the extents are, for how long, what triggers any activity, and that those basic materials were ALREADY posted upon Microsoft... These exact details and logging time-frames have never been published by Microsoft in any public way. Just WHAT did/DO you think you have exposed... nothing of value. Then did it provoked a hysterical sequence of postings from you? IN STARK CONTRAST I posted links to what HAS been done with some of that information and more importantly, WHY. You posted two URL's describing: 1) Microsoft got a court to issue a secret temporary restraining order that took 277 domains off-line. 2) The second link you posted was just more information describing example #1. You are referencing a legal action undertaken by microsoft against the operation of domains that microsoft determined was important to the operation of a botnet. There is absolutely no indication that the current topic of this thread (Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook) was in any linked to the legal action that you reference. BTW: Not only Microsoft, but the federal government, federal and state courts, state governments, and several foreign governments know EXACTLY who I am and have MORE information than that. Can you guess WHY they have that information. Yes, I can. I can do more than guess. I've read those documents. Various state and local gov'ts (particularly Kentucky) know about you because you're a mentally unstable crackpot. You tried to get the supreme court of Kentucky to convene a grand jury to hear evidence that the state gov't of Kentucky was being operated by an organized criminal gang. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook
MEB wrote:
Now perhaps you might wish to think about your own ISP, your DNS service, and of all the other OUT HERE who are monitoring YOU merely because you access this PAYASYOUGO Internet. Oh, that is classic MEB material. payasyougo internet? You want to explain what that is? Some FEES may be slightly higher than most realize... Fees? WTF are you talking about? Warning: the next MEB-statement may be flagged as sporge by spam-detection softwa then again those who DO understand, which you don't, don't like some of it very much, and even take action against it at times... I believe that MEB was having a mini-stroke while typing the above sentence fragment. So where are your links to *YOUR* actions to prevent the unlawful activities that might be involved? Who says that the function of Microsoft's document is to "prevent unlawful activities" ? It does nothing of the sort. BTW: did you BOTHER to actually LOOK at what Microsoft is doing, The document describes what information is captured or logged as the "customer" uses the various Microsoft-provided services. what the extents are, for how long, what triggers any activity, and that those basic materials were ALREADY posted upon Microsoft... These exact details and logging time-frames have never been published by Microsoft in any public way. Just WHAT did/DO you think you have exposed... nothing of value. Then did it provoked a hysterical sequence of postings from you? IN STARK CONTRAST I posted links to what HAS been done with some of that information and more importantly, WHY. You posted two URL's describing: 1) Microsoft got a court to issue a secret temporary restraining order that took 277 domains off-line. 2) The second link you posted was just more information describing example #1. You are referencing a legal action undertaken by microsoft against the operation of domains that microsoft determined was important to the operation of a botnet. There is absolutely no indication that the current topic of this thread (Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook) was in any linked to the legal action that you reference. BTW: Not only Microsoft, but the federal government, federal and state courts, state governments, and several foreign governments know EXACTLY who I am and have MORE information than that. Can you guess WHY they have that information. Yes, I can. I can do more than guess. I've read those documents. Various state and local gov'ts (particularly Kentucky) know about you because you're a mentally unstable crackpot. You tried to get the supreme court of Kentucky to convene a grand jury to hear evidence that the state gov't of Kentucky was being operated by an organized criminal gang. |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Microsoft Online Services Global Criminal Compliance Handbook
On 02/26/2010 09:58 PM, 98 Guy wrote:
MEB wrote: Now perhaps you might wish to think about your own ISP, your DNS service, and of all the other OUT HERE who are monitoring YOU merely because you access this PAYASYOUGO Internet. Let me finish this nonsense you and the rest of the morons on the planet seem to love to talk about in your mindless discussions and baseless conspiracy theories. Go here since the Law applied is the United States' in discussions concerning Microsoft, this group, your access, and other applicable: http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/index.html ALL of your stupid little questions will be answered, and your ignorant little theories will wash down the drain. Search for IP caching, and like aspects of TCP/IP activities and the Internet if you can't figure out the quoted material, I'm not wasting anymore of my time on a moron. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
what are global hosts? | richard | General | 7 | November 27th 07 05:02 PM |
Windows upgrade compliance check | Wiscoman333 | Setup & Installation | 1 | November 26th 04 08:42 PM |
Inability to access Microsoft Online Assisted Support | Ellis Butler | General | 0 | August 13th 04 09:51 PM |
services.exe | John | General | 10 | July 11th 04 05:45 PM |
Recycle Bin Global Malfunction | Hank | Software & Applications | 1 | July 2nd 04 04:22 AM |