If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
what happens when windows is reinstalled 'over the top'
When Windows is installed 'over the top', by changing the name of
win.com and forcing the installation away from the default 'wndows000' folder back to the 'windows' folder, which files are replaced? I ask because it came as a surprise that the registry was unchanged when this over the top installation was performed on a friend's machine. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Some system and program files will be overwritten. The Registry and other
configuration files are specifically not overwritten, just edited to some extent. Of the files that are overwritten, some backups will be retained in VCM (Version Control Manager), but not all. This is where the problem with reinstalling over the top comes in. When you overinstall to an updated Win9x system, you are in many cases replacing newer files and settings with older ones. A retrograde. Short of reinstalling all Windows Updates and some other runtimes, and even some applications, you will no longer have an up-to-date and secure Windows system. Considering all the work that this entails, with no guarantee that you got it right, it's just as efficient to clean install, and you get a known state when you've finished. Reinstalling over the top is OK for regaining temporary access to the system in order to retrieve personal files and other important data, but is not recommended for long term health. -- Gary S. Terhune MS MVP Shell/User "John" wrote in message ... When Windows is installed 'over the top', by changing the name of win.com and forcing the installation away from the default 'wndows000' folder back to the 'windows' folder, which files are replaced? I ask because it came as a surprise that the registry was unchanged when this over the top installation was performed on a friend's machine. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
http://search.support.microsoft.com/...SD=GN&LN=EN-US MSKB
Search "Version Conflict Manager"; Windows 98; Full Text; Exact Phrase; comes up with four... http://support.microsoft.com/default...57&Product=w98 Description of the Version Conflict Manager Tool in Windows 98 (186157) - This article describes the Version Conflict Manager tool(Vcmui.exe) included in Windows 98. You can use the Version Conflict Manager tool to troubleshoot problems that may occur after you install a program. NOTE: The Windows 98 Help topic "Version... http://support.microsoft.com/default...85&Product=w98 Files Not Backed Up Using the Version Conflict Manager Tool (184585) - When you use the Version Conflict Manager tool to restore the newer versions of files that were overwritten by Windows 98 Setup, the files are properly restored, but the original Windows 98 files may be lost. http://support.microsoft.com/default...07&Product=w98 List of Documentation Errors in Windows 98 Resource Kit (188307) - This article lists known documentation errors in the Microsoft Windows 98 Resource Kit and the Microsoft Windows 98 Resource Kit Book Online located in the Tools\Reskit\Help folder on the Windows 98 CD-ROM. The following known documentation errors are... http://support.microsoft.com/default...75&Product=w98 Description of Microsoft System Information (Msinfo32.exe) Tool (184075) - Windows 98 includes a tool called Microsoft System Information (Msinfo32.exe). This tool can be used to gather information about your computer, to diagnose issues with your computer, or to access other tools that are included with Windows 98. This... -- Thanks or Good Luck, There may be humor in this post, and, Naturally, you will not sue, should things get worse after this, PCR "John" wrote in message ... | When Windows is installed 'over the top', by changing the name of | win.com and forcing the installation away from the default 'wndows000' | folder back to the 'windows' folder, which files are replaced? I ask | because it came as a surprise that the registry was unchanged when | this over the top installation was performed on a friend's machine. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary S. Terhune" wrote:
Some system and program files will be overwritten. The Registry and other configuration files are specifically not overwritten, just edited to some extent. Of the files that are overwritten, some backups will be retained in VCM (Version Control Manager), but not all. This is where the problem with reinstalling over the top comes in. When you overinstall to an updated Win9x system, you are in many cases replacing newer files and settings with older ones. A retrograde. Short of reinstalling all Windows Updates and some other runtimes, and even some applications, you will no longer have an up-to-date and secure Windows system. Considering all the work that this entails, with no guarantee that you got it right, it's just as efficient to clean install, and you get a known state when you've finished. Reinstalling over the top is OK for regaining temporary access to the system in order to retrieve personal files and other important data, but is not recommended for long term health. Many thanks to Gary and PCR |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
You're welcome. Note that newer versions of Windows, including Windows ME and XP
(not sure about Windows 2000) have system file protection mechanisms that protect newer versions of system files from being replaced by older ones. These protections don't, for the most part, exist in Windows 98SE and earlier (except, as noted, the partial protection afforded by VCM.). -- Gary S. Terhune MS MVP Shell/User "John" wrote in message ... "Gary S. Terhune" wrote: Some system and program files will be overwritten. The Registry and other configuration files are specifically not overwritten, just edited to some extent. Of the files that are overwritten, some backups will be retained in VCM (Version Control Manager), but not all. This is where the problem with reinstalling over the top comes in. When you overinstall to an updated Win9x system, you are in many cases replacing newer files and settings with older ones. A retrograde. Short of reinstalling all Windows Updates and some other runtimes, and even some applications, you will no longer have an up-to-date and secure Windows system. Considering all the work that this entails, with no guarantee that you got it right, it's just as efficient to clean install, and you get a known state when you've finished. Reinstalling over the top is OK for regaining temporary access to the system in order to retrieve personal files and other important data, but is not recommended for long term health. Many thanks to Gary and PCR |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Gary,
Windows 2000 also has WFP (Windows File Protection). However doing an in place upgrade on W2K (a reinstall over itself) overwrites many files and one needs to reinstall service pack and hotfixes, it's an option of last resort. As for Windows ME which also has WFP doing a reinstall over without first removing IE6 results in a near complete disaster with a hopeless soup of mixed up IE files. When it comes to reinstalls the installation files override WFP. As for XP I don't know, I suspect it behaves like W2K but can't say. Just thought you might appreciate the information. Regards; John Gary S. Terhune wrote: You're welcome. Note that newer versions of Windows, including Windows ME and XP (not sure about Windows 2000) have system file protection mechanisms that protect newer versions of system files from being replaced by older ones. These protections don't, for the most part, exist in Windows 98SE and earlier (except, as noted, the partial protection afforded by VCM.). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
You're right, John. I *do* appreciate that info. I was never sure about ME & 2K,
and while I've used XP reinstall/Repair, in order to salvage a system, it's also only been so I could get back in long enough to take care of urgent chores before reinstalling, always in situations so urgent that I didn't have time to delve into the file versioning, s. I guess WFP really only works against 3rd-party apps wanting to intrude. -- Gary S. Terhune MS MVP Shell/User "John John" wrote in message ... Hi Gary, Windows 2000 also has WFP (Windows File Protection). However doing an in place upgrade on W2K (a reinstall over itself) overwrites many files and one needs to reinstall service pack and hotfixes, it's an option of last resort. As for Windows ME which also has WFP doing a reinstall over without first removing IE6 results in a near complete disaster with a hopeless soup of mixed up IE files. When it comes to reinstalls the installation files override WFP. As for XP I don't know, I suspect it behaves like W2K but can't say. Just thought you might appreciate the information. Regards; John Gary S. Terhune wrote: You're welcome. Note that newer versions of Windows, including Windows ME and XP (not sure about Windows 2000) have system file protection mechanisms that protect newer versions of system files from being replaced by older ones. These protections don't, for the most part, exist in Windows 98SE and earlier (except, as noted, the partial protection afforded by VCM.). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Reinstalled Windows, can't open FrontPage now. | SoapLady | General | 1 | October 24th 04 07:34 AM |
error loading explorer.exe. SHLWAPI.dll | Gary | General | 4 | October 20th 04 04:08 AM |
FAQ: Win98 users: Upgrading to WinXP, IE6, etc. | JM | Improving Performance | 6 | July 26th 04 01:44 PM |
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-023--Please Note! | Gary S. Terhune | General | 4 | July 14th 04 04:39 AM |
Zero-byte D: drive should not show, C: missing from Device Manager | *Vanguard* | General | 8 | June 12th 04 04:19 AM |