If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
cluster-sector question
What are the advantages and disadvantages of 2 sectors per cluster vs. 4
sectors per cluster? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
cluster-sector question
under fat, fat16, fat32 there are limits to the number of clusters the OS
can address, higher for each version if there is one sector per cluster maximum disk size is (Example only I cant remember what it actually is) 2 GB 64 sectors per cluster 128 GB Cluster sizes are determined when creating the disk volume changing the default cluster size for a given disk size is not usually efficient, and may if the disk is large enough make the later parts of the disk inaccessible Large cluster sizes are efficient when the files are large 900MB video in 64sector clusters very little head movement to find the next cluster Small cluster sizes are efficient where file sizes are generally small, Windows boot files, batch files since a 1kb batch file can then occupy a 1 kb disk cluster, no slack space A solution is to partition a large drive into two or more volumes, 1 or more small enough to be efficient to store small docs on, and 1 or more large enough to store large files efficiently, -- - Adaware http://www.lavasoft.de spybot http://security.kolla.de AVG free antivirus http://www.grisoft.com Etrust/Vet/CA.online Antivirus scan http://www3.ca.com/securityadvisor/virusinfo/scan.aspx Panda online AntiVirus scan http://www.activescan.com Panda online AntiSpyware Scan http://www.pandasoftware.com/virus_info/spyware/test/ Catalog of removal tools (1) http://www.pandasoftware.com/download/utilities/ Catalog of removal tools (2) http://www3.ca.com/securityadvisor/n...aspx?CID=40387 Trouble Shooting guide to Windows http://mvps.org/winhelp2002/ Blocking Unwanted Parasites with a Hosts file http://mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm links provided as a courtesy, read all instructions on the pages before use Grateful thanks to the authors/webmasters _ "b11_" wrote in message ... What are the advantages and disadvantages of 2 sectors per cluster vs. 4 sectors per cluster? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
cluster-sector question
Small clusters waste less space, but need a larger index (FAT) to manage
them, and that means more index accesses and updates for a given volume of data. -- Jeff Richards MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User) "b11_" wrote in message ... What are the advantages and disadvantages of 2 sectors per cluster vs. 4 sectors per cluster? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
cluster-sector question
So 2 clusters per sector waste less space then 4 cluters per sector?
__________________________________________________ ____________ "Jeff Richards" wrote: Small clusters waste less space, but need a larger index (FAT) to manage them, and that means more index accesses and updates for a given volume of data. -- Jeff Richards MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User) "b11_" wrote in message ... What are the advantages and disadvantages of 2 sectors per cluster vs. 4 sectors per cluster? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
cluster-sector question
On Mon, 22 May 2006 17:32:02 -0700, b11_
put finger to keyboard and composed: So 2 clusters per sector waste less space then 4 cluters per sector? Yes. On average you will save 1 sector per file, ie (4-2)/2. If you have 10,000 files, then you will save about 5MB. BTW, that should be sectors per cluster. __________________________________________________ ____________ "Jeff Richards" wrote: Small clusters waste less space, but need a larger index (FAT) to manage them, and that means more index accesses and updates for a given volume of data. -- Jeff Richards MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User) "b11_" wrote in message ... What are the advantages and disadvantages of 2 sectors per cluster vs. 4 sectors per cluster? - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
cluster-sector question
So 2 sectors per cluster waste less space then 4 sectors per cluster?
__________________________________________________ _________ "Franc Zabkar" wrote: On Mon, 22 May 2006 17:32:02 -0700, b11_ put finger to keyboard and composed: So 2 clusters per sector waste less space then 4 cluters per sector? Yes. On average you will save 1 sector per file, ie (4-2)/2. If you have 10,000 files, then you will save about 5MB. BTW, that should be sectors per cluster. __________________________________________________ ____________ "Jeff Richards" wrote: Small clusters waste less space, but need a larger index (FAT) to manage them, and that means more index accesses and updates for a given volume of data. -- Jeff Richards MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User) "b11_" wrote in message ... What are the advantages and disadvantages of 2 sectors per cluster vs. 4 sectors per cluster? - Franc Zabkar -- Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
cluster-sector question
"b11_" wrote in message
What are the advantages and disadvantages of 2 sectors per cluster vs. 4 sectors per cluster? Just some pertinent information that was easier for me to just copy/paste some portions of it right out of my Partition Magic help files. After you read and understand it is why that you will find it's best to keep your FAT32 OS primary partition(s) under 8 GB not only for best 4k cluster size efficiency, but it's so much faster to defrag it, etc; you don't need anymore than 8 GB anyway for the OS partition. Then you take all of your Non-OS partitions and that is where you would make all those larger according to your HD's size (but always under 128 GB) ...and use them for storage partitions - and the cluster efficiency may be bigger yes but for storage drives and what it's used for it's not a big deal and not that much is lost comparatively, and to me is a non-issue. Rick (gone on vacation ..now ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ (copy/paste) Making Efficient Use of Disk Space If you have a large hard disk and want to use the FAT file system on all or most of the disk, you can prevent wasted space by using several small FAT partitions. All data on a FAT partition are stored in allocation units called clusters. Each cluster is made up of a fixed number of disk sectors. (sectors meaning the smallest addressable section on a disk. It is used to record one block of a program or data. Each head on each track is typically divided into 17 or more sectors) The FAT file system supports disk or partition sizes up to 2 GB, but only allows a maximum of 65,525 clusters. Therefore, whatever the size of the hard disk or partition, the number of sectors in one cluster must be large enough so that all available space can be included within 65,525 clusters. The larger the available space, the larger the cluster size must be. However, using a large cluster size wastes disk space. Even if a data file (or the last portion of a data file) is much smaller than the cluster size, the computer must still use a complete cluster to store the data. The rest of the cluster space goes unused. The following table shows the minimum cluster size and typical wasted space for various partition sizes. Partition Sizes Min Required Cluster Size % Wasted Space (approx.) 16-127 MB 2 KB 2% 128-255 MB 4 KB 4% 256-511 MB 8 KB 10% 512-1,023 MB 16 KB 25% 1,024-2,047 MB 32 KB 40% 2,048-4,096 MB 64 KB 50% You can prevent wasted disk space by using smaller partitions, because smaller partitions use smaller cluster sizes. For example, a 1,024 MB partition has a cluster size of 32 KB. If you saved a 2 KB file to this partition, an entire 32 KB cluster would be used to save the file, wasting 30 KB of space. However, if you divide your storage space into 120 MB partitions, these partitions would only use 2 KB clusters. When you save the same 2 KB file, the file would fit neatly into a 2 KB cluster, with no wasted space. About Resizing Clusters Use Resize Clusters to change the cluster size on FAT and FAT32 partitions. Reducing cluster size may help you reclaim wasted space on your hard disk. All files on FAT and FAT32 partitions are stored in allocation units called clusters. Each file is allocated at least one cluster, resulting in wasted space in clusters containing small files. The size of a partition determines cluster size. Larger partitions have larger clusters, and, therefore, more wasted space. Default Cluster Sizes A partition's cluster size is set by the DOS FORMAT operation, based on the size of the partition, as shown in the following tables. DOS and Windows default FAT cluster sizes Partition Size (MB) FAT Type Sectors Per Cluster Cluster Size 0-15 12-bit 8 512 bytes 16-127 16-bit 4 2 K 128-255 16-bit 8 4 K 256-511 16-bit 16 8 K 512-1,023 16-bit 32 16 K 1,024-2,047 16-bit 64 32 K 2,048-4,096 16-bit 128 64 K* *Only available with Windows NT. Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2, Windows 98, Windows Me, and Windows 2000/XP default FAT32 cluster sizes Partition Size (GB) Sectors Per Cluster Cluster Size 0.256-8.01 8 4 K 8.02-16.02 16 8 K 16.03-32.04 32 16 K 32.04 64 32 K FAT (File Allocation Table) The FAT file system is used by DOS, Windows 3.x, and Windows 95 (in most installations). The FAT file system can also be used by Windows 98/Me/NT/2000/XP. The FAT file system is characterized by the use of a file allocation table (FAT) and clusters. The FAT is the heart of the file system; for safety, the FAT is duplicated to protect its data from accidental deletion or corruption. Clusters are the FAT system's smallest unit of data storage; one cluster consists of a fixed number of disk sectors. The FAT records which clusters are used, which are unused, and where files are located within the clusters. The FAT file system supports disk or partition sizes up to 2 GB, but only allows a maximum of 65,525 clusters. Therefore, whatever the size of the hard disk or partition, the number of sectors in one cluster must be large enough so that all available space can be included within 65,525 clusters. The larger the available space, the larger the cluster size must be. In general, large clusters tend to waste more space than small clusters. The FAT file system also uses a root directory. This directory has a maximum allowable number of entries and must be located at a specific place on the disk or partition. OSs that use the FAT file system represent the root directory with the backward slash character (\), and initially display this directory at boot-up. The root directory stores information about each sub-directory and file in the form of individual directory entries. For example, a file's directory entry holds information such as the filename, the size of the file, a date and time stamp that indicates when the file was last changed, the starting cluster number (which cluster holds the first portion of the file), and the file's attributes (for example, hidden, system, and so forth). FAT 32 (File Allocation Table 32) FAT32 is a file system that can be used by Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (version 4.00.950B), Windows 98/2000/XP. However, DOS, Windows 3.x, Windows NT 3.51/4.0, and earlier versions of Windows 95 cannot recognize FAT32, and are thus unable to boot from or use files on a FAT32 disk or partition. FAT32 is an enhancement of the FAT file system and is based on 32-bit file allocation table entries, rather than the 16-bit entries used by the FAT system. As a result, FAT32 supports much larger disk or partition sizes (up to 2 terabytes). The FAT32 file system uses smaller clusters than the FAT file system, has duplicate boot records, and features a root directory that can be any size and can be located anywhere on the disk or partition. NTFS (New Technology File System) The New Technology File System (NTFS) is accessible by Windows NT/2000/XP. NTFS is not recommended for use on disks less than 400 MB because it uses a great deal of space for system structures. The central system structure of the NTFS file system is the master file table (MFT). NTFS keeps multiple copies of the critical portion of the MFT to protect against corruption and data loss. Like FAT and FAT32, NTFS uses clusters to store data files; however, the size of the clusters is not dependent on the size of the disk or partition. A cluster size as small as 512 bytes can be specified, regardless of whether a partition is 500 MB or 5 GB. Using small clusters not only reduces the amount of wasted disk space, but also reduces file fragmentation, a condition where files are broken up over many noncontiguous clusters, resulting in slower file access. Because of its ability to use small clusters, NTFS provides good performance on large drives. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Major partition problem | Hoppy | General | 26 | May 13th 06 12:23 AM |
SCANDISK on 6GB drive producing Errors at 2.09GB to end. | Jerry | Disk Drives | 15 | July 21st 05 07:00 PM |
Surface scan in Windows 98 warning of bad cluster | Larry | General | 73 | February 20th 05 07:18 PM |
Adding another HD - some questions | Bill in Co. | General | 88 | December 12th 04 08:22 PM |
Scandisk data error while reading cluster 419202 | N Dias | Disk Drives | 1 | July 8th 04 03:52 PM |