A Windows 98 & ME forum. Win98banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Win98banter forum » Windows 98 » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Scandisk errors



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 27th 04, 11:41 AM
Peter Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Scandisk errors

I've tried to defrag my computer but at 10-12% it says that the computer has
errors and that i should use scandisk. It finds errors and then i try defrag
again. Again it stops and says there are errrors. I tried running the
computer in safe mode to stop anti-virus software etc. Still no luck. Is
there another way i can check my computer for errors and therefore use
defrag??

Peter


  #2  
Old August 27th 04, 12:01 PM
Don Phillipson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Brown" wrote in message
...

I've tried to defrag my computer but at 10-12% it says that the computer

has
errors and that i should use scandisk. It finds errors and then i try

defrag
again. Again it stops and says there are errrors.


If ScanDisk cannot repair the hard drive reliably,
this is a strong hint to buy a new hard drive, instal
it as C:\, instal the operating system, then see
what you can copy from the old hard drive before
it fails coompletely.

--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)


  #3  
Old August 27th 04, 12:13 PM
glee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Are you doing a Thorough (surface) scandisk, or just a file system scan? Often when
Defrag says there are errors, it refers to bad sectors which must be repaired or
marked bad by a thorough scan.

Boot to MS-DOS Mode, and run scan disk the
Click Start Shutdown Restart in MS-DOS Mode.
At the DOS prompt, type:
scandisk /all /surface
and press Enter.
It will take a while, depending on the disk capacity. When done, it will return you
to a DOS prompt. Then type EXIT and press enter, to restart Windows.

Have a look here, by MS MVP Ron Badour:
http://home.satx.rr.com/badour/html/scandisk.html
and
http://home.satx.rr.com/badour/html/defrag.html
--
Glen Ventura, MS MVP W95/98 Systems
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm


"Peter Brown" wrote in message
...
I've tried to defrag my computer but at 10-12% it says that the computer has
errors and that i should use scandisk. It finds errors and then i try defrag
again. Again it stops and says there are errrors. I tried running the
computer in safe mode to stop anti-virus software etc. Still no luck. Is
there another way i can check my computer for errors and therefore use
defrag??

Peter



  #4  
Old August 27th 04, 12:14 PM
Peter Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But the computer is running fine. Somebody suggested that i run defrag to
possibly speed up the computer. Is there a real risk it could die on me?

"Peter Brown" wrote in message
...
I've tried to defrag my computer but at 10-12% it says that the computer

has
errors and that i should use scandisk. It finds errors and then i try

defrag
again. Again it stops and says there are errrors. I tried running the
computer in safe mode to stop anti-virus software etc. Still no luck. Is
there another way i can check my computer for errors and therefore use
defrag??

Peter




  #5  
Old August 27th 04, 05:34 PM
Brian A.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Peter Brown" wrote in message =
...
But the computer is running fine. Somebody suggested that i run defrag =

to
possibly speed up the computer. Is there a real risk it could die on =

me?

Yes!! As Glen mentioned you need to run scandisk to check for bad =
sectors and repair them if/when found. What it does is mark the bad =
sector as unusable so it can not be accessed again and copies the data =
in that sector to another. Once sectors start going bad, most likely =
others are soon to follow.

You could also run a drive diagnostic utility obtained from the =
manufacturers site for the drive in question.

If you choose to do neither, then you set your own fate for the drive.


--=20
Brian A.

Conflicts start where information lacks.
http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
  #6  
Old August 30th 04, 07:33 PM
cquirke (MVP Win9x)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:41:17 +0100, "Peter Brown"

I've tried to defrag my computer but at 10-12% it says that the computer has
errors and that i should use scandisk. It finds errors


Forget Defrag for now; the Scandisk "errors" are more important. What
specific errors do you see? Are there any bad clusters (as opposed to
lost cluster chains)? What's the PC's history like; well looked
after, or subject to crashes and bad exits (improper shutdowns)?

and then i try defrag again. Again it stops and says there are errrors.


You are very lucky it stops. Defrag involves moving pontentially
every file on the PC, i.e. reading it from HD into RAM, then writing
it back elsewhere on the HD. If anything's wrong with HD, RAM, or the
reliability of the processing in general, you could lose data++

I tried running the computer in safe mode to stop anti-virus software etc.
Still no luck. Is there another way i can check my computer for errors


Yes; restart the PC in MSDOS mode and run Scandisk from there. This
is the safest approach, in that you don't have Windows trying to write
to the at-risk HD all the time; also, you can watch the cluster
counter for latency (pauses) during the surface scan.

The surface scan is crucial! If you have any latency, old bad
clusters, or new bad clusters, then the HD is likely dying and you
should salvage your data now.

and therefore use defrag??


Forget Defrag until you know your HD and data are OK...

"But apart from that, Mrs Lincon, how did you enjoy the play?"



--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -

The memes will inherit the Earth
--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -

  #7  
Old August 30th 04, 07:34 PM
cquirke (MVP Win9x)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:13:49 -0400, "glee"

Are you doing a Thorough (surface) scandisk, or just a file system scan? Often when
Defrag says there are errors, it refers to bad sectors which must be repaired or
marked bad by a thorough scan.


You can't wish away physically bad sectors by "fixing" them, and
Defrag remains an extremely bad idea under those circumstances.



--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -

Who is General Failure and
why is he reading my disk?
--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -

  #8  
Old August 30th 04, 07:41 PM
cquirke (MVP Win9x)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:14:07 +0100, "Peter Brown"

But the computer is running fine. Somebody suggested that i run defrag to
possibly speed up the computer. Is there a real risk it could die on me?


Yes there certainly is, if the HD is ill. We don't know that it's
ill, and there are other scenarios that may apply - but *until* we
know the HD's OK (by testing it) we have to assume the worst.

The only time I would relax is after I'd done a surface scan and seen
no bad clusters (either newly-discovered or "old' ones previously
"fixed") and Scandisk consistently completes without finding any
logical errors. If I kept seeing logical errors and I wasn't crashing
and I was shutting down properly, I'd check RAM. Mind you, I'd look
for RAM errors if I was having crashes too!

If you find that Scandisk never finds any errors at all, yet Defrag
keeps complaining about "errors", then I'd rename away the AppLog dir
from DOS mode. Bad entries in there can cause Defrag to abort as if
there were file system errors, when there are not.

An unbootable PC which has lost all your data is likely to slow you
down a lot more than not being able to Defrag for a while.



-------------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -

Reality is that which, when you stop believing
in it, does not go away (PKD)
-------------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -

  #9  
Old August 31st 04, 04:59 AM
glee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chris, I know you prefer to throw away a drive if it has a sector marked bad, but I
have been running literally for years now with a drive that has one sector marked
bad. It warrants keeping a close watch, but it does not make the drive necessarily
a throwaway, unless other sectors start to come up bad. I also did not suggest
anywhere that the OP should run Defrag.
--
Glen Ventura, MS MVP W95/98 Systems
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm

"cquirke (MVP Win9x)" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:13:49 -0400, "glee"

Are you doing a Thorough (surface) scandisk, or just a file system scan? Often

when
Defrag says there are errors, it refers to bad sectors which must be repaired or
marked bad by a thorough scan.


You can't wish away physically bad sectors by "fixing" them, and
Defrag remains an extremely bad idea under those circumstances.



--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -

Who is General Failure and
why is he reading my disk?
--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -


  #10  
Old August 31st 04, 03:15 PM
Peter Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I tried disk scan in MS DOS but on the surface scan it couldn't complete
due to lack of "free conventional memory". Is this important. I'd like to
repeat that the computer is working fine and if I hadn't tried to defrag the
computer I wouldn't have noticed anything wrong.

"cquirke (MVP Win9x)" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:41:17 +0100, "Peter Brown"

I've tried to defrag my computer but at 10-12% it says that the computer

has
errors and that i should use scandisk. It finds errors


Forget Defrag for now; the Scandisk "errors" are more important. What
specific errors do you see? Are there any bad clusters (as opposed to
lost cluster chains)? What's the PC's history like; well looked
after, or subject to crashes and bad exits (improper shutdowns)?

and then i try defrag again. Again it stops and says there are errrors.


You are very lucky it stops. Defrag involves moving pontentially
every file on the PC, i.e. reading it from HD into RAM, then writing
it back elsewhere on the HD. If anything's wrong with HD, RAM, or the
reliability of the processing in general, you could lose data++

I tried running the computer in safe mode to stop anti-virus software

etc.
Still no luck. Is there another way i can check my computer for errors


Yes; restart the PC in MSDOS mode and run Scandisk from there. This
is the safest approach, in that you don't have Windows trying to write
to the at-risk HD all the time; also, you can watch the cluster
counter for latency (pauses) during the surface scan.

The surface scan is crucial! If you have any latency, old bad
clusters, or new bad clusters, then the HD is likely dying and you
should salvage your data now.

and therefore use defrag??


Forget Defrag until you know your HD and data are OK...

"But apart from that, Mrs Lincon, how did you enjoy the play?"



--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -

The memes will inherit the Earth
--------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - -



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Can't re-install Win98 because Scandisk won't run Dick Wisan Setup & Installation 3 July 29th 04 10:30 PM
Scandisk Wayne Freeman Software & Applications 1 July 25th 04 11:28 PM
ScanDisk Lock-Up caroloyl General 5 June 22nd 04 12:11 PM
ScanDisk & Defrag problems anonymous General 0 June 14th 04 04:50 PM
Scandisk Created Numbered Directories Disk Drives 0 May 6th 04 01:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Win98banter.
The comments are property of their posters.