A Windows 98 & ME forum. Win98banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Win98banter forum » Windows 98 » Disk Drives
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

250 GB drives - please help



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 11th 07, 10:05 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win98.disks.general,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
98 Guy
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 2,951
Default 250 GB drives - please help

Adam wrote:

Not sure what the potential problem is with ScanDisk+Win98SE+
Big Drives


First, understand that there are 2 scandisk's. One is the DOS
scandisk (scandisk.exe) and the second is Windows scandisk
(scandskw.exe + diskmaint.dll). Then there is defrag (AKA windows
defrag).

The windows scandisk and defrag have problems when the number of
allocation units (AKA clusters) exceeds a certain number (I think it's
4 million but it could be 6 or 8 million). The windows ME versions of
scandisk and defrag have a higher limit (and most people recommend you
use them on your win-98 system for other reasons anyways).

The DOS version of scandisk (the one that sometimes runs at startup
when a bad shutdown was detected) actually doesn't have a limit from
my own tests, so it's quite robust in that regard.

The idiot (Rod) is claiming there is some other issue regarding large
hard drives and win-98, but he refuses to describe it.

And by the way, you don't need PM to prepare a large hard drive for
win-98. What you need is simply the updated version of fdisk.exe (may
2000 I think). It will correctly partition a large drive (250 gb or
larger) and then you use format.com to format it.

The only time I use something other than Fdisk/Format is when I want
to force a certain cluster size.

(I'm trimming the asus newsgroup from this reply because the NNTP
server that I use has a limit of 3 groups for a cross-post).
  #2  
Old November 11th 07, 11:52 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win98.disks.general,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
Eric Gisin
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 2
Default 250 GB drives - please help

"98 Guy" wrote in message ...

First, understand that there are 2 scandisk's. One is the DOS
scandisk (scandisk.exe) and the second is Windows scandisk
(scandskw.exe + diskmaint.dll). Then there is defrag (AKA windows
defrag).

The windows scandisk and defrag have problems when the number of
allocation units (AKA clusters) exceeds a certain number (I think it's
4 million but it could be 6 or 8 million). The windows ME versions of
scandisk and defrag have a higher limit (and most people recommend you
use them on your win-98 system for other reasons anyways).

Win 98 GUI scandisk and defrag are 16-bit, and limited to 16MB.
The FAT has to be resident, so the cluster limit is under 4M.
I don't know about Win ME. You could look up the MS KB article on these.
This topic was discussed 5 years ago, google groups has it.

The DOS version of scandisk (the one that sometimes runs at startup
when a bad shutdown was detected) actually doesn't have a limit from
my own tests, so it's quite robust in that regard.

The idiot (Rod) is claiming there is some other issue regarding large
hard drives and win-98, but he refuses to describe it.

The obvious problem is the MS IDE drive is not LBA-48,
so 128GB is a hard limit unless there is an alt driver available.

And by the way, you don't need PM to prepare a large hard drive for
win-98. What you need is simply the updated version of fdisk.exe (may
2000 I think). It will correctly partition a large drive (250 gb or
larger) and then you use format.com to format it.

Correct, or you could use freeDOS fdisk.
  #3  
Old November 12th 07, 02:35 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win98.disks.general,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
98 Guy
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 2,951
Default 250 GB drives - please help

Eric Gisin wrote:

Win 98 GUI scandisk and defrag are 16-bit, and limited to 16MB.
The FAT has to be resident, so the cluster limit is under 4M.


There is a KB that explains it - the limit being 4.177 million
clusters - at least that's how MS explains it for the DOS scandisk.
The reality is that if himem.sys is loaded, then DOS scandisk can
process FAT's with much higher cluster counts (perhaps assuming that
you have some arbitrarily large amount of memory - 128, 256 or 512
mb).

The ME versions of Scandskw and defrag can handle a volume with more
than 4 million clusters.

So the solution for win-98 is either (a) don't create partitions
larger than 128 gb, or (b) obtain the ME versions of scandskw.exe,
diskmaint.dll, and defrag.exe. (this assumes you've already overcome
the issue with ESDI_506.PDR).

The obvious problem is the MS IDE drive is not LBA-48,
so 128GB is a hard limit unless there is an alt driver
available.


Like I've said already here, the solution to that issue is

a) use SATA (not PATA) - either SATA on the motherboard or
SATA expansion (PCI) card

b) use Intel Application Accelerator (only good for specific
chipsets) - it replaces ESDI_506.PDR with something else

c) use the MSFN hacked / fixed version of ESDI_506.PDR

d) Pay for the Loew version of ESDI_506.PDR.

e) obtain an IDE (PATA) controller card (PCI) and hope it has
it's own replacement for ESDI_506.PDR.

All of the above requires that the motherboard BIOS performs 48-bit
sector handling (vs 32 bit). But if you have a SATA motherboard, it
most certainly will satisfy that criteria, as will any P-4 (or higher)
motherboard.

There is actually one more option:

f) rename or remove ESDI_506.PDR and force win-98 into "DOS"
compatibility mode for hard drive access (where it uses
BIOS function calls to access the hard drive).
  #4  
Old November 12th 07, 06:13 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win98.disks.general,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
Lil' Dave
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 247
Default 250 GB drives - please help

Would appreciate an MS weblink to the more updated form of fdisk.exe noted
by the respondent (actually OP per my newsreader).
The one and only version of fdisk that was an update many years ago has a
limit of 128GB parition size limitation. Original is 64GB.

--
Dave
Profound is we're here due to a chance arrangement
of chemicals in the ocean billions of years ago.
More profound is we made it to the top of the food
chain per our reasoning abilities.
Most profound is the denial of why we may
be on the way out.
"98 Guy" wrote in message ...
Adam wrote:

Not sure what the potential problem is with ScanDisk+Win98SE+
Big Drives


First, understand that there are 2 scandisk's. One is the DOS
scandisk (scandisk.exe) and the second is Windows scandisk
(scandskw.exe + diskmaint.dll). Then there is defrag (AKA windows
defrag).

The windows scandisk and defrag have problems when the number of
allocation units (AKA clusters) exceeds a certain number (I think it's
4 million but it could be 6 or 8 million). The windows ME versions of
scandisk and defrag have a higher limit (and most people recommend you
use them on your win-98 system for other reasons anyways).

The DOS version of scandisk (the one that sometimes runs at startup
when a bad shutdown was detected) actually doesn't have a limit from
my own tests, so it's quite robust in that regard.

The idiot (Rod) is claiming there is some other issue regarding large
hard drives and win-98, but he refuses to describe it.

And by the way, you don't need PM to prepare a large hard drive for
win-98. What you need is simply the updated version of fdisk.exe (may
2000 I think). It will correctly partition a large drive (250 gb or
larger) and then you use format.com to format it.

The only time I use something other than Fdisk/Format is when I want
to force a certain cluster size.

(I'm trimming the asus newsgroup from this reply because the NNTP
server that I use has a limit of 3 groups for a cross-post).



  #5  
Old November 12th 07, 06:36 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win98.disks.general,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
98 Guy
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 2,951
Default 250 GB drives - please help

Lil' Dave wrote:

Would appreciate an MS weblink to the more updated form of
fdisk.exe noted by the respondent.


http://support.microsoft.com/kb/263044
  #6  
Old November 12th 07, 06:54 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win98.disks.general,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
Adam
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 92
Default 250 GB drives - please help


"98 Guy" wrote in message ...
Eric Gisin wrote:

Win 98 GUI scandisk and defrag are 16-bit, and limited to 16MB.
The FAT has to be resident, so the cluster limit is under 4M.


There is a KB that explains it - the limit being 4.177 million
clusters - at least that's how MS explains it for the DOS scandisk.
The reality is that if himem.sys is loaded, then DOS scandisk can
process FAT's with much higher cluster counts (perhaps assuming that
you have some arbitrarily large amount of memory - 128, 256 or 512
mb).

The ME versions of Scandskw and defrag can handle a volume with more
than 4 million clusters.

So the solution for win-98 is either (a) don't create partitions
larger than 128 gb, or (b) obtain the ME versions of scandskw.exe,
diskmaint.dll, and defrag.exe. (this assumes you've already overcome
the issue with ESDI_506.PDR).


Option (a) is not a problem ... I don't see a real need to
have partitions anywhere near 128 GB.

Downloaded ScanDisk and Defrag from ...
http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=775763

DEFRAG EX_ 213,296 11-12-07 9:16a defrag.ex_
SCANDSKW EX_ 5,104 11-12-07 9:16a scandskw.ex_
DISKMA~1 DL_ 0 11-12-07 9:35a diskmaint.dl_

File size of "diskmaint.dll" doesn't seem right though.
Is there a better place to download ME versions of these files?

In my case, connecting HDDs larger than 120 GB via
the Maxtor Ultra ATA/133 PCI Adapter Card seems to
circumvent the problem with ESDI_506.PDR.
I definitely do not have a ESDI_506.PDR that
can handle HDDs larger than 120 GB ...

ESDI_506 PDR 24,406 04-23-99 10:22p ESDI_506.PDR



The obvious problem is the MS IDE drive is not LBA-48,
so 128GB is a hard limit unless there is an alt driver
available.


Like I've said already here, the solution to that issue is

a) use SATA (not PATA) - either SATA on the motherboard or
SATA expansion (PCI) card

b) use Intel Application Accelerator (only good for specific
chipsets) - it replaces ESDI_506.PDR with something else

c) use the MSFN hacked / fixed version of ESDI_506.PDR

d) Pay for the Loew version of ESDI_506.PDR.

e) obtain an IDE (PATA) controller card (PCI) and hope it has
it's own replacement for ESDI_506.PDR.

All of the above requires that the motherboard BIOS performs 48-bit
sector handling (vs 32 bit). But if you have a SATA motherboard, it
most certainly will satisfy that criteria, as will any P-4 (or higher)
motherboard.

There is actually one more option:

f) rename or remove ESDI_506.PDR and force win-98 into "DOS"
compatibility mode for hard drive access (where it uses
BIOS function calls to access the hard drive).


  #7  
Old November 13th 07, 02:22 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win98.disks.general,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
Adam
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 92
Default 250 GB drives - please help


"Adam" wrote in message
. net...

"98 Guy" wrote in message ...
Eric Gisin wrote:

Win 98 GUI scandisk and defrag are 16-bit, and limited to 16MB.
The FAT has to be resident, so the cluster limit is under 4M.


There is a KB that explains it - the limit being 4.177 million
clusters - at least that's how MS explains it for the DOS scandisk.
The reality is that if himem.sys is loaded, then DOS scandisk can
process FAT's with much higher cluster counts (perhaps assuming that
you have some arbitrarily large amount of memory - 128, 256 or 512
mb).

The ME versions of Scandskw and defrag can handle a volume with more
than 4 million clusters.

So the solution for win-98 is either (a) don't create partitions
larger than 128 gb, or (b) obtain the ME versions of scandskw.exe,
diskmaint.dll, and defrag.exe. (this assumes you've already overcome
the issue with ESDI_506.PDR).


Option (a) is not a problem ... I don't see a real need to
have partitions anywhere near 128 GB.

Downloaded ScanDisk and Defrag from ...
http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=775763

DEFRAG EX_ 213,296 11-12-07 9:16a defrag.ex_
SCANDSKW EX_ 5,104 11-12-07 9:16a scandskw.ex_
DISKMA~1 DL_ 0 11-12-07 9:35a diskmaint.dl_

File size of "diskmaint.dll" doesn't seem right though.
Is there a better place to download ME versions of these files?

In my case, connecting HDDs larger than 120 GB via
the Maxtor Ultra ATA/133 PCI Adapter Card seems to
circumvent the problem with ESDI_506.PDR.
I definitely do not have a ESDI_506.PDR that
can handle HDDs larger than 120 GB ...

ESDI_506 PDR 24,406 04-23-99 10:22p ESDI_506.PDR



The obvious problem is the MS IDE drive is not LBA-48,
so 128GB is a hard limit unless there is an alt driver
available.


Like I've said already here, the solution to that issue is

a) use SATA (not PATA) - either SATA on the motherboard or
SATA expansion (PCI) card

b) use Intel Application Accelerator (only good for specific
chipsets) - it replaces ESDI_506.PDR with something else

c) use the MSFN hacked / fixed version of ESDI_506.PDR

d) Pay for the Loew version of ESDI_506.PDR.

e) obtain an IDE (PATA) controller card (PCI) and hope it has
it's own replacement for ESDI_506.PDR.

All of the above requires that the motherboard BIOS performs 48-bit
sector handling (vs 32 bit). But if you have a SATA motherboard, it
most certainly will satisfy that criteria, as will any P-4 (or higher)
motherboard.

There is actually one more option:

f) rename or remove ESDI_506.PDR and force win-98 into "DOS"
compatibility mode for hard drive access (where it uses
BIOS function calls to access the hard drive).




Got around to backing up and then doubling the boot partition size.
Partition size is now around 16 GB. Cluster size was and still is 4 KB.
Still no problems so far.

If I ever have problems with ScanDisk or Defrag,
I'll install WinME from MSDN to extract the necessary files.

"98 Guy", thanks for your help. Really appreciate it.


  #8  
Old November 15th 07, 12:33 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win98.disks.general,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
Lil' Dave
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 247
Default 250 GB drives - please help

Its the 128GB (formatted capacity) I already mentioned.... See the
following note in your enclosed weblink:

"NOTE: This hotfix is not designed for 48-bit logical block addressing (LBA)
hard disks, and it is not supported on hard disks larger than 137 GB."


--
Dave
Profound is we're here due to a chance arrangement
of chemicals in the ocean billions of years ago.
More profound is we made it to the top of the food
chain per our reasoning abilities.
Most profound is the denial of why we may
be on the way out.
"98 Guy" wrote in message ...
Lil' Dave wrote:

Would appreciate an MS weblink to the more updated form of
fdisk.exe noted by the respondent.


http://support.microsoft.com/kb/263044



  #9  
Old November 15th 07, 02:05 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win98.disks.general,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
98 Guy
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 2,951
Default 250 GB drives - please help

"98 Guy" wrote:

Would appreciate an MS weblink to the more updated form of
fdisk.exe noted by the respondent.


http://support.microsoft.com/kb/263044


Lil' Dave wrote:

Its the 128GB (formatted capacity) I already mentioned.... See
the following note in your enclosed weblink:

"NOTE: This hotfix is not designed for 48-bit logical block
addressing (LBA) hard disks, and it is not supported on hard
disks larger than 137 GB."


That is another example of Meekro$oft dis-information.

The following is part of a post I made back in February. READ IT and
then tell me what you think about the MS statement you quoted above.

---------------------------------

Subject: Update 4: Cluster size and exploring the limits of FAT-32
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:49:46 -0500
From: 98 Guy
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion

Fdisk (dated May 18, 2000 - not april 23, 1999) was used to create
a single primary partition on a new 250 gb SATA Western Digital hard
drive. The computer was started in DOS via a win-98 boot floppy
(note: himem.sys was loaded as part of the boot).

A single primary partition was created using all available space on
the drive. I didn't check the details as to what fdisk reported as
the total drive capacity (fdisk is known for not reporting correct
on-screen numbers such as volume size or total drive size).

I then ran format, with the /z:n switch as follows:

format /z:8 c: /s (format the drive with 4kb cluster size)

I got this message:

"you have specified a cluster size that is too small for
this drive. Use a larger cluster size and try again"

I then tried this: format /z:12 c: /s

and got this:

"Parameter value not in allowed range - /z:12

I then tried format /z:16 c:/s and got the "cluster size too small"
message. Same thing with /z:32.

I tried /z:48 and got the "not in allowed range" error. I then tried
/z:64 and it worked.

Formatting 41,86.65M
Format complete.
Writing out file allocation table
Complete.
Calculating free space (this may take several minutes)...
Complete
System tranferred

Volume label (11 characters, ENTER for none)?

238,414.41 MB total disk space
360,448 bytes used by system
238,414.07 mb available on disk

32,768 bytes in each allocation unit.
7,629,249 allocation unites available on disk.

Ok, looks good. Let's try chkdsk c:

244,136,352 kilobytes total disk space
244,135,968 kilobytes free

32,768 bytes in each allocation unit
7,629,261 total allocation units on disk
7,629,249 available allocation units on disk

Ok, still looks good. Let's try Scandisk c:

Scandisk ran just fine, performed all checks except surface scan.

Running scandisk without himem.sys being loaded results in this
message:

"Scandisk is unable to check a drive because there
is no extended memory driver loaded on your computer.
To check this drive, make sure that you have a
HIMEM.SYS file on the disk from which you are starting
your computer (...)"

Ok, so there you go. You can use standard tools like fdisk and format
to prepare drives at least up to 250 gb in size and set them up for
windows-98se installation.
  #10  
Old November 15th 07, 04:59 AM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage,microsoft.public.win98.disks.general,microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion
MEB[_2_]
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 1,626
Default 250 GB drives - please help


It may be time [or rather past time] to think about using the hard drive
manufacturer tools rather than MS fdisk and format for ANY drive
manipulation.
The manufacturers newest tools all now have NTFS abilities built-in [some
more than others - of particular interest to dual booters], large drive
abilities, and if you bother to think about it, at least they are STILL
SUPPORTED and updated ...

There are other tools still being supported, such as BING, SuperFdisk and
others [such as FreeDos, Linux, BSD, etc], which also are being updated [or
were]. So this *traditional use* of MS fdisk and format isn't very
intelligent when there ARE other tools available which can deal with the
newer OSs, AND, newer disk formats, access routines, and capacities..

Plainly, it doesn't really make much sense to continue to use tools which
are seriously outdated when dealing with one of the more important elements
of your computer, its storage and from where the OS will run.

Want to use larger drives?
Then consider: a newer mother board [or a used board that supports larger
drives]; a hard drive adapter card [with its own controller/BIOS override];
one of the purported esdi_506 replacements [but your BIOS is still going to
need to support the drive]; USB enclosures {and proper drivers}; stay within
the design limits of the OS and its tools [unless your testing]; or don't
come crying when the disk errors out or the 9X OS craps out. At least until
there are well documented answers available.

MINIMUM MS TOOLS for larger drives:

DEFRAG.EXE 4.90.3000 = from WinME Setup CD
SCANDISK.EXE = from WinME Setup CD
SCANDSKW.EXE 4.90.3000 = from WinME Setup CD
dskmaint.dll = 4.90.3000 from the WinME Setup CD
cvtaplog.exe = 4.90.3000 from the WinME Setup CD

These can be obtained via various sources, example:
http://www.mdgx.com/web.htm
http://erpman1.tripod.com/w98meupd.html
http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=84886
http://www.msfn.org/board/?showtopic=46581
http://www.mdgx.com/secrets.htm#FDPT
http://www.mdgx.com/add.htm

Try Searches for scanfrag.exe {contains scandisks and defrag, check the
dskmaint.dll for the right version}.

optional:
oformat.com = from WinME Setup disk cab - XP ResKit - XP setup disks - other

Then you may need some updates to the system itself, such as:
272621usa8.exe - negative numbers shown
243450USA8.EXE - drives larger than 32 gig
273017USA8.EXE - cache write delay
4756US8.EXE - shutdown supplement
and maybe a few others...

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com
________


"Lil' Dave" wrote in message
...
| Its the 128GB (formatted capacity) I already mentioned.... See the
| following note in your enclosed weblink:
|
| "NOTE: This hotfix is not designed for 48-bit logical block addressing
(LBA)
| hard disks, and it is not supported on hard disks larger than 137 GB."
|
|
| --
| Dave
| Profound is we're here due to a chance arrangement
| of chemicals in the ocean billions of years ago.
| More profound is we made it to the top of the food
| chain per our reasoning abilities.
| Most profound is the denial of why we may
| be on the way out.
| "98 Guy" wrote in message ...
| Lil' Dave wrote:
|
| Would appreciate an MS weblink to the more updated form of
| fdisk.exe noted by the respondent.
|
| http://support.microsoft.com/kb/263044
|
|


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two DVD R/RW drives ok? Anthony Buckland General 1 September 25th 05 09:22 PM
cd rom drives carl General 2 January 22nd 05 08:40 AM
New Drives? Dave General 2 January 7th 05 05:57 AM
CD DRIVES Ken Software & Applications 1 July 19th 04 08:13 PM
zip drives joe General 0 June 26th 04 09:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Win98banter.
The comments are property of their posters.