If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Ping: Gary Terhune W98SE online security
Home user. Since original install, I only installed 5-6 MS patches, never used OE,
seldom used IE 5 (default in W98SE). I always used Netscape with normally Javascript, images and cookies disabled. I uninstalled OE and never installed Word or Office. I do a cold boot each day. Since MS changed policy, there have been no patches for the W98SE/IE 5.01/5.5 combination. DUN, online for about 8 years, don't (AFAIK) go to "risky" websites. I use antivirus, adware scanners, they never show much. I use a munged address. *And* I don't use a firewall. I keep reading about hackers using a home computer as a spam server. If someone did that with mine, seems my hard drive activity light would come on, it doesn't. Question: Haven't had online problems so far. Not using a firewall, am I at serious risk? TIA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ms wrote:
Home user. Since original install, I only installed 5-6 MS patches, never used OE, seldom used IE 5 (default in W98SE). I always used Netscape with normally Javascript, images and cookies disabled. I uninstalled OE and never installed Word or Office. I do a cold boot each day. Since MS changed policy, there have been no patches for the W98SE/IE 5.01/5.5 combination. DUN, online for about 8 years, don't (AFAIK) go to "risky" websites. I use antivirus, adware scanners, they never show much. I use a munged address. *And* I don't use a firewall. I keep reading about hackers using a home computer as a spam server. If someone did that with mine, seems my hard drive activity light would come on, it doesn't. Question: Haven't had online problems so far. Not using a firewall, am I at serious risk? TIA Forgot to add: I have been using Firefox and Firebird before that, after Netscape, all of them disabled as noted above, all fairly safe browsers. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why do you think the hard drive would engage just to broadcast a few =
puny bytes? Can all be done from memory. --=20 Gary S. Terhune MS MVP Shell/User =20 "ms" wrote in message = ... Home user. Since original install, I only installed 5-6 MS patches, = never used OE,=20 seldom used IE 5 (default in W98SE). I always used Netscape with = normally=20 Javascript, images and cookies disabled. I uninstalled OE and never = installed=20 Word or Office. I do a cold boot each day. Since MS changed policy, = there have=20 been no patches for the W98SE/IE 5.01/5.5 combination. In your place, I would want to update IE to the latest. I would want all = Critical Updates installed. I'm also curious as to what you use for email client--if it renders HTML = emails, that is another vulnerable spot. You may not be visiting risky = sites, but risky sites may very well be visiting you. You seem to think *only* MS products are at serious risk. Why? Because = MS is the only one that ever announces such issues and distributes = patches? That's fallacious logic, as I've explained before. =20 DUN, online for about 8 years, don't (AFAIK) go to "risky" websites. I = use=20 antivirus, adware scanners, they never show much. I use a munged = address. *And* I=20 don't use a firewall. In your place, I would want a firewall =20 I keep reading about hackers using a home computer as a spam server. = If someone=20 did that with mine, seems my hard drive activity light would come on, = it doesn't. Why do you think the hard drive would engage just to broadcast a few = puny bytes? Can all be done from memory. =20 Question: Haven't had online problems so far.=20 Not sure what you mean by that. How do you know? What, for you, = constitutes an "online problem"? Not using a firewall, am I at serious risk? =20 TIA The best answer I can give is a qualified, "Yes--you are at serious = risk." Qualified because you are also mitigating that risk substantially = with your habits. --=20 Gary S. Terhune MS MVP Shell/User |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I would update fully through Windows Update to the latest components.
You are more at risk if you have a broadband connection (DSL/Cable) and no firewall then a narrowband (dial-up) connection and no firewall. I would also use anti-spyware + anti-adware applications such as Adaware SE and Spybot -- Search and Destroy. "ms" wrote in message ... ms wrote: Home user. Since original install, I only installed 5-6 MS patches, never used OE, seldom used IE 5 (default in W98SE). I always used Netscape with normally Javascript, images and cookies disabled. I uninstalled OE and never installed Word or Office. I do a cold boot each day. Since MS changed policy, there have been no patches for the W98SE/IE 5.01/5.5 combination. DUN, online for about 8 years, don't (AFAIK) go to "risky" websites. I use antivirus, adware scanners, they never show much. I use a munged address. *And* I don't use a firewall. I keep reading about hackers using a home computer as a spam server. If someone did that with mine, seems my hard drive activity light would come on, it doesn't. Question: Haven't had online problems so far. Not using a firewall, am I at serious risk? TIA Forgot to add: I have been using Firefox and Firebird before that, after Netscape, all of them disabled as noted above, all fairly safe browsers. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Unfortunately, you are pretty much at the same risk whether using dial-up or
broadband. Hackers aren't too concerned about the connection speed of a machine they take over. A typical machine on dial up will be probed within a few minutes of logging on, especially if you use a popular ISP. I would strongly recommend a good firewall and installing all Windows updates. -- Jeff Richards MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User) "ms" wrote in message ... Home user. Since original install, I only installed 5-6 MS patches, never used OE, seldom used IE 5 (default in W98SE). I always used Netscape with normally Javascript, images and cookies disabled. I uninstalled OE and never installed Word or Office. I do a cold boot each day. Since MS changed policy, there have been no patches for the W98SE/IE 5.01/5.5 combination. DUN, online for about 8 years, don't (AFAIK) go to "risky" websites. I use antivirus, adware scanners, they never show much. I use a munged address. *And* I don't use a firewall. I keep reading about hackers using a home computer as a spam server. If someone did that with mine, seems my hard drive activity light would come on, it doesn't. Question: Haven't had online problems so far. Not using a firewall, am I at serious risk? TIA |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Please clear this up for me I thought dial-up users were more safe
because they have a different ip address each time they log on as opposed to a static ip address for broadband users. "Jeff Richards" wrote in message ... Unfortunately, you are pretty much at the same risk whether using dial-up or broadband. Hackers aren't too concerned about the connection speed of a machine they take over. A typical machine on dial up will be probed within a few minutes of logging on, especially if you use a popular ISP. I would strongly recommend a good firewall and installing all Windows updates. -- Jeff Richards MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User) "ms" wrote in message ... Home user. Since original install, I only installed 5-6 MS patches, never used OE, seldom used IE 5 (default in W98SE). I always used Netscape with normally Javascript, images and cookies disabled. I uninstalled OE and never installed Word or Office. I do a cold boot each day. Since MS changed policy, there have been no patches for the W98SE/IE 5.01/5.5 combination. DUN, online for about 8 years, don't (AFAIK) go to "risky" websites. I use antivirus, adware scanners, they never show much. I use a munged address. *And* I don't use a firewall. I keep reading about hackers using a home computer as a spam server. If someone did that with mine, seems my hard drive activity light would come on, it doesn't. Question: Haven't had online problems so far. Not using a firewall, am I at serious risk? TIA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
This is simply no longer the case. Intrusion techniques have gotten much faster.
Intrusion programs have become more widely seeded throughout the internet wherever unprotected systems have become infected. Dial-up networks have become much more centralized. Altogether, static vs. dynamic IP addressing is no longer a huge issue for hackers. -- Gary S. Terhune MS MVP Shell/User "Dan" wrote in message ... Please clear this up for me I thought dial-up users were more safe because they have a different ip address each time they log on as opposed to a static ip address for broadband users. "Jeff Richards" wrote in message ... Unfortunately, you are pretty much at the same risk whether using dial-up or broadband. Hackers aren't too concerned about the connection speed of a machine they take over. A typical machine on dial up will be probed within a few minutes of logging on, especially if you use a popular ISP. I would strongly recommend a good firewall and installing all Windows updates. -- Jeff Richards MS MVP (Windows - Shell/User) "ms" wrote in message ... Home user. Since original install, I only installed 5-6 MS patches, never used OE, seldom used IE 5 (default in W98SE). I always used Netscape with normally Javascript, images and cookies disabled. I uninstalled OE and never installed Word or Office. I do a cold boot each day. Since MS changed policy, there have been no patches for the W98SE/IE 5.01/5.5 combination. DUN, online for about 8 years, don't (AFAIK) go to "risky" websites. I use antivirus, adware scanners, they never show much. I use a munged address. *And* I don't use a firewall. I keep reading about hackers using a home computer as a spam server. If someone did that with mine, seems my hard drive activity light would come on, it doesn't. Question: Haven't had online problems so far. Not using a firewall, am I at serious risk? TIA |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Gary S. Terhune wrote:
Why do you think the hard drive would engage just to broadcast a few puny bytes? Can all be done from memory. Thanks, Gary, very informative. To answer your question, Thunderbird is my mail client. I will get into firewalls. BTW, your posts are set some way (as seen in Thunderbird) so in my reply, they clip most of the original post automatically. Never saw that before. How do you do it? The only point you mentioned that I would differ is one I've seen many times before- install all the patches. Years ago, I did install: -------- 11/2/04 Windows 98 Q245729 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Q249973 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Q823559 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Second Edition en 4,10,2222,0 Windows 98 Second Edition Q238453 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Second Edition Q242975 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Second Edition Q259728 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 TELNET Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Year 2000 Update en 4,10,0,2000 Windows Script version 5.1 I did these because at the time they were considered mandatory for security. I didn't do any more because my machine appears to work fine and: 1. Fred Langa and Scott Finnie advised many times that any patch has some risks, some that MS said were mandatory are not, some are definitely buggy. Only install if you recognize the risks. 2. Many stories online of patches causing problems on some systems. 3. People that use IE/OE/Word do have to keep patched as they are popular targets. I don't use them for that reason. 4. My old P166 continues to work OK (again, AFAIK). If it's not broke (appears so, anyway) don't fix it. To install all the patches is a serious risk of crashes, possible reinstall. For me, that's not easy to fix. Comment? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I have no idea why your Thunderbird is clipping automatically. I sometimes use
MIME Quoted Printable encoding, but I doubt that's it. As for the rest, I can only suggest that you install *all* security-related patches that are offered at Windows Update. You *do* have Internet Explorer installed, and you *must* keep it up to date if you want to be safe. Doesn't matter whether you use it to browse or not. It is an integral part of Windows. When you update/upgrade IE, you are updating Windows. The incidence of problems relating to updates is relatively low, or in some cases, the "bug" is a necessary trade-off for security. But of course, you only hear about the bugs, not about the millions of machines that have no problems with the patches. With regard to Windows 9x, these bugs have been worked out long ago. You are mistaken and or misguided when you say that, "To install all the patches is a serious risk of crashes, possible reinstall. For me, that's not easy to fix." The risk is only just significant. It's there, yes, but it's not a "serious" risk, certainly not compared to the risk you expose yourself to by *not* installing the patches. And I'm sorry, but if your system and backup habits are such that having to reinstall Windows or otherwise recover from a glitch is a disastrous possibility, then you're already skating on thin ice. I'd be looking to remedy *that* situation, too. -- Gary S. Terhune MS MVP Shell/User "ms" wrote in message ... Gary S. Terhune wrote: Why do you think the hard drive would engage just to broadcast a few puny bytes? Can all be done from memory. Thanks, Gary, very informative. To answer your question, Thunderbird is my client. I will get into firewalls. BTW, your posts are set some way (as seen in Thunderbird) so in my reply, they clip most of the original post automatically. Never saw that before. How do you do it? The only point you mentioned that I would differ is one I've seen many times before- install all the patches. Years ago, I did install: -------- 11/2/04 Windows 98 Q245729 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Q249973 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Q823559 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Second Edition en 4,10,2222,0 Windows 98 Second Edition Q238453 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Second Edition Q242975 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Second Edition Q259728 Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 TELNET Update en 4.10.0.2222 Windows 98 Year 2000 Update en 4,10,0,2000 Windows Script version 5.1 I did these because at the time they were considered mandatory for security. I didn't do any more because my machine appears to work fine and: 1. Fred Langa and Scott Finnie advised many times that any patch has some risks, some that MS said were mandatory are not, some are definitely buggy. Only install if you recognize the risks. 2. Many stories online of patches causing problems on some systems. 3. People that use IE/OE/Word do have to keep patched as they are popular targets. I don't use them for that reason. 4. My old P166 continues to work OK (again, AFAIK). If it's not broke (appears so, anyway) don't fix it. To install all the patches is a serious risk of crashes, possible reinstall. For me, that's not easy to fix. Comment? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Gary S. Terhune wrote:
I have no idea why your Thunderbird is clipping automatically. I sometimes use MIME Quoted Printable encoding, but I doubt that's it. As for the rest, I can only suggest that you install *all* security-related patches that are offered at Windows Update. You *do* have Internet Explorer installed, and you *must* keep it up to date if you want to be safe. Doesn't matter whether you use it to browse or not. It is an integral part of Windows. When you update/upgrade IE, you are updating Windows. The incidence of problems relating to updates is relatively low, or in some cases, the "bug" is a necessary trade-off for security. But of course, you only hear about the bugs, not about the millions of machines that have no problems with the patches. With regard to Windows 9x, these bugs have been worked out long ago. You are mistaken and or misguided when you say that, "To install all the patches is a serious risk of crashes, possible reinstall. For me, that's not easy to fix." The risk is only just significant. It's there, yes, but it's not a "serious" risk, certainly not compared to the risk you expose yourself to by *not* installing the patches. And I'm sorry, but if your system and backup habits are such that having to reinstall Windows or otherwise recover from a glitch is a disastrous possibility, then you're already skating on thin ice. I'd be looking to remedy *that* situation, too. I have a custom computer of separate bits and pieces. It plays fine after 7 years, but in a reformat, nothing finds anything, and with age/medical issues, I get help for it. I went for the choice of good hardware, but reformat is a bear. I have reformatted a factory computer, that's easy. You've given me good advice, a lot to "digest". |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Won't boot at first try | Solkeys | General | 43 | January 2nd 05 02:32 AM |
Attn: Mr. Gary Terhune | Rodney | General | 26 | December 30th 04 03:54 AM |
Problem with Online Windows Updates for W98SE | Papa | General | 16 | November 22nd 04 11:31 PM |
Ping: Gary Terhune | Steve | General | 3 | July 29th 04 12:17 AM |
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-018 - Cumulative Security Update for Outlook Express (823353) | PA Bear | General | 5 | July 15th 04 05:49 AM |