If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#301
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
WHY YOU DO NOT Like HOT-TEXT
"Sn!pe" wrote in message .uk... Hot-text wrote: ------=_NextPart_001_000F_01CAF8AE.324A5290 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Don't. Do. That. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe My pet rock Gordon loathes HTML on Usenet. |
#302
|
|||
|
|||
Post a link to an image on your web·site.
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote:
"Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest!" C'mon, October 1st! -- ~PAÞ Pieter Zijlstra wrote: JeffRelf.F-M.FM @. wrote: You geniuses think I invented this ( folded ) user·agent line: ? geniuses is plural, right?-) and that includes me, right?-) blithersnippage . Just ignore them, Robear. :-o |
#303
|
|||
|
|||
Post a link to an image on your web·site.
"PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote:
"Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest!" C'mon, October 1st! -- ~PAÞ Pieter Zijlstra wrote: JeffRelf.F-M.FM @. wrote: You geniuses think I invented this ( folded ) user·agent line: ? geniuses is plural, right?-) and that includes me, right?-) blithersnippage . Just ignore them, Robear. :-o |
#304
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
In article ,
Hot-text writes WHY YOU DO NOT Like HOT-TEXT I do not like it because it redundantly contains the message twice and the superfluous version is bloated by unnecessary "stuff". Neither did your client, WLM, strip Sn!pe's .sig. All of which nibbles away at my finite monthly traffic allowance. I was surprised to see: Lines: 23 in your headers, since the actual line count, even without folding, looks much greater to me. [unsnipped:] "Sn!pe" wrote in message o.uk... Hot-text wrote: ------=_NextPart_001_000F_01CAF8AE.324A5290 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Don't. Do. That. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe My pet rock Gordon loathes HTML on Usenet. -- Misha Free on-line, off-site backups? https://mozy.com/?ref=UK45Y5 |
#305
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
In article ,
Hot-text writes WHY YOU DO NOT Like HOT-TEXT I do not like it because it redundantly contains the message twice and the superfluous version is bloated by unnecessary "stuff". Neither did your client, WLM, strip Sn!pe's .sig. All of which nibbles away at my finite monthly traffic allowance. I was surprised to see: Lines: 23 in your headers, since the actual line count, even without folding, looks much greater to me. [unsnipped:] "Sn!pe" wrote in message o.uk... Hot-text wrote: ------=_NextPart_001_000F_01CAF8AE.324A5290 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Don't. Do. That. -- ^Ï^. Sn!pe My pet rock Gordon loathes HTML on Usenet. -- Misha Free on-line, off-site backups? https://mozy.com/?ref=UK45Y5 |
#307
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
In article , MEB-not-
says... snip Right, nice attempt to ignore that the legal Notice has been posted in all present groups, AND in specific groups the actually closing date, AND even a reminder in many groups of that closing. So your claim is you haven't received anything, right. Nice try, you would have to deliberately block Microsoft's postings and would thereby STILL be potentially liable. You have, in essence, been "served" in the same fashion as every other user. snip You mention "potentially liable" but fail to amplify from where liability stems. To what tort are you referring? If no actionable tort exists then there can be no liability. Microsoft can protect its trade name where the public could be confused but that doctrine would not preclude a newsgroup named "Microsoft." -- James E. Morrow Email to: |
#308
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
On 05/26/2010 11:47 PM, James E. Morrow wrote:
In article , MEB-not- says... snip Right, nice attempt to ignore that the legal Notice has been posted in all present groups, AND in specific groups the actually closing date, AND even a reminder in many groups of that closing. So your claim is you haven't received anything, right. Nice try, you would have to deliberately block Microsoft's postings and would thereby STILL be potentially liable. You have, in essence, been "served" in the same fashion as every other user. snip You mention "potentially liable" but fail to amplify from where liability stems. To what tort are you referring? If no actionable tort exists then there can be no liability. Microsoft can protect its trade name where the public could be confused but that doctrine would not preclude a newsgroup named "Microsoft." Read Microsoft's TOU and TOS. Further and compare your purported questions and arguments towards Microsoft's: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/p.../nwsgrppr.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/Default.aspx http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal...rks/en-us.aspx http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal...s/Default.aspx Don't forget to check the applicable federal Laws and other that apply, such as property, commerce, etc.. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#309
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
On 05/26/2010 11:47 PM, James E. Morrow wrote:
In article , MEB-not- says... snip Right, nice attempt to ignore that the legal Notice has been posted in all present groups, AND in specific groups the actually closing date, AND even a reminder in many groups of that closing. So your claim is you haven't received anything, right. Nice try, you would have to deliberately block Microsoft's postings and would thereby STILL be potentially liable. You have, in essence, been "served" in the same fashion as every other user. snip You mention "potentially liable" but fail to amplify from where liability stems. To what tort are you referring? If no actionable tort exists then there can be no liability. Microsoft can protect its trade name where the public could be confused but that doctrine would not preclude a newsgroup named "Microsoft." Read Microsoft's TOU and TOS. Further and compare your purported questions and arguments towards Microsoft's: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/p.../nwsgrppr.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/Default.aspx http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal...rks/en-us.aspx http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal...s/Default.aspx Don't forget to check the applicable federal Laws and other that apply, such as property, commerce, etc.. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#310
|
|||
|
|||
Other servers
On 05/27/2010 12:09 AM, MEB wrote:
On 05/26/2010 11:47 PM, James E. Morrow wrote: In article , MEB-not- says... snip Right, nice attempt to ignore that the legal Notice has been posted in all present groups, AND in specific groups the actually closing date, AND even a reminder in many groups of that closing. So your claim is you haven't received anything, right. Nice try, you would have to deliberately block Microsoft's postings and would thereby STILL be potentially liable. You have, in essence, been "served" in the same fashion as every other user. snip You mention "potentially liable" but fail to amplify from where liability stems. To what tort are you referring? If no actionable tort exists then there can be no liability. Microsoft can protect its trade name where the public could be confused but that doctrine would not preclude a newsgroup named "Microsoft." Read Microsoft's TOU and TOS. Further and compare your purported questions and arguments towards Microsoft's: http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/p.../nwsgrppr.mspx http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/Default.aspx http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal...rks/en-us.aspx http://www.microsoft.com/about/legal...s/Default.aspx Don't forget to check the applicable federal Laws and other that apply, such as property, commerce, etc.. Sorry, you may be from [or representing] a foreign nation or party wherein these would also apply: Free Trade agreements, W.T.O., U.N. Treaties and agreements, International Laws, E.U. agreements and/or Laws, and various other as apply. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
multiple VNC servers behind ICS | Ogg | Networking | 0 | October 11th 06 03:40 AM |
Can't retreive email from servers | mrc121 | Setup & Installation | 1 | February 11th 05 01:28 PM |
Print Servers | hawk | Networking | 5 | June 27th 04 06:08 PM |
Cannot Browse Network Servers | Bill | Networking | 0 | June 25th 04 12:41 AM |