Finding CD KEY from WinME CD :was help with logo.sys

Actually *no* it doesn't I just consider the source and ignore it; because I
spell the way I want and if the spell checker on my Office 2003 doesn't
catch it, then why should I bother. A wiser man that all here once said
something like "A small mind can only think of one way to spell a word" I
think it was Albert Einstein; but I could be wrong.

Ant although he thinks himself the consummate wit, is one of those that
won't take the chance of posting something, so he comments on those that do.
After all when was the last time you say Ant post anything that was not a
comment on what someone else had posted? Besides when he is trying to pick
on me he is leaving others alone, so that is ok with me.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware


"Heather" wrote in message
...
LOL!! I thought I was on the wrong ng when I saw your "name".

Noel, Mike and Mart.....meet Ant who lives on your side of the pond...and
takes the mickey out of Soooooge regularly. Luv him for that....grin.
And needless to say, it usually goes right over Dimbulb's head!!

Cheers....Figgs

"Ant" wrote in message
...
"Sugien" wrote:

[...] those that are computer enthusiasts like what I am

Your literacy knows no bounds!

[...] barley veils

Is that like barley wine or barley sugar?

Sorry, I apprently did something wrong trying to attach the jpg image

-- I make money the old fashioned way, I print it !

I always left any authors comments and or name inside the code. I did on
occasion if I thought I didn't use enough of an authors code, say less then
3 subs or the likes, then I didn't give them any credit in the about box;
but as I said I *always* left the original authors comments and or name in
the source code. However it is getting to the point in coding that if a
programmer were to give credit in an about box for every helo.world type of
code for each and ever subroutine that the about box would be larger then
the program it's self. I program sort of Lego Style and have a quite large
code snippet library and I simply pull in code for this button or that
function instead of having to rewrite the wheel every time I decide to
create something I or others might need.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
If you remove the attribution from the code - then yes, it would make you
a
code-ripper.
If the cap fits....
--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP, Win 9x 2002-6)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj


"Sugien" wrote:

No, you have only been lead down the garden path of rumor villa and
fell
hook line and sinker for lies told about me. They would also have you
believe that if you use the *free* code samples given away at such web
pages
as www.planet-source-code.com that you are stealing code and there by a
coderipper. I guess they would also say that if a person takes sample
code
that Microsoft gives away with Visual Basic and then starting off with
that
free sample you keep adding to it and then you make it into a full
application for public consumption that you would be a thief and
coderipper
because you started out with a *free* code sample.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
Well! - Sugiien admits error!
Is this a first??

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP, Win 9x 2002-6)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj


"Sugien" wrote:

I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding
out
that
I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD. I had
erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the sulogo.sys
from
Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did not. Now I am
wondering
why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys with SE but didn't continue
it
over
into ME? But then there is no telling with Microsoft because with XP
they
took the ability of changing the boot up screen out of the hands of
most
*common* users because they placed the boot up brag screen in the .exe
file
ntoskrnl.exe and a user needs to be familiar with using a resource
editor
to
change it. Well that is if they wish to change it their self without
relying on third party software that does it for them.
I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt
very
much
if those that are wrong about what I said about the system I sold
*after*
removing ME and *after* installing XP on it, will do likewise.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Sugien" wrote in message
...

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .

READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of
one
clouded by hear say.

Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them
the
computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put XP on
it.
So the logical understanding is that you DID sell them the WinME
computer, then later installed XP and they gave you back your ME
CD.

Comprendez?

Quote.....
"The system the WinME was on has been
sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and
they
let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for it.

Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that
*THAT
USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on.

Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said.

Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and won't
own
up
to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the system at the
same
time?, well even though there are ways of doing that, that however
was
not
the case and when XP is put on a system ME is NO LONGER on the
system.
they had no need of the ME cd because ME was no longer on the
system;
because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at last the worse worm
wiggle
of all
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

Liar!! You used someone else's code and deliberately took their name out
and tried to pass it off as your own.......but got caught at it,
coderipper!!

"Sugien" wrote in message
news
I always left any authors comments and or name inside the code. I did on
occasion if I thought I didn't use enough of an authors code, say less then
3 subs or the likes, then I didn't give them any credit in the about box;
but as I said I *always* left the original authors comments and or name in
the source code. However it is getting to the point in coding that if a
programmer were to give credit in an about box for every helo.world type of
code for each and ever subroutine that the about box would be larger then
the program it's self. I program sort of Lego Style and have a quite large
code snippet library and I simply pull in code for this button or that
function instead of having to rewrite the wheel every time I decide to
create something I or others might need.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
If you remove the attribution from the code - then yes, it would make you
a
code-ripper.
If the cap fits....
--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP, Win 9x 2002-6)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

You are the liar, because in that *ONE* instance the fellow that posted
the code to planet source code did NOT write the code, and he had his name
one it, seeing as how I did NOT know whom wrote it and his name was already
on it instead of the actual author I could not see putting his name one it
seeing as how he did NOT write it. So I guess in retrospect I could have put
it out with NO ONE's name on it; but I chose to put mine. I explained that
on my web page and in fact there was a discussion at planet source code
about it and EVERYONE there said I was in the right putting my name because
NO ONE knew who the original author was and he never step forward. so there
:P
Any way even in that case I DID leave the fellows name that posted it
to planed source code under his name, in the source code; but in the source
code I pointed out the dubious part the author may have had in the writing
of the code I used; but I did NOT put anyone in the about box as a shout out
or anything; because I truly did NOT and still do NOT know who wrote the
code originally.
You and a few others however not wishing for what ever reason to
research it for your self took it at face value what those that had it in
for me had to say without your going and even looking at the page I had up
explaining all of it, I bet you did NOT even go to the link I posted to PSC
at the time when the discussion about the use of that code did you?
From the time I first came to ACV and later ACVA-V because I made no
bones about what I thought about virus writers people looked for anything to
use against me, and then later you and others jumped in on the band wagon
WITHOUT looking into it for your self. Then you and others even upheld 4Q
when he harangued my wife and children when they don't even read or post to
newsgroups. You do realize that some do judge you by the company you keep
don't you? Your two friends Laura and 4Q STOLE pictures from my web page
that specifically says is ILLEGAL to do so, and then 4Q even went so far as
to make a fake pornographic picture using one of the stolen pictures; but
you and others just laughed it up and thought that was just great.
Personally I think anyone that upholds someone in something that despicable
is close to being just a guilty as the one that did the deed.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

"Heather" wrote in message
...
Liar!! You used someone else's code and deliberately took their name out
and tried to pass it off as your own.......but got caught at it,
coderipper!!

"Sugien" wrote in message
news
I always left any authors comments and or name inside the code. I did on
occasion if I thought I didn't use enough of an authors code, say less
then 3 subs or the likes, then I didn't give them any credit in the about
box; but as I said I *always* left the original authors comments and or
name in the source code. However it is getting to the point in coding
that if a programmer were to give credit in an about box for every
helo.world type of code for each and ever subroutine that the about box
would be larger then the program it's self. I program sort of Lego Style
and have a quite large code snippet library and I simply pull in code for
this button or that function instead of having to rewrite the wheel every
time I decide to create something I or others might need.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
If you remove the attribution from the code - then yes, it would make
you a
code-ripper.
If the cap fits....
--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP, Win 9x 2002-6)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

http://www.dino-soft.org/programs/

I had forgotten I had even left it up, there is the link the program and it
has a link to PSC and you can read all the comments for your self at PSC if
you care to learn the TRUTH of the matter. Oh and before you try and lie and
say I just put that up anyone that know anything about html and the likes
knows how to find out how long a page has been up or last modified


"Heather" wrote in message
...
Liar!! You used someone else's code and deliberately took their name out
and tried to pass it off as your own.......but got caught at it,
coderipper!!

"Sugien" wrote in message
news
I always left any authors comments and or name inside the code. I did on
occasion if I thought I didn't use enough of an authors code, say less
then 3 subs or the likes, then I didn't give them any credit in the about
box; but as I said I *always* left the original authors comments and or
name in the source code. However it is getting to the point in coding
that if a programmer were to give credit in an about box for every
helo.world type of code for each and ever subroutine that the about box
would be larger then the program it's self. I program sort of Lego Style
and have a quite large code snippet library and I simply pull in code for
this button or that function instead of having to rewrite the wheel every
time I decide to create something I or others might need.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
If you remove the attribution from the code - then yes, it would make
you a
code-ripper.
If the cap fits....
--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP, Win 9x 2002-6)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

How would you know he DIDN'T write it?? His name was on it. No different
than what you did, is it.

"Sugien" wrote in message
...
in that *ONE* instance the fellow that posted the code to planet
source code did NOT write the code, and he had his name one it, seeing as
how I did NOT know whom wrote it and his name was already on it instead
of the actual author I could not see putting his name one it seeing as
how he did NOT write it.

"Heather" wrote in message
...
Liar!! You used someone else's code and deliberately took their name out
and tried to pass it off as your own.......but got caught at it,
coderipper!!

"Sugien" wrote in message
news
I always left any authors comments and or name inside the code. I did on
occasion if I thought I didn't use enough of an authors code, say less
then 3 subs or the likes, then I didn't give them any credit in the about
box; but as I said I *always* left the original authors comments and or
name in the source code. However it is getting to the point in coding
that if a programmer were to give credit in an about box for every
helo.world type of code for each and ever subroutine that the about box
would be larger then the program it's self. I program sort of Lego Style
and have a quite large code snippet library and I simply pull in code for
this button or that function instead of having to rewrite the wheel every
time I decide to create something I or others might need.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
If you remove the attribution from the code - then yes, it would make
you a
code-ripper.
If the cap fits....
--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP, Win 9x 2002-6)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Now maybe your are starting to use *your* brain and catch on instead of just
being lead by the nose by someone with an axe to grind. Programmer most
*all* use sub-routines or sometimes entire programs and then build on them
to create a better or more functional program. Microsoft *gives away*
sample code which is in effect *complete* mini-programs; but I or anyone
with a VB or other compiler can *legally* and *morally* take those sample
programs and add to them and even pull in parts of other *free source code*
and create a program which they can even sell if they so desire and they do
NOT have to give shout outs in about boxes to Microsoft or those other
programmers and most do NOT do so; but they do , do as what I did and leave
in any comments from the person that they got the code from.
"Heather" wrote in message
...
How would you know he DIDN'T write it?? His name was on it. No different
than what you did, is it.

"Sugien" wrote in message
...
in that *ONE* instance the fellow that posted the code to planet
source code did NOT write the code, and he had his name one it, seeing
as how I did NOT know whom wrote it and his name was already on it
instead of the actual author I could not see putting his name one it
seeing as how he did NOT write it.

"Heather" wrote in message
...
Liar!! You used someone else's code and deliberately took their name
out and tried to pass it off as your own.......but got caught at it,
coderipper!!

"Sugien" wrote in message
news I always left any authors comments and or name inside the code. I did
on occasion if I thought I didn't use enough of an authors code, say
less then 3 subs or the likes, then I didn't give them any credit in the
about box; but as I said I *always* left the original authors comments
and or name in the source code. However it is getting to the point in
coding that if a programmer were to give credit in an about box for
every helo.world type of code for each and ever subroutine that the
about box would be larger then the program it's self. I program sort of
Lego Style and have a quite large code snippet library and I simply pull
in code for this button or that function instead of having to rewrite
the wheel every time I decide to create something I or others might
need.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
If you remove the attribution from the code - then yes, it would make
you a
code-ripper.
If the cap fits....
--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP, Win 9x 2002-6)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

"Sugien" wrote:

"Heather" wrote:
LOL!! I thought I was on the wrong ng when I saw your "name".

Hi Heather. It really is my name!

Noel, Mike and Mart.....meet Ant who lives on your side of the pond...and
takes the mickey out of Soooooge regularly. Luv him for that....grin.
And needless to say, it usually goes right over Dimbulb's head!!

Actually *no* it doesn't

Actually, yes, it does.

I just consider the source and ignore it; because I spell the way I
want [...]

When I see someone write "like what I am", and make a comment, I'm not
referring to spelling.

but I could be wrong.

You are invariably wrong, or get the wrong end of the stick. Not so
long ago I tried to engage you in a technical discussion. You didn't
respond properly, missed the point, made an irrelevant sidetrack, and
later claimed to be performing some sort of social-engineering trick.
To what end, I've no idea, but if it was to make you look like a
doofus then you succeeded.

Ant although he thinks himself the consummate wit, is one of those that
won't take the chance of posting something, so he comments on those that do.
After all when was the last time you say Ant post anything that was not a
comment on what someone else had posted?

I don't believe I've ever been the originator of a thread in acv or
aca-v, so what I say in those groups is always a comment on what was
posted. Sometimes it's even on-topic, and offers to-the-point
technical advice. I can see three non-followup posts from you since
April in acv, none of which are on-topic. In total, there are 525
messages from you in acv on my server, most of which are repetitious
off-topic blather.

Besides when he is trying to pick on me he is leaving others alone,
so that is ok with me.

I thought you enjoyed the "fun" you were having in acv. My comments
on your screeds have never been cruel or nasty.

VIA TITS

I like your new sig; but is being a tit on usenet the impression you
want to convey?

"Ant" wrote in message
...
VIA TITS

I like your new sig; but is being a tit on usenet the impression you
want to convey?


Probably not - but then he's never succeeded in much anyway, from what I can
make out

Noel