Q - What can happen if the COtent IE6 (or 5) is deleted from the TIF folder?

Noel Paton wrote:
There *was* ice-cream!g
burp

I THOUGHT that looked like foot prints up the back of my head! 'Seconds'
are supposed to be *after* everyone else has 'firsts'. Not 'seconds' after
your first. sigh


"Rick T" wrote in message
...
There's ice cream?


Jan Il wrote:
Noel Paton wrote:

Forget the lobster - where's the ice-cream?g


Just because you got your privileges in the queue back, no need to
get pushy..vbg


"Jan Il" wrote in message
...

Hi Mike :-) :

Jan,

If you delete the folder Content.IE5 it will simply be recreated
the next time the cache is accessed. Just the same as if you
delete its 8 char name sub-folders although in the latter case
the new folders will have different randomized names from those
that went before.

Good. I wanted to be very clear on that. I did remember your
saying once before that it should be recreated if deleted for
whatever reason, but, was not sure if in the mean time it being
missing might cause a problem.

Thank you very much for your help. Ummm...I can taste that
lobster now. :-))

Jan

"k...just for the record here, no I have not deleted mine. This
is a question to satisfy my curious about the need for the
Content IE 5-6 folder in the TIF folder, as to whether or not
if it is removed for whatever reason, would it cause problems
with IE, and if so, what kind?

I thought I remembered at one time someone told me that the
Content folder should not be removed, and the clearing of TIF
files should be done using the Internet Options method. I know
Mow told me to do it that way long ago, which I do, and always
recommend to others. But, now and then I run across someone who
says that there is no need for the folder and it is best to get
rid of it.

Ahmm.....and.....I have a lobster dinner riding on this, too.
g

Noel Paton wrote:

There *was* ice-cream!g
burp




To make up for it, one of you chappies want to have a look at a post by
"Frank" in .general? Between me and Harry, the guy will probably never
touch his PC again.


Rick
sherbet then.... there has to be some sherbet left, surely

Now you're being mean g
Joan

Jan Il wrote:
Just because you got your privileges in the queue back, no need to get
pushy..vbg

You'll be lucky with that lot, I never get a look in g
Joan

Rick T wrote:
Rick
sherbet then.... there has to be some sherbet left, surely

Joan Archer wrote:
Now you're being mean g
Joan

Jan Il wrote:
Just because you got your privileges in the queue back, no need to
get pushy..vbg

But..but...if I wasn't mean to him, he wouldn't think I cared. :-))

Jan

Awww - what can I say?

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2004, Win9x)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.btinternet.com/~winnoel/millsrpch.htm

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
or
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/f.../Mar27pmvp.asp

"Jan Il" wrote in message
...
Joan Archer wrote:
Now you're being mean g
Joan

Jan Il wrote:
Just because you got your privileges in the queue back, no need to
get pushy..vbg

But..but...if I wasn't mean to him, he wouldn't think I cared. :-))

Jan

Not a lot g
Joan

Noel Paton wrote:
Awww - what can I say?

Hmm.....

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2004, Win9x)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.btinternet.com/~winnoel/millsrpch.htm

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
or
http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/f.../Mar27pmvp.asp

"Joan Archer" wrote in message
...
Not a lot g
Joan

Noel Paton wrote:
Awww - what can I say?