A Windows 98 & ME forum. Win98banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Win98banter forum » Windows 98 » Improving Performance
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Memory managers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 9th 07, 05:44 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Rubyjack
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 66
Default Memory managers

I have Googled for memory manager reviews, but they are far from helpful.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether a memory manager (Cyberlat RamCleaner,
TweakRam) really helps performance or just uses up resources?

Running W98SE, 256MB, PII350MZ, IBM PC300PL.


Thanks,
Dan Hacker


--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---



  #2  
Old March 9th 07, 05:47 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Gary S. Terhune
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 147
Default Memory managers

Stay away from them. All hype and no reality.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
I have Googled for memory manager reviews, but they are far from helpful.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether a memory manager (Cyberlat RamCleaner,
TweakRam) really helps performance or just uses up resources?

Running W98SE, 256MB, PII350MZ, IBM PC300PL.


Thanks,
Dan Hacker


--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---





  #3  
Old March 9th 07, 05:47 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Gary S. Terhune
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 147
Default Memory managers

Stay away from them. All hype and no reality.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
I have Googled for memory manager reviews, but they are far from helpful.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether a memory manager (Cyberlat RamCleaner,
TweakRam) really helps performance or just uses up resources?

Running W98SE, 256MB, PII350MZ, IBM PC300PL.


Thanks,
Dan Hacker


--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---





  #4  
Old March 10th 07, 08:46 PM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Rubyjack
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 66
Default Memory managers

That was the conclusion I was coming to. But they have such "pretty"
graphics and "impressive" readouts :-)


Thanks for the reply,
Dan Hacker

--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---


"Gary S. Terhune" wrote in message
...
Stay away from them. All hype and no reality.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
I have Googled for memory manager reviews, but they are far from helpful.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether a memory manager (Cyberlat

RamCleaner,
TweakRam) really helps performance or just uses up resources?

Running W98SE, 256MB, PII350MZ, IBM PC300PL.


Thanks,
Dan Hacker


--


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
---







  #5  
Old March 10th 07, 08:46 PM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Rubyjack
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 66
Default Memory managers

That was the conclusion I was coming to. But they have such "pretty"
graphics and "impressive" readouts :-)


Thanks for the reply,
Dan Hacker

--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---


"Gary S. Terhune" wrote in message
...
Stay away from them. All hype and no reality.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
I have Googled for memory manager reviews, but they are far from helpful.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether a memory manager (Cyberlat

RamCleaner,
TweakRam) really helps performance or just uses up resources?

Running W98SE, 256MB, PII350MZ, IBM PC300PL.


Thanks,
Dan Hacker


--


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
---







  #6  
Old March 11th 07, 01:59 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Buffalo
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 182
Default Memory managers

Memory managers are rated as poor by those in the know.
With the price of ram so low, why not just buy and install more.
What kind of problems are you having that makes you think you are having a
memory problem?
Perhaps then, someone in this ng could help you out.


"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
I have Googled for memory manager reviews, but they are far from helpful.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether a memory manager (Cyberlat RamCleaner,
TweakRam) really helps performance or just uses up resources?

Running W98SE, 256MB, PII350MZ, IBM PC300PL.


Thanks,
Dan Hacker


--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---





  #7  
Old March 11th 07, 01:59 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Buffalo
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 182
Default Memory managers

Memory managers are rated as poor by those in the know.
With the price of ram so low, why not just buy and install more.
What kind of problems are you having that makes you think you are having a
memory problem?
Perhaps then, someone in this ng could help you out.


"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
I have Googled for memory manager reviews, but they are far from helpful.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether a memory manager (Cyberlat RamCleaner,
TweakRam) really helps performance or just uses up resources?

Running W98SE, 256MB, PII350MZ, IBM PC300PL.


Thanks,
Dan Hacker


--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---





  #8  
Old March 11th 07, 05:08 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Ron Badour
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 957
Default Memory managers

That's about all they have :-) Snake oil, pure snake oil.

--
Regards


Ron Badour, MS MVP for W98
Tips: http://home.satx.rr.com/badour
Knowledge Base Info:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=kbinfo



"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
That was the conclusion I was coming to. But they have such "pretty"
graphics and "impressive" readouts :-)


Thanks for the reply,
Dan Hacker

--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---


"Gary S. Terhune" wrote in message
...
Stay away from them. All hype and no reality.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
I have Googled for memory manager reviews, but they are far from
helpful.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether a memory manager (Cyberlat

RamCleaner,
TweakRam) really helps performance or just uses up resources?

Running W98SE, 256MB, PII350MZ, IBM PC300PL.


Thanks,
Dan Hacker


--


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
---









  #9  
Old March 11th 07, 05:08 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Ron Badour
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 957
Default Memory managers

That's about all they have :-) Snake oil, pure snake oil.

--
Regards


Ron Badour, MS MVP for W98
Tips: http://home.satx.rr.com/badour
Knowledge Base Info:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=kbinfo



"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
That was the conclusion I was coming to. But they have such "pretty"
graphics and "impressive" readouts :-)


Thanks for the reply,
Dan Hacker

--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---


"Gary S. Terhune" wrote in message
...
Stay away from them. All hype and no reality.

--
Gary S. Terhune
MS-MVP Shell/User
www.grystmill.com

"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
I have Googled for memory manager reviews, but they are far from
helpful.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether a memory manager (Cyberlat

RamCleaner,
TweakRam) really helps performance or just uses up resources?

Running W98SE, 256MB, PII350MZ, IBM PC300PL.


Thanks,
Dan Hacker


--


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
---









  #10  
Old March 11th 07, 05:51 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Rubyjack
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 66
Default Memory managers

Thanks for the reply.

I am not currently having problems. But when I had only 64MB for W98SE, it
creaked and groaned. So I bought Cyberlat RamCleaner ($5.00) to help with
the problem. I have since upgraded to 256MB. However, I still have CRC
running on my computer.

I asked for opinions on memory managers because CRC didn't seem to be doing
anything in particular. So I was curious as to what the knowledgeable
consensus was -- useful utility/resource waster.

It appear that I blew a WHOLE FIVE BUCKS on the program :-)


Dan

--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---


"Buffalo" wrote in message
. ..
Memory managers are rated as poor by those in the know.
With the price of ram so low, why not just buy and install more.
What kind of problems are you having that makes you think you are having a
memory problem?
Perhaps then, someone in this ng could help you out.


"Rubyjack" wrote in message
...
I have Googled for memory manager reviews, but they are far from

helpful.
Anyone have any thoughts on whether a memory manager (Cyberlat

RamCleaner,
TweakRam) really helps performance or just uses up resources?

Running W98SE, 256MB, PII350MZ, IBM PC300PL.


Thanks,
Dan Hacker


--


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
---
Madness takes its toll. Please have exact change.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

--
---







 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good Windows 98 Wi-Fi Managers [email protected] Networking 2 April 7th 06 11:51 AM
306 kb of memory available Jim Madsen General 6 July 11th 05 01:16 AM
deleting duplicate entries in device managers Josh Lott General 3 December 2nd 04 10:02 PM
Memory key for Win 98 Juan Disk Drives 3 November 13th 04 07:05 PM
Not enough memory SHM Improving Performance 2 June 11th 04 12:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Win98banter.
The comments are property of their posters.