![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hasn't appeared yet, though is on Google. If this still hasn't appeared, do
enjoy guessing why *this* one has been blocked. http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...n&dmode=source Shane |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shane wrote:
Hasn't appeared yet, though is on Google. Reading usenet posts on google is lame. If this still hasn't appeared, do enjoy guessing why *this* one has been blocked. Blocked by who? Blocked where? And why? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It appears my reply didn't make it either.
Mike Shane facetious'r'.us wrote: Hasn't appeared yet, though is on Google. If this still hasn't appeared, do enjoy guessing why *this* one has been blocked. http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...n&dmode=source Shane |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The problem seems to be something in the first three lines of your fourth
para given the non appearance of my Test Paragraph 4 and Test Paragraph 4a however none of the individual lines are being blocked (Test 4a1, 4a2, 4a3). At one point I wondered if the problem was that The Reg was being blocked. Mike Shane facetious'r'.us wrote: Hasn't appeared yet, though is on Google. If this still hasn't appeared, do enjoy guessing why *this* one has been blocked. http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...n&dmode=source Shane |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Microsoft seem to have a problem with the first line of your fourth
paragraph. My test post 4a1 appeared for a few minutes and was then deleted. Totally bl**dy crazy given its content, just ten words all of which are used in normal polite speech and not a critical word amongst them and certainly no trade name or link. I knew the filters were badly written and those writing them were clueless but until today I had never realised quite how bad they had become. Mike Mike M wrote: The problem seems to be something in the first three lines of your fourth para given the non appearance of my Test Paragraph 4 and Test Paragraph 4a however none of the individual lines are being blocked (Test 4a1, 4a2, 4a3). At one point I wondered if the problem was that The Reg was being blocked. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Still no go, I've tried posting my reply twice and both times have resulted
in a no show. This really is pathetic and for me at least shows how far Microsoft and their systems have sunk in recent times. I'll e-mail you my reply. Mike Mike M wrote: It appears my reply didn't make it either. Mike Shane facetious'r'.us wrote: Hasn't appeared yet, though is on Google. If this still hasn't appeared, do enjoy guessing why *this* one has been blocked. http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mic...n&dmode=source Shane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Text Case Problem | caroloyl | General | 21 | December 22nd 09 02:34 AM |
Modern computer case? | ms | General | 7 | April 8th 05 12:43 PM |
Sth like XP hibernatin for Win98SE AT case ? | Libor Striz | General | 4 | September 2nd 04 06:11 PM |
Is the registry case sensitive | Stan Hilliard | General | 1 | June 24th 04 11:49 PM |
N-case corruption | Alan | Internet | 1 | June 9th 04 12:59 PM |