A Windows 98 & ME forum. Win98banter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » Win98banter forum » Windows 98 » Improving Performance
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is it time to buy a new computer?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old September 15th 05, 01:57 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Buffalo
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 182
Default Is it time to buy a new computer?


"Gary S. Terhune" wrote in message
...
I'm thinking you are too prone to messing with your system for us to be able

to
draw any logical conclusions from your experiences. Just a bit too chaotic for
that, s.


Sadly, but very true about 'chaotic'. :-)


  #82  
Old September 15th 05, 03:49 AM
glee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well there you go, Mary. Obviously, your system is just not up to the rather large
drag that some A-V suites will put on it. As Gary stated, avoid McAfee and Norton
(Symantec) on that machine. AVG would be a much lighter drag, but it is not too
good at detecting the newer trojans. I use another free A-V named AVAST, and am
happy with its performance. I have it installed on systems as slow as PII and AMD
333MHz, with no problems. You might want to give it a try (www.avast.com). I have
also gotten good reports about an A-V app named Anti-Vir.
--
Glen Ventura, MS MVP Shell/User, A+
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm


"Mary" wrote in message
oups.com...
I followed Glen's suggestion and disabled McAfee (and stayed offline!)
and ran Word, Excel and some other programs. Lo and behold my computer
ran MUCH better - faster and with no hesitation. Mr. Martel was right
- with McAfee running, it's like driving a car with both feet on the
brake. Seems like the people at McAfee would be sensitive to the speed
issue. I think when my McAfee subscription runs out, I will check out
alternate AV software. Although all AV software is going to result in
computer slowdown, yes?

And yes, Gary, I did do a clean boot and followed the instructions at
auhma.org site (lots of info there). I've learned alot of stuff from
all of you - thanks.


  #83  
Old September 15th 05, 03:49 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
glee
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 2,458
Default Is it time to buy a new computer?

Well there you go, Mary. Obviously, your system is just not up to the rather large
drag that some A-V suites will put on it. As Gary stated, avoid McAfee and Norton
(Symantec) on that machine. AVG would be a much lighter drag, but it is not too
good at detecting the newer trojans. I use another free A-V named AVAST, and am
happy with its performance. I have it installed on systems as slow as PII and AMD
333MHz, with no problems. You might want to give it a try (www.avast.com). I have
also gotten good reports about an A-V app named Anti-Vir.
--
Glen Ventura, MS MVP Shell/User, A+
http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm


"Mary" wrote in message
oups.com...
I followed Glen's suggestion and disabled McAfee (and stayed offline!)
and ran Word, Excel and some other programs. Lo and behold my computer
ran MUCH better - faster and with no hesitation. Mr. Martel was right
- with McAfee running, it's like driving a car with both feet on the
brake. Seems like the people at McAfee would be sensitive to the speed
issue. I think when my McAfee subscription runs out, I will check out
alternate AV software. Although all AV software is going to result in
computer slowdown, yes?

And yes, Gary, I did do a clean boot and followed the instructions at
auhma.org site (lots of info there). I've learned alot of stuff from
all of you - thanks.


  #84  
Old September 15th 05, 04:09 AM
Dennis Rekuta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

glee wrote:

Well there you go, Mary. Obviously, your system is just not up to the rather large
drag that some A-V suites will put on it. As Gary stated, avoid McAfee and Norton
(Symantec) on that machine. AVG would be a much lighter drag, but it is not too
good at detecting the newer trojans. I use another free A-V named AVAST, and am
happy with its performance. I have it installed on systems as slow as PII and AMD
333MHz, with no problems. You might want to give it a try (www.avast.com). I have
also gotten good reports about an A-V app named Anti-Vir.


I have used AVAST free (currently v4.6.691) with ZoneAlarm free
(currently v6.0.667.000) for three years on a PII Celeron 466MHz with
absolutely no conflicts. I have had no problems using Outlook Express,
I.E.6 sp1, Avant Browser shell for I.E., and Mozilla suite.

Buffalo may have had a conflict with an older version of Avast and
ZoneAlarm Pro, but the free versions have never bothered me. There was
an issue of upgrades versus clean installs of ZoneAlarm Pro causing
problems in the past, but I have always done simple upgrades of the free
versions of ZA and AVAST.

Dennis
  #85  
Old September 15th 05, 04:09 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Dennis Rekuta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Is it time to buy a new computer?

glee wrote:

Well there you go, Mary. Obviously, your system is just not up to the rather large
drag that some A-V suites will put on it. As Gary stated, avoid McAfee and Norton
(Symantec) on that machine. AVG would be a much lighter drag, but it is not too
good at detecting the newer trojans. I use another free A-V named AVAST, and am
happy with its performance. I have it installed on systems as slow as PII and AMD
333MHz, with no problems. You might want to give it a try (www.avast.com). I have
also gotten good reports about an A-V app named Anti-Vir.


I have used AVAST free (currently v4.6.691) with ZoneAlarm free
(currently v6.0.667.000) for three years on a PII Celeron 466MHz with
absolutely no conflicts. I have had no problems using Outlook Express,
I.E.6 sp1, Avant Browser shell for I.E., and Mozilla suite.

Buffalo may have had a conflict with an older version of Avast and
ZoneAlarm Pro, but the free versions have never bothered me. There was
an issue of upgrades versus clean installs of ZoneAlarm Pro causing
problems in the past, but I have always done simple upgrades of the free
versions of ZA and AVAST.

Dennis
  #86  
Old September 15th 05, 05:29 PM
Buffalo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dennis Rekuta" wrote in message
.. .
[snip]
Buffalo may have had a conflict with an older version of Avast and
ZoneAlarm Pro, but the free versions have never bothered me. There was
an issue of upgrades versus clean installs of ZoneAlarm Pro causing
problems in the past, but I have always done simple upgrades of the free
versions of ZA and AVAST.

Dennis


I was using the latest version of Avast and I did do a clean install of ZAPro
when the version changed.
It may have been due to the fact that I, when I originally tried Avast! free,
only uninstalled the anti-virus portion of NSW2003Pro and then installed Avast.
It worked fine for aprox two days (this was about a week or so ago).
Thanks for your information.


  #87  
Old September 15th 05, 05:29 PM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Buffalo
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 182
Default Is it time to buy a new computer?


"Dennis Rekuta" wrote in message
.. .
[snip]
Buffalo may have had a conflict with an older version of Avast and
ZoneAlarm Pro, but the free versions have never bothered me. There was
an issue of upgrades versus clean installs of ZoneAlarm Pro causing
problems in the past, but I have always done simple upgrades of the free
versions of ZA and AVAST.

Dennis


I was using the latest version of Avast and I did do a clean install of ZAPro
when the version changed.
It may have been due to the fact that I, when I originally tried Avast! free,
only uninstalled the anti-virus portion of NSW2003Pro and then installed Avast.
It worked fine for aprox two days (this was about a week or so ago).
Thanks for your information.


  #88  
Old September 16th 05, 03:33 AM
Dennis Rekuta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Buffalo wrote:

"Dennis Rekuta" wrote in message
.. .
[snip]

Buffalo may have had a conflict with an older version of Avast and
ZoneAlarm Pro, but the free versions have never bothered me. There was
an issue of upgrades versus clean installs of ZoneAlarm Pro causing
problems in the past, but I have always done simple upgrades of the free
versions of ZA and AVAST.

Dennis



I was using the latest version of Avast and I did do a clean install of ZAPro
when the version changed.
It may have been due to the fact that I, when I originally tried Avast! free,
only uninstalled the anti-virus portion of NSW2003Pro and then installed Avast.
It worked fine for aprox two days (this was about a week or so ago).
Thanks for your information.


I was using NSW2001 (not PRO) for Win98 SE and uninstalled only the NAV
as well. Maybe the difference in versions makes the difference in
results. You might have had better results with a complete uninstall of
NSW, install of Avast, and then a clean install of NSW without the NAV.
Then again, maybe not.

Avast had a lower footprint on my resources and has separately
configurable components for Outlook/Exchange, IM and P2P as well as the
regular Web, Resident, and other E-mail programs. If I was given the
budget, I would probably go with the pro version, or possibly NOD32.

Dennis
  #89  
Old September 16th 05, 03:33 AM posted to microsoft.public.win98.performance
Dennis Rekuta
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Is it time to buy a new computer?

Buffalo wrote:

"Dennis Rekuta" wrote in message
.. .
[snip]

Buffalo may have had a conflict with an older version of Avast and
ZoneAlarm Pro, but the free versions have never bothered me. There was
an issue of upgrades versus clean installs of ZoneAlarm Pro causing
problems in the past, but I have always done simple upgrades of the free
versions of ZA and AVAST.

Dennis



I was using the latest version of Avast and I did do a clean install of ZAPro
when the version changed.
It may have been due to the fact that I, when I originally tried Avast! free,
only uninstalled the anti-virus portion of NSW2003Pro and then installed Avast.
It worked fine for aprox two days (this was about a week or so ago).
Thanks for your information.


I was using NSW2001 (not PRO) for Win98 SE and uninstalled only the NAV
as well. Maybe the difference in versions makes the difference in
results. You might have had better results with a complete uninstall of
NSW, install of Avast, and then a clean install of NSW without the NAV.
Then again, maybe not.

Avast had a lower footprint on my resources and has separately
configurable components for Outlook/Exchange, IM and P2P as well as the
regular Web, Resident, and other E-mail programs. If I was given the
budget, I would probably go with the pro version, or possibly NOD32.

Dennis
  #90  
Old September 18th 05, 11:20 AM
Lil' Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This slowdown is less of an issue in a more recent, faster, more RAM, PC.
McAfee is probably the worst in the slowdowns as far as AV packages. NAV is
a strong 2nd. The more recent versions do more, and has consequential
overhead. They look for more than viruses. Some up to date AV versions,
will not perform all their capabilities in 98, requires XP for that.

If you're running a slower PC, its probably best to go with lighter weight
AV, a firewall, and some careful web browsing, careful attachment opening
habits.

"Mary" wrote in message
oups.com...
I followed Glen's suggestion and disabled McAfee (and stayed offline!)
and ran Word, Excel and some other programs. Lo and behold my computer
ran MUCH better - faster and with no hesitation. Mr. Martel was right
- with McAfee running, it's like driving a car with both feet on the
brake. Seems like the people at McAfee would be sensitive to the speed
issue. I think when my McAfee subscription runs out, I will check out
alternate AV software. Although all AV software is going to result in
computer slowdown, yes?

And yes, Gary, I did do a clean boot and followed the instructions at
auhma.org site (lots of info there). I've learned alot of stuff from
all of you - thanks.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to set a specific time to shut down the computer Chris General 4 September 11th 04 11:49 AM
System window opens every time computer boots... Russ General 1 August 3rd 04 09:54 PM
System Clock Loses Time Rebecca General 2 July 22nd 04 12:21 PM
unknown? genX Software & Applications 4 July 11th 04 01:36 PM
Desktop clock loses time and computer freezes up for several seconds Jerry Improving Performance 1 July 1st 04 04:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 Win98banter.
The comments are property of their posters.