If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Windows Security
My opinion is this --- after my XP PRO. SP2 was hacked we need more security
in the software industry --- Fortunately, 98SE survived a hack from the government of China that was almost an 18,000 hack from China's government according to Zone Alarm Professional's tracking. The problem is many fold: 1. Hardware Routers can be interupted --- mine was with Cox Communications broadband --- after the router was interupted the hacker(s) gained access to the time and changed the password thus locking me out and destroying defense line one. This was a wired hardware router. If the signal is interupted all one must do is type -- admin and admin and the Cisco Systems (LinkSys -- $80 wired ethernet cat-5 router is bypassed and thus defense number 1 is down. 2. Next the hackers took advantage of the inherent weakness in the NT (New Technology aka Not There) source code of Windows XP Service Pack 2. My operating system had all ports locked down, Windows Messenger Disabled and used SpywareBlaster, Spybot Search and Destroy, Adaware SE, Computer Associates EZARMOR (the complete suite with a bi-directional software firewall and an antivirus package) --- taking advantage of the buffer underrun was fairly easy for a sophisticated hacker --- I could do it if I was a bad person. I have weblinks from EEYE Digital Security and Chris Quirke, MVP to prove my point about the lack of the secure foundation in XP PROFESSIONAL Service Pack 2 and despite what Mr. Gary S. Terhune says about XP PRO. SP2 being more secure he is simply mistaken and has fallen hook, line and sinker for the Microsoft Line. Anyway, according to the history on Microsoft -- Microsoft's software engineers called the NT source code the Not There Source code because it did not rest on a solid foundation like the 9x source code does. Microsoft has tried to save money by elimating the 9x consumer line by not having cordless keyboards and not having cordless mice for 98SE. Also, AFAIK, the latest version of Intellipoint driver for 98SE disabled some abilities and they were the forward and backwards button. My IBM PCJR which I still had when I grew up in New York City (Manhatten) had a simple infared senser (I think) to use wireless technology and this was in 1982!!! Talk about the computer industry going backwards since the glory days of the IBM (International Business Machine) It used 2 AA batteries in the keyboard -- you just removed the battery cover and installed the battery. Anyway, 98 Second Edition rests upon MS-DOS (Microsoft Disk Operating System) and some of you may remember the war between Microsoft and IBM in the DOS arena (IBM DOS vs. Microsoft DOS). Much as Microsoft would like to mislead people into thinking XP PRO. SP2 is the most secure operating system out there -- this is a deception -- The NT source code has been released over the Internet -- the 9x source code has not -- thus making the NT source code -- vulnerable to attacks by the NT (New Technology) Source Code. Anyway, Anthony needs to use David's computer so I will continue this debate later. http://www.eeye.com/html/research/upcoming/index.html http://www.eeye.com/html/research/up.../20050316.html http://www.eeye.com/html/research/up.../20050329.html Notice how the second web-link attacks the weak XP SP2 while the third web-link from my friends at eEye attacks all Windows Operating Systems. Therefore the conclusion, must be drawn that Unix/Linux is more secure than Windows because it is open and not closed source. http://cquirke.mvps.org/whatmos.htm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan" wrote in message ... My opinion is this --- after my XP PRO. SP2 was hacked we need more security in the software industry --- Fortunately, 98SE survived a hack from the government of China that was almost an 18,000 hack from China's government according to Zone Alarm Professional's tracking. The problem is many fold: 1. Hardware Routers can be interupted --- mine was with Cox Communications broadband --- after the router was interupted the hacker(s) gained access to the time and changed the password thus locking me out and destroying defense line one. This was a wired hardware router. If the signal is interupted all one must do is type -- admin and admin and the Cisco Systems (LinkSys -- $80 wired ethernet cat-5 router is bypassed and thus defense number 1 is down. 2. Next the hackers took advantage of the inherent weakness in the NT (New Technology aka Not There) source code of Windows XP Service Pack 2. My operating system had all ports locked down, Windows Messenger Disabled and used SpywareBlaster, Spybot Search and Destroy, Adaware SE, Computer Associates EZARMOR (the complete suite with a bi-directional software firewall and an antivirus package) --- taking advantage of the buffer underrun was fairly easy for a sophisticated hacker --- I could do it if I was a bad person. I have weblinks from EEYE Digital Security and Chris Quirke, MVP to prove my point about the lack of the secure foundation in XP PROFESSIONAL Service Pack 2 and despite what Mr. Gary S. Terhune says about XP PRO. SP2 being more secure he is simply mistaken and has fallen hook, line and sinker for the Microsoft Line. Anyway, according to the history on Microsoft -- Microsoft's software engineers called the NT source code the Not There Source code because it did not rest on a solid foundation like the 9x source code does. Microsoft has tried to save money by elimating the 9x consumer line by not having cordless keyboards and not having cordless mice for 98SE. Also, AFAIK, the latest version of Intellipoint driver for 98SE disabled some abilities and they were the forward and backwards button. My IBM PCJR which I still had when I grew up in New York City (Manhatten) had a simple infared senser (I think) to use wireless technology and this was in 1982!!! Talk about the computer industry going backwards since the glory days of the IBM (International Business Machine) It used 2 AA batteries in the keyboard -- you just removed the battery cover and installed the battery. Anyway, 98 Second Edition rests upon MS-DOS (Microsoft Disk Operating System) and some of you may remember the war between Microsoft and IBM in the DOS arena (IBM DOS vs. Microsoft DOS). Much as Microsoft would like to mislead people into thinking XP PRO. SP2 is the most secure operating system out there -- this is a deception -- The NT source code has been released over the Internet -- the 9x source code has not -- thus making the NT source code -- vulnerable to attacks by the NT (New Technology) Source Code. Anyway, Anthony needs to use David's computer so I will continue this debate later. http://www.eeye.com/html/research/upcoming/index.html http://www.eeye.com/html/research/up.../20050316.html http://www.eeye.com/html/research/up.../20050329.html Notice how the second web-link attacks the weak XP SP2 while the third web-link from my friends at eEye attacks all Windows Operating Systems. Therefore the conclusion, must be drawn that Unix/Linux is more secure than Windows because it is open and not closed source. http://cquirke.mvps.org/whatmos.htm and mine is " a device has yet to be made that could measure my indifference" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
=?Utf-8?B?RGFu?= wrote in
: My opinion is this --- after my XP PRO. SP2 was hacked we need more security in the software industry --- Fortunately, 98SE survived a hack from the government of China that was almost an 18,000 hack from China's government according to Zone Alarm Professional's tracking. The problem is many fold: 1. Hardware Routers can be interupted --- mine was with Cox Communications broadband --- after the router was interupted the hacker(s) gained access to the time and changed the password thus locking me out and destroying defense line one. This was a wired hardware router. If the signal is interupted all one must do is type -- admin and admin and the Cisco Systems (LinkSys -- $80 wired ethernet cat-5 router is bypassed and thus defense number 1 is down. 2. Next the hackers took advantage of the inherent weakness in the NT (New Technology aka Not There) source code of Windows XP Service Pack 2. My operating system had all ports locked down, Windows Messenger Disabled and used SpywareBlaster, Spybot Search and Destroy, Adaware SE, Computer Associates EZARMOR (the complete suite with a bi-directional software firewall and an antivirus package) --- taking advantage of the buffer underrun was fairly easy for a sophisticated hacker --- I could do it if I was a bad person. I have weblinks from EEYE Digital Security and Chris Quirke, MVP to prove my point about the lack of the secure foundation in XP PROFESSIONAL Service Pack 2 and despite what Mr. Gary S. Terhune says about XP PRO. SP2 being more secure he is simply mistaken and has fallen hook, line and sinker for the Microsoft Line. Anyway, according to the history on Microsoft -- Microsoft's software engineers called the NT source code the Not There Source code because it did not rest on a solid foundation like the 9x source code does. Microsoft has tried to save money by elimating the 9x consumer line by not having cordless keyboards and not having cordless mice for 98SE. Also, AFAIK, the latest version of Intellipoint driver for 98SE disabled some abilities and they were the forward and backwards button. My IBM PCJR which I still had when I grew up in New York City (Manhatten) had a simple infared senser (I think) to use wireless technology and this was in 1982!!! Talk about the computer industry going backwards since the glory days of the IBM (International Business Machine) It used 2 AA batteries in the keyboard -- you just removed the battery cover and installed the battery. Anyway, 98 Second Edition rests upon MS-DOS (Microsoft Disk Operating System) and some of you may remember the war between Microsoft and IBM in the DOS arena (IBM DOS vs. Microsoft DOS). Much as Microsoft would like to mislead people into thinking XP PRO. SP2 is the most secure operating system out there -- this is a deception -- The NT source code has been released over the Internet -- the 9x source code has not -- thus making the NT source code -- vulnerable to attacks by the NT (New Technology) Source Code. Anyway, Anthony needs to use David's computer so I will continue this debate later. http://www.eeye.com/html/research/upcoming/index.html http://www.eeye.com/html/research/up.../20050316.html http://www.eeye.com/html/research/up.../20050329.html Notice how the second web-link attacks the weak XP SP2 while the third web-link from my friends at eEye attacks all Windows Operating Systems. Therefore the conclusion, must be drawn that Unix/Linux is more secure than Windows because it is open and not closed source. http://cquirke.mvps.org/whatmos.htm Nothing in your post even discusses open vs closed source software so I find it difficult to come to the conclusions you have stated. Also it would appear the as many (if not more) vulnerabilities in open source softwa http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/bulletins/SB05-103.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Dan" wrote in message ... My opinion is this --- after my XP PRO. SP2 was hacked we need more security in the software industry I hope this will give you pause to reconsider your current position. We don't need or WANT more Security band-aided onto existing products. We need a new infrastructure. Some of us even WANT one. New software running on new hardware, and I'm not talking about the current vaporware abomination known as Longhorn, which is so appetising that Microsoft is about to launch a 3 YEAR LONG advertising campaign touting the benefits of.... WINDOWS XP !!! Windows source code isn't "solid", period, otherwise billions of dollars would not be poured into security efforts around the clock around the globe . You state that publishing NT source code begets attacks, then you immediately contradict yourself by saying that Unix/Linux source code being open inhibits attacks. You need to scale your posts WAY BACK, and concentrate on quality rather than quantity. That means you need to understand what you are talking about. Then and only then will you start to have ANY credibility, much less the hard-earned and well deserved MVP-level credibility that Gary has. Your criticism was ludicrous. And lose the cloak-and-dagger stuff. Nobody's buying it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Try posting your comments to this Security-specific newsgroup:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.security -- ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear) MS MVP-Windows (IE/OE) & Security Dan wrote: My opinion is this --- after my XP PRO. SP2 was hacked we need more security in the software industry --- Fortunately, 98SE survived a hack from the government of China that was almost an 18,000 hack from China's government according to Zone Alarm Professional's tracking. The problem is many fold: 1. Hardware Routers can be interupted --- mine was with Cox Communications broadband --- after the router was interupted the hacker(s) gained access to the time and changed the password thus locking me out and destroying defense line one. This was a wired hardware router. If the signal is interupted all one must do is type -- admin and admin and the Cisco Systems (LinkSys -- $80 wired ethernet cat-5 router is bypassed and thus defense number 1 is down. 2. Next the hackers took advantage of the inherent weakness in the NT (New Technology aka Not There) source code of Windows XP Service Pack 2. My operating system had all ports locked down, Windows Messenger Disabled and used SpywareBlaster, Spybot Search and Destroy, Adaware SE, Computer Associates EZARMOR (the complete suite with a bi-directional software firewall and an antivirus package) --- taking advantage of the buffer underrun was fairly easy for a sophisticated hacker --- I could do it if I was a bad person. I have weblinks from EEYE Digital Security and Chris Quirke, MVP to prove my point about the lack of the secure foundation in XP PROFESSIONAL Service Pack 2 and despite what Mr. Gary S. Terhune says about XP PRO. SP2 being more secure he is simply mistaken and has fallen hook, line and sinker for the Microsoft Line. Anyway, according to the history on Microsoft -- Microsoft's software engineers called the NT source code the Not There Source code because it did not rest on a solid foundation like the 9x source code does. Microsoft has tried to save money by elimating the 9x consumer line by not having cordless keyboards and not having cordless mice for 98SE. Also, AFAIK, the latest version of Intellipoint driver for 98SE disabled some abilities and they were the forward and backwards button. My IBM PCJR which I still had when I grew up in New York City (Manhatten) had a simple infared senser (I think) to use wireless technology and this was in 1982!!! Talk about the computer industry going backwards since the glory days of the IBM (International Business Machine) It used 2 AA batteries in the keyboard -- you just removed the battery cover and installed the battery. Anyway, 98 Second Edition rests upon MS-DOS (Microsoft Disk Operating System) and some of you may remember the war between Microsoft and IBM in the DOS arena (IBM DOS vs. Microsoft DOS). Much as Microsoft would like to mislead people into thinking XP PRO. SP2 is the most secure operating system out there -- this is a deception -- The NT source code has been released over the Internet -- the 9x source code has not -- thus making the NT source code -- vulnerable to attacks by the NT (New Technology) Source Code. Anyway, Anthony needs to use David's computer so I will continue this debate later. http://www.eeye.com/html/research/upcoming/index.html http://www.eeye.com/html/research/up.../20050316.html http://www.eeye.com/html/research/up.../20050329.html Notice how the second web-link attacks the weak XP SP2 while the third web-link from my friends at eEye attacks all Windows Operating Systems. Therefore the conclusion, must be drawn that Unix/Linux is more secure than Windows because it is open and not closed source. http://cquirke.mvps.org/whatmos.htm |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Hugh Candlin" wrote in message ... That means you need to understand what you are talking about. Then and only then will you start to have ANY credibility, much less the hard-earned and well deserved MVP-level credibility that Gary has. And lose the cloak-and-dagger stuff. Nobody's buying it. I don't think there is much to read in Dan's postings, it seems a case of " I'll post this and see if I get someone to talk to", but I may be wrong. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
1. Hardware Routers can be interupted --- mine was with Cox
Communications broadband --- after the router was interupted the hacker(s) gained access to the time and changed the password thus locking me out and destroying defense line one. This was a wired hardware router. If the signal is interupted all one must do is type -- admin and admin and the Cisco Systems (LinkSys -- $80 wired ethernet cat-5 router is bypassed and thus defense number 1 is down. So you didnt follow the router's install guide and set all security passwords away from the factory settings. No amount of programming can eradicate user stupidity |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Hugh and you can believe what you like.
"Hugh Candlin" wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... My opinion is this --- after my XP PRO. SP2 was hacked we need more security in the software industry I hope this will give you pause to reconsider your current position. We don't need or WANT more Security band-aided onto existing products. We need a new infrastructure. Some of us even WANT one. New software running on new hardware, and I'm not talking about the current vaporware abomination known as Longhorn, which is so appetising that Microsoft is about to launch a 3 YEAR LONG advertising campaign touting the benefits of.... WINDOWS XP !!! Windows source code isn't "solid", period, otherwise billions of dollars would not be poured into security efforts around the clock around the globe . You state that publishing NT source code begets attacks, then you immediately contradict yourself by saying that Unix/Linux source code being open inhibits attacks. You need to scale your posts WAY BACK, and concentrate on quality rather than quantity. That means you need to understand what you are talking about. Then and only then will you start to have ANY credibility, much less the hard-earned and well deserved MVP-level credibility that Gary has. Your criticism was ludicrous. And lose the cloak-and-dagger stuff. Nobody's buying it. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Idiot, the router signal was interupted therefore defaulting to the admin and
admin and the attacker(s) worked so fast at changing the time and changing the password that I could not get back in. I had a ten digit different password already set --- I am not that stupid, Bob The industry must have individual passwords for each hardware router sold and they must all be differnet. Surely, you read the news and know about the most recent hack of Ameritrade, and Bank of America, and Choicepoint, and Boston College, and are you listening yet Bob. Anyway, no offense but I have been programming since I was 7 on my IBM (International Business Computer) in New York City and that was in 1982 so you can see I was born in 1975 the same year of the A-10 -- my favorite plane -- warthog with gatling gun and cool titanium alloy armor and other stuff -- the cool Raptor did a fly over and I was there at Davis Monthan when it flew out from Nellis Air Force Base on Arizona Days. But you still hate me I guess. "AlmostBob" wrote: 1. Hardware Routers can be interupted --- mine was with Cox Communications broadband --- after the router was interupted the hacker(s) gained access to the time and changed the password thus locking me out and destroying defense line one. This was a wired hardware router. If the signal is interupted all one must do is type -- admin and admin and the Cisco Systems (LinkSys -- $80 wired ethernet cat-5 router is bypassed and thus defense number 1 is down. So you didnt follow the router's install guide and set all security passwords away from the factory settings. No amount of programming can eradicate user stupidity |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MS Response Re Windows Security Update CD Cancellation | Hugh Candlin | General | 17 | October 16th 04 06:38 AM |
FAQ: Win98 users: Upgrading to WinXP, IE6, etc. | JM | Setup & Installation | 6 | July 26th 04 01:44 PM |
FAQ: Win98 users: Upgrading to WinXP, IE6, etc. | JM | Improving Performance | 6 | July 26th 04 01:44 PM |
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-024 - Vulnerability in Windows Shell Could Allow Remote Code Execution (839645) | Gary S. Terhune | General | 2 | July 14th 04 05:06 AM |
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-024 - Vulnerability in Windows Shell Could Allow Remote Code Execution (839645) | Gary S. Terhune | General | 2 | July 14th 04 05:06 AM |