If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
scandisk errors
So you has a current backup
So was you able to run Scandisk with no errors are did you just give up? "Jim" wrote in message ... Thanks for the many varied responses. I luckily have a current backup and used it to restore to [original location] and it seems to have worked like a breeze. Most of these files are system junk collections I will never read again and perhaps I could have just deleted them without much ado about it. The KB articles are self explanatory in themselves, so thanks again. "Jim" wrote in message ... I did find answers to many of my questions in: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/186365 I did not find out how to restore the file to its original folder location after [ move to repair] option. If I just place the file in the root path folder it appears to have come from will this work? The KB article above suggests that user of this option write down the root path to folder file before moving the file. Unfortunately, I did not think to do this prior to the move/repair selection and there was no warning to user. My first attempt to restore was to use {scanreg / restore} in dos-mode and no luck... "Jim" wrote in message .. . If you uncheck the automatic fix scandisk errors, a prompt pops up and three options are allowed. The choices are ignore, move and repair and delete the file. If I chose the [move and repair] option, the program moves the file to the top of the host local drive C: . My question(s) are what is repaired and how do I restore the file to its proper folder location? Do I have to repair this file myself? When and why would I want to delete the file? The only errors that scandisk reports are MS-Dos name length errors that exceed 66 characters in length. Why does win98 name some MS-Dos files like this? Is this the only error that scandisk reports? It seems easier to just leave the program to autofix everything it finds, but then I would never learn what all it fixes. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
scandisk errors
So you has a current backup
So was you able to run Scandisk with no errors are did you just give up? "Jim" wrote in message ... Thanks for the many varied responses. I luckily have a current backup and used it to restore to [original location] and it seems to have worked like a breeze. Most of these files are system junk collections I will never read again and perhaps I could have just deleted them without much ado about it. The KB articles are self explanatory in themselves, so thanks again. "Jim" wrote in message ... I did find answers to many of my questions in: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/186365 I did not find out how to restore the file to its original folder location after [ move to repair] option. If I just place the file in the root path folder it appears to have come from will this work? The KB article above suggests that user of this option write down the root path to folder file before moving the file. Unfortunately, I did not think to do this prior to the move/repair selection and there was no warning to user. My first attempt to restore was to use {scanreg / restore} in dos-mode and no luck... "Jim" wrote in message .. . If you uncheck the automatic fix scandisk errors, a prompt pops up and three options are allowed. The choices are ignore, move and repair and delete the file. If I chose the [move and repair] option, the program moves the file to the top of the host local drive C: . My question(s) are what is repaired and how do I restore the file to its proper folder location? Do I have to repair this file myself? When and why would I want to delete the file? The only errors that scandisk reports are MS-Dos name length errors that exceed 66 characters in length. Why does win98 name some MS-Dos files like this? Is this the only error that scandisk reports? It seems easier to just leave the program to autofix everything it finds, but then I would never learn what all it fixes. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
scandisk errors
I am ok.
I ran scandisk without errors, and also did a though scan...which took a long time. I believe there is some info in those articles about doing a command-line scan in dos at the prompt, but one needs to load the [Himn.sys] first to do this procedure to check for errors and implies HDD damages. I do a regular (old school) backup monthly at the very least, and weekly if this were a critical workstation. "Hot-text" wrote in message ... So you has a current backup So was you able to run Scandisk with no errors are did you just give up? "Jim" wrote in message ... Thanks for the many varied responses. I luckily have a current backup and used it to restore to [original location] and it seems to have worked like a breeze. Most of these files are system junk collections I will never read again and perhaps I could have just deleted them without much ado about it. The KB articles are self explanatory in themselves, so thanks again. "Jim" wrote in message ... I did find answers to many of my questions in: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/186365 I did not find out how to restore the file to its original folder location after [ move to repair] option. If I just place the file in the root path folder it appears to have come from will this work? The KB article above suggests that user of this option write down the root path to folder file before moving the file. Unfortunately, I did not think to do this prior to the move/repair selection and there was no warning to user. My first attempt to restore was to use {scanreg / restore} in dos-mode and no luck... "Jim" wrote in message .. . If you uncheck the automatic fix scandisk errors, a prompt pops up and three options are allowed. The choices are ignore, move and repair and delete the file. If I chose the [move and repair] option, the program moves the file to the top of the host local drive C: . My question(s) are what is repaired and how do I restore the file to its proper folder location? Do I have to repair this file myself? When and why would I want to delete the file? The only errors that scandisk reports are MS-Dos name length errors that exceed 66 characters in length. Why does win98 name some MS-Dos files like this? Is this the only error that scandisk reports? It seems easier to just leave the program to autofix everything it finds, but then I would never learn what all it fixes. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
scandisk errors
I am ok. I ran scandisk without errors, and also did a though scan...which took a long time. I believe there is some info in those articles about doing a command-line scan in dos at the prompt, but one needs to load the [Himn.sys] first to do this procedure to check for errors and implies HDD damages. I do a regular (old school) backup monthly at the very least, and weekly if this were a critical workstation. "Hot-text" wrote in message ... So you has a current backup So was you able to run Scandisk with no errors are did you just give up? "Jim" wrote in message ... Thanks for the many varied responses. I luckily have a current backup and used it to restore to [original location] and it seems to have worked like a breeze. Most of these files are system junk collections I will never read again and perhaps I could have just deleted them without much ado about it. The KB articles are self explanatory in themselves, so thanks again. "Jim" wrote in message ... I did find answers to many of my questions in: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/186365 I did not find out how to restore the file to its original folder location after [ move to repair] option. If I just place the file in the root path folder it appears to have come from will this work? The KB article above suggests that user of this option write down the root path to folder file before moving the file. Unfortunately, I did not think to do this prior to the move/repair selection and there was no warning to user. My first attempt to restore was to use {scanreg / restore} in dos-mode and no luck... "Jim" wrote in message .. . If you uncheck the automatic fix scandisk errors, a prompt pops up and three options are allowed. The choices are ignore, move and repair and delete the file. If I chose the [move and repair] option, the program moves the file to the top of the host local drive C: . My question(s) are what is repaired and how do I restore the file to its proper folder location? Do I have to repair this file myself? When and why would I want to delete the file? The only errors that scandisk reports are MS-Dos name length errors that exceed 66 characters in length. Why does win98 name some MS-Dos files like this? Is this the only error that scandisk reports? It seems easier to just leave the program to autofix everything it finds, but then I would never learn what all it fixes. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
scandisk errors
get a new HDD and copy the Old HDD to, Then put new HDD in the Box and the
day you need it you can be back up and running in 5 min. For MEB will have same more good INFO for you. so keep a eye out for his POST "Jim" wrote in message ... I am ok. I ran scandisk without errors, and also did a though scan...which took a long time. I believe there is some info in those articles about doing a command-line scan in dos at the prompt, but one needs to load the [Himn.sys] first to do this procedure to check for errors and implies HDD damages. I do a regular (old school) backup monthly at the very least, and weekly if this were a critical workstation. "Hot-text" wrote in message ... So you has a current backup So was you able to run Scandisk with no errors are did you just give up? "Jim" wrote in message ... Thanks for the many varied responses. I luckily have a current backup and used it to restore to [original location] and it seems to have worked like a breeze. Most of these files are system junk collections I will never read again and perhaps I could have just deleted them without much ado about it. The KB articles are self explanatory in themselves, so thanks again. "Jim" wrote in message ... I did find answers to many of my questions in: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/186365 I did not find out how to restore the file to its original folder location after [ move to repair] option. If I just place the file in the root path folder it appears to have come from will this work? The KB article above suggests that user of this option write down the root path to folder file before moving the file. Unfortunately, I did not think to do this prior to the move/repair selection and there was no warning to user. My first attempt to restore was to use {scanreg / restore} in dos-mode and no luck... "Jim" wrote in message .. . If you uncheck the automatic fix scandisk errors, a prompt pops up and three options are allowed. The choices are ignore, move and repair and delete the file. If I chose the [move and repair] option, the program moves the file to the top of the host local drive C: . My question(s) are what is repaired and how do I restore the file to its proper folder location? Do I have to repair this file myself? When and why would I want to delete the file? The only errors that scandisk reports are MS-Dos name length errors that exceed 66 characters in length. Why does win98 name some MS-Dos files like this? Is this the only error that scandisk reports? It seems easier to just leave the program to autofix everything it finds, but then I would never learn what all it fixes. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
scandisk errors
get a new HDD and copy the Old HDD to, Then put new HDD in the Box and the day you need it you can be back up and running in 5 min. For MEB will have same more good INFO for you. so keep a eye out for his POST "Jim" wrote in message ... I am ok. I ran scandisk without errors, and also did a though scan...which took a long time. I believe there is some info in those articles about doing a command-line scan in dos at the prompt, but one needs to load the [Himn.sys] first to do this procedure to check for errors and implies HDD damages. I do a regular (old school) backup monthly at the very least, and weekly if this were a critical workstation. "Hot-text" wrote in message ... So you has a current backup So was you able to run Scandisk with no errors are did you just give up? "Jim" wrote in message ... Thanks for the many varied responses. I luckily have a current backup and used it to restore to [original location] and it seems to have worked like a breeze. Most of these files are system junk collections I will never read again and perhaps I could have just deleted them without much ado about it. The KB articles are self explanatory in themselves, so thanks again. "Jim" wrote in message ... I did find answers to many of my questions in: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/186365 I did not find out how to restore the file to its original folder location after [ move to repair] option. If I just place the file in the root path folder it appears to have come from will this work? The KB article above suggests that user of this option write down the root path to folder file before moving the file. Unfortunately, I did not think to do this prior to the move/repair selection and there was no warning to user. My first attempt to restore was to use {scanreg / restore} in dos-mode and no luck... "Jim" wrote in message .. . If you uncheck the automatic fix scandisk errors, a prompt pops up and three options are allowed. The choices are ignore, move and repair and delete the file. If I chose the [move and repair] option, the program moves the file to the top of the host local drive C: . My question(s) are what is repaired and how do I restore the file to its proper folder location? Do I have to repair this file myself? When and why would I want to delete the file? The only errors that scandisk reports are MS-Dos name length errors that exceed 66 characters in length. Why does win98 name some MS-Dos files like this? Is this the only error that scandisk reports? It seems easier to just leave the program to autofix everything it finds, but then I would never learn what all it fixes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scandisk errors/hard drive problem | Joe K | General | 3 | November 16th 05 12:38 AM |
Scandisk causes BSOD, character map causes errors, clipboard viewer crashs | bswarm | General | 5 | October 3rd 05 05:57 PM |
SCANDISK on 6GB drive producing Errors at 2.09GB to end. | Jerry | Disk Drives | 15 | July 21st 05 07:00 PM |
Recurring Scandisk Errors | vegeddabowdit | General | 2 | October 12th 04 02:55 PM |
Scandisk errors | Peter Brown | General | 15 | September 5th 04 10:40 AM |