Finding CD KEY from WinME CD :was help with logo.sys

"John John" wrote:

What the ??? If all else fails try Religion?

[snip]

your rod and your staff,
they comfort me.

He gets great comfort from his "rod"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...63d4751658694f

A prime example of his worm-wriggling!! Even when presented with the
absolute 200% proof of his error, he still tries to evade it. Dimbulb will
never admit he is wrong. He can't spell in English or in Merkin.

Woman = one. WOMEN = more than one. No matter what country you live in,
Dimbulb!! You are such a fool!!

Take a hike, coderipper.

HF

"Sugien" wrote in message
...
What you on your side of the pond consider the multiple of woman and our
women are two entirely different things, we also don't call a flashlight a
torch, or the TV the tellie and we certainly don't call the hood of our
cars it's bonnet
"Doc" ] wrote in message
...
"Sugien" wrote in
:

ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it
that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to
the *same* woman, so ipso facto if I have had a fulfilling life I must
have had a mistress or another woman on the side besides my wife.


But it did go over your head. George's comment had nothing to do with you
having a mistress, or whatever.

Reread your line ...."married to the same WOMEN"

--
Adam and Eve - the worlds happiest couple ever.
Neither had a mother-in-law.

yes and neither can you or the other; because when I said I got it about
multiple woman you all said it wasn't so, so bugger off and bite me, on
second thought don't I don't feel like going to get rabies' shots
"Heather" wrote in message
...
A prime example of his worm-wriggling!! Even when presented with the
absolute 200% proof of his error, he still tries to evade it. Dimbulb will
never admit he is wrong. He can't spell in English or in Merkin.

Woman = one. WOMEN = more than one. No matter what country you live in,
Dimbulb!! You are such a fool!!

Take a hike, coderipper.

HF

"Sugien" wrote in message
...
What you on your side of the pond consider the multiple of woman and our
women are two entirely different things, we also don't call a flashlight
a torch, or the TV the tellie and we certainly don't call the hood of our
cars it's bonnet
"Doc" ] wrote in message
...
"Sugien" wrote in
:

ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it
that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to
the *same* woman, so ipso facto if I have had a fulfilling life I must
have had a mistress or another woman on the side besides my wife.


But it did go over your head. George's comment had nothing to do with
you having a mistress, or whatever.

Reread your line ...."married to the same WOMEN"

--
Adam and Eve - the worlds happiest couple ever.
Neither had a mother-in-law.

"Ant" wrote in message
...
"Sugien" wrote:
"George Gee" wrote:
"Sugien":
I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the
same women for over a quarter centuary,

Sheeesh, a bigamist as well!

ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it
that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to
the *same* woman,

But that's not what he is saying. Heather was right; you don't get it.

yes I did you are the dense, 0ne oh, dimmest bulb. Just as I said, "he is
saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to the *same* woman"
as in married to the same *one* woman, instead of women as in multiple, so
there you see my reply went over you pointy head, rofl


[...] no matter how much you tell your self that it is going over my
head you will always have that tiny bit of doubt

No doubt whatsoever.

yep, no doubt the you are several cards short of a full deck in more then
one department of that pointy head of yours
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

I'm on the 'same side of the pond' as you and where I come from:

WOMAN equals one adult female
WOMEN equals two or more adult females

Sheesh.

--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User]
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to.
* My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/
* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm


"Sugien" wrote in message
...
What you on your side of the pond consider the multiple of woman and our
women are two entirely different things, we also don't call a flashlight a
torch, or the TV the tellie and we certainly don't call the hood of our
cars it's bonnet

"Sugien" wrote:
"Ant" wrote:
"Sugien" wrote:
"George Gee" wrote:
"Sugien":
I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the
same women for over a quarter centuary,

Sheeesh, a bigamist as well!

ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it
that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to
the *same* woman,

But that's not what he is saying. Heather was right; you don't get it.

yes I did you are the dense, 0ne oh, dimmest bulb. Just as I said, "he is
saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to the *same* woman"

He neither said, nor meant that. What you initially said, and his
remark, are quoted at the beginning of this post. Re-read carefully,
and you might understand.

as in married to the same *one* woman, instead of women as in multiple, so
there you see my reply went over you pointy head, rofl

Your reply indicated that you missed the joke entirely, oh self-
confessed pointy-headed one:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...1651ad9532d1b6

Hey Dimbulb.....

I see you ignored this post wherein Noel PROVED that you are totally WRONG
with regard to *sulogo.sys*!!!

How about it? You are always saying you will admit when you are
wrong.....well, you are WRONG!!

Bwa ha ha....caught lying once again....worm-wriggler!!

Heather

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail.

It's possible that your ripper friends were using OEM tailored versions -
or that your use of Google exceeds your comprehension of text.


1) http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 specifically says
that sulogo.sys does not exist (and neither Win98 nor Win98SE have a
Win98_19.CAB file)
2) http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm specifically states that the sulogo.sys
file is the one used at the final stage of the install - AND MUST BE
RENAMED to logo.sys before use.
3) http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0 - also
states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
4) http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
5) http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html - says " I found the
startup splash but only in the cabs. It's named sulogo.sys rather than
logo.sys." - but elsewhere explains that you need the logo.sys to show a
tailored splash. - it also links to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-011 , where the exact
procedure for creating a personalised splash screen is explained rather
well.

Wriggle out of that!




--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
which are US Retail!

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others that
say the same thing I do:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm
http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0
http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html
http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html

I can only say that maybe the splash screen for what ever reason was left
out of the over seas versions; because I just asked my son in law and he
says the German version likewise does not have it.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the sulogo.sys
file recognised by the boot process - and in neither is the logo/sys file
present by default, either (which I must admit, DID surprise me).

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding out
that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD. I had
erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the sulogo.sys from
Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did not. Now I am
wondering why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys with SE but didn't
continue it over into ME? But then there is no telling with Microsoft
because with XP they took the ability of changing the boot up screen out
of the hands of most *common* users because they placed the boot up brag
screen in the .exe file ntoskrnl.exe and a user needs to be familiar
with using a resource editor to change it. Well that is if they wish to
change it their self without relying on third party software that does
it for them.
I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt very
much if those that are wrong about what I said about the system I sold
*after* removing ME and *after* installing XP on it, will do likewise.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Sugien" wrote in message
...

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .

READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of one
clouded by hear say.

Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them
the computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put XP
on it. So the logical understanding is that you DID sell them the
WinME computer, then later installed XP and they gave you back your
ME CD.

Comprendez?

Quote.....
"The system the WinME was on has been
sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and
they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for it.

Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that
*THAT USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on.

Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said.

Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and won't
own up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the system at
the same time?, well even though there are ways of doing that, that
however was not the case and when XP is put on a system ME is NO
LONGER on the system. they had no need of the ME cd because ME was no
longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at
last the worse worm wiggle of all
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

So why should I care about anything you have to say about anything?
Oh that's right I DON"T, **** off
"Ant" wrote in message
...
"Sugien" wrote:
"Ant" wrote:
"Sugien" wrote:
"George Gee" wrote:
"Sugien":
I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the
same women for over a quarter centuary,

Sheeesh, a bigamist as well!

ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it
that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to
the *same* woman,

But that's not what he is saying. Heather was right; you don't get it.

yes I did you are the dense, 0ne oh, dimmest bulb. Just as I said, "he
is
saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to the *same*
woman"

He neither said, nor meant that. What you initially said, and his
remark, are quoted at the beginning of this post. Re-read carefully,
and you might understand.

as in married to the same *one* woman, instead of women as in multiple,
so
there you see my reply went over you pointy head, rofl

Your reply indicated that you missed the joke entirely, oh self-
confessed pointy-headed one:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.c...1651ad9532d1b6

Not about second edition, I see he did not post back after I poster several
links showing the same thing I said that on WinSe it is sulogo.sys and NOT
logo.sys. The links show it and if you don't wish to believe several links
that say the same thing as me, just because they agree with me, well that
just goes to show what a tiny brain and how immature you are
"Heather" wrote in message
...
Hey Dimbulb.....

I see you ignored this post wherein Noel PROVED that you are totally WRONG
with regard to *sulogo.sys*!!!

How about it? You are always saying you will admit when you are
wrong.....well, you are WRONG!!

Bwa ha ha....caught lying once again....worm-wriggler!!

Heather

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail.

It's possible that your ripper friends were using OEM tailored versions -
or that your use of Google exceeds your comprehension of text.


1) http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 specifically says
that sulogo.sys does not exist (and neither Win98 nor Win98SE have a
Win98_19.CAB file)
2) http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm specifically states that the
sulogo.sys file is the one used at the final stage of the install - AND
MUST BE RENAMED to logo.sys before use.
3) http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0 - also
states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
4) http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
5) http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html - says " I found the
startup splash but only in the cabs. It's named sulogo.sys rather than
logo.sys." - but elsewhere explains that you need the logo.sys to show a
tailored splash. - it also links to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-011 , where the exact
procedure for creating a personalised splash screen is explained rather
well.

Wriggle out of that!




--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
which are US Retail!

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others that
say the same thing I do:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm
http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0
http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html
http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html

I can only say that maybe the splash screen for what ever reason was
left out of the over seas versions; because I just asked my son in law
and he says the German version likewise does not have it.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the sulogo.sys
file recognised by the boot process - and in neither is the logo/sys
file present by default, either (which I must admit, DID surprise me).

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding out
that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD. I had
erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the sulogo.sys from
Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did not. Now I am
wondering why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys with SE but didn't
continue it over into ME? But then there is no telling with Microsoft
because with XP they took the ability of changing the boot up screen
out of the hands of most *common* users because they placed the boot up
brag screen in the .exe file ntoskrnl.exe and a user needs to be
familiar with using a resource editor to change it. Well that is if
they wish to change it their self without relying on third party
software that does it for them.
I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt very
much if those that are wrong about what I said about the system I sold
*after* removing ME and *after* installing XP on it, will do likewise.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Sugien" wrote in message
...

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .

READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of
one clouded by hear say.

Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them
the computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put XP
on it. So the logical understanding is that you DID sell them the
WinME computer, then later installed XP and they gave you back your
ME CD.

Comprendez?

Quote.....
"The system the WinME was on has been
sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and
they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for
it.

Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that
*THAT USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on.

Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said.

Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and won't
own up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the system
at the same time?, well even though there are ways of doing that,
that however was not the case and when XP is put on a system ME is NO
LONGER on the system. they had no need of the ME cd because ME was no
longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at
last the worse worm wiggle of all
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

You are such a liar!! You did NOT post anything that said that. Now ****
off and go bug some other news group, coderipper.

And I would NEVER believe anything you say coz you wouldn't know the truth
if it jumped up and bit you....dickhead!!

HF

"Sugien" wrote in message
...
Not about second edition, I see he did not post back after I poster
several links showing the same thing I said that on WinSe it is sulogo.sys
and NOT logo.sys. The links show it and if you don't wish to believe
several links that say the same thing as me, just because they agree with
me, well that just goes to show what a tiny brain and how immature you are
"Heather" wrote in message
...
Hey Dimbulb.....

I see you ignored this post wherein Noel PROVED that you are totally
WRONG with regard to *sulogo.sys*!!!

How about it? You are always saying you will admit when you are
wrong.....well, you are WRONG!!

Bwa ha ha....caught lying once again....worm-wriggler!!

Heather

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail.

It's possible that your ripper friends were using OEM tailored
versions - or that your use of Google exceeds your comprehension of
text.


1) http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 specifically says
that sulogo.sys does not exist (and neither Win98 nor Win98SE have a
Win98_19.CAB file)
2) http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm specifically states that the
sulogo.sys file is the one used at the final stage of the install - AND
MUST BE RENAMED to logo.sys before use.
3) http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0 - also
states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
4) http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
5) http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html - says " I found the
startup splash but only in the cabs. It's named sulogo.sys rather than
logo.sys." - but elsewhere explains that you need the logo.sys to show a
tailored splash. - it also links to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-011 , where the exact
procedure for creating a personalised splash screen is explained rather
well.

Wriggle out of that!




--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's which are US Retail!

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others that
say the same thing I do:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm
http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0
http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html
http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html

I can only say that maybe the splash screen for what ever reason was
left out of the over seas versions; because I just asked my son in law
and he says the German version likewise does not have it.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the sulogo.sys
file recognised by the boot process - and in neither is the logo/sys
file present by default, either (which I must admit, DID surprise me).

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding
out that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD.
I had erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the
sulogo.sys from Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did
not. Now I am wondering why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys with
SE but didn't continue it over into ME? But then there is no telling
with Microsoft because with XP they took the ability of changing the
boot up screen out of the hands of most *common* users because they
placed the boot up brag screen in the .exe file ntoskrnl.exe and a
user needs to be familiar with using a resource editor to change it.
Well that is if they wish to change it their self without relying on
third party software that does it for them.
I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt
very much if those that are wrong about what I said about the system
I sold *after* removing ME and *after* installing XP on it, will do
likewise.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Sugien" wrote in message
...

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .

READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of
one clouded by hear say.

Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them
the computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put XP
on it. So the logical understanding is that you DID sell them the
WinME computer, then later installed XP and they gave you back your
ME CD.

Comprendez?

Quote.....
"The system the WinME was on has been
sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and
they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for
it.

Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that
*THAT USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on.

Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said.

Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and won't
own up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the system
at the same time?, well even though there are ways of doing that,
that however was not the case and when XP is put on a system ME is
NO LONGER on the system. they had no need of the ME cd because ME
was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on,
you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware