Finding CD KEY from WinME CD :was help with logo.sys

"John John" wrote in message
...
Sugien wrote:

In any event they are not *dark* powers any way, I am a child of
the
light and a child of God, and not only can my father beat your father at
absolutely everything; but my father *created* everything *including YOU*

What the ??? If all else fails try Religion?

Pardon me for giggling, John. But Sooooge also plays the *religion card*
when he is losing an argument. And he damn near forgot he was supposed to
be this fundamentalist type when he talked about his *dark powers* and
supposedly threatened me. ROFL!!

(but he forgot to capitalize *Father*....oops!!)

Couldn't resist.....but perhaps now you folks can see why he drives sane
people up the wall on other ng's such as ACV. He lies continually about
anything and everything.

Cheers...Figgs

...I have no need to fight any battles; because I have a father that
fights for me even when I don't think it necessary.

Which Psalm is that one from?
The Lord Is My Shepherd. How far do you want to carry this? The Lord
probably knows all CD keys...

John

PKB, considering you have never looked ANYTHING up concerning me and have
always relied on what others have to say. For instance, I have NEVER
repaired a typewriter in Vietnam or any where else. I was a 26T which is
electronics; but of course you are NOT interested in the truth only in being
right; but you forget that your being right is NOT the truth; because your
right is a LIE.

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"John John" wrote in message
...
Sugien wrote:

In any event they are not *dark* powers any way, I am a child of
the
light and a child of God, and not only can my father beat your father at
absolutely everything; but my father *created* everything *including
YOU*

What the ??? If all else fails try Religion?

Pardon me for giggling, John. But Sooooge also plays the *religion card*
when he is losing an argument. And he damn near forgot he was supposed to
be this fundamentalist type when he talked about his *dark powers* and
supposedly threatened me. ROFL!!

(but he forgot to capitalize *Father*....oops!!)

Couldn't resist.....but perhaps now you folks can see why he drives sane
people up the wall on other ng's such as ACV. He lies continually about
anything and everything.

Cheers...Figgs

...I have no need to fight any battles; because I have a father that
fights for me even when I don't think it necessary.

Which Psalm is that one from?
The Lord Is My Shepherd. How far do you want to carry this? The Lord
probably knows all CD keys...

John

"John John" wrote in message
...
Sugien wrote:

In any event they are not *dark* powers any way, I am a child of
the
light and a child of God, and not only can my father beat your father at
absolutely everything; but my father *created* everything *including YOU*

What the ??? If all else fails try Religion?

...I have no need to fight any battles; because I have a father that
fights for me even when I don't think it necessary.

Which Psalm is that one from? Why not:

because this is one of those I was referencing:

Romans 12:20

Therefore if thine enemy hunger, feed him; if he thirst, give him drink: for
in so doing thou shalt heap coals of fire on his head.


iow, no matter what my enemy does to try and hurt me either physically or
emotionally or with hurtful words, I do not respond in kind but rather pray
for them. You see Heather and others like to play the "I am better then
you" and she and others take the words of people like 4Q at face value
instead of searching for their self and not only that but after taking the
word of such a person as 4Q that attacks the wives and children of those on
Usenet when he can't win in an argument any other way; but will join in
haranguing I half expected Heather to join him when he was dragging my wife
and children's names through the mud when they don't even read or post to
Usenet.
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"John John" wrote in message
...
Sugien wrote:

In any event they are not *dark* powers any way, I am a child of
the
light and a child of God, and not only can my father beat your father at
absolutely everything; but my father *created* everything *including
YOU*

What the ??? If all else fails try Religion?

Pardon me for giggling, John. But Sooooge also plays the *religion card*
when he is losing an argument. And he damn near forgot he was supposed to
When truth is used I never loose an argument because I don't lie and I rely
on my own research and not hear say or rumors like what you and others do.


be this fundamentalist type when he talked about his *dark powers* and
supposedly threatened me. ROFL!!
Other people sometimes think the powers of light are evil, just because the
powers of light can be a very frightening thing when you are standing wrong
in the power of light.


(but he forgot to capitalize *Father*....oops!!)

Oh, gee wiz, I made an error, so what is your point?

Couldn't resist.....but perhaps now you folks can see why he drives sane
people up the wall on other ng's such as ACV. He lies continually about
anything and everything.

I only do so when attacked by the likes of you or some one like you that
takes the word of a low life over the word of a good person. I will tell
the truth every time someone lies and tries to say something that I know to
be a lie. I will defend myself when I am maliciously attacked expressly
when it is for a no good reason.
People in groups like this wonder why there is so much malicious
software and virus out there when all they need do is look at the difference
in the way people are treated. People like 4Q that openly admit they think
people should be allowed to write virus and he also says that he studies and
tries to write artificial life and artificial intelligence programs which is
a thinly veiled way of saying virus, yet he can attack someone like me and
he is believed *prior* to any proof of anything and then it just snow balls.
Anyone with an open mind that reads back over the archives of ACV and
then ACVA-V will and have agreed with me. I think it is just that people
secretly like the darker side of the internet in private while all along
saying just the opposite in public for fear of reparations by their pears in
public forums such as Usenet.
I have ever only wanted to help people and lead young programmers away
from virus/malware/malicious types of programs; but those like 4Q and others
openly try and lead the young programmer to it are hailed like conquering
heroes and I think it stinks and sometimes I even think the net gets what it
deserves when one of those young programmers that have been groomed by
people like 4Q and others creates and then releases something wicked.

Cheers...Figgs

...I have no need to fight any battles; because I have a father that
fights for me even when I don't think it necessary.

Which Psalm is that one from?
The Lord Is My Shepherd. How far do you want to carry this? The Lord
probably knows all CD keys...

John


btw, I have no need of dard powers see this - Romans 12:20






--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail.

It's possible that your ripper friends were using OEM tailored versions - or
that your use of Google exceeds your comprehension of text.


1) http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 specifically says
that sulogo.sys does not exist (and neither Win98 nor Win98SE have a
Win98_19.CAB file)
2) http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm specifically states that the sulogo.sys
file is the one used at the final stage of the install - AND MUST BE RENAMED
to logo.sys before use.
3) http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0 - also
states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
4) http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html - also
states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
5) http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html - says " I found the
startup splash but only in the cabs. It's named sulogo.sys rather than
logo.sys." - but elsewhere explains that you need the logo.sys to show a
tailored splash. - it also links to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-011 , where the exact
procedure for creating a personalised splash screen is explained rather
well.

Wriggle out of that!




--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
which are US Retail!

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others that
say the same thing I do:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm
http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0
http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html
http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html

I can only say that maybe the splash screen for what ever reason was left
out of the over seas versions; because I just asked my son in law and he
says the German version likewise does not have it.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the sulogo.sys
file recognised by the boot process - and in neither is the logo/sys file
present by default, either (which I must admit, DID surprise me).

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding out
that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD. I had
erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the sulogo.sys from
Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did not. Now I am
wondering why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys with SE but didn't
continue it over into ME? But then there is no telling with Microsoft
because with XP they took the ability of changing the boot up screen out
of the hands of most *common* users because they placed the boot up brag
screen in the .exe file ntoskrnl.exe and a user needs to be familiar with
using a resource editor to change it. Well that is if they wish to
change it their self without relying on third party software that does it
for them.
I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt very
much if those that are wrong about what I said about the system I sold
*after* removing ME and *after* installing XP on it, will do likewise.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Sugien" wrote in message
...

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .

READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of one
clouded by hear say.

Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them the
computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put XP on it.
So the logical understanding is that you DID sell them the WinME
computer, then later installed XP and they gave you back your ME CD.

Comprendez?

Quote.....
"The system the WinME was on has been
sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and
they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for it.

Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that *THAT
USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on.

Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said.

Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and won't own
up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the system at the
same time?, well even though there are ways of doing that, that however
was not the case and when XP is put on a system ME is NO LONGER on the
system. they had no need of the ME cd because ME was no longer on the
system; because I took ME off and put XP on, you are at last the worse
worm wiggle of all
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

Sugien wrote:

bla..bla..bla... Gibberish and mumbo jumbo...

Are you in training to replace Pat Robertson and become leader of the
crackpot club?

John

"Sugien" wrote in
:


"George Gee" wrote in message
...

I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the
same women for over a quarter centuary,

Sheeesh, a bigamist as well!

George Gee



ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it
that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to
the *same* woman, so ipso facto if I have had a fulfilling life I must
have had a mistress or another woman on the side besides my wife.


But it did go over your head. George's comment had nothing to do with you
having a mistress, or whatever.

Reread your line ...."married to the same WOMEN"

--
Adam and Eve - the worlds happiest couple ever.
Neither had a mother-in-law.

bull hockey
"Doc" ] wrote in message
...
"Sugien" wrote in
:


"George Gee" wrote in message
...

I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the
same women for over a quarter centuary,

Sheeesh, a bigamist as well!

George Gee



ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it
that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to
the *same* woman, so ipso facto if I have had a fulfilling life I must
have had a mistress or another woman on the side besides my wife.


But it did go over your head. George's comment had nothing to do with you
having a mistress, or whatever.

Reread your line ...."married to the same WOMEN"

--
Adam and Eve - the worlds happiest couple ever.
Neither had a mother-in-law.

What you on your side of the pond consider the multiple of woman and our
women are two entirely different things, we also don't call a flashlight a
torch, or the TV the tellie and we certainly don't call the hood of our cars
it's bonnet
"Doc" ] wrote in message
...
"Sugien" wrote in
:


"George Gee" wrote in message
...

I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the
same women for over a quarter centuary,

Sheeesh, a bigamist as well!

George Gee



ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it
that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to
the *same* woman, so ipso facto if I have had a fulfilling life I must
have had a mistress or another woman on the side besides my wife.


But it did go over your head. George's comment had nothing to do with you
having a mistress, or whatever.

Reread your line ...."married to the same WOMEN"

--
Adam and Eve - the worlds happiest couple ever.
Neither had a mother-in-law.

"Sugien" wrote:
"George Gee" wrote:
"Sugien":
I have succeeded in haveing a fulfilling life, married to the
same women for over a quarter centuary,

Sheeesh, a bigamist as well!

ha ha, and just for ant that thinks things go over my head, I get it
that he is saying you can't have a fulfilling life being married to
the *same* woman,

But that's not what he is saying. Heather was right; you don't get it.

[...] no matter how much you tell your self that it is going over my
head you will always have that tiny bit of doubt

No doubt whatsoever.

and because of my knowing nothing much at all [...]

That explains it!