What is Usenet

"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote:
Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference
you
can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the
microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal.

It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright.
Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that
the
Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"?

(Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have
to
be
rescinded?)

These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The
moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately
continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by
me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently
ignorant people need.

You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses
their
"control"?
snip your verbose rants
Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has
stated
that:
"Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes
down"
Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you
put
on it.



Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of
control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two
groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May
29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers

So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else.

Microsoft has not stated that use of their named newsgroups is illegal.
Despite your claims it is not illegal to discuss Microsoft products on
Usenet.

So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't
participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you to
do.

"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote:
Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference
you
can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the
microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal.

It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright.
Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that
the
Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"?

(Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have
to
be
rescinded?)

These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The
moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately
continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by
me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently
ignorant people need.

You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses
their
"control"?
snip your verbose rants
Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has
stated
that:
"Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes
down"
Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you
put
on it.



Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of
control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two
groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May
29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers

So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else.

Microsoft has not stated that use of their named newsgroups is illegal.
Despite your claims it is not illegal to discuss Microsoft products on
Usenet.

So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't
participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you to
do.

On 05/30/2010 01:37 AM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote:
Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference
you
can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the
microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal.

It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright.
Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that
the
Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"?

(Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have
to
be
rescinded?)

These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The
moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately
continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by
me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently
ignorant people need.

You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses
their
"control"?
snip your verbose rants
Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has
stated
that:
"Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes
down"
Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you
put
on it.



Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of
control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two
groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May
29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers

So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else.

Microsoft has not stated that use of their named newsgroups is illegal.
Despite your claims it is not illegal to discuss Microsoft products on
Usenet.

So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't
participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you to
do.



Microsoft HAS stated such in its provided documents, the Law says such.

You can discuss Microsoft's products, you may NOT steal its property.

Take a hike, all this has already been done by parties much smarter
than you.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

On 05/30/2010 01:37 AM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote:
Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference
you
can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the
microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal.

It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright.
Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that
the
Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"?

(Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have
to
be
rescinded?)

These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The
moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately
continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by
me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently
ignorant people need.

You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses
their
"control"?
snip your verbose rants
Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has
stated
that:
"Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes
down"
Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you
put
on it.



Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of
control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two
groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May
29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers

So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else.

Microsoft has not stated that use of their named newsgroups is illegal.
Despite your claims it is not illegal to discuss Microsoft products on
Usenet.

So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't
participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you to
do.



Microsoft HAS stated such in its provided documents, the Law says such.

You can discuss Microsoft's products, you may NOT steal its property.

Take a hike, all this has already been done by parties much smarter
than you.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

"MEB" wrote in message
...

On 05/30/2010 01:37 AM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't
participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you
to
do.



Microsoft HAS stated such in its provided documents, the Law says such.

Bull****, they have not stated that you can't "discuss" their products.

You can discuss Microsoft's products, you may NOT steal its property.

What property is stolen in a discussion?

Take a hike, all this has already been done by parties much smarter
than you.

Who appointed you as part of the "smart set parties" ?
Self appointed perhaps? Pity a lot of people don'tseem to agree.

"MEB" wrote in message
...

On 05/30/2010 01:37 AM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't
participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you
to
do.



Microsoft HAS stated such in its provided documents, the Law says such.

Bull****, they have not stated that you can't "discuss" their products.

You can discuss Microsoft's products, you may NOT steal its property.

What property is stolen in a discussion?

Take a hike, all this has already been done by parties much smarter
than you.

Who appointed you as part of the "smart set parties" ?
Self appointed perhaps? Pity a lot of people don'tseem to agree.

"MEB" wrote in message
...

Now if you can't understand the *illegality* of the usage unless done
under Microsoft's allowances, and the *personal liability* attached with
usage of ANY of Microsoft's property regardless the method which YOU
received it, then you have no ability to complain when/if Microsoft,
individual, class and/or group, or any prosecutor [all of which can do
so] files any action against your illegal usage, whether in the U.S.A.
or abroad.

The second largest ISP in this country still carries the news group
microsoft.public.win98.webtv (I just put a test post in it)
Do you wish to do your "Microsoft Civic Duty" and report it ?

"MEB" wrote in message
...

Now if you can't understand the *illegality* of the usage unless done
under Microsoft's allowances, and the *personal liability* attached with
usage of ANY of Microsoft's property regardless the method which YOU
received it, then you have no ability to complain when/if Microsoft,
individual, class and/or group, or any prosecutor [all of which can do
so] files any action against your illegal usage, whether in the U.S.A.
or abroad.

The second largest ISP in this country still carries the news group
microsoft.public.win98.webtv (I just put a test post in it)
Do you wish to do your "Microsoft Civic Duty" and report it ?

why you Open the Door @ alt.free.newsservers,
Keep microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion @ microsoft

"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote:
Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference
you
can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the
microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal.

It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright.
Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that the
Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"?

(Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have to
be
rescinded?)

These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The
moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately
continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by
me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently
ignorant people need.

You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses their
"control"?
snip your verbose rants
Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has stated
that:
"Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes
down"
Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you
put
on it.



Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of
control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two
groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May
29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers

So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---

why you Open the Door @ alt.free.newsservers,
Keep microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion @ microsoft

"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message
...
On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote:
Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference
you
can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the
microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal.

It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright.
Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that the
Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"?

(Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have to
be
rescinded?)

These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The
moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately
continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by
me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently
ignorant people need.

You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses their
"control"?
snip your verbose rants
Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has stated
that:
"Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes
down"
Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you
put
on it.



Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of
control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two
groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May
29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers

So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else.

--
MEB
http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm
Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking
http://peoplescounsel.org
The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government
___---