If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
What is Usenet
"MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote: "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote: Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference you can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal. It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright. Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that the Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"? (Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have to be rescinded?) These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently ignorant people need. You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses their "control"? snip your verbose rants Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has stated that: "Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes down" Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you put on it. Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May 29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else. Microsoft has not stated that use of their named newsgroups is illegal. Despite your claims it is not illegal to discuss Microsoft products on Usenet. So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you to do. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
What is Usenet
"MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote: "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote: Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference you can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal. It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright. Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that the Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"? (Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have to be rescinded?) These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently ignorant people need. You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses their "control"? snip your verbose rants Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has stated that: "Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes down" Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you put on it. Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May 29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else. Microsoft has not stated that use of their named newsgroups is illegal. Despite your claims it is not illegal to discuss Microsoft products on Usenet. So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you to do. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
What is Usenet
On 05/30/2010 01:37 AM, Sunny wrote:
"MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote: "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote: Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference you can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal. It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright. Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that the Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"? (Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have to be rescinded?) These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently ignorant people need. You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses their "control"? snip your verbose rants Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has stated that: "Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes down" Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you put on it. Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May 29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else. Microsoft has not stated that use of their named newsgroups is illegal. Despite your claims it is not illegal to discuss Microsoft products on Usenet. So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you to do. Microsoft HAS stated such in its provided documents, the Law says such. You can discuss Microsoft's products, you may NOT steal its property. Take a hike, all this has already been done by parties much smarter than you. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
What is Usenet
On 05/30/2010 01:37 AM, Sunny wrote: "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote: "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote: Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference you can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal. It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright. Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that the Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"? (Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have to be rescinded?) These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently ignorant people need. You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses their "control"? snip your verbose rants Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has stated that: "Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes down" Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you put on it. Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May 29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else. Microsoft has not stated that use of their named newsgroups is illegal. Despite your claims it is not illegal to discuss Microsoft products on Usenet. So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you to do. Microsoft HAS stated such in its provided documents, the Law says such. You can discuss Microsoft's products, you may NOT steal its property. Take a hike, all this has already been done by parties much smarter than you. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
What is Usenet
"MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/30/2010 01:37 AM, Sunny wrote: "MEB" wrote in message ... So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you to do. Microsoft HAS stated such in its provided documents, the Law says such. Bull****, they have not stated that you can't "discuss" their products. You can discuss Microsoft's products, you may NOT steal its property. What property is stolen in a discussion? Take a hike, all this has already been done by parties much smarter than you. Who appointed you as part of the "smart set parties" ? Self appointed perhaps? Pity a lot of people don'tseem to agree. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
What is Usenet
"MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/30/2010 01:37 AM, Sunny wrote: "MEB" wrote in message ... So move on. Go post your arrogance somewhere else. (Seeing as you don't participate on Usenet with your "Usenutters" it should be easy for you to do. Microsoft HAS stated such in its provided documents, the Law says such. Bull****, they have not stated that you can't "discuss" their products. You can discuss Microsoft's products, you may NOT steal its property. What property is stolen in a discussion? Take a hike, all this has already been done by parties much smarter than you. Who appointed you as part of the "smart set parties" ? Self appointed perhaps? Pity a lot of people don'tseem to agree. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
What is Usenet
"MEB" wrote in message ... Now if you can't understand the *illegality* of the usage unless done under Microsoft's allowances, and the *personal liability* attached with usage of ANY of Microsoft's property regardless the method which YOU received it, then you have no ability to complain when/if Microsoft, individual, class and/or group, or any prosecutor [all of which can do so] files any action against your illegal usage, whether in the U.S.A. or abroad. The second largest ISP in this country still carries the news group microsoft.public.win98.webtv (I just put a test post in it) Do you wish to do your "Microsoft Civic Duty" and report it ? |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
What is Usenet
"MEB" wrote in message ... Now if you can't understand the *illegality* of the usage unless done under Microsoft's allowances, and the *personal liability* attached with usage of ANY of Microsoft's property regardless the method which YOU received it, then you have no ability to complain when/if Microsoft, individual, class and/or group, or any prosecutor [all of which can do so] files any action against your illegal usage, whether in the U.S.A. or abroad. The second largest ISP in this country still carries the news group microsoft.public.win98.webtv (I just put a test post in it) Do you wish to do your "Microsoft Civic Duty" and report it ? |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
What is Usenet
why you Open the Door @ alt.free.newsservers,
Keep microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion @ microsoft "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote: "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote: Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference you can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal. It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright. Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that the Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"? (Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have to be rescinded?) These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently ignorant people need. You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses their "control"? snip your verbose rants Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has stated that: "Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes down" Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you put on it. Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May 29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
What is Usenet
why you Open the Door @ alt.free.newsservers,
Keep microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion @ microsoft "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 07:52 PM, Sunny wrote: "MEB" wrote in message ... On 05/29/2010 02:51 AM, Sunny wrote: Your shotgun approach of directing posters to every "Legal" reference you can dream up, has not yet proven that posting on Usenet using the microsoft*named newsgroups is illegal. It has nothing to do with software piracy or copyright. Are you claiming that any messages posted on those newsgroups, that the Microsoft Server does not get are "illegal"? (Are all messages, posted while the Microsoft Server was "down" have to be rescinded?) These two documents were posted to misc.legal.moderated. The moderator(s) or other party is apparently bent upon deliberately continuing public deception and has not posted the further response by me [at least not yet]; these two supply the answers you apparently ignorant people need. You claim Microsoft has "control" then bleat when a moderator uses their "control"? snip your verbose rants Only because you still have not produced proof that Microsoft has stated that: "Microsoft Usenet news groups cannot be used when their server closes down" Discussion is not "piracy" no matter how much of your verbose spin you put on it. Just as an FYI to you and all others, Microsoft provided proof of control per the request of Leythos *for proof* [immediately] via two groups and via message comparison. Microsoft did that at 10:45 P.M. May 29, 2010. security.virus .msnewsservers So move on. Go post your ignorance somewhere else. -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.org/ref/windows-main.htm Windows Info, Diagnostics, Security, Networking http://peoplescounsel.org The "real world" of Law, Justice, and Government ___--- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Since this forum is now completely Usenet - What Usenet is | MEB[_18_] | General | 13 | October 1st 09 08:15 AM |
OT but Important: Usenet Abuse and Impersonation by a sick individual using IP address 34.4.88.47 | Radium | Disk Drives | 0 | September 6th 07 03:32 AM |
OT 20 Year Usenet Timeline | Hugh Candlin | General | 3 | February 7th 05 01:10 AM |