If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
gotta say.. so long ME
Hmm.. defeats the object/argument somewhat for binning WinMe in favour of
Ubuntu/Linux - especially on an 'older' box then g Compared to Ubuntu, WinMe leaves it standing (at least on this old box) hands down - and it works! Mart "Alias" wrote in message ... Mart wrote: May be that a 200MHz CPU and 256MB RAM just aren't adequate. Bingo. The RAM is enough but the processor is a tad slow ;-) Alias |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
gotta say.. so long ME
You must be having a lot of idle time on your hands. How about doing some needle work. "Heather" wrote in message ... DON'T BLOODY ENCOURAGE HIM!! He will be back here whining about how his computer is somehow messed up. SMACK!! "Shane" wrote in message ... You generally get Lilo and Grub with Linux distros, Harry. That is, a choice of two boot managers (as opposed to the reknowned gents outfitters of New York, Paris, Milan, Trumpton and Camberwick Green). Of course, if you're dualing it with XP that's three, and if you were already using, say, PowerQuest's Boot Magic, that's four. If one of your partitions is NT4.0 with DR-DOS, that's another two! I think six the max I've had at once. You can boot your Windows volumes with Lilo/Grub - though I never think as elegantly as with the NT loader. Also you can end up with problems it takes experience to undo (or paying someone to come round and get it up and running again). Shane webster72n wrote: What "BootManager" is that, Mart? Does it come with the Ubuntu OS as part of the package? I'll have to look into that and then make the proper decisions. You may want to subscribe to "alt.os.linux.ubuntu" at "nntp.aioe.org" in order to find some answers to your situation. And why doesn't it make any difference to install a seperate hard drive? I've one ready to go, but don't really need it, according to your estimate. Once I have the neccessary answers, I'll go ahead and install my "Ubuntu" on drive E or F, both yet empty partitions on my main hard drive, or the new HD. With a "bit" of luck I should get there allright. Harry. "Mart" wrote in message ... Harry wrote :- That's exactly what I plan to do, Alias and, hopefully, successfully too, by dual-booting. Err... that's exactly what the 'boot manager' does Harry - allows you to dual boot! In my case, the 'new' Boot Manager has (invisibly) installed itself on the C: and when booting gives a 'DOS type' menu offering to continue to boot either Ubuntu (plus a couple of other options) or WinMe. And, depending on which option I select, boots the appropriate OS. WinMe on the C: and Ubuntu on the D: (Or as the Boot Manager refers to them:- as (hd0,0) and (hd1,0) respectively) If you try it Harry, just use ONE HDD. And BTW, my v 6.06 is the LTS version! Mart "webster72n" wrote in message ... "Alias" wrote in message ... Mart wrote: Referring to my proposal to attempt to install Ubuntu, Alias wrote :- Once you've done all that, get back to me about Beryl. Well, I'm sadly disappointed with my (many) attempts to successfully install Ubuntu 6.06 (let alone 7.04). Probably the wrong forum but FWIW - I decided to install it on my D: drive (WinMe being installed on the C: - which runs like a well oiled clock). Big mistake! - It's installed a Boot Manager on the C: which I can't get rid of - but that's another story - and a PITA. v 6.06 runs (if that's the right word) very slowly, eventually recognises my PCI WiFi card and subsequently sees my router but won't let me connect. OTOH, v7.04 doesn't recognise the card (nor my ps/2 mouse either!!) so still doesn't connect. If I try to re-edit the 'Networks' settings in v6.06, it won't reboot - just hangs until I re-install it. Jeepers! I thought that I'd lived thru' enough hours watching spinning egg-timers loading (and re-loading) MS OS's over the past years but they don't hold a candle to Ubuntu. Nah - Sorry Beryl, 'fraid you're going to have to wait. I think I'll stick with WinMe (and XP of course) for a while longer yet. Mart Try putting a new hard drive in. I don't know but maybe Me and Ubuntu can't co-exist. That's exactly what I plan to do, Alias and, hopefully, successfully too, by dual-booting. I am surprised, that Mart tried his adventure, because you have called attention to it before, if I rmember correctly. Think he might back up and give it another try? There shouldn't be any conflicts between the two, if residing on seperate drives. Come to think of it, he also may have used the wrong version. The one before me is ver. 6.06 LTS, sent to me directly from "Yonder". Harry. Alias "Alias" wrote in message ... Mart wrote: Thanks Alias, I might now take Ubuntu a bit more seriously and get around to opening one of my boxes, swap the HDD for a spare and install Ubuntu - your response makes it seem a bit more worthwhile. It doesn't run too well on my old 200MMX with 256 MB of RAM, directly from the CD. Probably needs the 'virtual memory' to get things to run a bit more effectively. BTW - did you find the 'restricted drivers' elsewhere on the CD or did you have to download them from a completely different (manufactures web site?) source? Mart The restricted drivers for nVidia can be found once you've installed Ubuntu 7.04 by clicking on System/Administration/Restricted Drivers Manager. It takes five seconds or so. Also, for the codecs, etc. go to http://www.getautomatix.com/wiki/ind...e=Installation Once you've downloaded it, just double click on the setup like you would with Windows. Once you've done all that, get back to me about Beryl. Alias snipped |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
gotta say.. so long ME / Shane & Mart
Shane and Mart: Surely appreciate your input on this one. It should enable me to execute this "Ubuntu" thing. But still am not in a rush for now. Just getting ready. Harry. "Shane" wrote in message ... PS, Harry. Set the boot manager up on the same partition as Linux is installed to. I'm pretty sure - though it's been a long, long time, what with the fact I'm a control freak - that if left to the default it *will* install to the root of the disk, and cause problems eventually if you want to remove it and go back to how things were - such as Mart is now enjoying, but far more so if you usually boot with the NT loader. So, you need to do what I do, and it is not at all something for the novice, and just one more example of what I keep saying, that Linux isn't ready to take on Windows. Because Windows is where it is because of the novices being able to install it and run it without having to take a course or pay someone to set it up. It would be easier if more computers came with Linux pre-installed - but you have to have M$ wealth to bribe and extort your way into *that* happy place, at least these days. Still, with Windows, the novice in isolation isn't likely to grind to a halt after half an hour because they no longer understand the jargon. Shane Shane wrote: You generally get Lilo and Grub with Linux distros, Harry. That is, a choice of two boot managers (as opposed to the reknowned gents outfitters of New York, Paris, Milan, Trumpton and Camberwick Green). Of course, if you're dualing it with XP that's three, and if you were already using, say, PowerQuest's Boot Magic, that's four. If one of your partitions is NT4.0 with DR-DOS, that's another two! I think six the max I've had at once. You can boot your Windows volumes with Lilo/Grub - though I never think as elegantly as with the NT loader. Also you can end up with problems it takes experience to undo (or paying someone to come round and get it up and running again). Shane webster72n wrote: What "BootManager" is that, Mart? Does it come with the Ubuntu OS as part of the package? I'll have to look into that and then make the proper decisions. You may want to subscribe to "alt.os.linux.ubuntu" at "nntp.aioe.org" in order to find some answers to your situation. And why doesn't it make any difference to install a seperate hard drive? I've one ready to go, but don't really need it, according to your estimate. Once I have the neccessary answers, I'll go ahead and install my "Ubuntu" on drive E or F, both yet empty partitions on my main hard drive, or the new HD. With a "bit" of luck I should get there allright. Harry. "Mart" wrote in message ... Harry wrote :- That's exactly what I plan to do, Alias and, hopefully, successfully too, by dual-booting. Err... that's exactly what the 'boot manager' does Harry - allows you to dual boot! In my case, the 'new' Boot Manager has (invisibly) installed itself on the C: and when booting gives a 'DOS type' menu offering to continue to boot either Ubuntu (plus a couple of other options) or WinMe. And, depending on which option I select, boots the appropriate OS. WinMe on the C: and Ubuntu on the D: (Or as the Boot Manager refers to them:- as (hd0,0) and (hd1,0) respectively) If you try it Harry, just use ONE HDD. And BTW, my v 6.06 is the LTS version! Mart "webster72n" wrote in message ... "Alias" wrote in message ... Mart wrote: Referring to my proposal to attempt to install Ubuntu, Alias wrote :- Once you've done all that, get back to me about Beryl. Well, I'm sadly disappointed with my (many) attempts to successfully install Ubuntu 6.06 (let alone 7.04). Probably the wrong forum but FWIW - I decided to install it on my D: drive (WinMe being installed on the C: - which runs like a well oiled clock). Big mistake! - It's installed a Boot Manager on the C: which I can't get rid of - but that's another story - and a PITA. v 6.06 runs (if that's the right word) very slowly, eventually recognises my PCI WiFi card and subsequently sees my router but won't let me connect. OTOH, v7.04 doesn't recognise the card (nor my ps/2 mouse either!!) so still doesn't connect. If I try to re-edit the 'Networks' settings in v6.06, it won't reboot - just hangs until I re-install it. Jeepers! I thought that I'd lived thru' enough hours watching spinning egg-timers loading (and re-loading) MS OS's over the past years but they don't hold a candle to Ubuntu. Nah - Sorry Beryl, 'fraid you're going to have to wait. I think I'll stick with WinMe (and XP of course) for a while longer yet. Mart Try putting a new hard drive in. I don't know but maybe Me and Ubuntu can't co-exist. That's exactly what I plan to do, Alias and, hopefully, successfully too, by dual-booting. I am surprised, that Mart tried his adventure, because you have called attention to it before, if I rmember correctly. Think he might back up and give it another try? There shouldn't be any conflicts between the two, if residing on seperate drives. Come to think of it, he also may have used the wrong version. The one before me is ver. 6.06 LTS, sent to me directly from "Yonder". Harry. Alias "Alias" wrote in message ... Mart wrote: Thanks Alias, I might now take Ubuntu a bit more seriously and get around to opening one of my boxes, swap the HDD for a spare and install Ubuntu - your response makes it seem a bit more worthwhile. It doesn't run too well on my old 200MMX with 256 MB of RAM, directly from the CD. Probably needs the 'virtual memory' to get things to run a bit more effectively. BTW - did you find the 'restricted drivers' elsewhere on the CD or did you have to download them from a completely different (manufactures web site?) source? Mart The restricted drivers for nVidia can be found once you've installed Ubuntu 7.04 by clicking on System/Administration/Restricted Drivers Manager. It takes five seconds or so. Also, for the codecs, etc. go to http://www.getautomatix.com/wiki/ind...e=Installation Once you've downloaded it, just double click on the setup like you would with Windows. Once you've done all that, get back to me about Beryl. Alias snipped |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
gotta say.. so long ME
Needle work??? Bwa ha ha!! You ARE showing your age. Women haven't
done that since the middle ages. "webster72n" wrote in message ... You must be having a lot of idle time on your hands. How about doing some needle work. "Heather" wrote in message ... DON'T BLOODY ENCOURAGE HIM!! He will be back here whining about how his computer is somehow messed up. SMACK!! |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
gotta say.. so long ME
"Heather" wrote in message ... Needle work??? Bwa ha ha!! You ARE showing your age. Women haven't done that since the middle ages. Exactly my point... "webster72n" wrote in message ... You must be having a lot of idle time on your hands. How about doing some needle work. "Heather" wrote in message ... DON'T BLOODY ENCOURAGE HIM!! He will be back here whining about how his computer is somehow messed up. SMACK!! |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
gotta say.. so long ME
"webster72n" wrote in message ... "Heather" wrote in message ... Needle work??? Bwa ha ha!! You ARE showing your age. Women haven't done that since the middle ages. Exactly my point... And that point is??? Do tell. "webster72n" wrote in message ... You must be having a lot of idle time on your hands. How about doing some needle work. "Heather" wrote in message ... DON'T BLOODY ENCOURAGE HIM!! He will be back here whining about how his computer is somehow messed up. SMACK!! |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
gotta say.. so long ME
You just need to match a suitable linux with the 200MHz CPU. Take a look at
MintLinux or D*mnSmallLinux "Mart" wrote.. Hmm.. defeats the object/argument somewhat for binning WinMe in favour of Ubuntu/Linux - especially on an 'older' box then g Compared to Ubuntu, WinMe leaves it standing (at least on this old box) hands down - and it works! |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
gotta say.. so long ME
Mart wrote:
Hmm.. defeats the object/argument somewhat for binning WinMe in favour of Ubuntu/Linux - especially on an 'older' box then g Compared to Ubuntu, WinMe leaves it standing (at least on this old box) hands down - and it works! Mart See Ogg's post. Alias "Alias" wrote in message ... Mart wrote: May be that a 200MHz CPU and 256MB RAM just aren't adequate. Bingo. The RAM is enough but the processor is a tad slow ;-) Alias |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
gotta say.. so long ME
Mart wrote:
Harry, - if you're watching - DON'T go the two disk (dual boot) route. Just start with an old 'spare' in place of the existing (known good and working) C: and don't even consider a second disk at this stage! You can easily replace the disk if Ubuntu goes pear-shaped and you'll have your (WinMe) system back. Mart Excellent advice. Alias |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
gotta say.. so long ME
Mart wrote:
Harry, - if you're watching - DON'T go the two disk (dual boot) route. Just start with an old 'spare' in place of the existing (known good and working) C: and don't even consider a second disk at this stage! You can easily replace the disk if Ubuntu goes pear-shaped and you'll have your (WinMe) system back. Mart 'Course if Ubuntu goes pear shaped, it's a helluva lot easier to reinstall than Windows. Alias |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Invalid long filename | General | 10 | October 19th 05 07:11 AM | |
Long boot | Dale | General | 11 | July 28th 04 03:22 AM |
A very long message | ppoatt | General | 18 | July 3rd 04 07:43 PM |
Share name to long for ME | Herb | Networking | 2 | June 10th 04 04:41 PM |
Long shut down | Jim Y | Improving Performance | 0 | May 6th 04 10:00 PM |