Finding CD KEY from WinME CD :was help with logo.sys

That's strange - since I comprehensively ripped apart your (so-called)
proofs in the very post that you responded to, below!

..... or are you saying that somehow that the post you are talking about
never made it to the MS servers? If so - where is it visible?

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
Not about second edition, I see he did not post back after I poster
several links showing the same thing I said that on WinSe it is sulogo.sys
and NOT logo.sys. The links show it and if you don't wish to believe
several links that say the same thing as me, just because they agree with
me, well that just goes to show what a tiny brain and how immature you are
"Heather" wrote in message
...
Hey Dimbulb.....

I see you ignored this post wherein Noel PROVED that you are totally
WRONG with regard to *sulogo.sys*!!!

How about it? You are always saying you will admit when you are
wrong.....well, you are WRONG!!

Bwa ha ha....caught lying once again....worm-wriggler!!

Heather

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail.

It's possible that your ripper friends were using OEM tailored
versions - or that your use of Google exceeds your comprehension of
text.


1) http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 specifically says
that sulogo.sys does not exist (and neither Win98 nor Win98SE have a
Win98_19.CAB file)
2) http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm specifically states that the
sulogo.sys file is the one used at the final stage of the install - AND
MUST BE RENAMED to logo.sys before use.
3) http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0 - also
states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
4) http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
5) http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html - says " I found the
startup splash but only in the cabs. It's named sulogo.sys rather than
logo.sys." - but elsewhere explains that you need the logo.sys to show a
tailored splash. - it also links to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-011 , where the exact
procedure for creating a personalised splash screen is explained rather
well.

Wriggle out of that!




--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's which are US Retail!

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others that
say the same thing I do:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm
http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0
http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html
http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html

I can only say that maybe the splash screen for what ever reason was
left out of the over seas versions; because I just asked my son in law
and he says the German version likewise does not have it.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the sulogo.sys
file recognised by the boot process - and in neither is the logo/sys
file present by default, either (which I must admit, DID surprise me).

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding
out that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD.
I had erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the
sulogo.sys from Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did
not. Now I am wondering why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys with
SE but didn't continue it over into ME? But then there is no telling
with Microsoft because with XP they took the ability of changing the
boot up screen out of the hands of most *common* users because they
placed the boot up brag screen in the .exe file ntoskrnl.exe and a
user needs to be familiar with using a resource editor to change it.
Well that is if they wish to change it their self without relying on
third party software that does it for them.
I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt
very much if those that are wrong about what I said about the system
I sold *after* removing ME and *after* installing XP on it, will do
likewise.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Sugien" wrote in message
...

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .

READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of
one clouded by hear say.

Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them
the computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put XP
on it. So the logical understanding is that you DID sell them the
WinME computer, then later installed XP and they gave you back your
ME CD.

Comprendez?

Quote.....
"The system the WinME was on has been
sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and
they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for
it.

Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that
*THAT USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on.

Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said.

Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and won't
own up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the system
at the same time?, well even though there are ways of doing that,
that however was not the case and when XP is put on a system ME is
NO LONGER on the system. they had no need of the ME cd because ME
was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on,
you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

"Sugien" wrote:

So why should I care about anything you have to say about anything?
Oh that's right I DON"T, **** off

Oh dear. Sooge's pointy little head just exploded. Embarrassing, isn't
it, when you can't climb out of the hole you've dug yourself into. Now
what were you saying about wallowing in ignorance, bags of hot air,
and last and best laughs? chortle!.

Yep and I am laughing at you can you not hear me from there? funny I would
have thought you could
"Ant" wrote in message
...
"Sugien" wrote:

So why should I care about anything you have to say about anything?
Oh that's right I DON"T, **** off

Oh dear. Sooge's pointy little head just exploded. Embarrassing, isn't
it, when you can't climb out of the hole you've dug yourself into. Now
what were you saying about wallowing in ignorance, bags of hot air,
and last and best laughs? chortle!.

BS, and you know it, what the difference is , is that on your side of the
pond you government or for some other reason M$ didn't even include the
splash screen and had it deleted. On this side no matter what you try and
say I know the truth of the matte and here in the US of A, in Win98SE it was
and is sulogo.sys and NOT logo.sys. So bite me; because you are wrong about
Win98SE over here
"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
That's strange - since I comprehensively ripped apart your (so-called)
proofs in the very post that you responded to, below!

.... or are you saying that somehow that the post you are talking about
never made it to the MS servers? If so - where is it visible?

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
Not about second edition, I see he did not post back after I poster
several links showing the same thing I said that on WinSe it is
sulogo.sys and NOT logo.sys. The links show it and if you don't wish to
believe several links that say the same thing as me, just because they
agree with me, well that just goes to show what a tiny brain and how
immature you are
"Heather" wrote in message
...
Hey Dimbulb.....

I see you ignored this post wherein Noel PROVED that you are totally
WRONG with regard to *sulogo.sys*!!!

How about it? You are always saying you will admit when you are
wrong.....well, you are WRONG!!

Bwa ha ha....caught lying once again....worm-wriggler!!

Heather

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail.

It's possible that your ripper friends were using OEM tailored
versions - or that your use of Google exceeds your comprehension of
text.


1) http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 specifically
says that sulogo.sys does not exist (and neither Win98 nor Win98SE have
a Win98_19.CAB file)
2) http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm specifically states that the
sulogo.sys file is the one used at the final stage of the install - AND
MUST BE RENAMED to logo.sys before use.
3) http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0 -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
4) http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
5) http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html - says " I found
the startup splash but only in the cabs. It's named sulogo.sys rather
than logo.sys." - but elsewhere explains that you need the logo.sys to
show a tailored splash. - it also links to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-011 , where the exact
procedure for creating a personalised splash screen is explained rather
well.

Wriggle out of that!




--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's which are US Retail!

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others
that say the same thing I do:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm
http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0
http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html
http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html

I can only say that maybe the splash screen for what ever reason was
left out of the over seas versions; because I just asked my son in law
and he says the German version likewise does not have it.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the sulogo.sys
file recognised by the boot process - and in neither is the logo/sys
file present by default, either (which I must admit, DID surprise me).

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding
out that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD.
I had erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the
sulogo.sys from Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did
not. Now I am wondering why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys
with SE but didn't continue it over into ME? But then there is no
telling with Microsoft because with XP they took the ability of
changing the boot up screen out of the hands of most *common* users
because they placed the boot up brag screen in the .exe file
ntoskrnl.exe and a user needs to be familiar with using a resource
editor to change it. Well that is if they wish to change it their
self without relying on third party software that does it for them.
I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt
very much if those that are wrong about what I said about the system
I sold *after* removing ME and *after* installing XP on it, will do
likewise.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Sugien" wrote in message
...

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .

READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of
one clouded by hear say.

Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them
the computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put
XP on it. So the logical understanding is that you DID sell them
the WinME computer, then later installed XP and they gave you back
your ME CD.

Comprendez?

Quote.....
"The system the WinME was on has been
sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and
they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for
it.

Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that
*THAT USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on.

Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said.

Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and won't
own up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the system
at the same time?, well even though there are ways of doing that,
that however was not the case and when XP is put on a system ME is
NO LONGER on the system. they had no need of the ME cd because ME
was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on,
you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

We shall see, hmmm what is left now on the 2 weeks? about 10 days and
counting, are you already starting to feel sick? had any near misses in your
vehicle? if not you will; because well, just because I don't have any
powers doesn't mean it won't happen to you! but you of course (well if you
are still able that is) won't come back and tell like what Shane did, oh and
things may be getting worse for a few others, funny how those that harangue
me get the short end of the stick isn't it!
"Heather" wrote in message
...
You are such a liar!! You did NOT post anything that said that. Now ****
off and go bug some other news group, coderipper.

And I would NEVER believe anything you say coz you wouldn't know the truth
if it jumped up and bit you....dickhead!!

HF

"Sugien" wrote in message
...
Not about second edition, I see he did not post back after I poster
several links showing the same thing I said that on WinSe it is
sulogo.sys and NOT logo.sys. The links show it and if you don't wish to
believe several links that say the same thing as me, just because they
agree with me, well that just goes to show what a tiny brain and how
immature you are
"Heather" wrote in message
...
Hey Dimbulb.....

I see you ignored this post wherein Noel PROVED that you are totally
WRONG with regard to *sulogo.sys*!!!

How about it? You are always saying you will admit when you are
wrong.....well, you are WRONG!!

Bwa ha ha....caught lying once again....worm-wriggler!!

Heather

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail.

It's possible that your ripper friends were using OEM tailored
versions - or that your use of Google exceeds your comprehension of
text.


1) http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 specifically
says that sulogo.sys does not exist (and neither Win98 nor Win98SE have
a Win98_19.CAB file)
2) http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm specifically states that the
sulogo.sys file is the one used at the final stage of the install - AND
MUST BE RENAMED to logo.sys before use.
3) http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0 -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
4) http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
5) http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html - says " I found
the startup splash but only in the cabs. It's named sulogo.sys rather
than logo.sys." - but elsewhere explains that you need the logo.sys to
show a tailored splash. - it also links to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-011 , where the exact
procedure for creating a personalised splash screen is explained rather
well.

Wriggle out of that!




--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's which are US Retail!

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others
that say the same thing I do:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm
http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0
http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html
http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html

I can only say that maybe the splash screen for what ever reason was
left out of the over seas versions; because I just asked my son in law
and he says the German version likewise does not have it.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the sulogo.sys
file recognised by the boot process - and in neither is the logo/sys
file present by default, either (which I must admit, DID surprise me).

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding
out that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD.
I had erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the
sulogo.sys from Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did
not. Now I am wondering why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys
with SE but didn't continue it over into ME? But then there is no
telling with Microsoft because with XP they took the ability of
changing the boot up screen out of the hands of most *common* users
because they placed the boot up brag screen in the .exe file
ntoskrnl.exe and a user needs to be familiar with using a resource
editor to change it. Well that is if they wish to change it their
self without relying on third party software that does it for them.
I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt
very much if those that are wrong about what I said about the system
I sold *after* removing ME and *after* installing XP on it, will do
likewise.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Sugien" wrote in message
...

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .

READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of
one clouded by hear say.

Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell them
the computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you put
XP on it. So the logical understanding is that you DID sell them
the WinME computer, then later installed XP and they gave you back
your ME CD.

Comprendez?

Quote.....
"The system the WinME was on has been
sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on and
they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use for
it.

Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that
*THAT USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on.

Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said.

Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and won't
own up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the system
at the same time?, well even though there are ways of doing that,
that however was not the case and when XP is put on a system ME is
NO LONGER on the system. they had no need of the ME cd because ME
was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and put XP on,
you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

Listen, Sugien -
I USED AN MSDN DISK - which is US retail!

What's your excuse?


--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
BS, and you know it, what the difference is , is that on your side of the
pond you government or for some other reason M$ didn't even include the
splash screen and had it deleted. On this side no matter what you try and
say I know the truth of the matte and here in the US of A, in Win98SE it
was and is sulogo.sys and NOT logo.sys. So bite me; because you are wrong
about Win98SE over here
"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
That's strange - since I comprehensively ripped apart your (so-called)
proofs in the very post that you responded to, below!

.... or are you saying that somehow that the post you are talking about
never made it to the MS servers? If so - where is it visible?

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
Not about second edition, I see he did not post back after I poster
several links showing the same thing I said that on WinSe it is
sulogo.sys and NOT logo.sys. The links show it and if you don't wish to
believe several links that say the same thing as me, just because they
agree with me, well that just goes to show what a tiny brain and how
immature you are
"Heather" wrote in message
...
Hey Dimbulb.....

I see you ignored this post wherein Noel PROVED that you are totally
WRONG with regard to *sulogo.sys*!!!

How about it? You are always saying you will admit when you are
wrong.....well, you are WRONG!!

Bwa ha ha....caught lying once again....worm-wriggler!!

Heather

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail.

It's possible that your ripper friends were using OEM tailored
versions - or that your use of Google exceeds your comprehension of
text.


1) http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 specifically
says that sulogo.sys does not exist (and neither Win98 nor Win98SE
have a Win98_19.CAB file)
2) http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm specifically states that the
sulogo.sys file is the one used at the final stage of the install -
AND MUST BE RENAMED to logo.sys before use.
3) http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0 -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
4)
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
5) http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html - says " I found
the startup splash but only in the cabs. It's named sulogo.sys rather
than logo.sys." - but elsewhere explains that you need the logo.sys to
show a tailored splash. - it also links to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-011 , where the exact
procedure for creating a personalised splash screen is explained
rather well.

Wriggle out of that!




--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's which are US Retail!

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others
that say the same thing I do:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm
http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0
http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html
http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html

I can only say that maybe the splash screen for what ever reason was
left out of the over seas versions; because I just asked my son in
law and he says the German version likewise does not have it.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the
sulogo.sys file recognised by the boot process - and in neither is
the logo/sys file present by default, either (which I must admit, DID
surprise me).

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding
out that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the HD.
I had erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the
sulogo.sys from Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did
not. Now I am wondering why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys
with SE but didn't continue it over into ME? But then there is no
telling with Microsoft because with XP they took the ability of
changing the boot up screen out of the hands of most *common* users
because they placed the boot up brag screen in the .exe file
ntoskrnl.exe and a user needs to be familiar with using a resource
editor to change it. Well that is if they wish to change it their
self without relying on third party software that does it for them.
I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt
very much if those that are wrong about what I said about the
system I sold *after* removing ME and *after* installing XP on it,
will do likewise.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Sugien" wrote in message
...

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .

READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead of
one clouded by hear say.

Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell
them the computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN you
put XP on it. So the logical understanding is that you DID sell
them the WinME computer, then later installed XP and they gave
you back your ME CD.

Comprendez?

Quote.....
"The system the WinME was on has been
sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on
and they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no use
for it.

Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that
*THAT USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on.

Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said.

Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and
won't own up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on the
system at the same time?, well even though there are ways of doing
that, that however was not the case and when XP is put on a system
ME is NO LONGER on the system. they had no need of the ME cd
because ME was no longer on the system; because I took ME off and
put XP on, you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

About the only other thing I can think of is that I used a OEM version,
and I think that may be the difference; because it was and still is a *real*
OEM Win98SE and not a bootleg; because I had a multipack of 200 which I
installed on customers pc's back before I had to close my shop due to health
concerns. I became completely physically disabled in 1991; but continued to
work part time in my and my partners shop until I could no longer stand the
physical pain even with massive amounts of pain medication. So I guess I
could be because of using an OEM version; because I have never have
installed a retail version of Win98SE I only installed to new pc's we built
or used customers OEM version that came with their PC or the OEM versions on
recovery CD's.
Oh btw, Heather, you never did admit to your error about Microsoft
giving away Office 2003 at the TS2 events. I guess you will say something
about your not remembering how you said I could not have an Office 2003
because Microsoft doesn't just *give away* expensive software. Or will you
try and wiggle and say that you were only talking about Microsoft not giving
*me* Office 2003 at a TS2 event. I still get a chuckle knowing that it had
to irk you to no end that I got a FREE Office 2003 from Microsoft; because
other wise you would not have ranted so much about how I could not have
possibly received *free* Office 2003 from Microsoft. I have in fact
received quite a lot of FREE software from Microsoft by being *invited* by
Microsoft to attend launchings and events. I still have my *free* Win2K
T-Shirt shrink wrapped to look like a flying window from the Win2K launch
event where I told Microsoft about the con\con bug, and NO I don't claim to
have been the *first* to find it; but I have been given credit for reporting
it. I guess that some of the others that found it didn't want to report it
because they were having to much fun with it at users expense. Much like
what using +++ATH0 will do to about 50% of the dial up modems out there.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
Listen, Sugien -
I USED AN MSDN DISK - which is US retail!

What's your excuse?


--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
BS, and you know it, what the difference is , is that on your side of the
pond you government or for some other reason M$ didn't even include the
splash screen and had it deleted. On this side no matter what you try
and say I know the truth of the matte and here in the US of A, in Win98SE
it was and is sulogo.sys and NOT logo.sys. So bite me; because you are
wrong about Win98SE over here
"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
That's strange - since I comprehensively ripped apart your (so-called)
proofs in the very post that you responded to, below!

.... or are you saying that somehow that the post you are talking about
never made it to the MS servers? If so - where is it visible?

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
Not about second edition, I see he did not post back after I poster
several links showing the same thing I said that on WinSe it is
sulogo.sys and NOT logo.sys. The links show it and if you don't wish
to believe several links that say the same thing as me, just because
they agree with me, well that just goes to show what a tiny brain and
how immature you are
"Heather" wrote in message
...
Hey Dimbulb.....

I see you ignored this post wherein Noel PROVED that you are totally
WRONG with regard to *sulogo.sys*!!!

How about it? You are always saying you will admit when you are
wrong.....well, you are WRONG!!

Bwa ha ha....caught lying once again....worm-wriggler!!

Heather

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I was using MSDN versions, which are US Retail.

It's possible that your ripper friends were using OEM tailored
versions - or that your use of Google exceeds your comprehension of
text.


1) http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565 specifically
says that sulogo.sys does not exist (and neither Win98 nor Win98SE
have a Win98_19.CAB file)
2) http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm specifically states that the
sulogo.sys file is the one used at the final stage of the install -
AND MUST BE RENAMED to logo.sys before use.
3) http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0 -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
4)
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html -
also states that the file must be renamed to logo.sys to work
5) http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html - says " I found
the startup splash but only in the cabs. It's named sulogo.sys rather
than logo.sys." - but elsewhere explains that you need the logo.sys
to show a tailored splash. - it also links to
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/show/article02-011 , where the exact
procedure for creating a personalised splash screen is explained
rather well.

Wriggle out of that!




--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's which are US Retail!

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
Seeing as how you obviously do not believe me here are some others
that say the same thing I do:

http://www.mdgx.com/newtip3.htm
http://www.littleblackdog.com/viewto...14&start=0
http://forums.pcworld.co.nz/showthread.php?t=12565
http://www.thetechguide.com/forum/lo...php/t4913.html
http://www.burzurq.com/forum/startup_splash.html

I can only say that maybe the splash screen for what ever reason was
left out of the over seas versions; because I just asked my son in
law and he says the German version likewise does not have it.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
I just checked - and in neither Win98 nor in Win98SE is the
sulogo.sys file recognised by the boot process - and in neither is
the logo/sys file present by default, either (which I must admit,
DID surprise me).

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages
to NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
...
I installed the ME using my multipack cdkey, and then after finding
out that I was wrong about the sulogo.sys promptly formatted the
HD. I had erroneously thought that Microsoft had carried over the
sulogo.sys from Win98SE; but I have proven to myself that they did
not. Now I am wondering why Microsoft chose to go the sulogo.sys
with SE but didn't continue it over into ME? But then there is no
telling with Microsoft because with XP they took the ability of
changing the boot up screen out of the hands of most *common* users
because they placed the boot up brag screen in the .exe file
ntoskrnl.exe and a user needs to be familiar with using a resource
editor to change it. Well that is if they wish to change it their
self without relying on third party software that does it for them.
I unlike some others here admit when I am in error; but I doubt
very much if those that are wrong about what I said about the
system I sold *after* removing ME and *after* installing XP on it,
will do likewise.


--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware
"Sugien" wrote in message
...

"Heather" wrote in message
...

"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .

READ!! my post and actually READ it with an open mind instead
of one clouded by hear say.

Nowhere in your quoted text did you say that you did NOT sell
them the computer with WinME on it.......nor did you say WHEN
you put XP on it. So the logical understanding is that you DID
sell them the WinME computer, then later installed XP and they
gave you back your ME CD.

Comprendez?

Quote.....
"The system the WinME was on has been
sold and that user bought a retail WinXP Pro and I put it on
and they let me keep my WinME OEM CD because they had no
use for it.

Re-reading it again, you say you sold that WinME system and that
*THAT USER* (of WinME) bought XP Pro later and so on.

Worm-wriggler.....stop trying to weasel out of what you said.

Pure bs, you are the worm wiggler because you mis-read it and
won't own up to the mistake, how could WinME and XP both be on
the system at the same time?, well even though there are ways of
doing that, that however was not the case and when XP is put on a
system ME is NO LONGER on the system. they had no need of the ME
cd because ME was no longer on the system; because I took ME off
and put XP on, you are at last the worse worm wiggle of all
--
VIA TITS (Teenager In Tennis Shoes)proxy of Sugien
/}
@###{ ]:::::ino-Soft Softwa:::::
\}
This post brought to you by Sneaker Net floppyware

.....faint sounds of violins playing in the background....to accompany the
never ending worm-wriggling of the Dimbulb!!

Sooooge.....you are MENTALLY disabled, not physically. That is just a dodge
to collect welfare!!

I didn't make any errors re your allegedly having MS Office 2003. You still
can't spell, so obviously you don't have it. However, I do have a free copy
of it on this machine. Bill Gates likes me, lol.

OH........are those 200 copies of Win98SE the ones you said you sent to New
Orleans to help out in the Katrina aftermath? Like, duh.....money or food
would have been better, but I assume you were lying about that as well. The
truth is a concept you are not familiar with!!

HF
"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
About the only other thing I can think of is that I used a OEM
version, and I think that may be the difference; because it was and still
is a *real* OEM Win98SE and not a bootleg; because I had a multipack of
200 which I installed on customers pc's back before I had to close my shop
due to health concerns. I became completely physically disabled in 1991;
but continued to work part time in my and my partners shop until I could
no longer stand the physical pain even with massive amounts of pain
medication. So I guess I could be because of using an OEM version;
because I have never have installed a retail version of Win98SE I only
installed to new pc's we built or used customers OEM version that came
with their PC or the OEM versions on recovery CD's.
Oh btw, Heather, you never did admit to your error about Microsoft
giving away Office 2003 at the TS2 events. I guess you will say something
about your not remembering how you said I could not have an Office 2003
because Microsoft doesn't just *give away* expensive software. Or will
you try and wiggle and say that you were only talking about Microsoft not
giving *me* Office 2003 at a TS2 event.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
Listen, Sugien -
I USED AN MSDN DISK - which is US retail!

What's your excuse?


--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Inline....

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
About the only other thing I can think of is that I used a OEM
version, and I think that may be the difference;

Purest BS - this is a wiggle of the first order!

because it was and still is a *real*
OEM Win98SE and not a bootleg; because I had a multipack of 200 which I
installed on customers pc's back before I had to close my shop due to
health concerns. I became completely physically disabled in 1991; but
continued to work part time in my and my partners shop until I could no
longer stand the physical pain even with massive amounts of pain
medication. So I guess I could be because of using an OEM version;
because I have never have installed a retail version of Win98SE I only
installed to new pc's we built or used customers OEM version that came
with their PC or the OEM versions on recovery CD's.
The multipacks from MS do NOT vary the install or anything else from the
reatail build - except for the Product Key acceptance

Oh btw, Heather, you never did admit to your error about Microsoft
giving away Office 2003 at the TS2 events. I guess you will say something
about your not remembering how you said I could not have an Office 2003
because Microsoft doesn't just *give away* expensive software.

MS do give away software - for one of a number of reasons - I have no
knowledge of the particular event you claim, but the 'usual procedure' is
that at such events they will give away time-bombed software, except to
certain pre-identified persons/corporations.

Or will you
try and wiggle and say that you were only talking about Microsoft not
giving *me* Office 2003 at a TS2 event. I still get a chuckle knowing
that it had to irk you to no end that I got a FREE Office 2003 from
Microsoft; because other wise you would not have ranted so much about how
I could not have possibly received *free* Office 2003 from Microsoft. I
have in fact received quite a lot of FREE software from Microsoft by being
*invited* by Microsoft to attend launchings and events.

Want an invite to an MS launch event? register with a spurious addy at any
number of places, and you'll get invites - but it's only some of the
attendees who get freebies(beyond a key-ring, or whatever) and if you didn't
realise that, you have a problem!

I still have my *free* Win2K
T-Shirt shrink wrapped to look like a flying window from the Win2K launch
event where I told Microsoft about the con\con bug, and NO I don't claim
to have been the *first* to find it; but I have been given credit for
reporting it.

Give the man a coconut! - those T-Shirts were given to just about anyone who
participated in the Beta, IIRC.

I guess that some of the others that found it didn't want to report it
because they were having to much fun with it at users expense. Much like
what using +++ATH0 will do to about 50% of the dial up modems out there.

OK - what EXACTLY does it do??
(beyond giving an error message) - and there's a slight problem with this
claim, since MS does NOT have control of teh drivers for modems - that's up
to the hardware manufacturers (but then I thought you everything?)

When you're finished trying to change the focus of the current discussion
(which, in case you forgot, was the supposed use of SULOGO.SYS as a splash
screen in WinME) - please talk something that resembles sane English (or
even American English), and we can resume service as normal

You must be having a senior moment; because (and you can check google) I
said win95 not win98. I do use my spelling checker from my *free copy* of
Office 2003; but I don't care if you believe me or not, I just know it has
to irk you to no limit that I DO have it and that is why you insist I don't.
Just ask your so called friends that are associated (lol, I bet) with
Microsoft about the TS2 events; but of course you won't because you don't
want to be *proven* wrong. I could simply scan in the cd's and the package
they came it; but as I said the only thing about the office 2003 that is
important in this thread is your refusal to believe it and that gives me
considerable pleasure knowing how much it gratis against you because other
wise you would simply ask someone that knows about how Microsoft gives away
free Microsoft Office Professional Edition 2003 with One note and business
contact manager. It does however say on it in a yellow sticker "Promotional
sample Not for Resale"; but it is still a FULL *real* Microsoft Office
Professional Edition 2003, I take it that yours is only the students or the
regular retail and not the professional edition and that must irk you even
more, I laugh at you; because of your refusal to believe it just because
they gave it to me and not you.


Oh and btw, I have *never* been on welfare, and there is nothing wrong with
being on social security disability, and if you think you can fool the
social security doctors then you must have never known anyone that is
drawing disability from the government; because MRI's and CAT scans and the
likes can NOT be fooled . That tells me you hold people with disabilities
in a low regard and that in and of it's self makes me *very* **VERY** Sorry
for you , and indeed for anyone that even *knows* you
"Heather" wrote in message
...
....faint sounds of violins playing in the background....to accompany the
never ending worm-wriggling of the Dimbulb!!

Sooooge.....you are MENTALLY disabled, not physically. That is just a
dodge
to collect welfare!!

I didn't make any errors re your allegedly having MS Office 2003. You
still
can't spell, so obviously you don't have it. However, I do have a free
copy
of it on this machine. Bill Gates likes me, lol.

OH........are those 200 copies of Win98SE the ones you said you sent to
New
Orleans to help out in the Katrina aftermath? Like, duh.....money or food
would have been better, but I assume you were lying about that as well.
The
truth is a concept you are not familiar with!!

HF
"Sugien" wrote in message
.. .
About the only other thing I can think of is that I used a OEM
version, and I think that may be the difference; because it was and still
is a *real* OEM Win98SE and not a bootleg; because I had a multipack of
200 which I installed on customers pc's back before I had to close my
shop
due to health concerns. I became completely physically disabled in 1991;
but continued to work part time in my and my partners shop until I could
no longer stand the physical pain even with massive amounts of pain
medication. So I guess I could be because of using an OEM version;
because I have never have installed a retail version of Win98SE I only
installed to new pc's we built or used customers OEM version that came
with their PC or the OEM versions on recovery CD's.
Oh btw, Heather, you never did admit to your error about Microsoft
giving away Office 2003 at the TS2 events. I guess you will say
something
about your not remembering how you said I could not have an Office 2003
because Microsoft doesn't just *give away* expensive software. Or will
you try and wiggle and say that you were only talking about Microsoft not
giving *me* Office 2003 at a TS2 event.

"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
Listen, Sugien -
I USED AN MSDN DISK - which is US retail!

What's your excuse?


--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj