View Single Post
  #6  
Old January 12th 05, 07:57 AM
Gary S. Terhune
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

To be clear, I wouldn't use the additional protections because I am =
satisfied with the protections I have in place. I find that duplication =
of active scanning/blocking protection software usually leads to =
problems. I use SpywareBlaster and the MVP HOSTS file, along with eTrust =
antivirus and Firewall as active protection, all on top of properly =
conservative IE/OE settings, and they seem to cover all the bases. Any =
more than that, Spybot's additional tools like Immunization and TeaTime, =
for instance, tends to get in my way without providing any additional =
protection.

--=20
Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP Shell/User
=20
"Dan" wrote in message =
...
Thanks for the feedback, Gary. I know I can always count on you to =

give a
good and informative response.
=20
"Gary S. Terhune" wrote in message
...
How about because it's still one the best anti-adware/spyware apps =

around and
the author deserves at least a donation to his cause, if for no other =

reason.
Personally, I wouldn't use the additional protections the paid version
offers, but the author is definitely deserving of some return.
=20
--=20
Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP Shell/User
=20
"Dapper Dan" wrote in message
...
Just curious Dan, but why would you want to pay for something that =

is
offered free ?

"Dan" wrote in message
...
I was wondering if the experts thought it was worth paying for

Adaware SE
paid version if one already has the free version along with

Spybot -- Search
and Destroy, Spysweeper by Webroot, and SpywareBlaster. It is =

this
way in my
case and I would appreciate any information that you can give me.

Thanks in
advance.




=20