I've sent three posts this morning - a response to Job, an inserted oar to
Patc, and the response I promised Figgs (in which I now see I repeat quite a
lot and its not quite as incisive as I originally meant). The first two got
through, the last hasn't (I've reset the group twice). The last one gives my
reasons for no longer believing in a law passed here some years ago now,
allusions to which I've made before. The question is: who would censor it?
Because these days it wouldn't necessarily be MS and such is precisely why I
justified my current position on the emotive subject. If this gets through
and *it* hasn't I'll repost it in various forms.