Noel:
From now on in I'll ignore their recommendation(s) and make up my own mind
upon their findings 'only'.
Thanks.

Harry
and sooo much 'wiser' now.


"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
Ah - the 'old' Aida 32?
I can't remember the last time I ran that on an ME system that was high
enough spec to take either Win2K or XP.
From memory the 'way to improve' at the bottom of most of the pages should
be taken with a few grains of salt - IIRC, I ran it on a 512MB system, and
it recommended adding more RAM to speed it up

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to NG's
"webster72n" wrote in message
...

SiSoft looks beautiful to me and works just as nice, Noel, but aida32
was
the cause of my inquiry.
No *strike-out* here.

Harry.


"Noel Paton" wrote in message
...
SiSoft Strike Again??

--
Noel Paton (MS-MVP 2002-2006, Windows)

Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
http://www.crashfixpc.com/millsrpch.htm

http://tinyurl.com/6oztj

Please read http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm on how to post messages to
NG's
"Mike M" wrote in message
...
Upgrading to Win2K from Win Me is unsupported and whilst it can be
done
is
not recommended by Microsoft. Personally I wouldn't bother, stick
with
Win Me until you get a new PC with XP.
--
Mike Maltby



webster72n wrote:

By my system analasys I am being encouraged to upgrade to Win2000 to
improve performance.
My question:
Is this step worthwhile compared to installing WinXP Professional w.
SP2 instead?

Harry.