To be clear, I wouldn't use the additional protections because I am =
satisfied with the protections I have in place. I find that duplication =
of active scanning/blocking protection software usually leads to =
problems. I use SpywareBlaster and the MVP HOSTS file, along with eTrust =
antivirus and Firewall as active protection, all on top of properly =
conservative IE/OE settings, and they seem to cover all the bases. Any =
more than that, Spybot's additional tools like Immunization and TeaTime, =
for instance, tends to get in my way without providing any additional =
protection.
--=20
Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP Shell/User
=20
"Dan" wrote in message =
...
Thanks for the feedback, Gary. I know I can always count on you to =
give a
good and informative response.
=20
"Gary S. Terhune" wrote in message
...
How about because it's still one the best anti-adware/spyware apps =
around and
the author deserves at least a donation to his cause, if for no other =
reason.
Personally, I wouldn't use the additional protections the paid version
offers, but the author is definitely deserving of some return.
=20
--=20
Gary S. Terhune
MS MVP Shell/User
=20
"Dapper Dan" wrote in message
...
Just curious Dan, but why would you want to pay for something that =
is
offered free ?
"Dan" wrote in message
...
I was wondering if the experts thought it was worth paying for
Adaware SE
paid version if one already has the free version along with
Spybot -- Search
and Destroy, Spysweeper by Webroot, and SpywareBlaster. It is =
this
way in my
case and I would appreciate any information that you can give me.
Thanks in
advance.
=20
|