Heather wrote:
TARQUIN T SHUTTLECOCK????? ROFL!!

Merry Xmas, Shane.......where have you been??

Until very recently heading Ubuntu. That or it was just a dream!

Merry Xmas Figgsy!

XX

Shane

There're one or two footballers called Figueroa over here these days.
Probably no relation though, eh?



Kissies......Figgs

"Tarquin T. Shuttlecock" wrote in
message ...
Yes, Mike, I stopped bothering to run 64-bit versions some months
ago now. Funnily enough it seemed to me that Server 2008 x64 beta(s)
were less memory intensive than Win 7 x64, which is what finally
drove me back to x86.


Shane


Mike M wrote:
Avast might be on target by getting rid of support for old OSs, but
avast 5.0 still can't do a boot-time scan on 64 bit machines.

That's something I've never felt the need to do so not something
I'll miss. As to running 64 bit, although I have PCs running both
Vista 64 and Win 7 64 I have yet to find a compelling reason to
running 64 bit rather than 32 bit other than perhaps due to the
increased memory demands that result from application and os bloat.
:-)
Avast might be on target by getting rid of support for old OSs, but
avast 5.0 still can't do a boot-time scan on 64 bit machines. Kind
of reminds me of the song (Mr. In-between).