I emailed David Milliband proposing that I go to the States as an British
Envoy, to visit the grave of Sheriff Shull, and pi$$ on it. But he hasn't
answered.

He really ought to as I'll be saying those are the types he is protecting
when he sides with the torturers.

He's the minister responsible for GCHQ!

And a w@nker of the first water.

Shane

Noel Paton wrote:
ramble mode ON
What - as opposed to GWB, who assumed that everyone was cannon-fodder
for the arms cartels? (while having a rather dubious ,military past
himself). The idiots that have 'governed' the UK for the past 30
years have been little more than glove-puppets for the US
administration, and had almost no concept of the idea of
independence. The idea of the UK as the 51st)or is it now 52nd?)
state of the US has never been closer. I'd much rather have 'the big
O' than 'the burning Bush' as a potential leader of 'the Western
World' (please note the careful use of quotes and capitals!) I'm a firm
believer in minimalist government - but governments by
nature will always attempt to govern the maximum they can. At some
point the ability of the governments to control what they are
attempting to govern breaks down - and the result is chaos. The
recent carnage in the banking system worldwide is a good example of
this, in that the US (with the largest deficit in the world) decided
that unfettered credit was 'A Good Thing' - at least until it ran out
- and the UK then decided that it couldn't be left behind in the
lemming-race over the cliff. The 'Economic Miracle-worker' who made
that decision is now making similar decisions over the use of what
little nuclear deterrence the UK still possesses..... I doubt that
anyone except the poor b%st$rds who actually have their fingers on
the buttons really realise what that could mean! ramble mode OFF

"Time for bed", said Zebedee


Nil Carborundum Illegitemi
www.crashfixpc.co.uk
"N. Miller" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:58:35 -0400, Heather wrote:

Compared to the previous zombie?? Just shows you don't know when
you are well off.

Obama has demonstrated a sufficient lack of concern for
Constitutional issues to worry me. I don't expect him to reverse the
most egregious trampling of our rights instigated by his
predecessor. Rather, I expect him
to expand on those transgressions of our rights, reducing our
liberties significantly. He is much better suited for a government
which regards its citizens as "subjects"; as chattel to be used, and
discarded, by the ruling
elite.

--
Norman
~Shine, bright morning light,
~now in the air the spring is coming.
~Sweet, blowing wind,
~singing down the hills and valleys.