View Single Post
  #7  
Old February 15th 07, 02:37 PM posted to microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion,microsoft.public.win98.apps
tom
External Usenet User
 
Posts: 23
Default Daylight Savings Patch

On Feb 15, 8:47 am, "... et al."
wrote:
tom wrote:
"PCR" wrote:


MEB wrote:
|http://www.grystmill.com/articles/tz_update.htm


Subsequently, Terhune agreed with John John in another thread that steps
(g) though (j) [below] would also have to be done after running his
.reg, but obviously not steps (a) through (h). Looks like the one
from...http://www.mdgx.com/add.htm#TZU
...does it's own (g) through (j), though. Terhune had an objection to
that one, though, for another reason.


Where are these conversations? I cannot find them when I search the
news groups.


Gary answering 'John John', agreeing he'd forgotten to add something:




The above link does not work.

http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.win98.gen_discussion/...


That still does not explain if you need to do those steps for 98SE.
It's pretty ambiguous. Are the extra steps needed for some systems,
but not all? I am not sure.

I have a bunch of systems to do, so I would like to avoid extra steps
if possible.


In my 'locale' /they/ haven't changed these self-delusion rules, with
mucking around with /relative/ time, recently so i have only skimmed
through the discussions about it.

I did find one where you pointed out that (g) though (j) should be
run, but no reply from Terhune.


I tested the grystmill patch without running steps (g) through (j) and
it worked. Tested on 98SE by moving the time forward and letting it
pass through 2 AM on March 11, 2007.


So, when does this (g) through (j) issue apply. I have already
applied the patch on a number of systems, I need to know if I should
do the (g) through (j) thing on all systems, some systems, or no
systems.


--
Nah-ah. I'm staying out of this. ... Now, here's my opinion.

Please followup in the newsgroup.
E-mail address is invalid due to spam-control.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -