Blocking google adversizing, twitter, fecebook using hosts-fileentries
 

J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

writes:

98 Guy menulis:


127.0.0.1 localhost

# ALWAYS make sure "127.0.0.1 localhost" is the first line
in your # /hosts file or your system or browser may
malfunction!

Good work dude.... thanks

Agreed.

I read somewhere that 127.0.0.0 is faster (or something) than
127.0.0.1, so I have that for all the lines in my hosts file -
except the localhost one. It seems to work fine; whether any
faster or slower, I'm not sure.

the slowdown is possibly only an issue when using Win8.1
(and newer WinNT versions).

They use(d) "0.0.0.0" in the [hosts] file you can get at:
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm
Reason given was that ms had made changes in the TCP
loopback interface in Win8.1 causing a slowdown issue. /Nota
bene/ they list a few 3rdParty programs that has issues with this
unexpected redirection.


--
Nah-ah. I'm staying out of this. ... Now, here's my opinion.

Blocking google adversizing, twitter, fecebook using hosts-file entries
 

In message , Etal
writes:

So I looked@sig, and saw:
[]
--
Nah-ah. I'm staying out of this. ... Now, here's my opinion.

I think your From: line and your .sig have got out of step ... (-:
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

And Jonathan Harker would never have sent all those letters to his beloved
Mina from Transylvania, he'd have texted her instead. "Stuck in weird castle w
guy w big teeth. Missing u. xxxx (-:" - Alison Graham, RT 2015/11/7-13

Blocking google adversizing, twitter, fecebook using hosts-fileentries
 

J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

Etal writes:

So I looked@sig, and saw:
[]
--
Nah-ah. I'm staying out of this. ... Now, here's my opinion.

I think your From: line and your .sig have got out of step ... (-:


My opinion about your thinking is that your thinking is correct.

So it's been for a while and, 'less i nymshift, so it will
remain. :-/

¿I don't know which one is correct?, and_or fastest!
Etal writes:
Etal writes:
Etal writes:

--
Please followup in the newsgroup.
E-mail address is invalid due to spam-control.